Archive for the ‘BornInMalaysia’ category

PM Najib to remove NEP?

May 22nd, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


While this may not make it to our shores among the MSM, I found one Malaysiakini article and one from Taipei Times. Nothing much on Singapore ST website from what I searched. PM Najib in a candid interview with Singapore Straits Times mentioned about removing the NEP:

Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak has pledged to roll back a decades-old affirmative action program for the ethnic Malay majority, insisting that the long-term benefits of doing so would outweigh the initial “pain,” a news report said yesterday.

Najib, who took office last month, told Singapore’s Straits Times newspaper that he could handle the backlash to his plan from the ruling political party, the United Malays National Organization.

Najib told the newspaper that he did not fear opposition from the “warlords” in the party because he believes most of them are loyal to him.

“Don’t forget, I’m the biggest warlord. They are chiefs but they’re smaller chiefs. I’m the big chief,” Najib said in the interview ahead of his two-day visit to the city-state starting yesterday.

The affirmative action program launched in 1970 remains one of the most divisive aspects of Malaysia’s multiethnic society. Various policies in the program require many companies to be partly Malay-owned and allowed Malays to buy homes at reduced prices and get into universities more easily.

The Chinese and Indian ethnic minorities say this amounts to racial discrimination, but many Malays bristle at the suggestion that the program should be scrapped. The ruling party has been reluctant to meddle with the program for fear of losing the support of Malays.

Najib said Malays increasingly “support the idea of having a more equitable and socially just society.” He said steps toward economic liberalization were necessary to prevent Malaysia from being “out of sync with what’s happening globally” and reduce its ability to compete economically.

He did not elaborate on specific plans, but said the traditional method of “imposing quotas, for example, and equity restrictions, seems to be hampering achievements and growth.”

Maybe its just politik-speak. Maybe its not. Only time will tell.

Let’s end this piece with something that political scientist James Chin, who researches affirmative action policies, told The Straits Times:

Najib will likely be very cautious when it comes to actually amending the NEP. The key is to keep the economy efficient without losing the core support of the Malays that keeps Umno afloat.

Najib may modify certain less sensitive aspects of the NEP, such as the awarding of scholarships, but no country which has started affirmative action policies has ever been able to remove them, noted Chin.

“Najib is in a no-win situation,” he said.

alcohol sale limitation in selangor

May 21st, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


The sale of alcohol will be outlined under a “code of practice” says Selangor government. I remember the hot topic when it was proposed by PAS November last year. At that time, so condemned the proposal to limit the sale of alcohol in Selangor. I agreed with the proposal, and I still agree with it. Remember samsu with Santa Claus?

I reiterate that a proper, full blown campaign on the ills of alcohol to youths, women and the underaged to be started together with such code of practice.

While I mentioned about Malay girls being drunk and hitting my friend’s car  in previous posting, this time I like to mention about private university students. Those living in Pulau Meranti may want to comment on the antics of LKW students near the shoplots and apartments.

The Selangor government will outline a “code of practice” on the retail sale of alcohol, said state local government, study and research committee chairman Ronnie Liu.

He said the government would be holding an open discussion Thursday with food and beverage outlet operators, non-governmental organisations and religious departments to discuss the issue.

“We hope to come out with guidelines that are clear, practical and reasonable, on the sale of alcohol,” he told a press conference after the weekly state executive council meeting here Wednesday.

Liu said he had received many complaints over the last few months that alcoholic beverages had been restricted by certain municipalities under their by-laws.

He described as “baseless” claims that there was a ban on the sale of alcohol in the state.

Mentri Besar Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim said there were two main arguments on the issue.

Some argue that alcohol should be allowed to be sold to the right customers, but others worry that alcohol sales would lead to abuse and cause social problems if there are no proper controls.

“We want to find an equitable balance while allowing the sale of alcohol,” he said.

BN Speaker Ganesan provides his story

May 16th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


All this while, we have heard Speaker Sivakumar’s points, now let’s have a look at the BN Speaker’s side of the story (From Malaysiakini):

In a proceeding that would have put wrestling bouts to shame, MIC’s R Ganesan was elected as the new speaker for the Perak state legislative assembly.

MCPX

r ganesan 130509At a press conference in Ipoh today, the 57-year-old former state assemblyperson explained why he is the legitimate speaker and sheds a little light on the dark episode of May 7, when the state assembly convened for the first time since Barisan Nasional seized control of the state.

According to him, Pakatan Rakyat Speaker V Sivakumar, who was literally dragged out of the House, could not chair the motion to sack him (Sivakumar) because he was an interested party.

“We brought a motion to remove him. When we do that, he cannot table the motion because he is an interested party. It is against the rules of natural justice,” he said.

Ganesan said deputy speaker Hee Yit Fong then took over the proceedings from Sivakumar and allowed the motion moved by BN Menteri Besar Zambry Abdul Kadir to be passed, based on Article 36A of the state constitution.

“Naturally, the deputy speaker has to take the place of the speaker. This has been done correctly,” he said, adding that the motion was seconded by Hamidah Osman (Sungai Rapat) and supported by 29 state assemblypersons.

This was followed by the taking of oath and donning of the speaker’s regalia, said the two-term (1999-2008) Sungkai assemblyperson.

“So, 31 (state assemblypersons) elected me. How can you say I’m not the legitimate speaker? It was legally done. I have no doubts about it,” said the lawyer by training.

‘Sivakumar ignored my warnings’

On Sivakumar’s unceremonious ejection, Ganesan said he sought the help of the police to remove the Pakatan speaker after he refused to budge from the coveted seat.

He said that he had given Sivakumar ample warning before asking the sargent-at-arms to take action.

But when the sargent-at-arms was unable to break the Pakatan state reps’ human shield around Sivakumar, the police were called after Ganesan invoked his “residual powers” under Standing Order 90.

“Strangers can be allowed in the house. The Standing Orders (even) allow me let them speak during debates,” he said.

NGOs in Perak demand fresh elections

May 14th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Not sure where this NGOs came from, but I guess not aligned to BN as they are calling for elections, and with just 15,000 signatures can’t claim to speak for all Perakians. The statements from them seems to be challenging the Sultan. Sounds like they saying the palace doesn’t have the plight of the rakyat in mind, but something else. One thing for sure, they know that memorandums are just waste of paper and time.

They said the people of Perak may become frustrated with the continued denial of their rights in choosing a state government of their choice, and may spark off a similar situation like what happened in Thailand. Speaking a forum in Ipoh this afternoon, JAMA’IY Negeri Perak (a coalition of Muslim NGOs) assistant secretary Mohd Nazri Sahat said that is not what Perakians want but the “negative possibilities” are there. “This political uncertainty has led to the collapse of the state’s economy, the social structure and state administration and investors are shying away from our silver state. “The Sultan of Perak must take into consideration the plight of his subjects who are suffering economically, emotionally and fearful for their political safety,” he said. “His highness must correct and stabilise this political storm which is slowly destroying the everyday life of every citizen,” he added. Nazri regretted that no action was taken by the palace to address the grievances of the NGOs when they first submitted a memorandum containing 10,000 signatures on Feb 19 calling on the sultan to intervene in the state’s political crisis and find an amicable solution. A similar memorandum of 5,000 signatures was also submitted to the sultan’s secretary on May 6. He said the front of Perak NGOs started with 25 NGOs on Feb 19 and later expanded to 43 consisting of 16 Chinese NGOs and 27 Malay NGOs and today the number has swelled to 50 with seven Indian NGOs joining the force.

Another speaker, Perak Indian Social Network (PINSO) committee member A Tingaran was more direct.

Enough of giving memorandums and petitions which will not work. An ultimatum must be given with a time frame for the palace and state government to work on it as it is the people who are suffering economically now,” he said. ABIM Perak chairperson and JAMA’IY deputy president Suhaimi Latip said: “Snap election is the best way to solve the political crisis in Perak.” He said the political storm was generated by political parties with the concept of “the end justifies the means.” Gabungan Solidatari Rakyat (Gasra) vice president Jenapala also expressed that submitting memorandums to the sultan will not work and instead called on Perakians to get ready for the next state election.

As of 12.50am today, the Star poll indicates a whopping 92% agreeing to go for fresh elections.

poll-thestar-perak

PSD scholarship results

May 13th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Last year, only 72 Indian students (it was 34 initially) were selected. with nearly 190 others appealing via MIC (187 students, three had scored 12 A1s, seven (11 A1s), 68 (10 A1s), 66 (9 A1s) and 43 (8A1s) in the 2007 Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia (SPM) examination.

Do we remember Kamine Devi who scored 10A1s?

PSD said 13A1 was the cutoff for the overseas scholarships. Last year 15,217 applications were received, out of which 7,253 were called for interview.

900 places went to normal students while 1100 taken by privileged community.

This year, my blog registered comments from few students who got rejected.

MCA and Gerakan has started the ball rolling:

MCA Youth chief Datuk Dr Wee Ka Siong has lambasted the Public Service Department (PSD) on the awarding of overseas scholarships for top scorers, Sin Chew Daily and China Press reported.

Dr Wee, who is also the Deputy Education Minister, said the MCA Youth has requested MCA president Datuk Seri Ong Tee Keat and three other MCA ministers to bring the matter to the Cabinet today.

This was to ascertain the procedure and criteria of awarding scholarships to students to study overseas, Dr Wee said after receiving complaints from two students, one with 14 1As and the other 13 1As, that they did not get overseas scholarships but were offered local matriculation courses instead.

Dr Wee said their friends who scored 9 1As were offered scholarships to study overseas.

He urged the PSD to be clear in its guidelines on awarding overseas scholarships.

Gerakan Youth secretary-general Dr Dominic Lau, commenting on five top scorers from Malacca who were denied overseas scholarships, also told Sin Chew that the wing was willing to offer help to students who were rejected by the PSD.

He also said the PSD should consider reviewing students who were turned down to give them a chance to pursue their studies overseas.

Even if they were rejected, an explanation should be given to them, said Dr Lau.

SMJK Sam Tet principal Phang Yoon Ming was also quoted by Sin Chew as saying that it seems to be more difficult to secure overseas scholarships from the PSD this year.

Phang said about 10 students had approached him to sign appeal letters.

At least some of them got places in matriculation!

So, what would it be this year? How many get and how many didn’t? This year also no transparency. No list for public to check on those who received – whether really chosen according to the criteria or not. With minimum cut off of 13A1s, it will be a heartache for those who scored between 8 and 12As as they have no choice but to do STPM, if not selected for local IPTA foundation or matriculation programmes. Those from well to do families can opt for private education. How about others? Can imagine 8As student doing diploma in politechnic (no offense but it shows the level of competition nowadays)? Those days, 4 or 5As were meaningful. Now 8As is common like pisang goreng stall along roadside.

So, while I wait for MIC’s report on Indian students, time to go find something to eat…hungry!!!