Posts Tagged ‘Crime’

More on the Banting Murders

September 14th, 2010
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


I renamed the issue from Sosilawati murder to Banting Murders because (i) there’s potentially more than the 4 recent victims, and (ii) to reduce any possible racial connotations.

Today’s NST and Star gave much space on this murders. Coverage include the missing Chennai millionaire, other possible murder cases and so on. The articles are too many, so  for some of them, I’ll just provide the links for your reference.

Murder not planned?

Police forensics department personnel have been working round-the-clock and are still combing the 1.6ha farm where some of Sosilawati’s personal belongings were found. Sources said investigators believed that the murder of Sosilawati’s three companions were not planned.

“We believe the man had expected Sosilawati to show up alone,’’ said one source. The source said Sosilawati had gone to meet the lawyer to get a refund of several million ringgit she had paid him to buy a plot of land in Penang. Another source said the other suspects were paid RM2,500 to burn each body and dispose of the ashes at the nearby river.

More from the NST:

Datuk Sosilawati Lawiya’s murder was premeditated while her three companions were simply at the wrong place at the wrong time.This is the theory police are working on after it was ascertained that the cosmetics millionaire met a lawyer in Banting to seek a refund of the deposit she had given him to buy a parcel of land in Penang.

The three other victims were Sosilawati’s lawyer, Ahmad Kamil Abdul Karim, 32, CIMB Bank officer Noorhisham Mohammad, 38, and driver Kamarudin Shansudin, 44.

It was learnt that Sosilawati, 47, the founder of the Nouvelles Visages beauty line, had engaged the lawyer’s services to submit a tender for a piece of land in Bukit Jambul, Penang.

“However, the tender was unsuccessful and Sosilawati wanted her money back,
believed to amount to several million ringgit,” a source said.

It was believed that the lawyer, said to be a 41-year-old Datuk, then arranged to meet Sosilawati at his office in Banting on Aug 30, purportedly to return the money.

Sosilawati turned up with her business associates which surprised the lawyer as he thought she would come alone.

He then invited the group to a meeting at his poultry farm as his law firm had closed for the day.

It was learnt that the four victims were murdered on the same day. They had their throats slit.

It was also learnt that police recovered a knife, believed to have been used in the killings, last Sunday night after searching several streams near the poultry farm in Sungai Gadung, near Tanjung Sepat here. This followed
questioning of the suspects.

The remains of the four were said to have been burnt and the ashes scattered in several streams near the farm, owned by the lawyer.

Missing Indian millionaire Muthuraja:

Life for M. Usharani has been a living hell since her husband A. Muthuraja, a lawyer from India, disappeared in Banting after he came here for a visit in January.

She said her financier husband had arrived in Malaysia on Jan 18 after being invited by two lawyer brothers in Banting.

“They told him it was compulsory to come and that he could return to India in a day,” said Usharani, adding that her last contact with Muthuraja was on that day.

“My husband told me that the lawyers had picked him up and he was with them at their family home when I spoke to him,” Usharani said in a telephone interview from Chennai, India.

Usharani, 24, said that when she telephoned one of the brothers on Jan 19 after being unable to contact her husband, she was told they did not know if Muthuraja had even come to Malaysia.

She added that the lawyer brothers, who have been detained over the gruesome murder of businesswoman Datuk Sosilawati Lawiya and three others, had been friends with Muthuraja for 10 years.

Usharani, who has a three-year-old daughter, flew to Kuala Lumpur on Sept 7 and lodged a report on her husband’s disappearance at the Banting police station before returning to Chennai on Sept 9.

She said she had called the lawyer brothers and their family members several times when she failed to contact Muthuraja, but they would not entertain her.

“Their wives and family members were very rude.

“I found this strange because as family friends I thought they would be concerned.”

Usharani said that when she persisted in calling and demanding to know where Muthuraja was, the brothers and family members told her he had been caught smuggling ketamine and was in police custody.

“I made countless telephone calls and faxed a note to Interpol and the Indian High Commission in Malaysia.”

Usharani said the brothers’ family told her they could not get involved in her husband’s case “because they were from a reputable family.”

Usharani said Muthuraja’s brother Kasiviswanathan came to Banting four months ago to look for him but the brothers immediately sent him back to Chennai with Muthuraja’s luggage.

“They told him that since my husband was involved in a serious drug case, we should lie low,” she added.

“I don’t want to believe my husband was harmed by his friends.

“Ten years of friendship must amount to something,” she said.

– from The Star

While police were looking for Datuk Sosilawati Lawiya and three others last week, a woman from India came quietly into the country and lodged a second missing person’s report on her husband.The woman, S. Usharani, 24, from Chennai, lodged the report at the Banting police station on Sept 8.

Her husband, millionaire Allal Kanthan Muthu Raja, 34, had been missing since January and was last known to be in the company of the two lawyers, currently being investigated for the murders of Sosilawati and her aides.
Speaking to the New Straits Times from Chennai yesterday, Usharani alleged that her husband was lured to Malaysia by the lawyers purportedly for an urgent business deal.

“They called him in Chennai on Jan 16 and he took a flight to Kuala Lumpur the next day.”

Usharani said her husband called her after arriving at the Kuala Lumpur International Airport on Jan 18 to inform her that he had arrived safely and was on his way to Banting with both lawyers.
“We know both the lawyer brothers. Their families had visited us in Chennai many times and we, too, had visited them in Banting,” said the woman.

Allal has various business ventures including jewellery shops, plantations, hotels and restaurants.

“My husband had been partners with the brothers for almost 10 years. So when they called on Jan 16 and asked him to bring along cash, he did not hesitate,” she said, adding that Allal had almost 18kg of jewellery and at least RM10,000 on him.

On Jan 19, however, Usharani tried calling her husband and he could not be reached. That was when her troubles started.

“I contacted the lawyers and they told me my husband was caught by police for attempting to smuggle drugs into the country,” she said.

She then contacted the Indian High Commission but they, too, could not get any information on him.

Two weeks later, Usharani started receiving telephone calls from two men who claimed they were police officers from Bukit Aman who could secure her husband’s release if she paid them RM1 million.

“They insisted I come personally with the money so that they would release my husband to me.

“Afraid, I contacted the lawyers and they advised me to pay the ‘police officers’ and to stop calling them.

“That was when I became suspicious and I came down to Malaysia. I went to Banting and lodged a missing person’s report. However, I did not meet the lawyers.”

In May, Allal’s younger brother, Kasiviswanathan, 31, came down and met the lawyers.

“They told him that my husband was still under arrest. They also advised him to return quickly to India, saying that the police would arrest him as well. They even returned my husband’s luggage to him,” she said.

Usharani kept silent for several months, hoping that her husband would return soon.

However, her fears of not seeing him again increased when she got news from a relative here that the lawyers were implicated in the quadruple murders.

“I returned to Malaysia on Sept 8 and lodged a second report at the Banting police station, hoping this time, police would take my complaint seriously. I’m just keeping my fingers crossed.”

Usharani, who married Allal in 2006, has a 3-year-old daughter.

On Sunday, police had revealed that the two lawyers were also linked to four other businessmen reported missing over the past year.

Allal was one of them while the three others were said to be local Indians.

– from the NST
For years, the small community in Banting had known the brothers as they were prominent figures.

They were always said to be involved in land transfers and other land deals.

Old-time residents said the brothers suddenly gained wealth.

They opened up a law firm in Banting, a medical clinic run by their youngest sister, a poultry farm and other businesses in the town,

The Datuk was said to have strong ties to influential businessmen locally and internationally.

Both brothers, however, were suspended by the Bar Council in March 2007 for a year over allegations of cheating their clients.

Both are married and have two children each.

from NST:
Police investigations revealed that the lawyers often offered pro bono services to build up a clean and trustworthy reputation in the town.

“The Datuk had held several press conferences in the past to highlight cases of sexual harassment and maid abuse,” a source said.

Federal CID director commissioner Datuk Seri Bakri Zinin said on Sunday that four missing persons cases would be re-investigated based on police reports lodged by their families who had linked the lawyer duo.

Sources said that among those missing and believed to have been “disposed of” were an Indian national, a local woman and two men. It is learnt that the suspects had “spilled the beans” on at least four other murders although this could not be confirmed.

It is learnt the police’s anti-money laundering division would be applying to the Attorney-General’s Chambers for an order to freeze the assets, including bank accounts, of the two lawyers.

The main suspect was said to own at least nine luxury cars worth millions of ringgit, including seven Mercedes Benzes. The 41-year-old lawyer Datuk, said to be the mastermind behind the murder of Sosilawati and three others, was brought to the crime scene at Ladang Gadong here at 3am yesterday to help in investigations.

And it gets worse when police say want to investigate deaths, especially of lawyers, in the past few years:
Penang police are reopening unsolved murder cases in the state over the past few years, particularly those involving lawyers.State police chief Deputy Comm Datuk Wira Ayub Yaakob said a special committee would relook those cases to see if there were any new developments.

He was commenting on unsolved cases of lawyers who were murdered in the state over the past few years.

On whether these cases could be linked to the murder of cosmetics millionaire Datuk Sosilawati Lawiya, DCP Ayub said they were studying all possibilities.

On July 27 last year, four men cornered lawyer R. Thinakaran Raman, 37, outside a Hindu temple in Supreme Garden, Prai, before forcing him to drink a substance, believed to be detergent. He died a day later of acute renal failure.

Two weeks before his death, he was dragged out of a burning car on the Penang Bridge by passers-by and while resting against the concrete railings of the bridge, accidentally fell into the sea but survived after fishermen rescued him.

On Nov 6, 2007, senior civil lawyer Datuk S.P. Annamalai, 59, died of excessive loss of blood after he was stabbed with a long knife when he was walking to his car in Green Hall here.

His clerk S. Nalaaini, 22, said that the assailant fled on a motorcycle.

On March 2, 2000, lawyer Chew Sien Chee, 39, was shot twice in the neck by a hitman in Tingkat Betik 2, Taman Seri Jaya, Bukit Mertajam.

He had just entered his Mercedes Benz and was about to leave the house for work when the man approached him and fired three times at close range, hitting Chew twice.

He died without regaining consciousness.

On Oct 19, 1997, criminal lawyer S. Pathmanathan, 29, was found dead with nine stab wounds in the neck and back at his China Street office. He was believed to have been murdered the previous evening or night.

He was found with his hands tied behind his back with a metal chain and a padlock while his mouth was mask taped.

Triptipal Singh, 60, was shot in the back outside his house in Jalan Yeap Chor Ee on Oct 15, 1992. He died of heart complications on Nov 1.

Two men had walked up to him from behind and fired five shots at point-blank range. Three of the shots hit him.

The brother were disbarred from Bar Council, but appeal is pending:
The two lawyer brothers arrested in relation to the murder of cosmetics millionaire Da­tuk Sosilawati Lawiya and three others were disbarred by the Bar Council’s disciplinary board on Nov 5 last year.A Bar Council source said the duo however got a stay pending an ap­­peal against the board’s decision. “Their appeal in court has been scheduled for Oct 18,” said the source.

According to the source, the complaint against the brothers was that they had misrepresented themselves as advocates and solicitors in furnishing a false power of attorney in respect of the sale and purchase of a house in Banting.

Earlier, the council had suspended the two brothers from March 9, 2007 to March 30, 2008, over another property transaction.

It was also revealed yesterday that the Datuk had intentions of joining the MIC.

Deputy Minister in the Prime Mi­­nister’s Department Senator Datuk T. Murugiah said the lawyer told him so when they met at a Hari Raya community programme at Kampung Bukit Cheeding in Banting.

“He appeared to be a generous individual and I was invited to distribute hampers which he sponsored for the orang asli community there,” said Murugiah, who crossed over to the MIC from the PPP in July.

More from NST:

Checks also revealed that the Datuk and his brother were struck off the roll of legal practitioners in November last year. But they were granted a stay pending an appeal.

A Bar Council official said the two were struck off for various misdeeds, including alleged shady land dealings and breach of trust. The two were also suspended for a year from March 2007.

Checks also revealed that the younger brother was charged with three counts of criminal breach of trust involving the transfer of a parcel of land worth RM200,000 last year.

He was granted bail of RM50,000 pending the mention of his case on Sept 20.

Family members, friends, Banting residents, public etc. are shocked over the gruesome deaths:

http://www.nst.com.my/nst/articles/ClosefriendsofSosilawati_can_tacceptsheisdead_/Article

http://www.nst.com.my/nst/articles/Shockovergentlemanturnedmurdersuspect/Article/

http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2010/9/14/nation/7031480&sec=nation

The murder location, not a typical farm:

A luxury escapade in the guise of a poultry farm.This is how some residents in the vicinity described the three acres of “poultry farm” which comprised three blocks — an office, a clubhouse and a chalet — plus a betel leaf and livestock farms.

This was where Datuk Sosilawati Lawiya and three others were believed to have been murdered before their bodies were burnt.

A resident staying nearby, identified as Kumar, 40, said the farm was surrounded by a high wall and was not accessible to outsiders.

He said the farm, with its buildings, was situated about 1km away from the main entrance.

“No one knows what happens inside. Even if someone screamed for help, nobody could hear them.”

He said the farm originally belonged to a man from Batu Caves, who sold it to the Datuk lawyer about 11/2 years ago.

Kumar said the Datuk, whose main hobby was livestock-breeding, used the farm for his business dealings. It was learnt that the Datuk took most of his clients to the farm.

Kumar, who has lived here all his life, said on Sunday that he noticed scores of policemen and media representatives at the entrance to the farm.

“Initially, I thought it was a film shoot. I was shocked when a friend later told me what was going on.

“There are about 45 families living nearby. We were shocked when we learnt that the missing people could have been murdered so close to us.”

from the Star:

Meanwhile, an acquaintance of the lawyer Datuk said the farm housed a chalet where several workers were hired to care for the animals.

“Several goats, two peacocks, a cow, jungle fowl, squirrels and a fox were kept at the far end of the farm.”

He said the lawyer used the farm to entertain friends who were treated to exotic meats, besides expensive liquor and beers.

We hope that more cases can be solved so that other families who are missing their loved ones can get some peace and move on with their lives. May their souls rest in peace.

As for the murderers, nothing less than the death penalty should be given.

Twisting the Sosilawati murder case into racial issue?

September 13th, 2010
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


I  am at times amazed at the level of creativity or ingenuity (you may call it naivety or stupidity) our people have. I think the aim of becoming a creative and innovative nation is achievable indeed. I mean just look at the amount of nonsense written at this blog: Gerakan Anti PKR with predictably slanted political view (caution: lots of profanity there even though supposed to be religious). These folks trying to make a racial issue of out the Sosilawati murders by pointing out that the alleged murderers are all Indians while the four victims are all Malays. How pathetic and despicable can this be? I think should file a case against them for committing murder against our common sense!  You can report their page for inciting hatred by visit the Google  Blogger here.

The police have indicated that the group may been (most likely) to be involved in few other missing person case, which include Indians!  You can check all the major newspapers.

The murderers are not bothered about the victims race or religion nor whether its a festive season. They are not in the mood for bermaaf-maafan! They only want money.

Remember, this is not a hate crime against persons from certain race or religion. No churches attacked or cow heads paraded. No throwing of pig head into mosque compounds.

Remember, crimes are committed by all kinds of people. Remember Mona Fandey. Remember Al-Maunah. Remember Botak Chin. Remember Bentung Kali. Remember Ahmad Najib (Canny Ong case). Remember Bakaruddin Busu (UiTM lecturer killed and burned).  Remember Altantuya (exploded to death).

One blog mentioned about the suspect being a member of DAP. So what? You expect every DAP member to be a saint? Bad guys are in all the parties. And just now, Senator Murugiah said one of the suspect inquired about joining MIC! So, MIC members all criminals?  Use head a bit la. People join political parties mainly for self-interest – try to get something from the party, be it some license, support letter, position of power, influence etc. Very few join for purpose of  upholding principles. Some don’t even know they are members because registered by other people.

Someone also said the lawyer represented HINDRAF. So what? You expect to do a detailed background study of a lawyer before hiring him/her? Maybe this guy offered to act on a pro bono basis.

Instead of focusing on the main issues of a crime, the stories are spinned to link with political and racial issues.

My concern is why the group was not properly investigated before this. Rumours going around many previous cases not properly investigated due to links with high places. For me, if its true, corruption is the root cause of these murders.

Banting murderers also suspects in other missing person cases

September 13th, 2010
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


The suspected murderers of well-known entrepreneur and millionaire Susilawati and 3 others, are also suspected of committing similar crimes in the past. This incidence happened in Then’s hometown, so I’m a bit curious as well.

Picture from the Star

Two more picture are available from Low Yat forum (here).

Its seems the brothers also have Facebook profiles (refer here and here).

Some articles from newspapers highlight the possible extensiveness of the criminal activities of this group:

Two lawyer brothers are the prime suspects in the murder of cosmetics millionaire Datuk Sosilawati Lawiya and three others whose bodies were burnt and their ashes strewn in a river near Ladang Gadong, in Tanjong Sepat, here.

Cops are probing if the brothers are also responsible for four more people reported missing.

Bukit Aman CID director Comm Datuk Seri Mohd Bakri Zinin said police were awaiting forensic confirmation on the remains, believed to be that of Sosilawati, the client of the main suspect – a Datuk – said to have been handling a land deal in Penang for the entrepreneur. He owned the farm where the bodies were allegedly burnt after they had been assaulted and stabbed to death.

From initial investigations, police found that the ashes were disposed of at the mouth of a river about 4.2km from the farm. Comm Bakri said the motive of the murder could be business rivalry, debt and a land business deal gone sour. It is learnt that the land in Penang was bought for RM25mil and was to have been re-sold for RM200mil.

… “Police believe the 41-year-old lawyer was the mastermind behind the disappearances and could have been involved in four other missing persons cases,” Comm Bakri told reporters at the Banting police headquarters yesterday.

The brothers were among eight people arrested in connection with the case. The other six, including two women, aged between 19 and 45, were farmhands.

… “We will investigate the brothers in relation to their accumulation of properties, high-end cars and their business dealings that involve millions of ringgit,” he added.

Police are also investigating the whereabouts of the RM4mil which Sosilawati was said to have been carrying.

Comm Bakri said one of the four previous missing persons cases involved an Indian national who had opened a restaurant with the brothers as partners.

He said police would investigate these other cases as well.

… Comm Bakri said the police were investigating the farm land which the lawyer bought about 30 months ago to ascertain if the deal was made “properly”.

He added that the police also wanted to know where the former owner was. The previous owner is said to be missing.

– excerpts from The Star

… The lawyers, one of whom is a 41-year-old Datuk, are said to have masterminded the murders, while the six others are employees at the farm.

Federal Criminal Investigation Department director Datuk Seri Bakri Zinin said at least four of the suspects confessed to the murders.

Those detained, including two women, are between the ages of 19 and 54.

Although Bakri declined to elaborate on the motive for the murders, it was learnt from a reliable source that it stemmed from a business deal that had turned sour.

The lawyer was believed to have persuaded Sosilawati, who was the founder of the Nouvelles Visages beauty line, to purchase a plot of land and had asked her to bring along a substantial amount of cash on Aug 30.

However, when Sosilawati and her entourage met the lawyer, he got angry when she did not bring along the amount which was agreed upon earlier.

The four victims were then forcibly detained by the lawyer’s workers who later killed them.

Police also revealed that the lawyer brothers have been involved in similar cases where their clients had gone missing.

Bakri said police were investigating four similar disappearances linked to the brothers in the past one year.

One of the four earlier victims was an Indian national reported missing several months ago.

The suspects have indicated that the same modus operandi had been used in the other cases over the last one year,” he said at a press conference at the police station here, adding that there could be more arrests.

The Datuk had previously highlighted in the media several cases of exploitation of foreign workers in the country.

Bakri said it was almost certain that the four were held captive at the farm before being beaten up and murdered.

The farm is owned by the Datuk lawyer and is situated about 500m from the main road in an oil palm plantation. It is surrounded by a brick wall and livestock is also raised there.

The bodies are believed to have been burnt beside a pond near the cowshed towards the end of the far m.

Bakri said police had also brought in the anti-money laundering unit and assets belonging to the suspects might be frozen as information had been received that some of the properties were gained through dubious means.

– excerpts from NST.

Reading the article below makes it worse. Wonder why the previous cases were not able to be solved. Could have saved the lives of the four people who died recently (Susilawati and 3 others).

The mastermind said to be behind the murder of cosmetics millionaire Datuk Sosilawati Lawiya and three others is an infamous figure being investigated by police for land fraud and cheating.

Both the man and his brother are from humble beginnings. After graduating with law degrees, they opened a practice, where one of the brothers soon became an active member of the community.

They are known for their show of philanthropy with frequent donations of food and clothing to the poor.

Crime scene: The farm where the murders might have been committed.

The brothers, who specialise in land deals, had also developed a reputation for “unsavoury tactics” during their negotiations.

“Their methods were frowned upon and most lawyers kept their distance from them,” said a source.

The two, who were suspended from practising law for a year for alleged involvement in land scams, are known to have expensive tastes, being seen driving luxury cars.

It is understood that the elder brother, who received a Datukship a year ago, is being investigated by the Commercial Crimes Investigations Department (CCID) in Penang and Bukit Aman for land fraud and cheating cases involving millions of ringgit.

A forensics police officer collecting bone fragments near Banting Sunday.

Sources familiar with the case said he had attempted to cheat a businessman of more than a million ringgit over three parcels of land.

“The businessman was shown a power of attorney letter by the lawyer, who collected a RM1mil deposit pending transfer of the land title.

“When the businessman later did a search, he was shocked to find that the land had already been sold,” they said.

The sources said police were checking if Sosilawati had engaged one of the brothers in a land deal and if she could have wanted her money back after learning about the alleged fraud because there was talk that she had gone to see him in Banting on the same matter.

Federal CCID deputy director Deputy Comm Datuk Noryah Md Anvar confirmed that the brothers were under investigation.

An estate worker said he had sometimes seen luxury cars entering and leaving the farm near where the ashes of the victims were supposedly found.

“However, no one really knows what goes on there as the gates are always closed,” he said.

Another resident, who only wanted to be known as Rajes, 30, said one the brothers was the man “you go to see if you need help with something outside the boundaries of the law.”

Everyone knows that he is connected with certain types of people,” he said, adding that it was rumoured among locals that people who crossed the brothers would mysteriously disappear.

Misleading Publicity by YB Sungai Pinang

September 8th, 2010
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


I’m flabbergasted to say the least! This looks like a case of misleading the public. Teng Chang Kim should have not put the word “sumbangan” as it means contribution (but rakyat like me usually associate it with “donation”). Obviously its not the assemblyman’s contribution but actually from Selangor government. This doesn’t sound right to me at all.

Consider the amount of money wasted to print or emboss on each of the items.

Everywhere you turn looks like seeing his name.  Silap-silap, end up get cursed instead of praise. Cannot be like this la YB.

SELANGOR Speaker Teng Chang Khim’s name is found written all over the place at public parks in the Sungai Pinang constituency.

The Sungai Pinang assemblyman seems to have adopted a bold strategy by displaying his name on benches, gazebos and playground equipment provided by him to the constituents.

However, Teng’s action has not gone well with some of the residents in the constituency which covers a large part of North Klang town, Taman Eng Ann and a section of Jalan Meru.

Nothing spared: A slide in the playground bearing the Speaker’s name.

These residents felt that the move to display the assemblyman’s name as a contributor of the facilities was misleading especially when public funds were used to provide them.

A check by StarMetro following tip-off from a Klang resident, revealed that there were some 110 parks and playing fields in the constituency with Teng’s name displayed on the benches, gazebos and playground equipment.

Each venue has between three and seven benches. A few of them have facilities like playground equipment and three parks has gazebos.

Based on the information provided on the equipment, it was learnt that the assemblyman had started displaying his name on the facilities since 2008 after Pakatan Rakyat took over Selangor.

All the benches, gazebos and playground equipment displayed his name — as the contributor of the facilities.

For all to see: A signage in Malay and Mandarin on a gazebo stating it was a contribution from the Sungai Pinang assemblyman (why no English and Tamil?)

Checks also revealed that the names on the benches were very bold as they occupied almost the entire space of the back rest of the concrete structures.

The white coloured concrete benches had black prints which stated (Sumbangan dari Teng Chang Khim Ahli Dewan Undangan Negeri 2008) Contributed by Teng Chang Khim, state assemblyman 2008 and the third line written in Mandarin.

Some of the benches have the year 2010 printed to indicate the year the benches were provided.

The check also revealed that a white rectangle signboard was placed on the entrance of the each of gazebos with similar information provided in red characters.

All the playground equipment had a square black plastic signage with golden square lining and characters. They stood majestic on the colourful PVC board.

These black pieces had Bahasa Malaysia wordings stating that they were contributed by “Speaker, Teng Chang Khim”.

Some residents claimed the number of public facilities bearing Teng’s name have increased over the last two years and the situation had caused confusion among the public.

They said most people have been misled into believing that the facillities were provided by Teng through his personal contribution.

And the situation has attracted strong criticism from voters in the constituency who felt there was no need for Teng to advertise himself in this manner since he was duty bound to serve the constituents.

A resident who alerted the StarMetro on the existence of what she viewed as a strange practice by the Speaker questioned Teng’s sincerity.

In a strong tone of voice, the caller who declined to be identified said, this is clear misuse of authority by the assemblyman.

“How can he take credit for facilities that have been provided to the people from the public funds especially when his action gives an impression that he had used his own money to do so.

“It does not go well when some of the labels also stated that it was contributed by the Speaker,’’ she said,

While the majority of the residents were appreciative of Teng’s contribution in his official capacity as the elected representative, some of them felt that the presence of his name on the facilities at the public parks and fields in the constituency does not reflect well on the Speaker.

They described Teng’s action as uncalled for and felt that the assemblyman had gone overboard by displaying his name on these objects.

Social worker Peter Tan said it was clear that the assemblyman cum Speaker had became power crazy by seeking cheap advertisement for himself.

Teng, he said, had adopted an “ungentlemanly” approach to seek political mileage for carrying out his responsibility as a state assemblyman.

“You can see his name scattered all over the parks from the benches to gazebos and I wonder from where he got such an idea.

“I think he is getting too obsessed over his position especially after becoming the Selangor State Assembly Speaker from an opposition assemblyman in the past,” said Tan who is Taman Eng Ann resident and a voter in the Sungai Pinang constituency.

Law Chee Keen, 45, of Taman Gembira said he was taken aback when he first spotted the name of the assemblyman on the benches at a park in his housing estate about two years ago.

He said most residents from the housing estate were of the impression that the facilities were contributed personally by Teng.

“Initially, there were only benches with his name on the park but now we even have playground equipment and gazebos.

“We are happy that the assemblyman has provided us with these facilites but putting his name on them sounds strange,’’ he said

K. W. Tan, 56, from Jalan Serendit 9 of Taman Eng Ann said the park in front of his house had benches, a playground equipment and a gazebo with Teng’s name displayed on them.

He said he was unsure if the facilities were provided thorugh Teng’s personal money or allocation from the state but acknowledged that there was a need for the facilities in the area.

Tan said he was more concerned about the frequent flash flood problem in the area than the facilities at the park.

“We have been having sleepless nights for more than 10 years due to flash floods and we hope Teng can help us solve the problem,” he said.

YB Teng has this to say:

SUNGAI PINANG assemblyman Teng Chang Khim sees nothing wrong in putting his name on the benches, gazebos and playground equipment that had been provided to his constituents from state allocation.

Teng said he had been doing so since the Pakatan Rakyat won the Selangor state in the 2008 General Election in a move to show the voters the new administration was doing more things for the people now.

He said he had turned around the image of more than 10 open areas in the constituency into public parks.

“Most of these venues used to be just plain fields but now they have benches, gazebos and mini playground facilities.

“The facilities will encourage the residents including children to come out of their homes and get involved in outdoor actitivies as a community,” he said.

Teng said he had spent 30% from his RM500,000 annual allocation for providing park facilities in his constituency.

He said he was very focussed in his efforts to turn the plain grounds in the constituency into a recreational area for the community.

“At the same time, I want the public to be aware that I am doing my part to make their life better than what it was in the past.

“Just in three years since PR took over, I have been able to bring about so much changes that I was unable to do in the past,” he confessed.

Furthermore, Teng said, the Klang Municipal Council was in the red and had ran out of money to offer the residents with this sort of facilities.

However, he said, things had changed for the better for the people now as he was in the position to offer them such facilities.

“In fact, I was in a way assisting the council so that it can be relieved of some of the financial burden,” he said.

On displaying his name, Teng said, it was aimed at sending a clear message to the people on his contribution as a Pakatan assemblyman.

When asked why some of the singanges had addressed him as Speaker, he said, it was merely for easy identification.

“The wordings are printed according to the availability of the space and it does not matter if it says speaker or assemblyman, both refers to me,” he added.

Me thinks, best if you edit the signages to say “peruntukan Kerajaan Negeri Selangor melalui YB Sungai Pinang tahun [xxxx]”. The word “peruntukan” means “allocation” which is more accurate than “contribution”.

Bell Club in Johor transfered RM60k

August 31st, 2010
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Johor MIC seems to be in headline again. Just few weeks ago it was a division head who was convicted of corruption. Now is an “individual linked to MIC” – whatever that means.

Anyway, investigation only, doesn’t mean got any wrongdoing right? Maybe some simple case of miscommunication or misunderstanding of procedures. But, RM60,000 is lot of money.

The Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) is investigating allegations that an allocation given to an Indian non-governmental organisation had been transferred into a politician’s bank account.

It was learnt that the MACC had already begun recording statements from individuals and politicians in connection with the RM60,000 allocation to a Bell club in the state.

Johor MACC chief Simi Abdul Ghani confirmed that they were investigating the case but declined to disclose any details.

It was learnt that the probe started after the Johor Bell Club committee initiated its own investigation into one of its branches for receiving the allocation from the state government and then allegedly channelling a large part of it into the account of an individual linked to the MIC, keeping only a token sum for itself. The matter surfaced recently when the RM60,000 allocation to the branch in question was published in an MIC booklet.

Since then, questions have been asked as to why such a large sum was given to a small branch instead of the state committee to be distributed to all the clubs in the state.

This prompted the state Bell Club to call for an emergency meeting, its president G. Ganesh said.

“We view this matter seriously and want the branch chairman to explain as there are many rumours circulating.”

Ganesh said it was wrong to use the club’s accounts to get money and then use it for other purposes.

“We also do not know how they got such a huge allocation or who helped to source for the cash.”

Asked whether action would be taken against the chairman, Ganesh said they first had to decide whether to refer him to the disciplinary committee.

As for previous allocations from the Government, he said Johor Mentri Besar Datuk Abdul Ghani Othman had given RM150,000 to the state Bell Club to pay off a bank loan for a building in Kluang last year.

“That was the only allocation we received from the state government,” he said, adding that presently there were about 26 active Bell clubs with about 5,000 members state-wide.