inflation is at 7.7 percent

/* July 24th, 2008 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Our inflation rate used to be the lowest in the region if we used the official value of 2.8 percent. After the fuel price increase and its domino effect across the consumer sector, it was estimated that inflation will double to about 6%. Warning came in the form of May’s inflation which was 3.8% and some like Aseambankers expected it to be between 7.5 and 8 percent for the period July to December.

Today’s major headlines brought the bad news – 7.7 percent for June, and its expected to be the same in July due to increase in electricity tariff. This value is a 27-year high, since 1981’s 10.8 percent.

The substantial rise in the price of petrol and diesel announced by the
Government beginning June 5 is the main reason for the surge, said
Domestic Trade and Consumer Affairs Minister Datuk Shahrir Abdul Samad.

Other figures announced by the minister:

  • CPI for January to June this year had also increased by 3.7% compared
    with the same period last year, which was from 105.1 to 109.
  • Index for food and non-alcoholic beverages for June compared to the
    same month last year showed high percentage change of 10.0% while the
    index for non-food increased by 6.7%.
  • From January to June,
    index for food and non-alcoholic beverages increased by 6.1% and
    non-food 2.6%, while among the groups with high weights were transport
    (+4%), and housing, water, electricity, gas and other fuels (+ 1.4%).
  • The
    6.1% increase in the index for food and non-alcoholic beverages was the
    result of increases in the index for items such as milk, cheese, eggs,
    rice, bread, cereals, meat, vegetables, seafood, fruits, sugar, jam,
    honey, chocolate, confectionary and fats.
  • Among the food items
    that recorded notable increase in the June index were tomatoes, chicken
    eggs, rice, glutinous rice, imported beef, beehoon, dried noodles,
    watermelon, carrots, chicken and wheat flour.

Impact of UMNO and PAS talks

/* July 23rd, 2008 by poobalan | View blog reactions 10 comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


While some PAS stalwarts claim the talks between certain UMNO and PAS leaders were aimed to trap PAS, UMNO leaders asked the nation not to be worried as the focus is on Malay and Islam issues (well, that creates more panic now!). Lim Guan Eng says nothing much to worry but he was interested to know what the talks were all about.

Umno supreme council member Datuk Shahrir Abdul Samad said DAP should
not be overly suspicious as Umno had not abandoned its multi racial
stance.

While UMNO leaders try to clear the air that the talks were purely on the topics above and that non-Muslims should not be worried, Khir Toyo proudly reveals that there were efforts to coax PAS to join UMNO and rule over Selangor just days after the general elections.

In a posting on his blog, Khir said Umno had offered its arch-rival
PAS the menteri besar post during a dialogue session held shortly after
the elections.

Apart from this, he said PAS was also offered the
deputy menteri besar as well as four executive councillors posts if it
agreed to form the coalition.

Khir also said he was willing to be
left out of the state government line-up if that would encourage PAS to
accept the partnership.

“I brought them (PAS) for a muzakarah
(dialogue) with the prime minister and suggested to Abdullah (Ahmad
Badawi) that PAS leaders in Selangor be offered those posts,” he added.

A PAS leader also mentioned that UMNO tried to offer them the Selangor Menteri Besar post in order to get back Selangor.

For PAS, the announcement of such talks have created discomfort and split in the party, something that will make UMNO happy.

For UMNO, this boosts the president’s standing and push him ahead of other pretenders.

Strangely enough, the rest of BN coalition are very quiet. We must remember that MCA, MIC, etc. are against PAS as a matter of political stand. So, how does this meetings affect them? Should Gerakan, a so-called multiracial party initiate talks with PKR or DAP? Wonder what UMNO will say on that šŸ™‚

What is the response from MIC? Happy or unhappy? Any standard replies like “we have faith in the BN spirit”?

PAS was once aligned with UMNO in the BN before the went on separate ways. So, one can’t dismiss the possibility of such affliations happening in the near future. After the demise of Nik Aziz, the road will be clear for such partnership.

And that may well mean the end of BN coalition for MCA, Gerakan, MIC and other non-Muslim parties for UMNO-PAS team will try to “islamize” the country.

With attention turning towards UMNO-PAS topic, those leaders under pressure can breathe easier now. More headache for the rest of the pack.

For Pakatan, the brittle nature of the coalition is being put test. One problem after another keeps poppin up, and only matter of time before the coalition gives way. Most likely PAS will pull out, leaving DAP and PKR. So, PAS will be the dark horse. Will they join UMNO? That will cause MCA, MIC, Gerakan et. al. to leave BN. Will these parties team up with the Pakatan duo? That will change the political scenario into Malay Muslim versus non-Muslims. I believe there’s only one winner in that duel.

Will the time to migrate come soon?

DAP copycat

/* July 23rd, 2008 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


This is indeed a slap in the face for Penang CM and DAP. One of their Penang state assemblyman was found to have copied questions from their nemesis party, Gerakan’s assemblyman which was raised in the last assembly term.

 

This gaffe was not to be missed by Gerakan, who branded the DAP-led state government a “copy cat” government.

 

The culprit was Sungai Pinang state assemblyperson Koid Teng Guan who was found to have duplicated the written questions in total from those previously submitted by Gerakan’s former Datuk Keramat assemblyperson Ong Thean Lye on November 19 last year. The three questions were on the monorail project, natural gas vehicle pumping stations and the state sports trust fund.

 

Even though fellow assemblymen try to cover for him, citing that his act was not a crime nor unethical, I feel that an elected representative should know how to behave. Copying, from the “enemy” no less, is not a examplery act at all.

 

DAP should send their assemblyman for training first. At least learn to modify a bit la. Even college kids can do better!

Uthaya rejects rehabilitation

/* July 22nd, 2008 by poobalan | View blog reactions 1 comment »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


As reported in Malaysiakini, Uthayakumar had refused to attend a rehabilitation programme organised by the police special branch on July 10. According to Waytha, Uthaya refused under the provisos of Article 95 of the United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners which states that prisoners without charge are not subject to rehabilitation.

Uthayakumar’s detention is in violation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948 of which Malaysia is a signatory.

(It) specifically provides that there shall be no detention without trial, provides the right to personal liberty and fair trial and that a person is innocent until proven guilty.

According to Hindraf’s lawyer, N Surendran:

Any attempt to compel him (Uthayakumar) would be illegal, unlawful and in breach of all international laws.

If they dare to force him, we will be forced to take the matter to court.

Asked if Uthayakumar’s refusal would impede the efforts to secure his release, Surendran said the former, who is a lawyer himself, was
willing to face the repercussions.

Our conditions are that he must be released unconditionally which means that he must not be obligated to attend any rehabilitation or anything of the sort.

Obviously, this means a longer stay in ISA. But I wonder why news that the other four rejected such rehabilitation did not appear. Were they not subjected to these programmes or did they agree to attend it (bearing in mind that Uthaya is the only one without a wife and kids)?

fight during forum on PHEB sign of problem

/* July 22nd, 2008 by poobalan | View blog reactions 5 comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


The following appeared in Malaysiakini:

A public forum to discuss the Penang Hindu Endowments Board (PHEB) on Saturday night was marred by not one but two separate incidents.A speaker at the forum was allegedly punched by an irate ex-MIC politician after the event in Butterworth had ended. Last night, a police report was lodged in Jalan Patani police state alleging R Arunasalam of assaulting retired civil servant, K Balakrishnan, 62. The incident allegedly happened at the Sri Mariamman Hall when Balakrishnan was talking with a few friends after the forum.

The former MIC politician, who did not attend the forum, had stormed into the hall at about 11pm and hit Balakrishnan twice at the back of his neck, and accused the forum speaker of criticising him in his speech.

According to witnesses, Balakrishnan, a diabetic patient and currently undergoing dialysis treatment for kidney failure, nearly fainted from the assault. The furious MIC politician, who had to be escorted out from the hall, allegedly hurled verbal abuses against Balakrishnan before leaving.

It is learnt that the politician, a staunch supporter of former MIC deputy president S Subramaniam, has been short-listed for appointment as a chairperson in one of the five Hindu temples under the jurisdiction of PHEB, a statutory board of trustees.

Earlier, Balakrishnan had raised his reservations over the purported appointment, and criticised the DAP-dominated PHEB for attempting to appoint the politician on grounds that ā€œhe had on numerous previous occasions called for the government to abolish the boardā€.

Police told Malaysiakini that the case would be investigated immediately for it involved a ā€˜VIP’.

The United Hindu Religious Council and Penang Makkal Sakti Welfare Association (Pemaswa) jointly organise the forum, which was officiated by Padang Serai member of parliament N Gobalakrishnan.

Earlier, during the forum’s question-and-answer session, a youth criticised the forum as irrelevant and lambasted Pemaswa leadership of ā€œmisusing and abusingā€ the spirit of Makkal Sakti (people’s power), a popular tagline for the Hindu Rights Action Force (Hindraf).

Identifying himself only as Satish from Hindraf, the youth in his early 20s, hurled abuses at the organisers and abruptly demanded a ā€˜vote of no-confidence’ on the forum’s organisers. He also called on about 200 people at the forum to stage a walkout, but no one heeded him as he left the hall.

When contacted, Hindraf national coordinator RS Thanenthiran denied that the youth was a Hindraf supporter and said the movement would never allow its supporters to behave in such a manner at a public forum. ā€œHindraf condemned such unruly behaviour,ā€ he told Malaysiakini.

Organisers later told Malaysiakini the youth was ā€˜an agent’ deliberately sent to cause disruptions to the forum, and criticised the tactic as a ā€œshameful cowardice act ala MIC.ā€

Several PHEB commissioners and DAP assemblypersons are said to have used unethical methods to halt the forum since Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng, a Bagan MP, have declined the invitation to officiate it. Even though Lim has earlier indicated his desire to attend the forum, he spurned the offer citing an overload of work. Similarly Bagan Jermal state assemblyperson Lim Hock Seng also declined when he was invited instead. Both politicians are said to be influenced by certain quarters not to go to the forum.

This has apparently infuriated many Bagan’s Indian constituents, who have backed the DAP in the recent general election.

The forum organisers, an influential group among the Indian community in Penang mainland, warned that this controversy would be a major problem for the DAP-led state government if left unresolved.