Posts Tagged ‘Tamil school’

MIC waiting for money for schools…

December 17th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


At last, there’s some news on the allocation asked by MIC in order to complete the renovation of Tamil schools and construction of additional or replacement buildings for schools. The initial allocation of RM100 was deemed in sufficient due to escalation in material costs. There was a request for additional RM60 million, but according to news below, the request is for RM53 million. Not sure how much will be approved, since government is short of funds and even operating expenditure is being reduced by 10-15% next year.

MIC is awaiting clearance from the Finance Ministry on the party’s request for an additional allocation of RM53 million for the construction of new buildings in several Tamil schools, including the SJK (Tamil) Sungai Tok Pawang in Kedah’s Jerai constituency.

MIC president S Samy Vellu said at least RM1.6 million was needed to construct a new building for the SJK (Tamil) Sungai Tok Pawang on a piece of land reportedly already earmarked for the school.

“This project (SJK (Tamil) Sungai Tok Pawang) was supposed to have started some time back but because of the escalation in the construction cost of the Tamil schools, it had to be deferred along with several other (Tamil) schools,” he said in a statement today.

Samy Vellu was commenting on a Malaysiakini report today which said that despite a 5.5 acre land allocated by the Kedah state government last April for the SJK (Tamil) Sungai Tok Pawang, there was still no word on the construction of the building.

Samy Vellu said the request for the RM53 million extra allocation to cover the escalated construction cost from the original RM130 million allocated by the government, was made to Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak, who is also the finance minister when he chaired the special cabinet committee for the development of the Indian community recently.

He said the RM53 million additional allocation was “over and above” the RM100 million approved by Najib under the two economic stimulus packages and another RM30 million approved during Abdullah Ahmad Badawi’s tenure as prime minister.

“Once the additional allocation has been approved, work on the projects can start after tender processes are completed by the Public Works Department (PWD),” he said, adding that all allocations from the Finance Ministry would be channeled as usual through the PWD.

Samy Vellu said MIC had listed out many Tamil schools which required new buildings, and construction work would commence in stages, depending on the availability of funds from the Finance Ministry.

“The government has already rebuilt many Tamil schools over the years through MIC, and many more will be redeveloped,” he said.

He also said MIC was working with the Education Ministry to switch partially-aided Tamil schools into fully-aided schools.

I hope they update the list of schools, complete with the work done and costs. Photos will be great too. Is that part of some KPI for MIC?

The issue arose after news about SJKT Sg Tok Pawang school came to light. This school has been sharing compound with a national school for two decades:

Sekolah Kebangsaan Tok Pawang and Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan Tamil Sg Tok Pawang share the same compound, but it’s a different story with the canteen.

SJK(T) pupils have been denied access to the canteen. This was decided by SK Tok Pawang teachers after frequent quarrels between the pupils of the two schools. [err..why not just adjust the break time so that it doesn’t clash?]

The SJK(T) PIBG then organised a makeshift canteen for the 170 Tamil school students at a corridor behind the building.

Students of both schools also do not share classrooms.

Twenty-three years ago the students of the Tamil school were accommodated at SK Tok Pawang after they had to abandon their own building due to pollution caused by the nearby Lee Rubber building.

The Tamil school received a new lease of life when the Kedah state government allocated 5.5 acres of land to build a new school on April 3 this year.

Menteri Besar Azizan Abdul Razak, accompanied by deputy P Ramasamy and the current state exco S Manikumar, attended the groundbreaking ceremony to a joyful atmosphere of excited schoolchildren and parents.

At the event, he said that the state government is giving the land to the school without any premium charge. They have also waived the assessment and the school needed to pay only a token sum of RM10 for the land.

This happened about eight months ago. The situation has not changed since then.

SJK (T) Tok Pawang students still share the school building with SK Tok Pawang pupils. There is no sign of a new building being built on the land that was given to the Tamil school.

Azizan had, at the groundbreaking ceremony, clearly indicated that the state government had done their job by giving the land.

It was now up to the school to negotiate with the Education Ministry to obtain the RM1.6 million needed to build the school.

Jerai MP Mohd Firdaus Jaafar said that now the ball was in MIC’s court to “pressure the minister (of education) at the federal level to make sure the building gets built.”

Balasingham, 35, says that he had been waiting for the school to be built since the day he left the school when he was 12.

His daughter now attends the school in Standard 1, but nothing has changed.

At the moment, students have no choice but to go about their familar routine of sharing the same compound and building, and having their meals under a a makeshift canteen.

Thus far, there is not even a hint of a new school building emerging on the land provided to them.

All you can see is the tractor used by the Kedah menteri besar during the groundbreaking ceremony. It sits forlornly by several oil palm trees, a sad reminder of what should have been.

RM60 million more needed for Tamil schools upgrading

December 10th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


This issue is being dragged since early this year I think. How long does one need to beg seek?

Obviously, in this era of transparency, we will be seeing a full list of school upgraded, the costs involved, the items upgraded, the contractors names and so on. We will right? Would it be published in MOE, JKR or MIC website? Perhaps should take out ads in major newspapers too. I hope the MIC Info chief reads this 🙂

MIC is seeking an additional RM60mil from the Government to make good its promise to the Indian community to upgrade some 70 Tamil primary rural schools nationwide.

Party president Datuk Seri Samy Vellu said an initial allocation of RM130mil from the Government was insufficient to carry out the upgrading works owing to fluctuations in the cost of building materials since the plan was mooted.

The Government had approved RM30mil to upgrade 25 schools under the first phase.

However, the amount was only able to cover 15 schools.

The Government later approved another RM100mil for the programme to upgrade the schools.

Speaking after laying the foundation stone for the construction of a new RM3.39mil four-storey block at SRJK (T) Alor Gajah here yesterday, Samy Vellu said work to upgrade the 15 schools was schedule for completion next August.

Protest against 10 subject limit

November 29th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Somewhere in early June this year, the Education Minister came up with an idea to limit the number of subjects a students can take for SPM examinations in 2010. The reasons given:

– help to reduce teacher shortage

– 90% of students take 10 subjects

– many students take elective subjects not offered in schools, just to score more As. [Note: Tamil and Tamil Literature usually not offered in secondary schools]

– ease burden on students to excel

– reduce parents’ cost for tuition

– students will be able to focus on other activities

– easier to select students for scholarships

– to create a level playing field: students in fully residential schools were only allowed to take a maximum of nine subjects and those in rural areas too had to take fewer subjects due to a lack of facilities.

The Education Ministry then set up a communication channel to gather public feedback (I gave mine too) within a week, but not sure about the results of the feedback.

Interested parties can send their views on the Education Ministry’s plan to cap the number of subjects taken in the Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia (SPM) by the end of this week.

Education director-general Datuk Alimuddin Mohd Dom urged them to send by e-mail or facsimile their views to him.

“The views will be taken into consideration when I prepare a paper for the minister,” he told reporters after opening the Government Integrated Telecommunications Network Learning in Schools Programme schools’ convention.

Alimuddin can be reached at alimuddin.dom@moe.gov.my or fax: 03-8889 4548.

He was asked about complaints from students who were already studying for more than 10 subjects in Form Four this year.

Alimuddin said he would prepare the paper by next week, adding that the limit on the number of subjects for the SPM examination had not been finalised yet.

“We want to hear feedback from various organisations including teachers. I will also meet with ministry-level professionals.”

He said he would then discuss the matter with the Malaysian Examinations Syndicate before Deputy Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin makes a final decision.

The abrupt proposal caused parents and students to fume since students in Form 4 have already started classes for their subjects. However, DPM Muhyiddin said he was open for suggestions and clarified that any decision would not affect the students:

“Whatever decision made will not affect the people negatively.”

I’m not sure which professionals were consulted, but the decision (proposal) remained and the DPM said this:

“There are many who agree and they come from the education system.”

It seems that the core subjects may be reduced in order to allow more elective subjects. Currently, the core subjects are BM, English, Maths, History. Islam/Moral, and Science (for Arts stream students). However, DPM Muhyiddin mentioned recently that the core subjects will remain, so its back to square one in terms of solving the problem.

Note that it was a cabinet decision, so MIC representative Dr Subra have no choice but to support the decision, even though MIC is protesting the move (even made a resolution during the AGM).

You may want to read what two parents had to say on this limitation here to get some insight as well.

Back in June, this is what MIC rep Dr Subra said:

The MIC has asked the Education Ministry to allow Indian students to take 11 SPM subjects, including Tamil language and Tamil literature.

Party deputy president Datuk Dr S. Subramaniam said he had submitted the request to Deputy Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin before the Government’s recent proposal to limit the number of subjects to 10 from next year.

“If they are not allowed 11 subjects, some (those in the Science stream) will have to miss the Tamil language or Tamil literature subjects. With the 10-subject limit, they have to choose either one, as they already have nine compulsory subjects,” he told reporters in Pagoh yesterday.

Dr Subramaniam said that if Indian students were not allowed to take Tamil language and Tamil literature, some parties might exploit the issue.

He said for those in the Art stream, the new ruling would not pose a problem as they could take both the subjects and two others besides the six core subjects.

And this is what I heard him say last Sunday on TV2 in the interview show by Pandithurai:

MIC is still holding discussions with the ministry. For science stream students, they have to decide which two science subjects they want to take (meaning student already have an ambition or career in mind) if they want to take both Tamil subjects. For Arts stream students, he said not a problem, as there’s four elective places, meaning there two left after taking Tamil subjects.

Clearly, the stakeholders not very happy at the progress being made by MIC, until some guy from PKR wanted to burn an effigy of Dr Subra. There’s also a big protest planned on the 12th December at Wisma Peladang, Old Klang Road by various NGO groups:

More than 20 national Indian NGOs will stage a protest on Dec 12 at the Wisma Peladang in Petaling Jaya against a perceived grand plan to purge the Tamil language from the education system through the Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia (SPM).

The protest is over the government’s elimination of Tamil language and Tamil literature under the 10-subject SPM package system from next year.

The joint NGO group organizing chairman A. Thiruvenggadam (left) said because of the restrictive ruling, Indian students whose mother tongue is Tamil would not be able to sit for subjects in their language and this is not what 1 Malaysia is all about.

“The problem has arisen because the package is restricted to only 10 subjects. If an Indian student sits for nine subjects, he has only one more subject which can be used up for Tamil language, and will not be able to sit for Tamil Literature.

“And if the Indian student takes all 10 subjects there is no option at all for both the subjects,” he said in an interview with Malaysiakini.

The system of the 10 SPM Subject System, he said was a grand plan to eliminate Tamil as a vernacular language in Malaysia and this is not keeping with the 1Malaysia concept the government is propagating.

“It is totally unfair and an abuse of the education system to discard Tamil as a language spoken by a major component race of Malaysia. This is a ruling that will mark the progressive closure of Tamil schools in the country.

“Eventually, Tamil students will not be able to take Tamil as a language in STPM and university. This is another plan to eliminate Tamil totally out of the system,” he said on behalf of Indian NGOs.

Some of the NGOs jointly participating in the protest are the Malaysian Hindu Sangam, Malaysian Tamil Literature Association, Malaysian Dravidian Association, Hindu Dharma Maha Madhuram and several other Indian NGOs.

Most of the these NGOs constitution provides for the protection and propagation of the Tamil language and Tamil Literature in the community.

“When students are unable to take Tamil language there will not be enough Tamil teachers to teach Tamil in schools in future,” he added.

While it may not be just to eliminate Tamil language (I wondered if it got anything to do with BM borrowing heavily from Tamil and Sanskrit), I think the state has a responsibility to provide education of vernacular language to its citizen. We can’t be only interested on promoting multi-cultural aspect of our country, but not willing to invest on building those multi-cultural identities.

What I feel is also not right is this:

The only exceptions would be students in the joint science and religious stream who will be allowed to take 11 subjects next year until the curriculum is streamlined by 2011, after which they too will be able to take a maximum of 10 subjects.

Such leeway should be given to other students tamil vernacular language as well, while a proper solution is devised.

I’m also unhappy with these two fellows: Dr Ramasamy and MP Kapar Manikavasagam because was quiet all this while. Now, there’s a posting on MP Kapar’s blog and also Malaysiakini article featuring Dr Ramasamy. Where was the noise before this? Looks like cheap publicity for me.

Dr Subra claims that such protests and actions may jeopardise the effort of MIC, but I beg to differ. The NGOs and public should also voice out their unhappiness in some way, which will help MIC to promote its cause. And, the reality is, people not really trusting MIC now. Perhaps MIC could have started a poll or survey or mobilized its various branches to gauge feedback from parents. But no, its still in processing of changing, so no proactive effort there.

Even in Minnal FM program call-in session recently, parents and teachers also opposed the move, saying it will deter students from taking Tamil subjects.

As for current status, Dr Subra says this:

Dr Subramaniam said he had on Monday met officers from the Education Ministry, including its director-general Datuk Alimuddin Mohd Dom, on the matter.

“We proposed that the Indian students be allowed to take 11 subjects, which would include Tamil and also Tamil Literature.

“However, the officials counter-proposed that the students wanting to sit these two papers could drop a subject, such as moral education or one of the four science subjects. We are not agreeable to this and this is why we are still in talks with the authorities.

I’m all for dropping Moral. Its a pathetic excuse for a subject!  Just take out Moral, and make it 4 core subjects (5 for Arts students). Or increase the subjects limit to 11 or 12. Is it so difficult? Another options is to allow student take language subjects separately (without SPM grading). A simple pass should be enough to provide the prerequisite for entering language related courses in IPTA or maktab, a workaround if you may. Something like MUET.

I have to repeat here: The state has a responsibility to ensure the multi-cultural heritage of the country is nurtured. One of the core elements is language. Instead of promoting growth of language, its seems to be the opposite. Its myopic to view language subjects as purely for examinations. In fact, why not make vernacular language as compulsory subject as well?

I hope Tamil proponents, ex-Tamil school students, NGOs, MIC’s 530,00 members, PKR’s members, DAP’s members, etc. all will turn up at Old Klang Road next weekend in a show of  force as voters of next general elections. That will be better than any discussion MIC can initiate.

Counseling for teachers only?

November 25th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


It is indeed sad to read the news about the parents being depressed over untimely death of the children during Kuala Dipang, Kampar bridge collapse.

The emotional upheaval and mental anguish of the families has been exacerbated by the knowledge that the bridge at the Kuala Dipang 1Malaysia camp was constructed without the required permits. It collapsed on Oct 26.

Lorry driver T Nathan said he has not slept properly since the death of Dina, his favourite child. She was born after her mother S Mogana had suffered several miscarriages. They have two sons, now 19 and 17.

Nathan, 45, said Dina “was the live-wire of the family and her smile lingers in my mind”.

“Before she was born, my wife used to serve my food. When Dina turned seven, she took over…she knew what I like,” he said in distress.

Technician K Vasudevan, 43, has become withdrawn and depressed after Divyashree’s death.

He wakes up frequently in cold sweat, thinking of the ordeal his daughter would have experienced when she was thrown into the water and fought for survival.

Vasudevan last saw his daughter alive on Oct 18, after Deepavali, when he and his wife K Kanakam,41, returned to Kuala Lumpur where they work.

Divyashree (right) was the eldest of three girls and a bright student who wanted to become a doctor. She scored 4As and 3Bs in her UPSR examination this year – results that she never saw because these were released last week.

Vasudevan said he was told at 1.30am on Oct 27 that his daughter was reported missing in the incident, and he had dashed to the camp site with his wife.

They waited, hoping she was alive but two days later, were told that her body had been found. Relatives prevented him from viewing her remains at the Kampar Hospital because he was so distraught.

“It is like the right hand of my body has been chopped off. Every time I see small children now, memories of my daughter come to haunt me and I choke up,” he said.

He has had to resign from his job because his employer refused to grant him compassionate leave to attend to the funeral rites. [what kind of useless employer is this?]

His wife has quit her job as a clerk in a private firm to look after her other two daughters. She said her husband no longer smiles and has a lost look, as he was very attached to Divyashree.

K Mageswaran left it to his wife R Nagarathna, 41, to talk about Devatharshini as he is in deep depression over his loss.

Devatharshini (left), the only girl and the youngest of four children, was the darling of the family. She was conceived after Nagarathna prayed for a daughter, and was named after a Hindy deity.

Mageswaran had initially refused her permission to attend the camp, as he was concerned about her safety. When she pleaded and cried, he relented.

A good cook, Mageswaran made her a meal and took her on his bicycle to her school, from where she reported to the camp. Her brother Sarveswaran,12, was also a participant.

About 1.30am on Oct 27, Nagarathna received a phone call from her friend who told her that the bridge had collapsed and that her daughter had been swept away in the current. By then, her husband had left with a friend for the camp site.

Nagarathna said she fainted on hearing the news but, on recovering consciousness, stayed up the whole night, praying for the safety of her other two children.

On three occasions, she went to the camp site but could not locate her daughter. Her relatives even sought the help of a bomoh.

When the body was retrieved from the river three days later, identification had to be made based on the school uniform that Devatharshini was wearing.

“It’s hard to accept that she has gone. But her spirit remains with us in our home,” said Nagarathna, consoling herself.

Mageswaran’s relatives, worried for his health, have tried to persuade him to change residence, but he refuses to leave the house where his daughter once lived.

Did anyone provide emotional support for the parents and families of the deceased? Apparently not. But look at what Education Ministry is doing:

The Education Ministry will provide counselling for the teachers involved in the Kuala Dipang incident, in which three schoolchildren attending a 1Malaysia camp drowned after the suspension bridge they were crossing collapsed and plunged them into the Kampar river.

… Deputy Education Minister Dr Mohd Puad Zarkashi said the teachers who were directly involved when the incident occurred on Oct 26 had been traumatised by the tragedy.

”They will be given counselling to help them ride out this difficult period,” he told reporters on Wednesday after opening the national teachers education research seminar.

Dr Mohd Puad said that the teachers were not to be blamed for the incident.

”The incident was not due to negligence by the teachers,” he added, claiming that parents of the three deceased pupils told him that they were proud of the teachers for their quick action.

Deputy Education Minister said that part of the trauma counselling is due to harrassment faced by the teachers:

… More than 20 teachers have been traumatised, partly because they feel responsible, but also because they have have been harassed and threatened by parents.

Deputy Education Minister Dr Mohd Puad Zarkashi said the teachers have been advised to lodge police reports.

“But in fact, those who harassed or threatened the teachers are not parents of the victims but others who took advantage of the tense situation.” he told newsmen after launching the 3-day National Teachers Education Research seminar today.

He was asked to comment on the statement by the National Union of the Teaching Profession (NUTP) president Hashim Adnan urging the ministry to hold counselling sessions for the teachers.

Hashim said two teachers who were punched by parents following the incident had requested transfers to other schools.

Dr Mohd Puad agreed with NUTP that the affected teachers need counselling. He commended the teachers involved, especially those who joined the search for the missing pupils.

“I am willing to defend these teachers as it was not their negligence. In fact, the parents of the three children even commended the teachers for their quick action,” he said.

Its good that NUTP and Education Ministry is concerned about the teachers, but don’t forget the parents. They are also in dire need of counselling!

BTW, what happened to the report by the Education Ministry after being handed over to DPM Muhyiddin? Has it gone AWOL or branded under OSA? The PR report was very fast, within days, but Education Ministry is taking 30 days (and still counting). I hope its 5 volumes and thousands of pages thick!

The deputy Education Minister of course was unhappy with the PR’s version:

Dr Mohd Puad slammed a report by a Perak Pakatan Rakyat investigation committee, which had stated that the three teachers were not present to supervise the children during the crossing, claiming it was based on assumptions.

”They did not call witnesses or teachers when preparing the report. They are just assuming,” he claimed, adding that the state Opposition was “only good at pointing out people’s faults rather than finding solutions.”

The Pakatan committee claimed that the three teachers who were supposed to have been supervising the schoolchildren when they were crossing the suspension bridge had gone “missing” prior to the incident.

According to its chairman V. Sivakumar, deceased student Devatharshini’s elder brother, Sarveswaran, who also took part in the camp, had told him this after a visit to their home in Mambang Diawan.

Meanwhile Dr Mohd Puad said that the report by the committee set up by the Government following the incident had been completed and handed over to Deputy Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin, who is also the Education Minister.

Below is some of the findings of PR’s investigation:

The metal pillar anchoring the cable of the collapsed Kuala Dipang suspension bridge incident which took three young lives on Oct 26 had broken off from its concrete foundation causing the walkway to fall into the Kampar River.

At a press conference held at the PAS state headquarters yesterday, Su said: “Our initial finding is that the foundation of the anchor block B is very shallow only 2.8 ft deep whereas the actual depth should, according to the chartered consultant structural engineer, be about 10 times that depth.”

He showed Malaysiakini a sketch of the foundation block B with a height of 5’10” , width of 2′ 3″ and depth of 2’8″.
According to the Pasir Pinji assemblyperson, the anchor block B should have been the size of a container.

“Furthermore the initial soil testing done by a civil engineer yesterday (Tuesday) at the bank where the tragedy took place showed that the soil there is very soft.

“This is the preliminary findings of the collapsed bridge tragedy and the final findings report will be ready by the weekend and we hope to reveal the full details on Monday,” he said.

Earlier during the same press conference, Sivakumar said they interviewed Kinta Selatan district education officer Raja Abdul Raman Raja Amaran on Tuesday.

“The surprising fact is that his department was not aware that a suspension bridge had been built by a contractor linking SK Kuala Dipang with the 1Malaysia camp site across the Kampar River,” he said.

“Pupils of SK Sentosa were the first to notice the suspension bridge when they camped at the site on Oct 9. The school notified Raja Abdul Rahman who visited the site on Oct 16 (10 days before the collapse),” he added.

Sivakumar said the education officer told him that a party had approached him early last month with a proposal for a bridge but the project was put on hold because it was deemed too costly at RM110,000.

Raja had informed Sivakumar that the directive to build the bridge came from the Co-curriculum Centre in Pangor Island.

The committee will call on the centre at Pangor Island today to gather details on construction of the bridge and contractor’s identity, said Sivakumar.

Raja also had stated that initially he had directed 40 teachers to attend the 1Malaysia camp but only 23 turned up for the four-day event.

Asked why 20 of the teachers were holding a meeting when 22 children were on the bridge at 10.30am on that day, according to Sivakumar, Raja had replied, “They (teachers) were within the vicinity of the camp area.

The team also held a public inquiry:

Thirteen eyewitnesses narrated their version of the horrifying incident during the four-hour ‘inquiry’ held in Kampar on Saturday.

Most vocal of them was lorry driver T Nathan, 44, (right in photo) who lost his daughter Dina Deve, 11, that night. M Davadharshini,11, and V Diviyasri,12 also drowned in the incident.

“Why weren’t measures put in place to safeguard the 300 pupils?” asked Nathan in anger and anguish.

“There were no bomba (fire and rescue services), medical or Rela personnel on hand to help the 22 children when they fell into the river. If a VIP or a minister’s child was taking part in the camp, there would have been adequate safety measures.

“But who are we? Just poor people whose lives are not important and can be sacrificed and forgotten.”

M Balan, 41, a teacher with the Sri Murugan Centre, said 21 of his students had reported for the four-day camp, involving 298 pupils from 64 schools in the Kinta Selatan district

It was organised by the Education Ministry to foster better ties among the races under the1Malaysia concept. The district education officer had directed 40 teachers to be on duty but only 23 turned up.

“There was chaos and confusion among the teachers as to what to do when the bridge collapsed and the children fell into the swift-flowing river, as none of them (the teachers) were given prior training as to how to cope with an emergency,” said Balan. [was he there as well?]

A 12-year-old student (name withheld to protect his safety) said: “It was not the teachers who threw safety vests (as was reported in the media) to (the 19 students in river) but it was us (the students) who ran to the storeroom and got these items to help save them.”

He said the 19 were left clinging to the metal cable of the collapsed bridge in the darkness for about 30 minutes before any attempt was made to save them. He said he had jumped into the river to save two of his classmates.

The student also claimed that there was only one teacher standing in the middle span of the bridge to control the pupils just before the bridge collapsed.

Earlier, the inquiry heard that pupils who had finished dinner were told to go back and clean used plates left on the other side of the river.

The to and fro movement of the pupils on the suspension bridge resulted in the weakened anchor block being ripped off its foundation, caused the bridge to collapse.

It is learnt that only six pupils were allowed at any one time on the bridge but that this guideline was ignored.

Balan said: “The bomba personnel were searching for survivors in a boat and refused to allow anxious parents to dive into the river to search for the pupils.”

He then used an alternate route about 5km away to get to the other side of the river to search for his students. However, the school authorities prevented him from leading the students back by the same route.

A frustrated Balan said he waited about three hours in the darkness for a rescue truck to come, and finally, in desperation, took the students over to the other side. It took another half an hour for a police truck o come to the rescue of other stranded students.

“There was very poor coordination and an indifferent attitude among the authorities concerned,” he alleged.

Another participant asked for the attendance list of the teachers so that they can be held accountable and not claim that they were not on duty during the incident.

An angry participant blasted the media for reporting that Indian Malaysian students had been jumping on the bridge, leading to its collapse.

“You mean to say that it is always the fault of the Indian community for any untoward incident in the country?” he asked.

However, Tronoh assemblyperson V Sivakumar (extreme left in photo), who is heading an ad hoc committee investigating the incident, told the parent that the fault lay with poor construction of the bridge.

“The authorities will find excuses to divert the blame from their shortcomings in building the illegal bridge but we will nail them,” he assured the 50 participants.

A 41-year-old mother of one of the drowned girls lamented that none of the school teachers came to pay their last respects and counsel those bereaved in their hour of need.

“Furthermore they (the teachers) had the cheek to say that we had assaulted them after the incident, when we did not do this,” she said.

The parents are now suing various parties for RM105 million (no doubt advised by the PR lawyers):

The fathers of the three pupils who drowned in the recent Kuala Dipang bridge collapse tragedy have filed a RM105mil suit against the Malaysian Government and Education Ministry.

The suit, which was filed on their behalf by their lawyers at the High Court here Friday, named nine others including bridge donor GS Synergy Sdn Bhd and contractor CWL Enterprise as defendants.

The others are the heads of SJK (T) Mambang Diawan and SJK (T) Gopeng, the Kinta Selatan education officer, Perak Education director, Kampar district council president, Perak Public Works Department director and the Kuala Dipang 1Malaysia Camp commandant.

Plaintiffs K. Mageswaran, K. Vasudevan and T. Nathan are each seeking RM35mil in general damages and a further RM100,000 in exemplary damages besides RM19,120 in special damages, and costs.

They claim that the deaths of M. Devatharshini, 11, V. Divyashree, 12, and N. Dinadevi, 11, on Oct 26 had been due to the defendants’ negligence.

Speaking to reporters outside the court, their lawyer A. Sivanesan said the papers would be served on the named defendants in the next few days.

Asked why he had decided to file the suit, Nathan said it was not about the money as all the money in the world would not bring back Dinadevi.

”We want to know who’s fault it is and make sure everyone else knows about it too so that no other parents would have to lose their children like this,” he said.

Vasudevan stressed that he wanted justice to be served.

”We want the teachers and the Government to be held responsible,” he said.

Nathan added: “I had sent my daughter to school but she was returned to me in a coffin.”

Also representing the plaintiffs are Datuk Ngeh Koo Ham, M. Kulasegaran, Nga Kor Ming, Keshvinder Singh and A. Magesan.

Perak Mentri Besar Datuk Seri Dr Zambry Abd Kadir said the Government would not stop the grieving families from suing it.

“This is about lives. The parents have lost their children and it is their right to pursue the matter,” he told reporters after a study loan presentation ceremony here.

“Most importantly is that we want to ensure that the Kuala Dipang incident would not be covered up,” he added.

He said the Government was still working to provide concrete studies and suggestion for the future so that similar tragedies would not recur.

Dr Zambry added that the government was not conducting the investigation to gain political mileage.

Two acts of charity for school kids

November 24th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Two good news from the Star today. As school children are getting ready to go back to school,  one group donated school bags and stuff to 1000 students, while another sponsored 40 spectacles for children.

News 1:

ABOUT 1,000 poor pupils received school bags, shoes and stationery at an event orgainsed by the Petaling Jaya Old Town Sun Tau Jing Sheh temple, in partnership with the Yayasan Maha Karuna Educare programme.

“We are giving these items to the children to encourage them to work study harder,” said organising chairman Jacob Chan Teng Meng, during the event at the temple in Jalan 1/15 recently.
Education aid: (Back row from left) Chan, Sun Tau Jing Sheh Abbot Venerable Shi Kai Shan and Saranankara with the children who received the schoolbags.

Yayasan Maha Karuna founder Ven B. Sri Saranankara Nayaka Maha Thera said the Educare programme was started in 2001 and they aimed to help about 5,000 children each year.

He added that they helped children irrespective of their race or religion.

“We are not only working with temples but also NGOs.

“Our objective is to encourage the public to start their own initiatives to help the poor in their own community,” he said.

The pupils were from SJK(C) Choong Wen, SJK(C) Yak Chee, SJK(C) Chen Moh PJ, SJK(C) Yuk Kuan, SJK(C) Han Meng, SJK(T) Kinrara, SK(1) Petaling Jaya, SK Petaling Jaya, SR Sathya Sai, SJK(T) Vivekananda and SJK(C) Chung Hwa Damansara.

The children, whose parents were from the low-income group, were recommended by their respective schools.

News 2:

THE SJK (Tamil) Rawang Parents-Teacher Association (PIBG) sponsored spectacles for 40 children with poor eyesight.

Its chairman, C. Pamarasivam, said the children who received the spectacles were from poor families.

“Because it is expensive to buy spectacles, the PIBG allocated RM120 for each pupil.
Part of school programme: A pupil getting his eyes checked.

“Many teachers have complained about pupils having poor eyesight. Further checks revealed that some pupils are shortsighted while others are longsighted.

“Some cases are very bad. Many parents just could not afford to buy spectacles for their children and we decided to do so,” said Paramasivam who was present during an eye check-up programme at the school recently.

About 1,600 pupils in the school had a free eye check up.