Author Archive

HINDRAF lodges police report against Home Minister and Utusan

October 7th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


This is a good move from HINDRAF. They should make police report if they believe in the actions. Home Minister Syed Hamid, Utusan and its columnists, plus few other NGO leaders were issuing statements that seemed off tangent and diverting the issue into something else. Not one, but many police reports were lodged throughout the country by HINDRAF members. According to Malaysiakini, Hindraf national coordinator RS Thanenthiran, 46, who lodged the first police report this afternoon, said the movement wanted police to take action on the home minister, Utusan and the NGOs for wrongfully accusing the human rights group of “creating chaos and insulting Islam” during the open house in Putra World Trade Centre, Kuala Lumpur.

“They should be charged under the Sedition Act for inciting communal hatred and instigating racial conflict and under the Penal Code for criminal intimidation by issuing threats to racial harmony,” said Thanenthiran (photo, left), who with Nibong Tebal Hindraf coordinator Sanjeeviramah Subramani, 42, lodged the report in Butterworth police station at 12.50pm.

That report was followed by a series of others lodged by Hindraf leaders and activists in George Town, Nibong Tebal, Simpang Empat, Shah Alam, Petaling Jaya, Klang, Alor Star, Sungai Petani, Jitra, Kulim, Lunas, Ipoh, Bagan Serai, Air Tawar, Parit Buntar, Taiping, Teluk Intan, Sitiawan, Muar, Tangkak, Skudai, Kluang and Johor Bahru. Reports were also lodged this evening in Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Terengganu, Seremban, Malacca and Tanah Merah.

Earlier, HINDRAF said it was planning to sue the same group of people. Now the quantum of claim may be set as high as RM100 million it says.

The movement plans go ahead with a civil suit against the newspaper and home minister and if warranted against the NGOs as well.

Thanenthiran told reporters that Hindraf had decided to raise the quantum of its claims from RM1 million ringgit to perhaps even as high as RM100 million. The movement is now discussing the matter with its lawyers and will file the suits soon.

Last Friday, Utusan had front paged its report with the headline – ‘Hindraf Keterlaluan’ (Extreme Hindraf). Two more articles – Baharom Mahusin’s commentary in his ‘Cetusan’ column and Zulkifli Bakar’s commentary in his ‘Pada Hemat Saya’ column – published in the same edition were unfair and intimidating, alleged Thanenthiran.

“The reports and criticisms were inciting racial hatred and instigating communal conflict. The reports suggested that we trespassed the function when in truth, we were invited,” said Thanenthiran.

“The function was not held in a mosque not a buka puasa event. It was organised in a common public building with an open invitation to all Malayians. Suddenly open houses during festive seasons were given new definitions, thanks to Syed Hamid and Utusan,” he added.

The Hindraf leader also alleged this was not first time the Malay daily had played up communal hatred and conflict against various organisations and individuals in the country.

Thanenthiran also challenged Syed Hamid, Utusan and the NGOs to speak the truth and apologise to the movement for “distorting facts and lying to the public.”

Xavier talks on temples in Selangor

October 7th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Xavier Jayakumar who visited the demolished temple met with over 300 people. He briefed them on the plans for Indian temples in Selangor. He urged all Hindu temples in Selangor to register with the relevant municipal councils within a month so that the government would have a record of all temples in the state and also ensure that no temple would be demolished in the future.He said committees fighting for ownership of land for their temples in Selangor could meet him to submit their applications.

This news appeared in Makkal Osai. Not sure if he apologies over his earlier statements on temple demolition being a small issue.

Limit for gopurams removed in Selangor

October 7th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Common sense dictates that there should have been a valid reason for the previous Selangor government to impose a height limit for gopurams in the state (Gopuram is the tower that is on top of the temple. It is usually adorned with intricate designs, images and statues of Gods and so on). So, perhaps Khir Toyo or MIC fellas can explain to us the reason. Was it due to safety, aviation ruling, town planning acts, building acts, political decision, or based on whims and fancies?

Even the current government did not provide any reason for lifting of the limit.

The Selangor government had decided to lift the earlier 7.3m limit for the construction of gopurams (entrance towers) for temples set by the previous government, Makkal Osai reported.

State Executive councillor Dr Xavier Jayakumar said that the current government had recently given approval for the construction of a temple gopuram for more than 12.8m.

He added that the previous state government had approved 929 sq metres of land, next to a sewerage reclamation pond, for the building of a temple and did not allow any extension or renovation.

One thing for sure is that more money will be spent to build elaborate and grand gopurams!!!

Big trouble in Ipoh Little india

October 7th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


I don’t know what to say. Maybe have to bang my head on the wall!!! Small town like Ipoh also getting bad name no thanks to politicians.

The city’s Little India is shaping out to be a battle scene for two political parties fighting for the right to hold their own grand Deepavali celebration.

Perak executive councillor A. Sivanesan from Pakatan Rakyat is crossing swords with an equally determined Perak MIC chairman Datuk G. Rajoo over the matter.

Sivanesan said the state government rejected Rajoo’s application yesterday to hold the celebration in Little India as the Ipoh Barat MIC had been organising the event over many years “to make profits.” Rajoo is Ipoh Barat chairman.

He added that Pakatan planned to organise the annual event this time with the backing and participation of local hawkers, businessmen and organisations.

“We have received complaints from traders that, in the past, Ipoh Barat MIC never involved the public when organising the celebration.

“This time the community will decide with Pakatan on how the celebration should be done,” he told reporters at the state secretariat yesterday.

Sivanesan, who is also state Health, Environment and Human Resources Committee chairman, accused the MIC of making profit from the festival through sales of trading lots.

“But we (Pakatan) are not doing it to make money. As a veteran politician, Rajoo should understand that the final decision is in the hands of the state executive council,” he said.

A defiant Rajoo, however, said Ipoh Barat MIC would carry on with its preparations for the Deepavali celebration, which they had been doing for the past 16 years, as they were doing it legally.

He said they had received approval in May from the Ipoh City Council for the week-long celebration.

“We paid RM2,770 for the lots and we were issued an official receipt. We’ve even received payment for 83 stalls,” he said, adding that the state government was being unfair and that Sivanesan should not have meddled as the council was an independent body.

Rajoo also denied that MIC made a profit from the event, adding that the party had even subsidised the traders.

issues:
1. profit. MIC says no profit but actually gives subsidy. state says MIC makes profit.
– very easy. MIC can expose how much it charges per lot. By right, they paid RM2770 (total or per day?) to Ipoh city council, and created 83 lots. That means a lot is only RM876.75. So, if the charge is extra RM50 for electricity, water, and miscellaneous expenses, still OK. Of course, they have to show last year’s records as well. Then we can know who is lying.

2. public. state plans to involve community and alleges MIC never did so.
– This is publicity stunt. Obviously Pakatan will get feedback from all quarters, especially the business community and perhaps many “new” Pakatan supporters will try their luck. The community was with MIC previously so can get something, now the community sway towards Pakatan…also hoping to get something.

3. legality. MIC already have approval from city council, but state government rejected it.
– This is critical issue. Is this interference by state government? Who has the legality to approve or reject the application? Can MIC sue the council?

PM Badawi comments on HINDRAF open house visit

October 7th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Finally, PM Badawi tells his version of the HINDRAF Raya open house visit. He was gracious enough to allow them in as he thought they wanted to wish him and the other ministers but was disappointed that their intention was not so. He said the group did not wish him “Selamat Hari Raya” except for one person. The others told him to release HINDRAF ISA detainees and repeal the ISA. According to the Star:

Relating the incident to reporters, he said the police and security personnel who initially denied the Hindraf group access, sought clearance from him.

“I discussed it with (Deputy Prime Minister) Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak and the other ministers. In that spirit I told the security team to allow them in.

“They came in and there was a lot of noise, I don’t know why,” said Abdullah, who was at the time welcoming visitors to the open house with his wife Datin Seri Jeanne Abdullah, Najib and wife Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor.

“I heard very clearly ‘Hapuskan ISA, Lepaskan Hindraf’ (Repeal the ISA, Release the Hindraf detainees),” he said, adding that he did not know if another group of 70 people who arrived later had wished anyone as he had left for prayers by then.

Earlier, the Star published this version online (extracts only):

Abdullah said the police and security personnel, who had initially denied the Hindraf group access, sought clearance from him.

“I discussed it with (his deputy) Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak and the other ministers. My view was that they wanted to come to the open house, which is open to all and we do not stop any group from coming to wish us and join other guests. “We even welcomed non-Malaysians who came in huge numbers. In that spirit I told the security people to ask them to come in. But they came in and there was a lot of noise, I don’t know why,” Abdullah said on Monday.

Abdullah said those around him pointed out that none of the Hindraf supporters had wished him Selamat Hari Raya.

“The rest I heard very clearly – ‘Hapuskan ISA, Lepaskan Hindraf; Hapuskan ISA, Lepaskan Hindraf’ (Repeal the ISA, Release the Hindraf detainees). That was all they wanted to say to me. They did not have the spirit of Hari Raya, to enjoy and join in the celebration,” he added.

“But this one has created a lot of unhappiness to many people,” he said, adding he was told that when he went for prayers in between, another group of about 70 people were there.

“I was not present, if they were some among the 70 who wished Selamat Hari Raya, I wouldn’t know. But when I was there and this happened, nobody was interested to wish Selamat Hari Raya.

“Some of them even skipped my ministers. Even Datuk Seri Najib, some of them skipped also,” he said.

To a question he said no action was being planned against the group.

The NST quoted him as being disappointed with the HINDRAF members:

The prime minister said except for one Hindraf member, none of them conveyed Hari Raya wishes to him or his cabinet colleagues.

“No Raya wishes at all. Instead, they were saying things like ‘Hapuskan ISA (abolish ISA)’ and ‘Lepaskan Hindraf (release Hindraf detainees)’. I was very disappointed.”

Abdullah said he had given clearance for the group to enter the hall at the Putra World Trade Centre in the spirit of Aidilfitri.

“Our open house is for everyone and we do not stop anyone from attending.”

He said except for the morning prayers, the festivities had become a national celebration.

“We have thousands of guests and usually there are no problems. But this one has created a lot of unhappiness.”

While yesterday online version quotes from NST:

“Only one of them said ’Selamat Hari Raya’ (greetings) to me. The rest said ’Abolish ISA’ (Internal Security Act) and ’Free the Hindraf Leaders’,” he said.

“It was I who allowed them to attend, in the spirit of Hari Raya,” he said.

The prime minister said he believed that the open house was for everyone and that no one should be prohibited from attending it.

“Why should I prevent any Malaysian group from coming to the open house. Even non-Malaysians came in huge numbers,” he said.

more quotes from Malaysiakini:

“I feel disappointed, actually,” he told a press conference after chairing a meeting with members of the International Advisory Panel to the Malaysia Biotechnology Corporation at the Kuala Lumpur Convention Centre today.

“We don’t prevent any group from coming to our open house, to wish Selamat Hari Raya, and to mix with other guests. This is the spirit of Hari Raya,” he said.

“Why should I prevent Malaysians from coming to our open house? It’s open for everybody, even tourists and non-Malaysians who came in big numbers.”

However, he said the activists’ entry into the hall where the main reception was held was accompanied by “a lot of noise”, due in part to their sloganeering over the Internal Security Act (ISA) and demands for the release of their leaders currently being detained.

“What I was told by someone who was observing … behind me, was ‘Pak Lah, did you realise that only one of them said Selamat Hari Raya to you?’,” said Abdullah, adding that they had failed to shake hands even with other cabinet ministers.

“The rest (of their words), which I heard very clearly, was, ‘Abolish the ISA! Free the Hindraf! Abolish the ISA! Free the Hindraf!’ That’s all they wanted to tell me. This is not the spirit of Hari Raya, where you wish (Selamat) Hari Raya, are happy and have fun and socialise.”

Abdullah said the Hindraf crowd created “a lot of unhappiness to a lot of people who were around”.

He said, however, that “there is no report (to warrant) severe action” against the activists for their conduct.