Tamil Schools Board in plan

/* October 27th, 2009 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


This is an interesting news. Three NGOs have come together to organise a seminar to brainstorm on the idea of setting up Tamil schools boards for all the remaining schools.  Hopefully by establishing such boards, the schools can be developed with better coordination. We don’t want to hear the boards being used as tool by political parties for the personal or party benefits.

A seminar on the formation of Tamil school boards will be organised soon. The boards are being formed to handle issues concerning Tamil schools.

The Tamil Foundation, Education Welfare Research Foundation (EWRF) and Child Information Learning Development Centre are the joint organisers of the seminar.

Both the Tamil Foundation and EWRF will be playing a consultative role for the formation of the school boards.

“Presently less than 10 percent of the 523 Tamil schools have school boards whereas 100 percent of Chinese schools have them,” said Tamil Foundation president, A Soorian.

He also explained that prior to independence, estate management formed school boards to pay salaries to the teachers.

The role has since been taken over by the government as teachers are recruited directly by the government.

The Tamil school boards that are to be formed would, however, play a different role.

“The school board would be playing a role in everything that is related to the development of the schools.

“It would also look into school land and school building issues because most schools are partially aided.”

Of the 523 Tamil schools, 373 of them are partially aided schools.

K Arumugam (left), also of the Tamil Foundation, also stressed on the need for school boards.

“School boards are a requirement for partially aided schools in accordance to the Education Act.

“However this has been neglected, which has not been the case for Chinese schools.

“We want Tamil schools to have a facelift that would match the status of Chinese schools.”

EWRF president S Pasupathi, when contacted, hoped that the formation of school boards would bring out the best in Tamil schools.

“The success of Chinese and missionary schools was largely due to the presence of school boards.

“A school board would be made up of well wishers, old boys association, the parent teachers association (PTA) and people appointed by the ministry, unlike the PTAs.”

Among those who are expected to attend the seminar are Deputy Education Minister, Wee Ka Siong and Education Ministry director general, Alimuddin Mohd Dom.

Tamil school headmasters, PTA heads, and members of the present school boards have also been invited to share their thoughts and ideas on the formation of the boards in Tamil schools.

The seminar is scheduled to be held on Saturday, Oct 31 at the NUPW Hall, from 8.30 am to 2.00pm.

Shah Alam temple photos, moratorium idea and temple building

/* October 26th, 2009 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


MalaysianIndian1 Blog has some pictures of the said altar/shrine/temple before it was demolished, while Human Rights Party website has the scanned photos from newspapers post-demolishment.

Looking at the photos, I noticed the deities seem to resemble those found in Chinese places of worship.

So, is a proper religious site or used for obtaining 4D numbers as claimed by MBSA? Does it really matter? Its on government land, so they have right to demolish structure.  But is this considered temple, shrine or altar?

Very confusing. Anyway, MIC Youth wing advisor Vell Paari opined that a moratorium is placed on all Hindu temple demolitions until an amicable solution is reached on the status of these temples in the country. He said a  3 to 5 year period is needed for a “all-party” committee include stakeholders from state governments, political parties, civil societies, religious bodies, and temples,  to establish proper guidelines on Hindu temples. He further mentioned that till a proper guideline enforced with political will is established, temple demolishment issues will be used by political parties as part of the blame game, and the worshippers are the ones who suffer in the end.

I think it comes back to the culture. The Indians are known to be temple builders since thousands of years ago. Life practically evolved around temples if one observes cities in India, especially in southern states.  Things have changed a bit in recent years, as more of them embrace modernity. The “educated” tend to spend less time involved in temples but focus more on economic concerns. The rest still depend a lot on divine interception.  An ant hill or tree trunk can be converted into a place of worship easily. The story in Mahabaratham – Eklavya who makes a clay figure of his guru and learns archery by himself, comes to mind. Even in housing areas, there are residents who build an altar at their car porch area and do prayers till wee hours of night.

Asking the Malaysian Indians to not simply built temples everywhere is one of the possible steps, but how about those places already in existence? MHS is doing study on temples at myhindutemples.com for starters. Do we need some sort of committee at national level? Or to be handled by each states accordingly? Would it be proper to establish one under PM Dept or Ministry of Unity, for example?

Is accepting the culture of the Indian community part of 1Malaysia (or whatever)? If we are to accept others as they are, with warts and all, it should be the same the other way around, no?

MBSA says its altar used for 4D prediction

/* October 23rd, 2009 by poobalan | View blog reactions 1 comment »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


My earlier post was about the temple demolishment in Shah Alam, which was highlighted by PKR’s Manikavasagam yesterday and also newspapers today. However, MBSA issued statement (read in Malaysiakini) later today that the demolished structure was an “altar” used by few people to obtain 4D predictions.

Shah Alam Municipal Council (MBSA) deputy mayor, Mokhtar Hani said it was not a temple that was demolished as alleged by MIC, but rather an altar used by punters to obtain lucky numbers, built illegally on government land.

“We demolished an illegal structure, following complaints by the Jabatan Kerjaraya Daerah Petaling Jaya on the Jan 19,” said Mokhtar.

Mokhtar (left) said that the structure was built on government land without permission.

“The alleged Mathurai Veeran Temple is in actual fact an altar for punters to obtain numbers for gambling purposes.

“In fact, the altar was being maintained by these punters,” said Mokhtar.

“MBSA carried an inspection on Feb 16 and found out that there were six structures that was built without permission (of MBSA), and immediately issued a warning notice to the owners concerned to demolish the illegal structures that were put up,” said Mohtar.

Mohtar also said the owner of the structure, Muniandy Kathan, filed an appeal to MBSA to be given a one-month grace period starting from Feb 20 until March 20 this year to relocate the illegal structure, but failed to do so.

Following this, MBSA conducted an inspection on Oct 20 and found that not only had the original structure not been removed, but additions were made to it.

As such, he said, the MBSA had no choice but to demolish the structures on Oct 21 since there was no sign of any action on the part of the owner to relocate the structure all this while.

He said this in response to the statement by MIC president S Samy Vellu yesterday that the council had demolished a Hindu temple.

MBSA councilor Uthayasoorian Kalimuthu meanwhile expressed his disappointment with MIC for having manipulated the issue in an attempt to gain sympathy and support.

“MIC cannot use religion for politics.We do not want MIC to exploit this issue for their ‘survival’,” Uthayasoorian said.

He also said that MBSA takes such allegations, which clearly incites religious sensitivities, seriously.

“We will not hesitate to take further action and also consider lodging a police report if necessary,” said Uthayasoorian (right).

Mokhtar also said there was a temple for Hindu devotees not far away from the demolished altar.

Earlier, Selangor MIC Youth head Shanker Raj Ayanger who visited the demolition site said he would hand over a memorandum to Selangor Menteri Besar Abdul Khalid Ibrahim on Wednesday to protest against the demolition of the structure.

Shanker also said a report was lodged at the Bukit Jelutong police station yesterday over the incident.

There are some photos of the demolished structures scanned from newspapers and hosted at HRP’s website. From the photos, it doesn’t look like a big temple, probably about smaller than a normal terrace house in terms of land area. A small structure with zinc roof, cemented floor, and wooden walls. Anyway, I hope some of the locals or eye witnesses can provide better details.

As for me, regardless of altar or temple, this is still considered a place of worship and must be handled sensitively. Not simply demolish. What’s the point of having a committee and making promises, but later playing with rhetorics? I never found any statement in the above article that mentioned about discussing or informing the non-Muslim religious affair committee about this temple problem. No mention of Malaysian Hindu Sangam as well. So, that means MBSA did not follow procedure? That’s an act of indiscipline and insubordination, no? Perhaps the councillor can verify on this.

Budget 2010 for the regular family

/* October 23rd, 2009 by poobalan | View blog reactions 2 comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


This years budget proposal focused on certain industries like agriculture, transportation infrastructure, green technology, health tourism, crime prevention, financial services, halal products, SME, etc.

For the man in the street, nothing much to shout about. [don’t forget to read the Mr & Mrs Malaysia Survey on Income and Finance). For a typical household  of 4 with monthly income between 2k – 8k, can’t see anything really beneficial. Let’s look at the proposals for individual:

1. Proposed increase from RM8000 to RM9000 for personal tax relief. [could have been more, at least RM10000]

2. Proposed increase for EPF and insurance from RM6000 to RM7000, but the extra RM1000 is meant for annuity schemes with insurance companies, if I read the budget correctly. [Should not be limited to annuity. Medical insurance relief should been increased too]

3. School children aged 13 above using KTM will get 50% discount on fares. [Should have included RapidKL]

4. Tax relief of RM500 for individual for broadband use (Streamyx, WiMax, Celcom/Maxis broadband etc) for year 2010 till 2012. [RM500 is not worth much. A decent package will cost RM1200 per year].

5. RM50 service charge for each credit card and RM25 for each supplementary cards, regardless the card was offered for free or not. [Should have allowed first card exemption. I use credit cards for petrol purchase, online payment, auto-billing etc, which actually reduces cost and risk of carry cash]

6. Students entering IPTA will get a netbook and broadband package for RM50 per month for two years. Up to 100,000 students will be offered first, primarily those enrolling in first year and those from low-income family. [good move!]

7. Tax of 5% charged on sale of property. Waived for once in a lifetime. Transfer between relatives, descendants not charged.  Up to RM1000o or 10% is exempted. [Is this really necessary?]

8. Establishment of 1Malaysia clinics in shophouses to cater for urban folks. [good news to reduced medical costs]

9. New scheme from EPF to allow people to buy house using FUTURE savings in Account 2 to purchase house. [This is indeed risky!]

10. Employee EPF contribution can be reverted back to 11% upon request from 2010. However, it will automatically revert to 11% from 2011 onwards.

11. Student who obtain first class results will have their PTPTN loan converted into scholarships. [good news!]

12. 30 top students will be offered National Scholarships based purely on merit to further studies in top world-class universities.

13. Those self-employed or without fixed income can opt to contributed to a 1Malaysia Retirement Scheme to be offered by KWSP. For every RM100 contribution, government will add extra 5% subject to a maximum amount of RM60 per annum. The government contribution is valid for 5 years only. [good move too]

13. A better petrol subsidy scheme will be introduced to cater for the variety of users. That may mean those using higher CC vehicles will get less subsidy. Details not available yet.

On a community note, majority of the funds/projects is expected to filter down to the rural folks, entrepreneurs, and youths from the majority community via established entities like RISDA,FELDA, TEKUN, JAKIM, MARA etc. The Indians are allocated RM20 million under TEKUN for the coming year.

Unfortunately, no increase in alcohol and tobacco taxes.

The budget presentation went on smoothly except at the end, when the PM mentioned about Bagan Pinang victory, which caused a ruckus in the Parliament. There were shouts of “rasuah” by the opposition. Ill-advised move, I’ll say.

Mr and Mrs Malaysia Survey

/* October 23rd, 2009 by poobalan | View blog reactions 6 comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Managed to write this just in time for the Budget. I’m waiting for it to start in 20 minutes or so.

CLSA produced its Mr and Mrs Asia 2009 report, which covers the expenditure and financial trends of the average person (hence the Mr and Mrs in the report). I read the Malaysian segment presentation which was received via an email. The details extracted below are from the Mr and Mrs Malaysia survey updated  Summer 2009. Their first survey was in 2007, so there are some comparisons made at times.

So, do you fit in anywhere in here? Are you an average Mr or Mrs Malaysian? Check it out (note that I have categorised the main points/findings):

  • Location: 285 respondents in Kuala Lumpur (171 or 60%) and smaller cities like Johor Bahru (29), Ipoh (34), Kuantan (17) and Penang (34).
  • Income: Typical household income is RM2,001-5,000 per month (42%) with 84% currently working. 18% have monthly income above RM10,000, 2% earning less than RM1000, 14% earning beween Rm1001 and Rm2000, and 24% earning between RM5,001 and Rm10,000 per month.
  • Age: Their sample has a mean age of 33.2, reflecting Malaysia’s young demographic. 78% are less than 40 years old.
  • Gender: More than half, 58%, are female.
  • Children: 62% have one child and 14% have no children in their household. 15% have two children while 3% have more than 3 children.
  • Dependents: 49% had other dependents than children, and 65% said those were parents.
  • Household Size: Average household has at least four people. Typically two members of the household are employed.
  • Economy Effect on Income: Despite 1Q09 GDP contracting by 6.2% YoY and exports falling 23.5% YTD,  56% said household income has not been affected.
  • Economic Effect on Employment: 67% say the downturn has not affected their employment and 67% have not seen family members affected. 23% say the downturn has affected the jobs of other family members, with 59% saying  one family member is affected. The downturn has affected household income of 44% of respondents, and 70% have changed their spending patterns. But 10% said the income has increased, 63% said income dropped, and 27% said income unchanged since start of 2008.
  • Spending Pattern: Nonetheless, Mr & Mrs Malaysia remain fairly cautious with 70% having changed their spending patterns since the downturn, cutting spending on leisure and entertainment, clothing, food and groceries. Children’s education, mortgages and healthcare took priority. Households have cut spending on leisure/entertainment (1) , clothing (2), food and groceries (3), communications (4), and utilities (5). Changes in income (+/-) affects the leisure/entertainment expenses. Food, mortgage and transport account for bulk of expenses.  Children’s education, healthcare, communication, and clothing account for less of the spending.
  • House: 31% lives in a 1,500-2,000sf house; 79% own their own homes while 64% have one other property. 52% have a mortgage, and of that, 72% said its for one property only.
  • Cars: 94% of respondents own cars. Favorite cars are Toyota and Honda
  • Credit Card: 90% have credit cards. 68% have more than once credit card. Favorite credit card provider is Citibank and favorite debit card provider is Maybank. Credit card preferred over debit cards. 63% spend less than RM1000 on their credit cards, while 24% spend between RM1001 and RM2000. 17% said the credit card expenses increased, but 42% said it reduced.
  • Savings Pattern: The key buffer is the nation’s high savings rate. Malaysians save the equivalent of 43% of GDP. But Mr & Mrs Malaysia are cautious: 81% place their savings in cash deposits and 72% have not bought stocks in the last 12 months. 45% of respondents save 10-20% of their income, and 47% say savings patterns are unchanged since the downturn. 10% are actually saving more while 43% saving less. 65% do not plan to buy shares in next 12 months. Best investments are cash deposits and properties, while the worst are bonds and stocks. 58% put their wealth in properties, 53% invest in equities while another 31% invest in foreign currencies.
  • Employment Outlook:  Despite the slowdown, 19% expect job prospects to worsen in the next 12 months, while 40% said it will improve.
  • Future Expenditures: This is also reflected in their plans to buy big ticket items in the next 12 months, with 28% planning to buy a house and 13% a car. 40% said they won’t make any big purchases in the next 6-12 months, but 26% plan to buy a house within that period.
  • Concerns: Respondents are largely concerned with unemployment and income decline, followed by inability to save and medical costs.
  • Expectation on Government: Mr & Mrs Malaysia want the government to prioritise improving the country’s economic conditions. Unfortunately, not many are confident that the Najib administration can handle the downturn well. 66% do not have confidence in the way the government is handling the downturn and many want the government to reduce crime rates. 49% wants the government to improve the economy.