Author Archive

Why HIV testing only for Muslims?

October 7th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


I’m curious as to why HIV testing is not done for all Malasyians. I read in papers that in certain states like Johor, its compulsory for Muslims to obtain a certificate before getting married. Now, Islamic Development Department (Jakim) director-general Datuk Wan Mohamad Sheikh Abdul Aziz said all state religious authorities agreed to implement and enforce the ruling in a meeting in July. So, 2009 onwards its compulsory HIV testing for all Muslims. Furthermore, the test is for free of charge!

Now, lets look at the body that issues the statement – JAKIM, which is solely for Islamic affairs. That’s fine because the religion is stated as religion of the federation. But, problem now is that members of that religion are getting extra non-religious benefit. Of course the funds for the free test may come from zakat collection or other sources which is not from non-Muslims. But my point is that, the non-Muslims are deprived of such free services or even such rulings which can protect innocent lives. Why? Because we don’t have a body to protect our rights. There’s no “non-Muslims Development Department” or “Other Religions Development Dept” or whatever. Can we expect Malaysian Hindu Sangam or MCCBCHST to issue such rulings when they are toothless and moneyless?

Not only free testing, the religious authorities will even give couples detected with HIV “counselling and advice on preventive measures, and on how to prepare themselves physically and mentally”, says the director-general.

Why not the Health Ministry and NRD work together to take over this task and make it compulsory for all Malaysians who want to get married.

Are non-Muslims lives cheaper than Muslim lives?

Gerakan vice president aspirant Parameswaran promises 240 new members

October 7th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Interesting promise by the Ampang Gerakan division chairman G. Parameswaran, who is vying for one the vice-president’s posts. He plans to recruit more than 240 Malay and Indian members if he wins. Well, one may ask why not 500 or 1000? Why 240? Your guess is as good as mine. Anyway, best of luck to him. Some of his comments are below:

“Gerakan has always been a multicultural party. While the opposition is now championing that cause, we were the original. Somewhere along the way, we had become MCA’s younger sibling,” he said, referring to Gerakan’s Chinese majority makeup.

“The fact that the party fielded all Chinese candidates in the last election didn’t help. That alienated voters,” said the 51-year-old businessman whose father previously worked as a gardener in Parliament House.

“The grassroots are asking for a change. They say if Gerakan is a real multiracial party, then the leadership has to reflect that.”

Miss MalaysianIndian Global 2008 Fiona to help organise charity events

October 7th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


A bit more on Fiona Zuzartee, the winner of Miss MalaysianIndian Global 2008 (The Star):

The 1.6m beauty, winner of Saturday’s 2008 Miss Malaysia-Indian Global pageant, came across as an ambitious and articulate but a humble person.

The 20-year-old lass was also buzzing with confidence and professional patience.

“But I still got stage fright. I knew I was rambling during the question-and-answer session as I was not used to it yet,” she told The Star yesterday.

A shy but amicable person unless she was with small groups of friends, Fiona’s ambition was to open a fusion restaurant business in five years, something she learned to do while working as a supervisor at the Starbucks outlet at Assunta Hospital here.

Her real passion to be an airline pilot was derailed because of her family’s weak financial background.

Her parents — a charity logistics manager and an IT project manager — did not give her an allowance until she was in secondary school and had taught Fiona the value of money at an early age.

“I used to earn money from radio contests. The RM100 or RM200 I won, I would stretch it for a month,” she said.

Her lack of chance to pursue her dream of becoming a pilot spurred Fiona to organise a charity event to raise funds to help secondary school students pursue their tertiary education. The charity event will be part of her year-long obligation as a pageant winner that is to be involved in a large-scale community project.

HINDRAF 5 is worse threat that RPK?

October 6th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


I was surprised to read that Raja Petra was allowed to attend the court case today, but so far none of the 5 detainees were allowed to do so. I’m sure there are loads of reports on HINDRAF and its leaders, don’t tell me not even one had been heard in court till now. I remember Manoharan’s appeal to represent himself (he’s a lawyer) in a case was also rejected. What does this mean? Raja Petra is not as dangerous as the HINDRAf 5?

UPM Temple under threat

October 6th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


I think some of the local universities had a temple in their compound – maybe due to the fact that the universities were built on ex-plantation or forest areas, which housed Indian families nearby.

UTM Skudai’s temple had been relocated. UM’s one is still there. UPM’s one is now under plans to be removed because UPM wants the land back. The 80-year old Maha Mariamman temple (see it on map here) was located on a half-acre plot of land within the university’s ground, according to the temple’s land and building committee chairman K.G. Kuppusamy.

“We are requesting the university officials to reconsider taking back the land. Perhaps they can sell us the plot of land or provide us with an alternative land plus compensation of RM1.5mil to help rebuild the temple,” Kuppusamy said.He said discussions between both parties have been on-going since November last year.

Yesterday, some 200 people gathered at the Sri Maha Mariaman temple near to voice their worries over the temple land problem.

What would be the ideal solution for this issue? The temple is as old as the precursor of UPM, which was the School of Agriculture, officially instituted on 21 May, 1931 by John Scott. UPM itself was established in 1971. Basicall, you have an historic site. Perhaps it can be declared as a heritage site? As for community, I guess UPM students will frequent the temple, along with residents who live nearby. Sometimes, the in-house temples are venues for cultural and religious programs held by students. Not sure if its still the same.

Is this a state or federal issue? Since universities are granted certain amount of autonomy, can they decide on their own? Can state government reclaim the land if such situation arises?