Deepavali Stall application

/* July 26th, 2008 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Deepavali stall will be available along KL Sentral Monorail station for RM30/day including canopy and electricity. Rental is for 30 days before Deepavali (OCT 26 2008).

Deadline is Monday, 28 July 2008.

Contact:

Mr Dineshwaran (National Entrepreneur Bureau, Putera MIC) at 012-2333 434

Birth Certificate Registration Programme

/* July 26th, 2008 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


The Women, Family and Community Development Ministry announced on July 21st about starting a Birth Certificate Registration Programme, but it seems that the program have been running for some time.

Unlike previous efforts which started with few events and then faded away, we hope this programme is able to persevere.

The NST report highlighted a case which was bought to the programme:

When she was born in a hospital in Klang, T. Gomarthy was issued a birth certificate which registered her as a boy. The mistake only came to light 12 years later when she went to the Shah Alam National Registration Department to apply for her identity card.

That marked the beginning of her problems. The NRD officer required the presence of her mother to rectify the mistake.

But Gomarthy’s mother had left the family when she was 11 and could not be contacted.

She spent the next six years pleading her case with the NRD without success.

Help eventually came from the “Birth Certificate Registration Programme” organised by the Women, Family and Community Development Ministry.

With the assistance of one of the co-organisers of the Yayasan Strategik Sosial (YSS), Gomarthy, now 18, obtained a new birth certificate last week and applied for her IC.

“Because of this problem, I had to stop schooling in Form Three. If only it was settled years ago.”

YSS assistant director V. Vanita Ramany criticised the NRD for the delay in correcting the mistake in Gomarthy’s birth certificate.

“Why did they ask her to bring her mother who went missing years ago when her biological father was with her?”

Vanita said about 200 stateless people attended the programme held in Setapak, of which 87 were those without birth certificates, while the rest held red identity cards or had no identification papers.

A similar programme would be carried out in Raub, Pahang next month.

She said a child born in an unregistered marriage might not get a birth certificate as some NRD officers would register a child in the absence of the parents’ marriage certificate while others would not.

She cited a case where seven brothers and sisters, aged 4 months to 10 years, did not have birth certificates because their parents did not register their marriage as it was the woman’s second marriage.

Then there are married women without birth certificates.

In such cases, even if their children were to get their birth certificates, they would remain non-citizens, Vanita said.

She called for the appointment of more Tamil-speaking officers at NRD offices to help Indians who only spoke their mother tongue.

Police report on Koperasi Pekerja Jaya

/* July 26th, 2008 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Another police report against MIC. This time related to Koperasi Pekerja Jaya Berhad (KPJ) in Perak. An ex-MIC member, M Lokanathan makes the report:

A disgruntled ex-MIC member has lodged a police report against several top party leaders, alleging criminal breach of trust involving land given to Koperasi Pekerja Jaya Berhad (KPJ) in Perak.
Former MIC Sungai Siput division chairman M. Loka- nathan, 51, lodged the report at the Sungai Siput Utara police station on Wednesday.

The land was part of a 20ha parcel given by the Perak government in 1982.

More than 1,300 houses were built and sold by KPJ, About 100 lots were sold to third parties but the money was never accounted for, Lokanathan said.

Between 1998 and 2006, plots in Taman Tun Sambanthan were transferred to Loka-nathan’s company, before he sold them to third parties.
He said he passed the money to co-operative leaders, but failed to find out what happened to the money.

Government consider converting Tamil schools status if land issue settled

/* July 26th, 2008 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


There was a meeting on Thursday to discuss about the partially-aided Tamil schools, chaired by Education Minister, Hishamuddin. Others included Devamany, Murugiah (PPP), Saravanan.

The meeting repeated the same mantra on the schools being on private or estate land, but this time there are plans to get those lands from the plantation/private companies and convert to government owned. With quite a number of schools on GLC lands, it should not be a problem, and should have never been a hurdle in the first place.

While the report says there are about 250 (or half the schools) were in private land, if I’m not mistaken, more than 320 schools (about 2/3) are partially aided.

There should also be efforts to relocate under-enrolled schools to other places. Education Ministry should set up a channel for residents/community to forward their requests. If there are ample number of potential students, let’s say 200 of them, then relocation must be seriously considered.

But what made me stand up was the news report in Minnal FM which says that MIC was thankful for government to converting schools after getting the land from plantations. This is quite misleading because the meeting highlighted the possibility only, and nothing has been done yet.

One have to ask why this effort is being taken now. What was the catalyst? Obviously Samy Vellu and MIC 😉

From the Star:

KUALA LUMPUR: The Government will consider converting the status of partially aided Tamil primary schools to fully aided, if the land issue can be solved.

Education Minister Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Tun Hussein said the problem was that about 250 Tamil primary schools were presently built on estate land.
Status problem: Hishammuddin (right), Deputy Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department S.K. Devamany (middle) and Deputy Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Senator T. Murugiah holding copies of the ministry’s reports on the status of Tamil primary schools after the meeting yesterday.

“We can’t have a fully aided school if the land doesn’t belong to us,” he told reporters after chairing a special committee meeting to overcome Tamil school issues.

He said the ministry had to identify if the land belonged to government-linked companies, private companies or individuals.

Besides land, he said, the Government also had to look at other issues such as the supply of teachers, upgrading of schools and under-enrolled schools.

“There is no point converting a school if it only has three pupils. This is why in our meeting, we identified the actual number of pupils and schools, schools which need to be upgraded or are overcrowded,” he said.

There are presently 523 Tamil primary schools in the country.

He said the committee found that the overall situation at Tamil primary schools was not as bad as painted by some parties.

“We are also working closely with the Plantation Industries and Commodities Ministry to upgrade the infrastructure of Tamil schools in plantations,” he said.

Hishammuddin said 171 applications had been approved in cases of children who do not have birth certificates as long as their parents obtained a confirmation letter from their village headman or the Village Development and Safety Committee (JKKK) head to allow them to go to school.

A bit on Tamil Schools

/* July 26th, 2008 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Taken from the NST:

MUCH has been said and written about the plight of Tamil schools in the country, often said to be treated as the step- child or, as an educationist puts it, “the Cinderella of the Malaysian educational system”.

But who is treating it as a stepchild? Most fingers point at the government, but there are several pointing at the Indian community itself.

Comparisons are sometimes made with Chinese schools which, like most Tamil schools, are not fully funded by the government.

Malaysian Indian Businessmen Association president P. Sivakumar dismisses outright claims that the community is not doing enough to assist Tamil schools.

If not for private donors and wealthy businessmen from the community, Sivakumar argues, half of the 523 Tamil schools in the country would have been closed down a long time ago.
He cites a recent example where a hall for a Yahya Awal Tamil school in Johor Baru, costing RM700,000, was built with public donations.

Does this mean the community can now stop asking for government handouts? Can it become like the Chinese community, which even runs private independent schools?

Sivakumar says it is unfair to compare the two communities.

“Almost 90 per cent of the (Indian) community are wage earners. There is no way for these people to contribute when they themselves often do not have enough. “It is high time these schools were turned into fully-funded schools. Don’t drag out the problem any more.”

Education, Welfare and Research Foundation Malaysia (EWRF) president S.P. Pathi agrees that the community cannot take care of the Tamil schools on its own. He dismisses as illogical the comparison between the Indians and the Chinese as economically, the Indians were way behind them. “About 10 years ago, 85 per cent of the Tamil school-going pupils came from families earning RM1,200 and below. Things have not changed much,” he says.

A dissenting voice comes from YSS director of policy research, K. Manikam.

“Many businessmen and well-to-do Indians are not coming forward to help Tamil schools,” says Manikam, who has been involved in Tamil school issues for eight years. “Most Indians are willing to spend on temples rather than Tamil schools. Temples are given very little allocation but Indians fork out their own money and build big temples costing millions of ringgit. “Why can’t the same be done for Tamil schools?”

Manikam says the community must take the initiative to invest its resources in primary education.

Perhaps there is another major difference between Chinese and Tamil schools.

The Chinese, although speaking different dialects at home, have a common “Chinese language” in Mandarin whereas Tamil schools are mainly for Tamils and not for all Indians, who have their own written and spoken languages. This could be why, although there is a growing number of well-to-do Indians, the contribution to Tamil schools remains small.

Manikam agrees that most of the other sub-ethnic groups like the Telugus, Malayalees and Punjabis prefer not to send their children to Tamil schools as it is not their mother tongue. “The English-speaking and non-Tamil speaking families also prefer to send their children to national schools. “Many feel it is beneath their status to send their children to Tamil schools as most of the pupils there are from poor families,” he says.

Tamil schools in the country began in 1816 when the first was established in Penang. More followed with the opening up of rubber estates although not all owners supported or provided funds. Things improved in the 1930s when the Indian government raised the issue of the treatment of Indian labourers with the colonial government in then-Malaya. Soon, the government started providing financial aid and teacher training and appointed inspectors for Tamil schools.

At its height in 1957, there were 888 Tamil schools, but the number had fallen to 523 by last year. Nevertheless, the enrolment has seen a 108 per cent increase, rising from 50,766 pupils in 1957 to 105,618 pupils last year. The number of teachers has also risen from 3,258 teachers in 1970, to 7,126 last year. The numbers clearly show that there is a demand for places in Tamil schools.

Or is it a case of parents having no choice but to send their children to such schools because national schools are too far from their homes?

Manikam says there is an increase in the enrolment in Tamil schools because of the improvement in academic performances. “In 2002, only 45 pupils scored 7As in their UPSR but the number increased to 583 pupils last year,” he says.