Another temple demolished in Shah Alam

/* October 23rd, 2009 by poobalan | View blog reactions 1 comment »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Facebook is quite active with the news of temple being demolished in Shah Alam yesterday. The temple, Mathurai Veeran Temple located at Persiaran Kerjaya, Jalan Glenmarie, Seksyen U1 in Shah Alam, was demolished by MBSA.

MIC was quick to condemn the demolition (OK, we can ignore their record for the moment):

MIC president Datuk Seri S. Samy Vellu said demolition of the Mathu-rai Veeran temple in Persiaran Kerjaya, Jalan Glenmarie, Seksyen U1 in Shah Alam was an “act of treachery” by the Pakatan Rakyat-led state government.

… Samy Vellu said the Mathurai Veeran temple committee had submitted an appeal to the February 2009 notice sent by the Shah Alam Municipal Council but the temple was still demolished without an alternative land being offered.

“There were also no discussion with the temple committee and no recent notices given by the council. They just went ahead and demolished it,” said Samy Vellu.

He wanted the Selangor Government, especially state executive councillor Dr. Xavier Jayakumar to explain the demolition, failing which the MIC would seek legal redress.

Samy Vellu goes on to point EXCO  Xavier Jayakumar to provide explanation:

Samy Vellu wanted the Selangor government, especially its state executive councilor Dr Xavier Jayakumar to explain the demolition, failing which MIC would seek legal redress.

“He (Xavier) does not seem to worry about what is happening. Perhaps this (the demolition) is being carried out because the Indians are not united under the Pakatan state government,” he said.

I too wonder how Samy Vellu knew that MBSA took “direct orders” from the Selangor government to demolish the temple. Who gave the orders? An individual? a committee? Selangor government here means the state secretariat, the EXCO or MB?

“I salute the MPSA for taking direct orders from the Selangor government without consulting the temple committee,” he added sarcastically.

Granted, current Selangor government did announce approval of land for temples time to time, but this is the second such demolishment happening. AFTER they have given their word that temples won’t be demolished without proper relocation. Remember Ampang Jaya? Well, search this blog for the related articles on that demolition.

Back then, MP Kapar Manikavasagam did some drama about quitting and all. There was even news about suspending high level officer in the MPAJ. I sent email to the committee on non-Muslim religious affair. But no news till now.

This time, MP Kapar also mentioned in his Facebook entry that those who did it should be sacked. So, who would it be? Some low-level MBSA enforcement officer? The head of enforcement division? MBSA chief? State secretary? Or ask the 3-man committee (Xavier, Ronnie, Teresa) to resign?

The temple demolished already. So, what’s next? Who going to foot the bill for relocation and reconstruction? Who is going to be demoted/suspended/fined/sacked? Who going to resign? Who will face legal action?

Should MBSA put a non-Muslim as the head to turn things around? Just wondering….

Misuse of welfare funds

/* October 23rd, 2009 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Just reading the below news makes my blood boil. These criminals should be imprisoned.

WELFARE aid totalling RM418,145 was paid out in cash to 184 people up to December 2008 in Perlis, but there are no records of the recipients with the National Registration Department, revealed the Auditor-General’s Report.

The report found that the Perlis Welfare Department also discovered that 26 recipients who died between 2007 and 2008 continued to receive cash aid totalling RM14,520.

“In one case, the recipient continued to receive cash aid 20 years after he passed away,” said the report.

The report also discovered another startling case where a department employee created 20 fictitious identities and paid out RM16,140 to them until December last year.

The report said that the NRD confirmed that the recipients did not exist.

“The Perlis Welfare Department lodged a police report against an assistant community development officer in February over the alleged misappropriation of funds,” said the report, adding that police were still investigating.

“This case happened due to lack of monitoring and supervision from high-ranking officers. The incident could have been avoided if duty rotation among staff members was practised,” said the report.

The department explained that the cash aid was paid to representatives of the recipients. In one case, a representative was found to be receiving two sets of cash aid, one in Titi Tinggi and the other in Beseri, it said.

Such cases took place because there was no monitoring or checks and change of duty among staff, it said.

“The auditors are of the view that cash aid should not be given to a representative or a proxy. The recipient never gave consent for such representation,” the report said.

got smoke no promotion

/* October 21st, 2009 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


PAS is really going for the jugular here. Denying promotion on basis of smoking habit? While I’m all for anti-smoking campaign, I think this may infringe of personal rights and can be considered discrimination. A better option (or workaround) would be to ask those civil servants to undergo regular health checks and make the results as part of the promotion requirements. Maybe add in compulsory insurance coverage will also serve as a reminder (since smokers pay more premium). Instead of all the “nice” campaigns, the authorities should go in hard – put up giant sized posters of damaged organs instead of pictures of leaders. Play anti-smoking video clips at in every cinema, between TV shows, take up full page ads in newspaper, buy adspace in Facebook, Utusan, The Star, Gmail, Yahoo, etc.

Oh ya, instead of hiring snoop squads to follow couples around, why not station them at public spaces to immediately fine those who smoke in the public? Hire some ladies too – can improve employment rates and at the same time increase revenue for the state coffers.

PAS is studying the possibility of penalising the state’s government servants by not giving them any promotion if they are smokers, in an all-out effort to discourage the habit.

State Women’s Development, Family and Health committee chairman Wan Ubaidah Omar said the government was serious in getting people to kick the smoking habit.

“The Federal and state governments have done everything possible to discourage people from smoking, and perhaps punitive measures could be considered to get some results,” she said during the question-and-answer time at the Kelantan State Legislative Assembly meeting at Kota Darul Naim on Wednesday.

Wan Ubaidah (PAS-Kijang) said this in response to a supplementary question by Abdul Fattah Harun (PAS-Bukit Tuku), who suggested penalising government servants in line with the proposal by Kelantan Mentri Besar Datuk Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat that PAS leaders who smoked would not be given a chance to contest in any general election.

“I notice that anti-smoking campaigns are not getting anywhere and I would like to suggest that state leaders set conditions that any state assemblymen or civil servant who smokes will not be considered for promotion,” he said.

Earlier, Wan Ubaidah replied to an original question by Dr Nik Mazian Nik Mohamad (PAS-Gaal) on efforts by the government to educate the public on the dangers of smoking and on follow-up measures taken to get smokers to kick the habit.

She said that the Kelantan government recently organised a state-level workshop for 90 imams (prayer leaders) to disseminate information on the dangers of smoking in their respective areas.

“We want the masses to know of the government’s aspiration to bring down the number of smokers in the state and hope that it would have the necessary impact in the long-run,” she said.

“I am very disappointed that anti-smoking campaigns have not worked — based on studies, almost half of the male population in Kelantan are smokers and this is a worrying trend which could get worse,” she added.

She said that the state government had even issued a fatwa (official ruling on a point of Islamic law) at hospitals, clinics, business premises and public areas that it is forbidden to smoke cigarettes because they were harmful not only to smokers but also passive smokers.

change?

/* October 20th, 2009 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


In the last 4 months, we have seen many changes or promises of change being done under new leadership, especially for the significant minorities – increased token allocation for schools,  job allocation in public sector, visits to community areas like Batu Caves and Brickfields, approval of extra APPLIED holidays for Deepavali, advise to have school final exams few days after Deepavali, allocation for training youths, meeting with non-MIC groups, processing of PR and identity documents, allocation of PNB units, …the list can go on. Some of them may seem to be cosmetic, but still it is something new for the moment.

All this can take place without any changes to the constitution. Does it mean that all this while, the freedom of interpreting and administering policies based on the certain Articles of the Federal Constitutions could have been  misused?

Samsu Report on Al-Jazeera

/* October 20th, 2009 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Got this from Saravanan’s FB entry.

Few interesting facts:

1. Samsu (rice wine) can have up to 50% alcohol content.

2. According to CAP’s Subbarow, the government banned sales of samsu in plastics about 20 years ago because it was becoming a social problem among the Malay youths.

3. MIC’s new Information Chief, P Kamalanathan says taxes on the samsu should be raised, similar to cigarettes, wine, beer etc.

4. The guy interviewed in the report says he won’t stop drinking until death. (Even pawned wife’s jewelery to buy liquor).

5. The reason given be the interviewee is that he drinks to forget his sorrows.

6. CAP estimates rural Indians spend US6 million (RM21 million) annually on alcohol.

7. In this example, drinking samsu leads to domestic violence, runaway children, disease and early death.