Author Archive

Is population imbalance a problem?

September 23rd, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


That question had been in running in my mind for last two months. I remember reading in the newspaper where an MP (can’t recall who it was) said that something to the effect that we have to follow the majority. This is of course very much true. Currently in our country, the population can be categorised into four areas of importance – Race (Malays versus non-Malays), Religion (Muslims versus non-Muslims), Bumiputra Status (Bumi versus non-Bumi) and gender.

In terms of racial composition, we have many races (Malay, Chinese, Indian, etc) in this country, but the most critical one is Malays versus the rest. This ratio is important to maintain the national security and harmony, if we are to believe our politicians. The majority race is Malays, which is above 50% at the moment and rising steadily. The second largest group is the Chinese which is less than 30% and declining steadily. Same with the Indians which are at 7++% and declining as well. So, in the near future, we can expect the population to be imbalanced in terms of race with up to 70% Malays. With the inflow of Indonesians, the population of Malays are boosted through marriages.

In terms of religion, Islam being the religion for the majority race, automatically becomes the majority religion. Second in place is Christianity, followed by Buddhism, Hinduism and the rest. As the majority race experiences significant growth, we can expect the majority religion to also improve percentage-wise. Coupled with the capability of non-Muslims to be not aligned to any religion (in other words be a free thinker or atheist), we can expect the number of Muslims to significantly overwhelm the other religions in the near future.

In terms of Bumiputra composition, I remember reading a statement few months back that Bumiputra percentage is 62.1% while the non-Bumis are 30++%. Again, this tied closely to the majority race which are automatically accorded Bumiputra status. Then we have the ethnic races in Sabah and Sarawak who also Bumiputra. So, obviously the percentage of Bumiputra will be higher than the rest of the categorization.

Finally, population in terms of gender. So far, our population is nearly evenly balanced between male and female. However, the number of educated females are on the rise and it won’t be long before the white-collar workforce is overwhelmed with female workers. Due to the lack dwindling percentage in the above three categories, it is highly possible that marriages in the future will be inter-racial or inter-religion.

With more chances for the minority groups to convert to the majority – either via religious conversion or marriage (future generation can be of different race), the problem is compounded.

Now, where does this lead to? The possibilities are aplenty. A country that still sticks to its constitution and provides equality to all, or one that is in favor of the majority, and discriminative towards the minority.

Guided by the constitution, there will be protection for the minority races and religion. But with majority race in place, this can change if there’s consensus among them. As time goes, it may be economically unviable for example, to maintain many vernacular schools (EXAMPLE ONLY!). At that point of time, it is likely that a scheme like the NEP is created to ensure the minority races are not discriminated or deprived of opportunities.

Many areas will be affected in the next 20 – 30 years. Education, health care, places of worship, public service, tradition and culture, living neighborhoods, working environment, services industry, restaurants, our multiracial identity, public holidays, economic equity, gaming industry, etc.

I feel that with the way things are going, a imbalanced population will be more volatile and may even be a threat to national security. The voices of the minority can be easily drowned. Thus it may be the right time to implement a national population plan to boost the population of the minority races in order to preserve the status quo, or to implement population control (one child policy?) for the majority race (which is quite impossible due to religious factor).

Of course, things will be much, much easier if we don’t think along racial and religion lines. But that’s wishful thinking at the moment.

This is my thoughts, so I hope readers can share your opinions and thoughts as well.

CMIO also calls for release of Hindraf 5

September 23rd, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


CMIO was created in March, post general elections. The coalition was supposed to be a watchdog to monitor all the elected representatives and “report” back to the community. Still waiting for their report. Interestingly, they also urged the Indian community to stop relying on MIC. But going by Samy Vellu’s words, the community is flocking back to MIC.

Now, they are echoing MIC in asking for release of the Hindraf 5:

The Coalition of Malaysian Indian NGOs today urged Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi to release the five Hindraf leaders held under the Internal Security Act.

Chairperson of the coalition A Vaithilingam said that it was pointless to continue to hold the five as “causes and grievances brought up by Hindraf have been admitted by almost all the BN officials over the past few months”.

“We further request the prime minister to have an open mind and open up dialogue with Hindraf as their release and subsequent interest in dialogue will help the government win back the confidence of the Indian community,” he said in a statement.

He said that the government must be held responsible for the outburst of emotions of the Indian community, and Hindraf members in particular.

“It has led to the frustration and lack of confidence in the nation’s leaders by all Malaysians,” he said.

Indians returning to MIC?

September 22nd, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


So claims its president, Samy Vellu. That is indeed good news for MIC and Samy.

Samy says that those voters who abandoned MIC during the elections are turning back to the party. “Hundreds of people” are visiting the party offices everyday, knowing that only MIC could help them.

Quoting some statistics from unknown sources, Samy said that 50% of the community rejected MIC in the last election.

According to him, the community realised that only a close relationship with th Federal Government through the MIC can improve the community’s livelihood.

They admit to having been confused and in disarray, that they were influenced into voting for the Opposition but I tell them that it does not matter.

When asked why they had come back looking for us, their answer was that the MIC has an administration, offices and an experienced leadership, and has continued looking after the people despite having lost in the elections.

This is the reason why they are still interested in forging a relationship with the MIC.

Its good that MIC did not give up hope, and still trying to win over the community. They had to eat the humble pie and move on with times. Yes, the MIC machineries are in place, but need to be fine-tuned or even overhauled to maximize its potential. Its time to look at the community as equal partners, rather than a meekly wife.

I hope MIC won’t be trapped again in false sense of security, just like in the elections time. They were pretty confident, but ended up in the losing end. The community can make use of all MIC facilities and network, but may very well ditch MIC when it matters most. This is something that needs to be understood. Just like when MIC played out the community at times, the community also can strike down MIC with vengeance.

By the way, do you really believe what he says?

HINDRAF to reimburse the RM1000 fine

September 22nd, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


PRESS STATEMENT

RE: HINDRAF WOULD UNDERTAKE TO PAY AND REIMBURSE THE RM1000 FINE PAID OR OWED BY ITS SUPPORTERS.

HINDRAF wishes to state that it would reimburse each and every of the 27 supporters who pleaded guilty on 18th September 2008 for the RM1000 they have paid or owe to the court in fine imposed for their participation on the peaceful HINDRAF rally on November 25th last year.

For those who have already paid the fine and those still owing to the court kindly contact our Selangor Coordinator Mr. Selvam on 016 9673066 to help facilitate transfer of funds and fine payment into court.

However we would continue to welcome any form of donations to help ease the burden of the remaining 27 who would undergo 2 months continued hearing beginning 23rd September 2008.

Those willing to make contributions could make their donations to our nominated accounts as below:

Bank – Public Bank Berhad

Account Name – P. Taramaraju & Aridass Velu

(Joint saving account)

Account No – 4-5235622-34

Tel No : 019- 330 5197

012- 332 3490.

Thank you

P.Waytha Moorthy

Chairman

HINDRAF

Forced to plead guilty or not?

September 22nd, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


The Rm1000 fine each for the 27 accused who pleaded guilty to unlawful assembly during HINDRAF rally has taken a new twist. Waytha claims that the trial of the balance 27 people which will run for two months continuously is an injustice and will cause the accused to lose their jobs:

The movement’s leader in exile P Waytha Moorthy told a press conference in Sentul, Kuala Lumpur via video conferencing, that the 27 individuals would lose their jobs during the two-month hearing.

“This is a great injustice to them. They are bound to lose their jobs, face severe financial crisis and their families would suffer,” said Waytha Moorthy who is in self-imposed exile in England.

The 27 are mostly odd-job workers and labourers who were among 54 individuals jointly charged for participating in an illegal assembly on Nov 11 last year in Kuala Lumpur.

He says that those who pleaded guilty did so out of fear since a prolonged trial period will affect them financially.

Naturally, the lawyer for the accused was incensed after Waytha’s comments. N Sivananthan denied the accusations and condemned Waytha:

In a statement today, their lawyer N Sivananthan denied the allegation and called on all quarters to stop politicising the issue.

He also took a swipe at the London-based Waythamoorthy, saying that he found the latter’s remarks “offensive and ignorant.”

Sivananthan said that the unjust treatment allegation was being equated to the fact that the court had given priority and its time to the trial of the said matter.

“I would like to categorically deny this (the unjust treatment allegation). The offence on which the guilty plea was taken carries a maximum two years’ imprisonment or fine (any amount) or a combination of both.

“Not only did the court only impose a RM1,000 fine, a time period of two months was also allowed for payment of the same with a proviso to extend the period to six months on a case-by-case basis,” he said.

“As a lawyer, I can confidently say that my clients have been treated justly and I find the comments made by Wathyamoorthy (left) from his refuge in London not only offensive but also ignorant.

“The admission of guilt was on the basis that my clients accepted the fact that laws need to be followed and that a failure to disperse when told to do so amounts to a breach of that law,” he added.

Meanwhile, Surendran, the lawyer for Hindraf 5 also chipped in, supporting Waytha:

Hindraf legal advisor N Surendran said that initially, the trial was supposed to last two weeks but was somehow extended to two full months.

Surendran said he has spoken to some of those who had pleaded guilty and claimed that many of them took the plea to avoid being absent from work and be subsequently axed.

“You can see here the enormity of the injustice. We have 27 people who have been forced to plead guilty because of a miscarriage of justice,” he said.

Surendran also urged the attorney-general and the government to drop charges against 27 individuals who he said were exercising their democratic right to assemble peacefully.

This was also rebutted by Sivananthan:

…Sivananthan noted that the comments made by Surendran are rather suspect since none of his clients had indicated that they were being “forced” to plead guilty.

“I don’t think he quite understands the concept of miscarriage of justice. The difference here is that my legal team and I are acting only as lawyers and not politicians whilst the individuals who are making these allegations are trying to dramatise this issue for reasons best known to them.
“I would therefore be grateful if the plea of guilt is not politicised by all parties concerned.”

So, which is which? As a lawyer, would you advise your client to plead guilty to avoid more problems and possible stiffer sentences? As a client, would you expect your lawyer to offer the best advice and as many options as possible to you?

Obviously its strange that this case was given much time and fast-tracked, but it can be taken either way – as a concern for the issue or to pressure the accused.

On the other hand, a sum of RM1000, which can be paid in installments is a good deal for the accused. So, on the smaller, individual scale, the accused can leave all this mess behind and move on in life. On a larger scale, the admission of guilt can be used to further condemn Hindraf, denounce the rally, and to try sway the community back to its original position.