Armed with sticks?

/* February 8th, 2010 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


If the below news is correct, the it casts a very negative view of the police. How can they allow people carrying sticks into the building? Imagine if something happened and people got hurt? The police acted unnecessarily tough during harmless protests like November 25 or PJ candle light vigils, but didn’t do anything to stop protestors from moving from approved location to elsewhere, possibly armed with sticks? If act like this, how to earn respect from public la? Common people like me also will have a negative impression.

Jelutong MP Jeff Ooi, who was also present together with Komtar assemblyman Ng Wei Aik, claimed the police had not acted against the protesters who moved from the mosque to Komtar.

Ng said police should also investigate why a group of protesters had gone into the state administrative office in Komtar armed with sticks but were not stopped by police that day.

Say No to Alcohol by MHS

/* February 8th, 2010 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Few other groups are doing what they can to highlight dangers of alcohol. Its a good idea for MHS to work together with many other NGOs, Health Ministry and schools.

The packaging and positioning of alcoholic drinks in colorful, fizzy-like covers mislead people. The bombarding advertisements in newspapers, billboards, and cinema is also a major concern. I think a total ban on advertisement is needed.

The sales of samsu and illegal alcohol is also another problem. Cheaper means more accessible. And once you are hooked, its not easy to let go.

I think the acceptance of alcohol in social events and daily life is also a reason for rampant and indiscrete consumption. In the west, the dietary pattern and climate is not same as here. Thus, we have less reason to follow the alcohol use, especially on the pretext of “health”.  There’s more than one way to skin a cat, and if one is looking for better memory power, or improved blood circulation or living longer, then alcohol is not the only avenue. There are many other food and activities that can provide equal benefits sans the damage.

Alcohol’s damage far outweighs its benefits, especially in the long run, as many research indicates. While we are young, we have to energy to push our bodies and to sustain the impact of alcohol. But later in life? Can we live with damaged kidneys, damaged liver, weakening eyesights, offspring with physical/mental problems,  etc.?

Its critical to fight the menace of alcohol from health and social impact angle, instead of religion.  What entertainment idols, parents and adults do are what children imitate. The couldn’t care less attitude of youths and adults, in the name of freedom, equal rights, anti-establishment, business, stress, and so on, for me, is just excuses to consume alcohol, nothing more, nothing less. Its a pity when idea of a good time for us means a bottle of alcohol among others.

Alcohol also contributes towards accidents and vandalism especially among youths and young adults. This involves loss of life and increased maintenance cost. While totally banning alcohol is not possible, a more forceful education campaign is needed. Alcohol companies must be roped in to contribute some cash for education of alcohol impact and also on responsible consumption. This must cover fertile areas like colleges, housing areas, restaurants etc.

I always ask alcohol consumers if they can live without alcohol for a period of time, like a month or two. If you consume alcohol, and think that you are not addicted to it (in fact, you may even swear to it!), then try to abstain for one or two months. See if you can live without it. If you have to fight the temptation to consume alcohol daily during that abstaining period, then need to reexamine your lifestyle.

Anyway, good luck to MHS on their initiative:

Malaysia Hindu Sangam has declared war on alcoholism among the younger generation with the first move being adopting a dual approach to exorcize this particular devil through legislation and enforcement.

“We want to make under-aged drinking an offence punishable by being locked up for two days, “said its youth leader Arun Doraisamy today.

He said this at MHS’s consultation forum entitled Alcohol Laws in Malaysia 2010: National Review of Alcohol Laws, Policies and Programs.

In addition there are also suggestion to raise the age limit for drinking from 18 to 21.

He also suggested that a tier based taxation be adopted based on alcohol content instead of the standard 10% .

In the long term Arun called for the establishment of a research centre – tentatively named Malaysian Alcohol Prevention, Research and Rehabilitation Centre

These were among the 12 legislative proposals put forward today.

Need holistic approach

In addition to the proposals, participants at the session also called for a holistic approach to resolve the issue.

A Gunapathy of Yayasan Strategik Sosial suggested that MHS should concentrate more on families in high risk areas.

Vice president of Education Welfare Research Foundation (EWRF) T Rajasegaran who has been working with Indian children, aged between 12-14, said that the root of the problem lies with the fathers who do not play their role in bringing up their offspring, hence the urgent need for a change in the mind set.

Maria Chin Abdullah of Empower and Ahmad Safarudin Yusof of Malaysian Muslim Youth Organisation (ABIM) along with a host of 20 Indian NGOs attended the discussion session.

Both were supportive of the program.

Ahmad told the participants that ABIM would be conducting a program on alcohol abuse soon.

MIC recommendations for 10th Malaysia Plan

/* February 8th, 2010 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


While MIC diligently does its usual act – delivering memorandums, proposals, requests, and invitation, among others, I hope the results of recommendation for 9th Malaysian plan is published for public viewing later.  It will be interesting to know how the recommendation was implemented and the results of those implementation. Anyway, the current recommendation has been developed based on input by NGOs and UM, so hopefully its given due attention.

Anyway, who else sends recommendations to federal government on behalf of Indian community? HINDRAF’s documents ends up in you-know-where. Perhaps MAICCI and MHS are the only others who have some resemblance of rapport with government.

MMSP and IPF? I think they are preoccupied with something more down to earth.

So, its not like the community has much choice.

The MIC will submit its 12 recommendations on the Indian community’s “Agenda for Development” to the Government before the end of this month for inclusion in the 10th Malaysia Plan (10MP), party president Datuk Seri S. Samy Vellu said.

He said the recommendations would be discussed at a special MIC Central Working Committee (CWC) meeting on Thursday.

Samy Vellu said the recommendations were drafted by the MIC with the cooperation of 75 Indian-based non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and University Malaya’s Ethnic Studies Department.

“We have prepared a comprehensive report that took us more than three months,” he told reporters before handing out cheques to 825 Tamil school students who obtained 7As in last year’s Ujian Penilaian Sekolah Rendah (UPSR) examination here on Sunday.

He said the recommendations, among others, included special initiatives for Indians in the education, economic, training, housing, employment and women’s affairs fields.

Samy Vellu said it was the first time that the MIC had sought the views and proposals of many NGOs and an institution of higher learning to prepare its recommendations.

“Before this, the recommendations (for the Malaysia plans) were drafted by experts and academicians roped in by the MIC but this time we wanted the ordinary people to give their input and feedback through the NGOs,” he said.

Samy Vellu said he hoped that the Government would study the party’s recommendations and make the necessary adjustments to the 10MP, which was expected to be tabled in Parliament in June.

On the MIC’s rejuvenation exercise, Samy Vellu said the results had been “very positive”, with more Indians seeking the assistance of the party for various problems.[I think the concept of access to public service via political party channel is a factor for the assistance seeking.]

“We now get between 100 and 200 people coming to the MIC headquarters daily to seek our help, and if this is to be used as a yardstick to gauge the support of the Indians for the MIC, then we are on the right track,” he said. [This is expected as  MIC is the bridge to access federal government and departments- in terms of financial help, TEKUN loan, education, welfare, contracts, etc.]

Samy Vellu said with more Indians seeking the party’s assistance, he had decided to reintroduce his weekly meet-the-people session every Tuesday at the MIC headquarters beginning next month.

He also said that the party had launched the “People First Programme” in all its 3,600 branches nationwide where at least one major programme involving the community had to be carried out by the branches every month.

“We have started to monitor the branches and soon we will be evaluating them through a high-level score card, key performance indicators and star ratings,” he added. – BERNAMA

Masing Masing Sack Party

/* February 2nd, 2010 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


I guess you know what I’m taking about 🙂

Latest news says there’s two presidents (but I think its three actually, including Thanenthiran, since ROS haven’t replied):

The crisis-ridden Malaysia Makkal Sakti Party (MMSP) is set to have two presidents by this weekend.

The 14 central committee (CC) members, who sacked the party founding-president RS as a member on Jan 17, will appoint a stand-in president during a scheduled CC meeting in Shah Alam on Sunday Feb 7.

Two names have been submitted so far by the two factions within the party.

The pro-Thanenthiran faction are championing Klang-based businessman ‘Ohms’ P Thiagarajan – a close friend of former MIC deputy president S Subramaniam.

However, the anti-Thanenthiran faction is proposing another name as well – R Kenghadaran, a former detainee under the Internal Security Act.

Rival faction leader and MMSP secretary-general R Kannan said both names would be tabled for the perusal of the 14-member CC.

Once a ‘new president’ was appointed, an extraordinary general meeting (EGM) would be held to legitimately select a new president.

Until the EGM happens, the MMSP would have two presidents next week – one heading each faction. The result will be Malaysia’s latest Indian-based party having two parties, two constitutions, two presidents and two CCs.

Thanenthiran (right), on the other hand, has already sacked the 14 ‘troublemakers’ from MMSP, staking his claim to being ultimate party president.

MMSP was launched by Barisan Nasional chairperson and Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak last October as a breakaway group from Hindu Rights Action Force (Hindraf) and intended to help Najib and his Umno-dominated federal government to regain lost Indian electoral ground.

However, as predicted by political pundits then and now, MMSP had split and was believed to be nearing a natural demise.

Both factions have now referred their cases to the Registrar of Societies (ROS) to decide the legitimate inheritor of MMSP – meaning Najib is set to have the final say on the fate of MMSP.

I lost count of who sacked who, and who appointed who. Go ahead and read the articles below, and hopefully someone can enlighten us poor folks.

CC members vote to remove Thanenthiran

Deputy president, A. Vathemoorthy, is the acting president

Office locked, things missing

ROS informed of Thanenthiran sacking

President supporter says sacking illegal

Thanenthiran should quit

President sacks 14 CC members

Sacking each other

Reply by Thanenthiran after returning from India

Both claim to be president

Claims on Thanenthiran’s improper actions

OHMS for President?

I didn’t realise allocation finishing???

/* February 2nd, 2010 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


What kind of representative is this la? Need to go for financial management course before standing for re-election. Not knowing the status and details of allocations is a pathetic excuse. Leaving this to aides to run the office is fine, but that doesn’t absolve you of anything. Its your responsibility and your head on the block.

Selangor state executive councillor Ronnie Liu admitted he did not realise he had used almost all of his RM600,000 annual allocation for 2009 in the first six months.

He was in fact surprised when informed by the Special Select Committee on Competency, Accountability and Transparency (Selcat) of the Selangor State Assembly that 99% of his allocation had been used between January and June.

Liu, the state Local Government Committee chairman, said he only knew that a large portion of the allocation had been spent when his personal assistant told him “wang cepat habis” (the money was running out fast).

Liu was hauled before a Selcat inquiry yesterday at the state secretariat building here to explain excessive expenditures of annual allocations.

“The situation in and around my constituency is unique. There are many active associations, temples and churches.

“They request for my financial help. There is a lot of pressure on my part,” said the Pandamaran state assemblyman.

When Selcat panel member Saari Sungib asked Liu what did he do to source for money after June when his allocation dried up, the exco member replied he pledged funds to organisations by using loans and next year’s allocation.

He had pledged about RM120,000 until the end of last year.

Saari then asked him: “Aren’t you a politician who promises too much?” Liu replied: “These are promises I can keep. The money will not be given out immediately. The recipients understand this.”

Another Selcat panel member Mohamed Azmin Ali asked why the allocation disbursed via cheques to 43 organisations had named individuals as recipients, and Liu said: “That is a good question.

“I do not know why such a mechanism was used. I will direct my three personal assistants to change the names of the recipients to the associations.” [this is recipe for disaster. MACC will be gleefully investigate this!]

Seri Setia assemblyman Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad and Sri Muda assemblyman Shuhaimi Shafiei were the other two leaders who have used more than 70% of their allocations from January to June 2009.

Nik Nazmi had used up 88% of his funds while Shuhaimi had spent 72%.

Later at a press conference, Selcat chairman Teng Chang Khim commended Nik Nazmi and Shuhaimi, describing them as “superb” in answering questions posed by the panel members.

“Nik Nazmi adhered to the guidelines by using 30% of his allocation for small projects and is very familiar with his account.

“Shuhaimi explained that his area encountered three floods in December 2008 and January the following year,” he said.

NST has more juicy details:

Pandamaran assemblyman Ronnie Liu pleaded ignorance and blamed his personal assistant for his financial predicament on the last day of the Select Committee on Competency, Accountability and Transparency (Selcat) hearing yesterday.Liu, who was the first Pakatan Rakyat representative called as a witness before Selcat, spent 99.01 per cent of his RM618,042.34 constituency allocation last year in six months (from January to June). [who is elected rep, Ronnie or his assistant?]

He said he did not realise that he had spent almost all his constituency allocation by June as he was not in charge of the accounts and was never informed by his personal assistant Tee Boon Hock that it had almost run out of money.

My personal assistant was in charge of the accounts and because he is also a local councillor, he did not have the time to tell me.

“He just said, ‘YB, the money is finishing fast’. I was surprised when I was told by Selcat that 99 per cent of my constituency allocation had been spent.”

He was one of the first Pakatan representatives who disclosed to the public that most Barisan Nasional assemblymen in Selangor had spent their annual constituency allocations within the first three months in 2008.

Liu, who is state executive councillor in charge of local government and research, claimed most of his allocation went to schools, non-governmental and religious associations, adding that he was under pressure to contribute.

Selcat chairman Teng Chang Khim said Liu could not make such a claim as only 40 of the 168 applications for contributions were from schools and organisations.

Liu, however, disagreed. Teng then ordered him to read out loud each of the organisation which received funds from him.

It turned out that 43 of 168 contributions were made to associations and religious bodies and this amounted to 25 per cent of the allocations.

Moreover, none of the allocations was spent on small projects and of the 168 che-ques issued, 167 were to Tee. [this is not a good news!]

Liu was also grilled by the panel on his “pledges” to give money to associations after his allocations ran out and his decision to borrow money to hold functions. [borrowing money is also not good sign]

By the end of last year, Liu had pledged an additional RM120,000, which was to be paid with this year’s allocation.

Teng said: “What circular or guideline did you use to make such a decision?

“If the state assembly was to be dissolved tomorrow, how would you pay for it?”

I think Ronnie Liu is in deep, deep trouble.