Posts Tagged ‘Protest’

Developer takes Tamil school land

December 30th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Another case of Malaysia Boleh! A round of applause please to the actors in this land-grabbing drama!

SJKT Taman Melawati’s land area has been magically reduced from 1.45ha to 1.36ha. The 0.9ha has now been made into a site for a low-cost flats project. The area in question was the school field.

The issue was highlighted by Gombak MIC who organised a protest. 200 over people took part in the protest.

So, how is it done? Here’s some tips for aspiring developers:

According to the Gombak MIC division chairman G. Jayakumaran, the developer used its own team of surveyors and resubmitted the school land plans to the land office. The plot of land was then transfered to a third party on 4th September 2006. He claimed that this act also misled education ministry and Public Works Department.

The problem started with PWD not properly fencing the school area, thus delaying its land application. Biasalah, when there’s a chance, surely the money-minded businesses would take advantage.

According to Jayaraman, a memorandum would be submitted to state and federal government next week. 480 people have signed the memorandum, and the campaign will go to various temples to garner more signature.

In NST, the developer has been named as Negara Properties:

Gombak MIC Division chief G. Jayakumaran said the school field was 1.44 hectares (3.6 acres) but the developer of Taman Melawati, Negara Properties Sdn Bhd had claimed that the area was only 1.35 hectares (3.38 acres).

The developer wants to use the remaining 9,000 square feet of the field to built low cost flats, Jayakumaran told reporters here today.

He added that he could not understand why Negara Properties had informed the Gombak district education office that the school field was only 1.35 hectares instead of 1.44 hectares.

They (developer) may have misled the education office into believing that the land was actually 1.35 hectares, for the purpose of using it for their own benefit, said Jayakumaran.

He said transactions involving the transfer of the land title from Negara Properties to Melawati Development Sdn Bhd and to an individual, done simultaneously in Sept 2006, also raises suspicion.

So, what is the state government going to do? Land matters come under Selangor state, but 2006, it was Khir Toyo’s government. Only option is to get a stay order, investigate the case and make the right decision. Not sure if SJKT Taman Melawati is fully-aided school, which means the land should be federal or state owned land.

Klang Sentral Terminal a hot potato

December 30th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


The new RM300 million bus terminal (air-conditioned and has a food court, surau and closed- circuit TV system, among others) started operating 3 days ago, and there’s been both optimism and opposition to the new terminal.

Commuters face the biggest problem – longer travel time and higher cost:

However, some commuters were not happy with the move. They said the new terminal was far from the town centre and government offices.

Lim Boon Kig, 58, who was heading to Banting said it took him 90 minutes to reach Klang Sentral from his home in Sekinchan, instead of just 45 minutes previously.

“At the old terminal, there would be several buses to Banting. I could just hop on one without waiting.

“Here, not only is it further, I have been waiting for 30 minutes and there is not a single bus to Banting yet.”

Another case:

Housewife Zainiah Mohamed, 35, was at a loss with her three young children in tow, wondering how to get back to her home in Banting after a shopping trip here.

Nallamah, 55, from Bandar Sunway in Subang, went to the nearly-abandoned station yesterday afternoon to catch the bus home.

“I’m now told I will have to go back to the Jalan Meru bus station in Kapar to catch a bus to Sunway.”

It seems MPK has distributed pamphlets on the changes of bus service. According to one officer, there are five pick-up points in Klang town including the old bus station. However, the I guess people still have to travel to Meru and take a bus from there in certain cases.

Some traders seemed to be optimistic:

More than 90 per cent of the shoplots and kiosks at the new terminal have been snapped up despite the “high” rental.

Trader Shamsul Kamar Abd Razak said even though the rent was high and the terminal had been operating for only two days, business was encouraging.

“The rent is at RM3,000 for a convenience store and about RM2,000 for a kiosk but I’m in this for the long term and I’m confident business will pick up.”

But those in old bus terminal are an unhappy lot:

With the buses and taxis gone, the 250 traders at the Klang Utara Bus Terminal claim they are now staring at bankruptcy.

Trader C. Krishnan said: “We will lose 80 per cent of our income and most of us will go bankrupt within three years.”

According to NST:

The lunch crowd at the Komathy Vilas was halved overnight, from about 2,000, when the Klang bus station was relocated from the town centre on Saturday.

Restaurant owner V. Jeyaraman, 40, said commuters used to make a beeline for his restaurant on arrival at the Jalan Baru bus station, located adjacent to his shop.

Stall owners at the food court at MPK Plaza in the vicinity claim they had only themselves for company over the last two days.

Zaniyah Yeob, 53, who sells nasi campur at the food court, said stall owners were dealt a double blow with the relocation of the bus station and the economic downturn.

Cendol seller Ah Seng, 52, said he had been operating his stall for about 20 years and hoped the authorities would reconsider the move.

The unhappy traders protested near the old bus station yesterday with placards and banners slamming State Assembly Speaker Teng Chang Khim and the Klang Municipal Council for being “pro-developer” The traders chanted slogans and protested for about an hour. The group together with bus operators and commuters had held a meeting and formed an action committee to protest the relocation.
Transport company lament the higher charges, but can’t do much except complain:

The local council decided to shift operations as the new terminal, located 10km from the town centre, would ease traffic congestion. The New Straits Times found operations at Klang Sentral were running smoothly.

One of the bus companies operating at the old terminal, Wawasan Sutera Travel & Tour, urged the council to open a lane for buses to pick up and drop off passengers.

Its operations manager, M. Logesvaran, said bus firms should be given more time to move to Klang Sentral to avoid huge losses.

“The rental at the new terminal is 10 times more than what we are paying now. My company will also lose a lot of time travelling as it will take us almost 40 minutes to reach Klang Sentral.”

A bus operator said companies were being charged RM900 rental per month for a counter at the new terminal, compared with just RM150 at the old terminal. Buses are charged RM10 per entry, from RM2 previously.

As calls for transparency pick up, the local council (MPK) and the state government is under pressure to manage this potential political bomb. As it is, PKR and DAP are seen to have internal squabbles and rift, with MP for Kapar, Manikavasagam as the central figure.

Even though the bus station was mooted under previous administration, the new state government should do something about it. The objective of mass transportation system is to move people efficiently.No point having a system that causes more misery for the rakyat especially in terms of cost. The bus operator may use higher operating cost to increase ticket prices.

In the long run, perhaps the banning of private vehicles into Klang town will be a better option. Heavy vehicles should be limited to certain hours, and both the old and new terminal should co-exist. There should have been an effort to integrate bus service with the Komuter service. The local council should have tried to get some land near Komuter station like Klang or Tepi Sungai.

15 minutes????

November 28th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Something wrong somewhere. 15 minutes is barely enough to arrange the crowd, get into line and start shouting at same time. How can the MB simply agree to the police’ suggestion that outdoor protest is limited to 15 minutes, after which the protestors have to go indoors? Even PKR itself can’t organise a protest in 15 minutes la! Ini macam gol sendiri.

Wait a minute, maybe he meant 15 minutes outdoors, 1 minute indoors, another 15 minutes outdoors, then go back indoor for 1 minute, then another 15 minutes outdoors….and so on?

Silibin remains, so no referendum?

November 23rd, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


The family of late Patto rejected the proposal to rename Jalan Silibin to Jalan Patto. They were quite distressed and unhappy that the contributions and sacrifices of Patto were belittled or even unknown to the residents. Some excerpts from Star below:

Patto’s widow Mary, 59, said the decision was out of respect for the Silibin residents, who had protested against the proposed name change, and not out of fear.

“I am very sad and hurt to say that as a family, I will reject the offer to rename Silibin Road because of the controversy and uproar,” she told a packed press conference at Wisma DAP here on Saturday.

Speaking softly and passionately, Mary said she and her daughters were greatly distressed by newspaper articles suggesting that Patto had not done anything for the people.

The widow described her husband as a simple and humble man who wanted unity for all races, who often gave up his time with his daughters and wife to travel around the country.

“It was for the people that he lived for. When he lost his parents in Bagan Serai at a young age, he went through a lot of hardship and found many people living that way too.

“Those feelings stayed with him until he decided that he should work for the voiceless and that he would sacrifice his life for the less fortunate,” said Mary.

Lashing out at critics saying her husband had done little for his constituents as the Bagan MP, Mary said Patto was a national leader who struggled for everyone.

“He spent 18 months under ISA detention because of that struggle. What has Patto done to you?

“I am asking the public: Please do not attack us anymore. We have suffered enough. He is not here to defend himself,” she said with emotion.

To a question, Mary said the family was open to any other suggestion by the Pakatan Rakyat government to honour her husband.

Patto’s daughters Shaalini Anne, 27, and Kasthuriraani, 29, were of the view that it was not right that the people should remember their father because of a tussle over a road.

“My father’s struggle was not superficial. The newspapers have been quoting the minority who protested. What about the thousands of people who agreed to renaming Jalan Silibin?” said Shaalini.

Possible that the current generation does not know about Patto, what more of his contributions. People move out, businesses take over premises, things happen. Unless its properly documented somewhere. We can trust the history text books (and really, how many students love to study history subject?). Some won’t even know the name of all 5 prime ministers, what more of a opposition MP.

I guess the Silibin people have moved on. They really don’t see the need to rename the road. Purely viewed from economic and practical points.

However, does this rejection mean there won’t be any referendum to reveal the wishes of the people?  Since the road won’t be renamed, obviously no need to ask for opinions. I was looking forward for the referendum as it provided people a chance to directly have their say. Looks like have to wait for next controversy to come along.

It seems now that a new DAP research centre will be set up and name after Patto. The ‘P. Patto Research Centre’ will be its name.

RPK at Anti-ISA Freedom Run

November 17th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Some photos of the Anti-ISA Freedom Run by DAP, courtesy of a reader. Note the T-shirts that read “Bebaskan Makkal Sakthi 5”.