Archive for the ‘Indian’ category

Police report on Koperasi Pekerja Jaya

July 26th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Another police report against MIC. This time related to Koperasi Pekerja Jaya Berhad (KPJ) in Perak. An ex-MIC member, M Lokanathan makes the report:

A disgruntled ex-MIC member has lodged a police report against several top party leaders, alleging criminal breach of trust involving land given to Koperasi Pekerja Jaya Berhad (KPJ) in Perak.
Former MIC Sungai Siput division chairman M. Loka- nathan, 51, lodged the report at the Sungai Siput Utara police station on Wednesday.

The land was part of a 20ha parcel given by the Perak government in 1982.

More than 1,300 houses were built and sold by KPJ, About 100 lots were sold to third parties but the money was never accounted for, Lokanathan said.

Between 1998 and 2006, plots in Taman Tun Sambanthan were transferred to Loka-nathan’s company, before he sold them to third parties.
He said he passed the money to co-operative leaders, but failed to find out what happened to the money.

Government consider converting Tamil schools status if land issue settled

July 26th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


There was a meeting on Thursday to discuss about the partially-aided Tamil schools, chaired by Education Minister, Hishamuddin. Others included Devamany, Murugiah (PPP), Saravanan.

The meeting repeated the same mantra on the schools being on private or estate land, but this time there are plans to get those lands from the plantation/private companies and convert to government owned. With quite a number of schools on GLC lands, it should not be a problem, and should have never been a hurdle in the first place.

While the report says there are about 250 (or half the schools) were in private land, if I’m not mistaken, more than 320 schools (about 2/3) are partially aided.

There should also be efforts to relocate under-enrolled schools to other places. Education Ministry should set up a channel for residents/community to forward their requests. If there are ample number of potential students, let’s say 200 of them, then relocation must be seriously considered.

But what made me stand up was the news report in Minnal FM which says that MIC was thankful for government to converting schools after getting the land from plantations. This is quite misleading because the meeting highlighted the possibility only, and nothing has been done yet.

One have to ask why this effort is being taken now. What was the catalyst? Obviously Samy Vellu and MIC 😉

From the Star:

KUALA LUMPUR: The Government will consider converting the status of partially aided Tamil primary schools to fully aided, if the land issue can be solved.

Education Minister Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Tun Hussein said the problem was that about 250 Tamil primary schools were presently built on estate land.
Status problem: Hishammuddin (right), Deputy Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department S.K. Devamany (middle) and Deputy Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Senator T. Murugiah holding copies of the ministry’s reports on the status of Tamil primary schools after the meeting yesterday.

“We can’t have a fully aided school if the land doesn’t belong to us,” he told reporters after chairing a special committee meeting to overcome Tamil school issues.

He said the ministry had to identify if the land belonged to government-linked companies, private companies or individuals.

Besides land, he said, the Government also had to look at other issues such as the supply of teachers, upgrading of schools and under-enrolled schools.

“There is no point converting a school if it only has three pupils. This is why in our meeting, we identified the actual number of pupils and schools, schools which need to be upgraded or are overcrowded,” he said.

There are presently 523 Tamil primary schools in the country.

He said the committee found that the overall situation at Tamil primary schools was not as bad as painted by some parties.

“We are also working closely with the Plantation Industries and Commodities Ministry to upgrade the infrastructure of Tamil schools in plantations,” he said.

Hishammuddin said 171 applications had been approved in cases of children who do not have birth certificates as long as their parents obtained a confirmation letter from their village headman or the Village Development and Safety Committee (JKKK) head to allow them to go to school.

A bit on Tamil Schools

July 26th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Taken from the NST:

MUCH has been said and written about the plight of Tamil schools in the country, often said to be treated as the step- child or, as an educationist puts it, “the Cinderella of the Malaysian educational system”.

But who is treating it as a stepchild? Most fingers point at the government, but there are several pointing at the Indian community itself.

Comparisons are sometimes made with Chinese schools which, like most Tamil schools, are not fully funded by the government.

Malaysian Indian Businessmen Association president P. Sivakumar dismisses outright claims that the community is not doing enough to assist Tamil schools.

If not for private donors and wealthy businessmen from the community, Sivakumar argues, half of the 523 Tamil schools in the country would have been closed down a long time ago.
He cites a recent example where a hall for a Yahya Awal Tamil school in Johor Baru, costing RM700,000, was built with public donations.

Does this mean the community can now stop asking for government handouts? Can it become like the Chinese community, which even runs private independent schools?

Sivakumar says it is unfair to compare the two communities.

“Almost 90 per cent of the (Indian) community are wage earners. There is no way for these people to contribute when they themselves often do not have enough. “It is high time these schools were turned into fully-funded schools. Don’t drag out the problem any more.”

Education, Welfare and Research Foundation Malaysia (EWRF) president S.P. Pathi agrees that the community cannot take care of the Tamil schools on its own. He dismisses as illogical the comparison between the Indians and the Chinese as economically, the Indians were way behind them. “About 10 years ago, 85 per cent of the Tamil school-going pupils came from families earning RM1,200 and below. Things have not changed much,” he says.

A dissenting voice comes from YSS director of policy research, K. Manikam.

“Many businessmen and well-to-do Indians are not coming forward to help Tamil schools,” says Manikam, who has been involved in Tamil school issues for eight years. “Most Indians are willing to spend on temples rather than Tamil schools. Temples are given very little allocation but Indians fork out their own money and build big temples costing millions of ringgit. “Why can’t the same be done for Tamil schools?”

Manikam says the community must take the initiative to invest its resources in primary education.

Perhaps there is another major difference between Chinese and Tamil schools.

The Chinese, although speaking different dialects at home, have a common “Chinese language” in Mandarin whereas Tamil schools are mainly for Tamils and not for all Indians, who have their own written and spoken languages. This could be why, although there is a growing number of well-to-do Indians, the contribution to Tamil schools remains small.

Manikam agrees that most of the other sub-ethnic groups like the Telugus, Malayalees and Punjabis prefer not to send their children to Tamil schools as it is not their mother tongue. “The English-speaking and non-Tamil speaking families also prefer to send their children to national schools. “Many feel it is beneath their status to send their children to Tamil schools as most of the pupils there are from poor families,” he says.

Tamil schools in the country began in 1816 when the first was established in Penang. More followed with the opening up of rubber estates although not all owners supported or provided funds. Things improved in the 1930s when the Indian government raised the issue of the treatment of Indian labourers with the colonial government in then-Malaya. Soon, the government started providing financial aid and teacher training and appointed inspectors for Tamil schools.

At its height in 1957, there were 888 Tamil schools, but the number had fallen to 523 by last year. Nevertheless, the enrolment has seen a 108 per cent increase, rising from 50,766 pupils in 1957 to 105,618 pupils last year. The number of teachers has also risen from 3,258 teachers in 1970, to 7,126 last year. The numbers clearly show that there is a demand for places in Tamil schools.

Or is it a case of parents having no choice but to send their children to such schools because national schools are too far from their homes?

Manikam says there is an increase in the enrolment in Tamil schools because of the improvement in academic performances. “In 2002, only 45 pupils scored 7As in their UPSR but the number increased to 583 pupils last year,” he says.

Uthaya rejects rehabilitation

July 22nd, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


As reported in Malaysiakini, Uthayakumar had refused to attend a rehabilitation programme organised by the police special branch on July 10. According to Waytha, Uthaya refused under the provisos of Article 95 of the United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners which states that prisoners without charge are not subject to rehabilitation.

Uthayakumar’s detention is in violation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948 of which Malaysia is a signatory.

(It) specifically provides that there shall be no detention without trial, provides the right to personal liberty and fair trial and that a person is innocent until proven guilty.

According to Hindraf’s lawyer, N Surendran:

Any attempt to compel him (Uthayakumar) would be illegal, unlawful and in breach of all international laws.

If they dare to force him, we will be forced to take the matter to court.

Asked if Uthayakumar’s refusal would impede the efforts to secure his release, Surendran said the former, who is a lawyer himself, was
willing to face the repercussions.

Our conditions are that he must be released unconditionally which means that he must not be obligated to attend any rehabilitation or anything of the sort.

Obviously, this means a longer stay in ISA. But I wonder why news that the other four rejected such rehabilitation did not appear. Were they not subjected to these programmes or did they agree to attend it (bearing in mind that Uthaya is the only one without a wife and kids)?

fight during forum on PHEB sign of problem

July 22nd, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


The following appeared in Malaysiakini:

A public forum to discuss the Penang Hindu Endowments Board (PHEB) on Saturday night was marred by not one but two separate incidents.A speaker at the forum was allegedly punched by an irate ex-MIC politician after the event in Butterworth had ended. Last night, a police report was lodged in Jalan Patani police state alleging R Arunasalam of assaulting retired civil servant, K Balakrishnan, 62. The incident allegedly happened at the Sri Mariamman Hall when Balakrishnan was talking with a few friends after the forum.

The former MIC politician, who did not attend the forum, had stormed into the hall at about 11pm and hit Balakrishnan twice at the back of his neck, and accused the forum speaker of criticising him in his speech.

According to witnesses, Balakrishnan, a diabetic patient and currently undergoing dialysis treatment for kidney failure, nearly fainted from the assault. The furious MIC politician, who had to be escorted out from the hall, allegedly hurled verbal abuses against Balakrishnan before leaving.

It is learnt that the politician, a staunch supporter of former MIC deputy president S Subramaniam, has been short-listed for appointment as a chairperson in one of the five Hindu temples under the jurisdiction of PHEB, a statutory board of trustees.

Earlier, Balakrishnan had raised his reservations over the purported appointment, and criticised the DAP-dominated PHEB for attempting to appoint the politician on grounds that “he had on numerous previous occasions called for the government to abolish the board”.

Police told Malaysiakini that the case would be investigated immediately for it involved a ‘VIP’.

The United Hindu Religious Council and Penang Makkal Sakti Welfare Association (Pemaswa) jointly organise the forum, which was officiated by Padang Serai member of parliament N Gobalakrishnan.

Earlier, during the forum’s question-and-answer session, a youth criticised the forum as irrelevant and lambasted Pemaswa leadership of “misusing and abusing” the spirit of Makkal Sakti (people’s power), a popular tagline for the Hindu Rights Action Force (Hindraf).

Identifying himself only as Satish from Hindraf, the youth in his early 20s, hurled abuses at the organisers and abruptly demanded a ‘vote of no-confidence’ on the forum’s organisers. He also called on about 200 people at the forum to stage a walkout, but no one heeded him as he left the hall.

When contacted, Hindraf national coordinator RS Thanenthiran denied that the youth was a Hindraf supporter and said the movement would never allow its supporters to behave in such a manner at a public forum. “Hindraf condemned such unruly behaviour,” he told Malaysiakini.

Organisers later told Malaysiakini the youth was ‘an agent’ deliberately sent to cause disruptions to the forum, and criticised the tactic as a “shameful cowardice act ala MIC.”

Several PHEB commissioners and DAP assemblypersons are said to have used unethical methods to halt the forum since Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng, a Bagan MP, have declined the invitation to officiate it. Even though Lim has earlier indicated his desire to attend the forum, he spurned the offer citing an overload of work. Similarly Bagan Jermal state assemblyperson Lim Hock Seng also declined when he was invited instead. Both politicians are said to be influenced by certain quarters not to go to the forum.

This has apparently infuriated many Bagan’s Indian constituents, who have backed the DAP in the recent general election.

The forum organisers, an influential group among the Indian community in Penang mainland, warned that this controversy would be a major problem for the DAP-led state government if left unresolved.