Yet another committee to solve birth certificate problem

/* July 22nd, 2008 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Following the revelation that some children in an orphanage were turned away from school, this time its the turn of Women, Family and Community Development Ministry to try solve the problem. Their plan is to set up a special committee to resolve the cases of children without birth certificates. The advisor to the ministry, Datuk Shamsiah Abdul Rahman, said the committee would comprise representatives from government agencies such as the National Registration Department and the Social Welfare Department as well as non-governmental organisations (NGOs).The ministry also plans to implement a special programme to facilitate the registration of children without birth certificates, by which parents or guardians of children without birth certificates could register their births at designated places announced by the ministry.

What happened to all the previous committees, strategies and plans?

Poverty line index to be calculated annually

/* July 21st, 2008 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


The government had decided that the poverty line index (PLI) will be updated annually
instead of every five years. This is due to changes in the spending
habits of consumers affected by the rise in consumer goods prices and
inflation. This news was announced by Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Tan Sri
Amirsham Abd Aziz in Dewan Negara. The Consumer Price Index will also be recalculated.

Good news indeed as this information can be used to provide suitable assistance to the poor and the middle class. Currently, poverty line is set at RM 691 and hardcore poverty is set at half of that amount (following international standards). Some states had recently revised the poverty rate, like Selangor which set it to RM1500. Poverty line can different among states, and area (urban/rural).

I estimate a ball park figure of at least RM1200 to be the poverty line in urban area, with Klang Valley, Penang, Kuching, Kota Kinabalu and Johor Bahru poverty line set at RM1500. Rural areas may be around RM800 – RM1000.

Protest over Buddhist park in Shah Alam

/* July 21st, 2008 by poobalan | View blog reactions 3 comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


While there is a protest over building of a surau in Desa Mentari, the new Selangor government faces another potential bomb in Shah Alam, this time over a Buddhist park. The Bodhi Park project by Young Buddhist Foundation Malaysia is to be located in Section U12, Shah Alam. The project was kick off by Ong Ka Chuan, Housing And Local Government Minister. Just like the Desa Mentari surau, this protest happened during the ground breaking event.

According to Star, six people who claimed to be residents from the nearby Desa Alam neighbourhood led by Ahmad Shakri Tarmuchi handed a memorandum to Ong, urging him to scrap the project citing that the neighbourhood was a Muslim-majority area and Bodhi Park should not be built in there. Ahmad Shakri told reporters the residents were not informed of the project by the City Council and there was no notice board at the site announcing the project from the time they had occupied the housing estate in December 2006. Minister Ong replied that “people there should live in harmony”.

Bodhi Park is being built by the Young Buddhist Foundation Malaysia ona 0.68ha of land and the building committee chairman Goh Seng Chai said it would serve as a leading centre for Buddhist educational outreach and cultural activities. A Bernama report mentions that the park will comprise an auditorium, a centre for Buddhist research and studies, a multipurpose hall, and a main shrine for devotees.

In the early 1990’s, the foundation bought a 0.6-hectare piece of land in Section 24 for the project but the state government found it unsuitable for religious use and offered the alternative site in November 2002, Goh added. He said the land for the project was bought from the Selangor Economic Development Corporation for RM95,844 and the sale-and-purchase agreement was signed in April 2004. Goh said the development order for the project was approved on April 24 this year and construction was scheduled to commence in September.

What is your take on this? Is it the previous government’s fault for allocating land in a Muslim majority area for a Buddhist park? Shah Alam itself is 90% Muslim populated, so not much place will be suitable. Generally, I find Buddhist programs are not noisy, so it won’t be disruptive as other religion’s function. So, should the park?

15 percent Tamil school teachers expected to be graduates by 2010

/* July 21st, 2008 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


15 percent of the Tamil school teachers are expected to be graduates by 2010, says Malaysian Tamil Schools Organisation chief organiser S. Baskaran. The 15% is about 1200 teachers. At present, there are about 8,000 Tamil schoolteachers and only 10% are graduates. The aim should be to increase this percentage to about 100% by 2020 – either via part time degree program or recruiting teachers with degree.

Two of my sister in laws are doing their degree part-time via OUM, both starting this year. Another relative also got a place to pursue degree part time via OUM.

Perhaps this opportunity will encourage more people to take up teaching. As it is, there are less people applying for Tamil in teachers training colleges.

Gerakan president says PSD should consider scholarship applicant background

/* July 20th, 2008 by poobalan | View blog reactions No comments »
 Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Gerakan’s acting president Koh Tsu Koon appears to disagree with MIC’s Dr S.Subramaniam on the criteria for awarding JPA scholarships. He gives the following scenario:

A student from a poor family scores 9As in his examinations while another from a rich family scores 11As.

If there was only one scholarship available, which student should be given it?

Koh said the government should check the backgrounds of the two students, instead of focusing on academic achievements when granting scholarships.

However, Koh agrees with the 55:45 allocation, which is fast becoming a point of contention.

What is your answer to Koh’s scenario?