Author Archive

Developer takes Tamil school land

December 30th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Another case of Malaysia Boleh! A round of applause please to the actors in this land-grabbing drama!

SJKT Taman Melawati’s land area has been magically reduced from 1.45ha to 1.36ha. The 0.9ha has now been made into a site for a low-cost flats project. The area in question was the school field.

The issue was highlighted by Gombak MIC who organised a protest. 200 over people took part in the protest.

So, how is it done? Here’s some tips for aspiring developers:

According to the Gombak MIC division chairman G. Jayakumaran, the developer used its own team of surveyors and resubmitted the school land plans to the land office. The plot of land was then transfered to a third party on 4th September 2006. He claimed that this act also misled education ministry and Public Works Department.

The problem started with PWD not properly fencing the school area, thus delaying its land application. Biasalah, when there’s a chance, surely the money-minded businesses would take advantage.

According to Jayaraman, a memorandum would be submitted to state and federal government next week. 480 people have signed the memorandum, and the campaign will go to various temples to garner more signature.

In NST, the developer has been named as Negara Properties:

Gombak MIC Division chief G. Jayakumaran said the school field was 1.44 hectares (3.6 acres) but the developer of Taman Melawati, Negara Properties Sdn Bhd had claimed that the area was only 1.35 hectares (3.38 acres).

The developer wants to use the remaining 9,000 square feet of the field to built low cost flats, Jayakumaran told reporters here today.

He added that he could not understand why Negara Properties had informed the Gombak district education office that the school field was only 1.35 hectares instead of 1.44 hectares.

They (developer) may have misled the education office into believing that the land was actually 1.35 hectares, for the purpose of using it for their own benefit, said Jayakumaran.

He said transactions involving the transfer of the land title from Negara Properties to Melawati Development Sdn Bhd and to an individual, done simultaneously in Sept 2006, also raises suspicion.

So, what is the state government going to do? Land matters come under Selangor state, but 2006, it was Khir Toyo’s government. Only option is to get a stay order, investigate the case and make the right decision. Not sure if SJKT Taman Melawati is fully-aided school, which means the land should be federal or state owned land.

Klang Sentral Terminal a hot potato

December 30th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


The new RM300 million bus terminal (air-conditioned and has a food court, surau and closed- circuit TV system, among others) started operating 3 days ago, and there’s been both optimism and opposition to the new terminal.

Commuters face the biggest problem – longer travel time and higher cost:

However, some commuters were not happy with the move. They said the new terminal was far from the town centre and government offices.

Lim Boon Kig, 58, who was heading to Banting said it took him 90 minutes to reach Klang Sentral from his home in Sekinchan, instead of just 45 minutes previously.

“At the old terminal, there would be several buses to Banting. I could just hop on one without waiting.

“Here, not only is it further, I have been waiting for 30 minutes and there is not a single bus to Banting yet.”

Another case:

Housewife Zainiah Mohamed, 35, was at a loss with her three young children in tow, wondering how to get back to her home in Banting after a shopping trip here.

Nallamah, 55, from Bandar Sunway in Subang, went to the nearly-abandoned station yesterday afternoon to catch the bus home.

“I’m now told I will have to go back to the Jalan Meru bus station in Kapar to catch a bus to Sunway.”

It seems MPK has distributed pamphlets on the changes of bus service. According to one officer, there are five pick-up points in Klang town including the old bus station. However, the I guess people still have to travel to Meru and take a bus from there in certain cases.

Some traders seemed to be optimistic:

More than 90 per cent of the shoplots and kiosks at the new terminal have been snapped up despite the “high” rental.

Trader Shamsul Kamar Abd Razak said even though the rent was high and the terminal had been operating for only two days, business was encouraging.

“The rent is at RM3,000 for a convenience store and about RM2,000 for a kiosk but I’m in this for the long term and I’m confident business will pick up.”

But those in old bus terminal are an unhappy lot:

With the buses and taxis gone, the 250 traders at the Klang Utara Bus Terminal claim they are now staring at bankruptcy.

Trader C. Krishnan said: “We will lose 80 per cent of our income and most of us will go bankrupt within three years.”

According to NST:

The lunch crowd at the Komathy Vilas was halved overnight, from about 2,000, when the Klang bus station was relocated from the town centre on Saturday.

Restaurant owner V. Jeyaraman, 40, said commuters used to make a beeline for his restaurant on arrival at the Jalan Baru bus station, located adjacent to his shop.

Stall owners at the food court at MPK Plaza in the vicinity claim they had only themselves for company over the last two days.

Zaniyah Yeob, 53, who sells nasi campur at the food court, said stall owners were dealt a double blow with the relocation of the bus station and the economic downturn.

Cendol seller Ah Seng, 52, said he had been operating his stall for about 20 years and hoped the authorities would reconsider the move.

The unhappy traders protested near the old bus station yesterday with placards and banners slamming State Assembly Speaker Teng Chang Khim and the Klang Municipal Council for being “pro-developer” The traders chanted slogans and protested for about an hour. The group together with bus operators and commuters had held a meeting and formed an action committee to protest the relocation.
Transport company lament the higher charges, but can’t do much except complain:

The local council decided to shift operations as the new terminal, located 10km from the town centre, would ease traffic congestion. The New Straits Times found operations at Klang Sentral were running smoothly.

One of the bus companies operating at the old terminal, Wawasan Sutera Travel & Tour, urged the council to open a lane for buses to pick up and drop off passengers.

Its operations manager, M. Logesvaran, said bus firms should be given more time to move to Klang Sentral to avoid huge losses.

“The rental at the new terminal is 10 times more than what we are paying now. My company will also lose a lot of time travelling as it will take us almost 40 minutes to reach Klang Sentral.”

A bus operator said companies were being charged RM900 rental per month for a counter at the new terminal, compared with just RM150 at the old terminal. Buses are charged RM10 per entry, from RM2 previously.

As calls for transparency pick up, the local council (MPK) and the state government is under pressure to manage this potential political bomb. As it is, PKR and DAP are seen to have internal squabbles and rift, with MP for Kapar, Manikavasagam as the central figure.

Even though the bus station was mooted under previous administration, the new state government should do something about it. The objective of mass transportation system is to move people efficiently.No point having a system that causes more misery for the rakyat especially in terms of cost. The bus operator may use higher operating cost to increase ticket prices.

In the long run, perhaps the banning of private vehicles into Klang town will be a better option. Heavy vehicles should be limited to certain hours, and both the old and new terminal should co-exist. There should have been an effort to integrate bus service with the Komuter service. The local council should have tried to get some land near Komuter station like Klang or Tepi Sungai.

HINDRAF wins SUARAM award

December 30th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


An old news, but still worth mentioning:

The now-banned Hindu Right Action Force (Hindraf) and Penan activists of the Ulu Baram area in Sarawak have won Suaram’s 2008 Human Rights Award.

The annual award, presented since 1999, was given to the two rights groups for their unique achievements in highlighting concerns of their communities.

Civil society movement Hindraf was recognised for being able to “captivate, mobilise and empower vast numbers of Malaysians of Indian origin” within a short period of its existence, said Xavier.

She said the judges were “impressed by the way Hindraf contextualised the current situation by bringing in colonial history and demonstrating how, even after 50 years of Merdeka (independence), the Indian community has continued to be marginalised and disenfranchised”.

“The success of Hindraf can perhaps be seen in the fear it has caused the government, to the extent that it detained five of its leaders under the ISA and outlawed the organisation.”

Accepting the award, the movement’s national coordinator RS Thanenthiran (left) said it was an honour for all marginalised communities and noted that the struggle has been recognised for the first time.

“This shows that the banning of Hindraf does not make any sense because the spirit and the struggle are continuing. We the civil society… who are all fighting for human rights have shown that a lot of changes have to be made to the system,” he said.

“You (the government) cannot control the people with ISA… they are now bolder and braver to tell the government that it is violating human rights.”

The award comprises a trophy, a certificate and prize money of RM1,000.

Hindraf 5 ISA detention anniversary and review

December 30th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Its been more than one year since the HINDRAF 5 was arrested under the ISA on December 13th 2007.

A forum was held on that day of the anniversary at the Bar Council auditorium. The heart-touching report can be read here. I reproduce two paragraphs:

Next to speak was Mrs. Puvaneswary, the wife of V. Ganabatirau. She related the experience of herself and her 2 children in the year since her husband’s arrest and detention.Her older child kept asking daily where Papa was, while her younger child was unable to recognise her father since she was very young when Ganabatirau was arrested.She maintained that her husband had done nothing wrong, and so should never have been arrested. She thanked members of the Bar, especially those who had been helping very closely, for their assistance. She had had to rent out half of her husband’s office space in order to make ends meet.  She added that clients had also been very understanding.

The Master of Ceremonies for the event, Malaysian Bar Treasurer George Varghese, then read out a letter from Dr. Kalaivani, the proud wife of R. Kengadharan. She apologised for not being present in person due to her once-a-week visit to her husband in Kamunting. She too hihlighted the cost to her parents-in-law and her young son of her husband’s detention, and spoke of the nightmare which evolved on 13 December 2007. Their 2 and ½ year old son’s first word was Papa but now he spoke it very rarely. At every family visit to Kamunting, their son has to be reminded to hug and kiss Papa Their home environment was lifeless, empty and lonely. She thanked Prabhakaran, her brother-in-law, who toiled each day and most nights to keep Kengadharan’s law firm going, as well as to some members of the Malaysian Bar who helped him along, and also clients who continued their support. She was glad that the issue of the ISA was now being addressed by many individuals, groups and parties including the Malaysian Bar, and hoped that this struggle and the call for the immediate release of the Hindraf 5 would continue. She hoped and prayed that the suffering would end as soon as possible.

To commemorate the anniversary as well, Makkal Sakthi organised a fast from December 13th till 16th.

According to Malaysiakini, the banned movement’s coordinator S Jayathas told reporters that the hunger strike – to be participated by about a dozen of people – will last as long as it takes to make the government listen. He said the strike was not suggested by Hindraf leaders but a voluntary move on the part of the supporters. These people want to see some changes and they have come forward, and will carry on doing so until the government listens to the plight of the minority Indians, he said.

However, the fast ended four days during which one of the participants was admitted to hospital due to diabetes complications. It was held in Maha Kaliamman temple in Gombak, after the organisers failed to get a prime location:

The strike was initially planned to take place in Shah Alam but the organisers failed to secure the location.

Waytha Nayagi explained that they had also approached over 30 temples in the vicinity of Kuala Lumpur and Selangor but were denied permission.

They were afraid and some of them were threatened by the police, when they (temples) face demolition, makkal sakthi (people power) is always there, that’s the irony of this, you see, she added.

Following the fast, Makkal Sakthi is now planning to submit memo to Malay rulers throughout the country to seek their intervention. First up was the ruler of Negeri Sembilan (who passed away yesterday). Obviously the ruler did not even send anyone to collect the memorandum when 200 people converged at the palace on 21st December.

According the movement’s coordinator S Jayathas, the petition was instead given to a police officer as the authorities had ordered all those gathered at the palace gate to disperse.

We were surprised with the heavy police presence at the palace, they gave us five minute to disperse and we left peacefully, he added.

What we want to tell them (the rulers) is that the Malaysian Indians have never questioned the prerogative of the rulers and we want them to look at the continued marginalisation of the Malaysian Indians, said Jayathas.

We hope through this, the issues of marginalisation would be addressed by the government as the rulers can exert some influence, he said.

The day after the anniversary of the ISA detention, ISA detainee Uthayakumar revealed (via a message delivered by his 14-year old nephew V Pirassad) that he would take full responsibility for the events which led to the detention of his fellow lawyer brothers. Uthaya said that he will take complete responsibility for the 18-point demands the group had submitted to Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi in the administration capital Putrajaya in August last year.

I stand by those demands made and urge the government to release my fellow lawyer brothers who merely acted in helping me and my brother (Hindu Rights Action Force chairperson) P Waythamoorthy in various matters in court.

The three lawyers have suffered in prison for a year and there are no valid reasons for the government to hold them and they should be immediately released, said lawyer and Hindraf’s legal adviser Uthayakumar in his brief statement to the 250-strong crowd who had gathered at the PAS hall.

Uthaya also reaffirmed his commitment and stand:

I’ve resolved to struggle for the rights of Malaysian Indians. The Umno government has cheated Malaysian Indians for more than 51 years and this has to come to an end, he said.

Uthayakumar also pointed out that it was crucial for the minority Indians to be united and speak in a single voice.

With this single voice we should continue to push forward and I urge all of you to be prepared for a higher task of not only demanding our rights from this government but to also make yourselves available to serve the community in a positive way, Uthayakumar added.

As 2008 comes to a close, Uthayakumar urged Malaysians to dedicated themselves to serving the community in the new year.

I urge all of you to come forward to join us in our next agenda to serve the public, he said.

In his speech, he clearly mentioned the next course of action for Makkal Sakthi – serving the public. Let’s see how this evolves.

The speech was made during a Makkal Sakthi organised forum on anti-ISA held in Klang. During this forum, there was a commotion due the Vasanthakumar’s photo not present in the banner:

While Gobind was delivering his speech to the crowd, a small commotion erupted at the sideline of the forum where three people who claimed to be Hindraf supporters protested over a banner depicting the movement’s leaders.

It was learnt that the supporters were not satisfied with the organisers as the banner showed only four detained Hindraf leaders together with a photo of the outlawed organisation’s self-exile chairperson P Waythamoorthy.

Where’s the other photo of the Hindraf 5? It should be five rather than four,” they said furiously, referring to the group’s organising secretary and ISA detainee, Vasanthakumar, whose photo was not on the banner.

The argument with the organisers lasted for about five minutes, which some claimed the three outraged supporters were planted to sabotage the event.

It was later revealed to Malaysiakini by one of the organisers that Vasanthakumar’s wife has requested not to have her husband’s photo on the banner or she would sue us.

Later, Vasanthakumar’s wife denied that she said she would sue anyone. The non-inclusion of Vasanthakumar seems to indicate a rift in the strategy. Its widely believed that Vasanthakumar is going for more low-profile steps so that he can be released from ISA.

The review of the HINDRAF 5 was will be held on last this Friday. With rumours saying that three of them may be released, dovetailing Uthaya’s message (and his letter to the review board) that his will bear full responsibility, and Vasanthakumar’s disassociation from Makkal Sakthi events, it will be a much awaited review. Would some of them be released?

IPF replacing PPP?

December 30th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Hmmm..as far as I know, IPF’s entry into BN was blocked by MIC. After demise of IPF’s boss Tan Sri Pandithan, there seems to be some good fortune smiling on the party.

BN secretary general Tengku Adnan hinted so, saying that PM Badawi himself had mentioned it during the supreme council meeting:

Barisan chairman Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi had, at the coalition’s supreme council meeting last week, said it would seriously consider the IPF’s long-standing ap­plication to join the ruling coalition.

Barisan secretary-general Datuk Seri Tengku Adnan Tengku Mansor, who disclosed this yesterday, said Abdullah made the statement when opening the meeting.

Tengku Adnan, who is the Umno secretary-general, said the possibility of IPF being accepted was very bright.

I am looking forward to welcoming IPF, which has always been our friend, as a mate soon, he said when opening IPF’s 16th annual general meeting yesterday.

Tengku Adnan said Barisan had always been thankful for the support shown by IPF, especially during general and by-elections.

Adnan said he did not see much difficulty in IPF being accepted as a member since it had always shared and believed in the Barisan spirit.

As Barisan and Umno secretary-general, I fully support the IPF application, he added.

The article in the Star also shows Samy Vellu’s son Vel Paari at the IPF function. Interesting.

However, there a slightly different yet crucial report in NST:

“This matter was brought up during the recent BN supreme council meeting as other parties, especially from Sarawak, had indicated their interest to join the coalition.

“The chairman said BN would consider their requests,” Tengku Adnan told about 500 IPF members who attended the party’s 16th general assembly at a hotel here.

“When I informed Datuk Seri Abdullah that I was invited by IPF to officiate its general assembly, he told me to go because they (IPF) are friends of BN.”

Star reports as if IPF is certain to be a BN member, but NST’s report seems to indicate there’s a long way to go.

This new turn comes at a time when the mosquito is making all kinds of noise that seem to irritate the big brother. So, would the mosquito be finally swatted?

BTW, IPF president (?) Jayashree says there are 300,000 members. I think MIC supposed to have 500,000 members. 800,000 out 1.7 million Indians accounted for. Assuming 60% are above the age of 21 (1.02 million), that means there’s another 420,000 Indians who would be members of other parties or not members at all.