Archive for the ‘BornInMalaysia’ category

9A+ student gets diploma in English offer from JPA

May 26th, 2011
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Yet, another sad story. This “annual” affair really makes me angry. Such a simple thing also the authorities can’t get it right. Every year, JPA’s name gets spoilt and dragged through the mud. Really embarrassing. I hope the politicians repent and pray for forgiveness for causing misery to students.

This is really surprising case. I wonder if Hema was put through the MEDSI test to determine if she has the personality to be a teacher. If not, HOW did JPA identify which course is suitable for her? Especially, allocation a critical course (teaching) to a student?

 

 

Every year, we hear stories of high achievers not being able to secure government scholarships to pursue the courses of their choice despite fulfilling the necessary requirements. 

Heamanthaa Padmanaban was among those who had suffered this setback to follow her ambition to study medicine abroad and also did not qualify to take up a course in biotechnology locally.

The 17-year-old from Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan (SMK) Tuanku Jaafar in Seremban, Negri Sembilan, scored 9A+ and 1A in last year’s Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia (SPM) examinations and was an all-rounder in extra-curricular activities.

“I qualified for cross-country runs and played hockey at state level, and was a schools champion in chess and badminton.

NONEIn April last year I was among those chosen to participate in the Malaysia-America Soccer Exchange programme with 12 other women,” Heamanthaa (right) said toldMalaysiakini

All these, besides her academic qualification, were means to secure a Public Service Department (PSD) scholarship to achieve her dream of becoming a doctor. 

“I got the letter from PSD on May 13 and when I saw it I was happy thinking I must have qualified. 

“After reading the contents of the letter I felt as if all my efforts and everything I had strived for had shattered.

“I cried and when I told my mum about it she broke down crying, too, she couldn’t take it,” she recounted. 

Instead of an opportunity to study medicine or biotechnology, the petite and athletic looking Heamanthaa was offered a Diploma course in English at University Pendidikan Sultan Idris (UPSI).

If it was my ambition to teach English, I would have taken up the offer but I want to be a doctor. It doesn’t make sense,” she said.

‘I believed in the govt’

Although disappointed, she has appealed for an alternative offer as she is determined to become a doctor, specialising in oncology.

But without a scholarship, Heamanthaa’s chances of achieving her dream are bleak as her family may not be able to sustain and fund her tertiary education if she decides to pursue medicine privately. 

Her father deals in health products and her mother is a primary school teacher while her younger brother is in Form 4. 

“Private institutions have offered scholarships but they are only enough to pay tuition fees. I worked hard to study overseas and I believed in the government’s word that students with 9A+ will be given scholarships and also to study the courses of their choice,” said Heamanthaa. [worse case, just take the IPTS offer and study hard. Being 4th class citizen means you can’t be choosy]

In July last year, Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak announced that PSD scholarships would be awarded to all students, regardless of ethnicity, who managed to score 9As or higher, for either local or overseas studies.

On May 4, the cabinet decided that all students who scored 8As and above in the SPM would be eligible for PSD scholarships and Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Mohd Nazri Aziz reiterated that the promise will be kept. 

Later, Nazri had rubbished Deputy Education Minister Wee Ka Siong’s allegations of malpractice in the PSD’s selection of scholarship recipients. 

The minister also said the PSD’s focus includes medicine, dentistry, pharmacy, engineering, science and technology and several areas under social sciences.

“Two of my peers were offered medicine, one at a medical college in New Zealand and another at the International Medical University (IMU). [wonder what race the peers are]

“We all got more less the same grades but why didn’t I get any such offers? I want to do medicine and it is one of the critical courses under PSD,” said Heamanthaa.  [more or less? Need to be specific here!]

‘Think about our feelings’

She related that during her 45-minute interview with four PSD panel members on April 13, she was asked several perplexing questions.

“They asked me why doctors don’t want to work in rural areas; why PSD scholars don’t want to come back to the country to work; and what inspires me to be successful.” [these are not perplexing questions! Its fair and logical question to ask. Maybe she didn’t answer well?]

In PSD’s merit category – 85 percent is based on academic excellence, 10 percent on co-curricular activities and five percent on the interview. [but just because of the 5%, she can end up getting diploma in teaching???]

Heamanthaa’s father Padmanaban opined that it is unlikely for his daughter to fail her PSD interview, as she had received good remarks from the US Embassy visa approval officer when she attended an interview last year.

At a press conference yesterday, Heamanthaa said she had appealed to MCA and MIC as well as to several NGOs. 

“Please give it to those who are worthy, that’s all I ask, give scholarships to all those who deserve them,” she added. 

Imagine the anguish when their applications are rejected or not offered the courses they want, she said. 

Another who suffered the same fate as Heamanthaa was Chair Sheng Min from SMK St Joseph in Kuching, Sarawak who obtained 10As. He said he was only offered a scholarship to study engineering at Universiti Technology Petronas, while his two friends with 4As and 5As respectively were awarded scholarships to pursue science degrees in the United States.

“I hope this doesn’t get repeated again in the coming years and the issue is addressed once and for all,” Hemanthaa said. [dream on…, I’ve been wishing the same for years!]

 

source: http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/165143

72 percent of Malaysians optimistic about job prospects

May 26th, 2011
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Wow! We rank fourth in the world in terms of job prospects. Not sure if Malaysians thinking about jobs in the country or overseas. Probably a mix of both.

But then, the Wellness report says 83% of Malaysians consider themselves as suffering or struggling! Hmm…

Probably we are optimistic about getting jobs, but still worried about economy, cost of living, politics, health, environment, education, crime rates, and so on.

Malaysians are among the most upbeat in the world in terms of their employment outlook and ranked as the fourth most optimistic in the world over their job prospects in a Nielsen survey released today.

Malaysia surged to the fourth place globally in the first quarter of this year from sixth in the fourth quarter of 2010 in terms of consumer optimism about their job prospects.

Seventy-two per cent of online respondents in the survey described their job prospects as excellent or good over the next 12 months, compared to 70 per cent in the previous quarter. Across the Asia Pacific region, the average was 66 per cent.

Malaysia came in ahead of Switzerland in fifth place but behind top ranked India as well as Singapore and Saudi Arabia which were second and third most optimistic respectively.

“The positive response mirrored the good news on Malaysian exports which hit a record of RM64.1billion in March 2011, driven by the growth of shipments of goods including electrical and electronics as well as commodities — refined petroleum products and palm oil,” said Nielsen in a media release.

Malaysians fared less well, however, in terms of optimism over the economic outlook, coming in ninth and also expressed concern over their personal finances.

More than half — 55 per cent of online consumers surveyed — felt that the nation is not in an economic recession, compared to 49 per cent a quarter ago. About a third, or 27 per cent, of respondents believed the country is still in recession and anticipated that the recession would last for another 12 months.

“Malaysian consumers seemed concerned that inflationary pressures, rising food and fuel prices and potential interest rate hikes would reduce their disposable incomes,” said Nielsen.

The Nielsen survey also showed that Malaysia ranked second (41 per cent of online consumers) and sixth (33 per cent) globally when it comes to paying off debts/credit cards/loans and investing in shares/mutual funds respectively.

The survey was conducted by global information and measurement company Nielsen and was conducted between March 23 and April 12, 2011 and polled more than 28,000 consumers in 51 countries throughout Asia Pacific, Europe, Latin America, the Middle East, Africa and North America.

 

source: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/malaysians-4th-most-optimistic-globally-over-job-prospects/

 

Insurance for the poor registered under eKasih

May 26th, 2011
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


This is a good idea since it provides a safety net in case the head of the household dies. As its well documented that those in the low income background and underserved communities are more susceptible to illness, poverty, occupational hazard, and social ills, which can  lead to death, this insyurance scheme is well placed to provide temporary reprieve to the family who may have lost their sole breadwinner.

Only thing is the the amount is a bit low (RM10k to RM20k). I think it should be raised to RM30k  – RM50k, which of course will involve more cost for the government. Maybe can do it in stages. The RM10k sometimes is used up to settle debts and other expenses, and not to plan for future.

 

 

Women, Family and Community Development Minister Datuk Seri Shahrizat Abdul Jalil yesterday presented compen­sation money amounting to RM295,000 to 19 low-income families in Selangor whose heads of household had died.

She said insurance protection was among the initiatives under the National Key Results Area (NKRA) to give financial aid to low-income families when the heads of household were deceased.

The Government began providing life insurance protection against death or permanent disability to low-income families early this year.

“The insurance protection is given to heads of households, their spouses and their children under three schemes: life insurance, accident insurance and death khairat (benefits),” she said yesterday.

“All heads of households registered with the e-Kasih system under the Prime Minister’s Department up to January this year are eligible for protection under the schemes.”

She said the Government had allocated RM12mil to pay the annual insurance premiums to Allianz General Insurance Company (M) Bhd for 100,000 families nationwide.

“Allianz has paid compensation amounting to RM3mil following the death of about 200 heads of households,” she said.

Shahrizat said that in cases of death, the next of kin would get compensation of RM10,000 but if the head of a household sustained a permanent disability, he would get RM20,000, his spouse RM10,000 and his children RM5,000. — Bernama

source: http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2011/5/26/nation/8760620&sec=nation

ADUN Manoharan to sue Education Ministry over partially aided status of vernacular schools

May 24th, 2011
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Not sure why he wants to sue on behalf of Selangor schools only. Perhaps because he’s ADUN in Selangor. But if its applicable for one state, then can extend to others as well. Should get few ADUNs from other states to join in as well.

Obviously there are some guidelines on establishing the status of the school. The land on which the school stands on primarily is the main issue.  If any part of a schools is privately-owned, then it can’t be fully aided.  Probably the ADUN should look to change the guidelines or ensure the landowner donates the land to government.

 

Kota Alam Shah state assemblyperson M Manoharan has threatened to sue the Education Ministry for failing to recognise all vernacular schools in Selangor as fully-aided public schools. 

A notice of proceedings was issued to Education Minister Muhyiddin Yassin today, urging the ministry to fulfil Manoharan’s demands in 21 days, or else be slapped with the suit. 

According to the notice, there are a total of 108 national-type Chinese schools (SJKC) and 97 national-type Tamil schools (SJKT) in the state. 

“Regretfully, only 55 SJKC and 30 SJKT are categorised as fully-aided schools while 53 SJKC and 67 SJKT are categorised as partially-aided schools,” read the notice. 

Manoharan (right) argued that all schools should be treated fairly, in line with the federal constitution, to ensure racial harmony. But now, numerous schools in Malaysia’s most developed state are in deplorable conditions. 

Contacted for details, Manoharan cited the widely reported case of SJK (C) Chung Hua in Klang, which reportedly cannot even afford to pay its water and electricity bills.

“Students can’t even get decent food from the canteen because the operator cannot store food in the fridge because electricity is turned off at night. 

“This is because it is a partially-aided school. The government only pays the teachers’ salaries and nothing else,” he said. 

PE classes in carpark

He also cited the case of SJK (T) Batu 4 in Kampung Jawa where, despite having a student population of 900, there are no laboratories or library because all available space is used for classrooms. 

“There is also no field. Physical education classes takes place in the car park. Teachers, too, are affected. There are 55 of them, but only one toilet,” he said. 

He said that the situation distressed students, parents and teachers in partially-aided schools throughout the state. 

“Children must love to go to school. This is difficult for those in partially-aided schools, particularly Tamil schools. They are typically badly equipped and are as hot as boiler rooms, without proper facilities,” he said. 

Manoharan adds that he had taken up the issue because he had visited several badly affected schools in the state and is very distressed about the situation. 

“I feel it is a form of cleansing, a move to finish off vernacular schools. What is so difficult for the government to pay to upkeep the condition of schools? 

They spend millions lighting up certain places, millions on water splashing all over the place. Why can’t they afford money for education?” he asked.

 

source: http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/164491

Why roti canai costs 4 times more?

May 24th, 2011
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


So, why does our food cost a lot? According to the article below, its due to (i) rental price, (ii) worker cost, (iii) material cost, and (iv) hidden costs.

Logically, those tepi jalan stalls should be the cheapest places to eat (and yes indeed), but there are some stalls whom prices are equal to restaurants.

Some restaurants may reduce price by sourcing for lower quality products as raw material. This brings down the cost for materials.

Others may hire illegal workers, which also brings down the cost a bit.

Some become creative and reduce the portion of the food, or use smaller plates to play tricks on our eyes.

 

To understand why Malaysians are charged four times more for a 20-sen roti canai, CHAI MEI LING and TAN CHOE CHOE delve into the economics of food to dissect the prices of popular fare

WHY is it that we pay RM3.50 for a bowl of instant noodles when the same amount can get us five packets from the hypermarket?

What is the real cost of a plate of nasi lemak, fried rice and roti canai?

To answer these questions, the New Sunday Times team got insiders from the food and beverage industry to open up on the sensitive and tricky issue of pricing.

The truth is the actual cost of most Malaysian staples is just one-third of the price we are paying.

For example, it takes only slightly more than RM1 to whip up an average plate of char kuey teow, which sells for RM4 at a regular outlet.

Roti telur, the actual cost a mere 60 sen, is priced at RM1.80.

As drinks cost much less to prepare, businesses reap an even higher profit margin.

On an average, consumers fork out five times the actual cost of a drink. It takes, for instance, 30 sen to come up with a glass of teh tarik that we pay RM1.50 for.

These lopsided equations may raise the question of unfair trade practices, but traders argue that there are other factors that need to be taken into account.

Rental, workers’ wages, hidden costs and profit are also worked into the price tag, they say.

Of them all, rental carries the most weight, says business operator and chef Khairul Arifin Ismail.

At the high-end restaurant where he works, rent amounts to an astronomical RM40,000 a month.

“Rent is the biggest expenditure for businesses housed in a proper lot. It’s a fixed amount. It’s not something traders can change. Some business people struggle just to pay the rent.”

It is not surprising then that 30 to 40 per cent of what we pay for is attributed to rental. Other factors give business owners more flexibility in fixing an amount that can maximise their profit.

For example, many opt for foreign labour which costs less. This is especially when locals fresh out of school are now demanding up to RM1,000 pay a month.

Workers’ wages normally make up 15 to 25 per cent of the food price, says Khairul.

Businesses also have to contend with wastage and hidden costs, such as food packaging, wear and tear of equipment and miscellaneous items such as tissue paper and plastic cutlery.

If businesses are prudent, they can bring it down to five per cent of the food pricing, and thus channel more of the savings into profits.

With all these to juggle, striking a balance between costs and profit is a huge challenge for businesses. Fix a price too low and one ends up running a loss; charge too high and one risks losing patrons.

To come up with competitive prices, operators depend on experience and business acumen.

Marcus Poon, for one, feels the price of his food items are “reasonable”, if not bordering on cheap.

Poon operates a WiFi-enabled, air-conditioned cafe that serves a combination of Asian and Western cuisine near a residential area in the Klang Valley.

His competitors include hawker stalls and several other cafes in the area.

“Most of my food items cost 35 to 45 per cent of the price I charge. But that is just the cost of materials.

“When you take the cost of labour and rental into consideration, the total cost per item is about 65 to 75 per cent,” says Poon.

So, a profit of between 25 and 35 per cent is reasonable, he adds.

“The F&B business is getting increasingly competitive these days and consumers are spoilt for choice. Although my profit margin is supposedly about one-third of the price, my turnover is not that high,” says Poon.

Khairul says a profit of 20 to 30 per cent is considered normal for any budget and medium-sized business, but high-end restaurants and hotels mostly take home a profit margin of about 10 per cent because of the high costs of investment.

Even then, they are the biggest takers as the value of the margin is much bigger than the profit of smaller businesses.

“A hotel that charges RM45 for a plate of fried rice may gain a 15 per cent profit after deducting all the other expenses that come in the form of a gold-rimmed plate, air-conditioning, expensive tablecloth, good service and such. The value is almost RM7.

“Comparatively, at a normal eatery, a 30 per cent profit amounts to only RM1.20.”

Sometimes, the price of a dish is reflective of the labour that goes into preparing it.

“There’s more to a packet of nasi lemak than it seems. Making the sambal takes a lot of effort,” says Khairul, who has 20 years of experience in the food industry.

“Many people think that nasi beriani gam, which sells at RM8 to RM9 a plate, is expensive. But the process of making it is tedious. We’re also paying for the process, not just for the materials.”

Poon says consumers should appreciate that the prices they pay are also for the ambience of the restaurant.

“Wallpaper, decorations and renovations — all these cost money but we cannot factor these into the calculation of the prices of food items we sell. At least, not in this neighbourhood.”

But this doesn’t mean that he can choose not to repair, upgrade or renovate his cafe because “every restaurateur has to strive to differentiate themselves from others”.

“Everyone likes a concept store these days. Some places sell yucky food at exorbitant prices, but if the concept or design of the shop is appealing, people will still come.

“Ultimately, it is very much a demand and supply situation,” says Poon.

Lim Hui San, a single mother with three children who operates a hawker stall in Jinjang, Kuala Lumpur, says the food business does not promise huge returns.

She says the material cost of a plate of char kuey teow with shrimps, blood cockles and bean sprouts is RM1.20. She sells a plate at RM3.80. On a good day, she can sell up to 80 plates.

Similarly, her profit margin is about 30 per cent after deducting the cost of rental and labour.

“But the coffee shop where I operate my stall only opens six days a week and it also closes shop on public holidays. I also have to pay a local assistant RM1,200 a month.

“I could easily get an illegal for less, probably RM700 to RM800, but I’m trying not to.”

Lim earns about RM2,000 to RM3,000 a month.

“A respectable amountlah. Any less and I would not know how to survive in Kuala Lumpur.”

source: http://www.nst.com.my/nst/articles/10mfo/Article/#ixzz1MrG83EVh