Posts Tagged ‘discrimination’

9A+ student gets diploma in English offer from JPA

May 26th, 2011
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Yet, another sad story. This “annual” affair really makes me angry. Such a simple thing also the authorities can’t get it right. Every year, JPA’s name gets spoilt and dragged through the mud. Really embarrassing. I hope the politicians repent and pray for forgiveness for causing misery to students.

This is really surprising case. I wonder if Hema was put through the MEDSI test to determine if she has the personality to be a teacher. If not, HOW did JPA identify which course is suitable for her? Especially, allocation a critical course (teaching) to a student?

 

 

Every year, we hear stories of high achievers not being able to secure government scholarships to pursue the courses of their choice despite fulfilling the necessary requirements. 

Heamanthaa Padmanaban was among those who had suffered this setback to follow her ambition to study medicine abroad and also did not qualify to take up a course in biotechnology locally.

The 17-year-old from Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan (SMK) Tuanku Jaafar in Seremban, Negri Sembilan, scored 9A+ and 1A in last year’s Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia (SPM) examinations and was an all-rounder in extra-curricular activities.

“I qualified for cross-country runs and played hockey at state level, and was a schools champion in chess and badminton.

NONEIn April last year I was among those chosen to participate in the Malaysia-America Soccer Exchange programme with 12 other women,” Heamanthaa (right) said toldMalaysiakini

All these, besides her academic qualification, were means to secure a Public Service Department (PSD) scholarship to achieve her dream of becoming a doctor. 

“I got the letter from PSD on May 13 and when I saw it I was happy thinking I must have qualified. 

“After reading the contents of the letter I felt as if all my efforts and everything I had strived for had shattered.

“I cried and when I told my mum about it she broke down crying, too, she couldn’t take it,” she recounted. 

Instead of an opportunity to study medicine or biotechnology, the petite and athletic looking Heamanthaa was offered a Diploma course in English at University Pendidikan Sultan Idris (UPSI).

If it was my ambition to teach English, I would have taken up the offer but I want to be a doctor. It doesn’t make sense,” she said.

‘I believed in the govt’

Although disappointed, she has appealed for an alternative offer as she is determined to become a doctor, specialising in oncology.

But without a scholarship, Heamanthaa’s chances of achieving her dream are bleak as her family may not be able to sustain and fund her tertiary education if she decides to pursue medicine privately. 

Her father deals in health products and her mother is a primary school teacher while her younger brother is in Form 4. 

“Private institutions have offered scholarships but they are only enough to pay tuition fees. I worked hard to study overseas and I believed in the government’s word that students with 9A+ will be given scholarships and also to study the courses of their choice,” said Heamanthaa. [worse case, just take the IPTS offer and study hard. Being 4th class citizen means you can’t be choosy]

In July last year, Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak announced that PSD scholarships would be awarded to all students, regardless of ethnicity, who managed to score 9As or higher, for either local or overseas studies.

On May 4, the cabinet decided that all students who scored 8As and above in the SPM would be eligible for PSD scholarships and Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Mohd Nazri Aziz reiterated that the promise will be kept. 

Later, Nazri had rubbished Deputy Education Minister Wee Ka Siong’s allegations of malpractice in the PSD’s selection of scholarship recipients. 

The minister also said the PSD’s focus includes medicine, dentistry, pharmacy, engineering, science and technology and several areas under social sciences.

“Two of my peers were offered medicine, one at a medical college in New Zealand and another at the International Medical University (IMU). [wonder what race the peers are]

“We all got more less the same grades but why didn’t I get any such offers? I want to do medicine and it is one of the critical courses under PSD,” said Heamanthaa.  [more or less? Need to be specific here!]

‘Think about our feelings’

She related that during her 45-minute interview with four PSD panel members on April 13, she was asked several perplexing questions.

“They asked me why doctors don’t want to work in rural areas; why PSD scholars don’t want to come back to the country to work; and what inspires me to be successful.” [these are not perplexing questions! Its fair and logical question to ask. Maybe she didn’t answer well?]

In PSD’s merit category – 85 percent is based on academic excellence, 10 percent on co-curricular activities and five percent on the interview. [but just because of the 5%, she can end up getting diploma in teaching???]

Heamanthaa’s father Padmanaban opined that it is unlikely for his daughter to fail her PSD interview, as she had received good remarks from the US Embassy visa approval officer when she attended an interview last year.

At a press conference yesterday, Heamanthaa said she had appealed to MCA and MIC as well as to several NGOs. 

“Please give it to those who are worthy, that’s all I ask, give scholarships to all those who deserve them,” she added. 

Imagine the anguish when their applications are rejected or not offered the courses they want, she said. 

Another who suffered the same fate as Heamanthaa was Chair Sheng Min from SMK St Joseph in Kuching, Sarawak who obtained 10As. He said he was only offered a scholarship to study engineering at Universiti Technology Petronas, while his two friends with 4As and 5As respectively were awarded scholarships to pursue science degrees in the United States.

“I hope this doesn’t get repeated again in the coming years and the issue is addressed once and for all,” Hemanthaa said. [dream on…, I’ve been wishing the same for years!]

 

source: http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/165143

ADUN Manoharan to sue Education Ministry over partially aided status of vernacular schools

May 24th, 2011
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Not sure why he wants to sue on behalf of Selangor schools only. Perhaps because he’s ADUN in Selangor. But if its applicable for one state, then can extend to others as well. Should get few ADUNs from other states to join in as well.

Obviously there are some guidelines on establishing the status of the school. The land on which the school stands on primarily is the main issue.  If any part of a schools is privately-owned, then it can’t be fully aided.  Probably the ADUN should look to change the guidelines or ensure the landowner donates the land to government.

 

Kota Alam Shah state assemblyperson M Manoharan has threatened to sue the Education Ministry for failing to recognise all vernacular schools in Selangor as fully-aided public schools. 

A notice of proceedings was issued to Education Minister Muhyiddin Yassin today, urging the ministry to fulfil Manoharan’s demands in 21 days, or else be slapped with the suit. 

According to the notice, there are a total of 108 national-type Chinese schools (SJKC) and 97 national-type Tamil schools (SJKT) in the state. 

“Regretfully, only 55 SJKC and 30 SJKT are categorised as fully-aided schools while 53 SJKC and 67 SJKT are categorised as partially-aided schools,” read the notice. 

Manoharan (right) argued that all schools should be treated fairly, in line with the federal constitution, to ensure racial harmony. But now, numerous schools in Malaysia’s most developed state are in deplorable conditions. 

Contacted for details, Manoharan cited the widely reported case of SJK (C) Chung Hua in Klang, which reportedly cannot even afford to pay its water and electricity bills.

“Students can’t even get decent food from the canteen because the operator cannot store food in the fridge because electricity is turned off at night. 

“This is because it is a partially-aided school. The government only pays the teachers’ salaries and nothing else,” he said. 

PE classes in carpark

He also cited the case of SJK (T) Batu 4 in Kampung Jawa where, despite having a student population of 900, there are no laboratories or library because all available space is used for classrooms. 

“There is also no field. Physical education classes takes place in the car park. Teachers, too, are affected. There are 55 of them, but only one toilet,” he said. 

He said that the situation distressed students, parents and teachers in partially-aided schools throughout the state. 

“Children must love to go to school. This is difficult for those in partially-aided schools, particularly Tamil schools. They are typically badly equipped and are as hot as boiler rooms, without proper facilities,” he said. 

Manoharan adds that he had taken up the issue because he had visited several badly affected schools in the state and is very distressed about the situation. 

“I feel it is a form of cleansing, a move to finish off vernacular schools. What is so difficult for the government to pay to upkeep the condition of schools? 

They spend millions lighting up certain places, millions on water splashing all over the place. Why can’t they afford money for education?” he asked.

 

source: http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/164491

DAP wants to work with MIC to save Tamil schools?

May 20th, 2011
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Already critical stage, now only want to work on blueprint? Crazy people. First of all, I wonder if MIC themselves have any blueprint or not. Want to relocate even one school take years, and need some minister intervention. We are talking about relocating dozens of school here.  You think easy ahh? Who want to give land? Who want to give money to build new building? Who want allow convert to fully-aided status?

First, try run a campaign to say all DAP Tamil (or even other Indians) members should send kids to Tamil schools. I don’t remember MIC running any such campaign, so MIC should start one too. I wonder if these guys can survive such a campaign or not.

MIC will tell the usual stuff: its complicated, they are working with the relevant people, will take time, got some quarters not cooperating. Which is true. Its complicated because you need land. Who want to give precious land to 4th class citizens’ education? Housing developer?  If manage to get land, it will be in some corner, next to sewerage pond, highway, cemetery or some faraway place.  Then, the cost of building the school. Government says limited fund. So, need to get sponsor from businessmen and public. Will take time.  Finally, if meet all the requirements (not easy because got many departments who need to give approval), have to apply for fully-aided status. In the middle of all this, will have different groups – parents, PIBG, HM and teachers, NGOs, politicians, and school board,  who may try to interfere and oppose relocation, for various reasons.

BTW, I hope no one goes to town misleading the community saying new school has been built. So far, number of schools is still 523. So where’s the new school? Please be clear if its a relocation, or replacing some school which has closed down already, or just new building.

 

THE DAP is willing to put its political differences with the MIC aside to work on a blueprint to ensure Tamil schools don’t close down, Malaysia Nanban reported.

There are 523 schools nationwide but there is a possibility that many may have to close down, DAP vice-chairman M. Kulasegaran said.

He said many Tamil schools closed down because of poor enrolment and no new ones were opened to replace them in semi-rural and urban areas.

Many estate Tamil schools have low enrolment as these estates have been fragmented or sold off, forcing the workers to migrate to urban areas.

The Ipoh Barat MP said that 70% of the 134 Tamil schools in the state were located in former estates, including about 80 with an enrolment of fewer than 100 pupils.

source: http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2011/5/20/nation/8718356&sec=nation

 

UPDATE: some stats and news from FMT on the same topic:

Tamil schools that were closed because of poor enrolment are not being substituted with new ones in semi-rural and urban areas to cater to the Indian community, the DAP claimed.

Party national vice-chief M Kulasegaran said that nearly 60% of Indian parents preferred to send their children to Tamil schools rather than national schools.

He also said that in Perak, there are over 17,000 pupils studying in Tamil schools – 9,000 in national schools and over 1,500 in Chinese schools.

“Over 70% of the 134 Tamil schools in the state are located in former estates and about 80 of them have an enrolment of fewer than 100 pupils,” said Kulasegaran, who is also Ipoh Barat MP.

“When the estates were fragmented or sold off , the Indians migrated to urban areas and there weren’t enough Tamil schools to cater for their children’s education.

“Clearly there is an anomaly. We urge the authorities to have a new mindset on the Tamil school problem and address them in a holistic manner,” added Kulasegaran.

He accused the MIC of not doing nothing for the past 54 years to address the declining number of Tamil schools, which has now reduced to 523 and is decreasing even further.

DAP is willing to put its political differences with MIC aside to work on a blueprint to ensure the status quo of Tamil schools in the country is maintained.

“We’re willing to have a candid talk with MIC to ensure a win-win situation for our community,” said Kulasegaran.

“Tamil schools with fewer than 100 pupils that have been closed must be replaced with new ones in urban areas.”

The DAP is concerned that without such a blueprint, the Barisan Nasional (BN) government may systematically closed these schools.

Election gimmick

Kulasegaran said that the vernacular system may suffer a slow death as more estates are fragmented resulting in the closure of Tamil schools.

His concern is that when schools with poor enrolment are closed, the government will not replace them with new ones in urban areas with an Indian population .

He said that the federal and state governments were implementing policies on an ad hoc basis.

“For example, Perak MIC chairman S Veerasingam has announced that Tamil schools (with low enrolment) will be relocated to four areas in Jelapang in Ipoh, Langkap near Teluk Intan, Taman Kaya in Taiping and Tun Sambanthan in Sungai Siput ,” Kulasegaran said.

“However, our investigation revealed that the areas are not feasible as they do not meet the education ministry’s guidelines for building new schools, which require at least five acres of land.

“We are concerned that this announcement could just be an election gimmick and for mere publicity to hoodwink the Indian community,” Kulasegaran said.

He alleged that on several occasions, MIC leaders had made empty promises of building new schools to replace the ones in the rural areas, which were shut down.

He claimed that the MIC had taken voters for a ride and had failed to safeguard the interests of Tamil schools in the country. He gave several instances:

  • for the past 20 years, at every election, the MIC pledged to relocate the Tamil school in Merlimau, Malacca;
  • there are Tamil schools that have been squatting in shophouses at Lukut since 2003 and nothing had been done to relocate them;
  • one Tamil school is located in a cinema in Ladang Brausnton, Jeram, Kuala Selangor; and
  • in Kajang there is only one Tamil school with about 1,800 pupils on a half-acre plot of land, whereas in Bandar Mahkota, Cheras, there are three parcels of vacant land measuring about five acres belonging to the education ministry.

“ Why can’t this vacant land be allocated for the construction of a Tamil school?” Kulasegaran asked.

“Though the nation has achieved independence for so many decades, many Tamil schools still don’t have electricity and water supply,” he said.

source: http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/2011/05/18/tamil-school-problem-still-being-ignored/

 

JPA Scholarship allocation problem

May 19th, 2011
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


At least Dr Wee Ka Siong was being honest when he said: “If this trend continues, many Barisan Nasional parties will have to close shop because such a practice will only scare away young voters”. Main concern is about political survival. Of course there’s other reasons too, as he said :  “Many talented young people will also be driven away and this will make the brain drain problem even worse.”

Dr Wee, besides being the MCA Youth chief, is also the deputy education minister. Makes us wonder what’s happening when “products” of one ministry is treated in such way by another agency.

Anyway, year after year we keep hearing the same stories. JPA says they are being transparent, but as I commented on Eduhelp:

…I just wonder, how difficult it is to post the details of the recipients on the website to ensure MAXIMUM transparency on the selection process. Its not enough to just announce the selection criteria and process, but not announce the outcome of the selection process. It can be manipulated, and is it a wonder if people think there’s manipulation in the selection?

To make it easy for JPA, let me suggest to you the relevant fields: recipient name, detailed result, detailed marks received for the selection process, selected for which award/country/program, family income, school name, district/state, and basis for selection (merit, race, location etc).

Sure, sometimes students have high expectations even though their results are not so excellent. They may have applied for courses with toughest competition, and all of them want to go overseas (presumably greener pasture and possibly not to return?). Or their academic results were good, but not their co-curriculum marks. Or maybe they performed badly at the interview session.

Sure, we have quota system whereby students from certain race/background is given place instead of other Malaysians. JPA already highlighted the category of selection criteria, which for readers’ reference, are two documents by JPA which document the selection process and also the relevant application details for 2011.

http://esilav2.jpa.gov.my/esila_new/pdf/2011_piln/Syarat-syarat_permohonan_piln_2011.pdf

http://esilav2.jpa.gov.my/esila_new/pdf/2011_piln/Pre_conditioning_piln_2011.pdf

 

So, if the deputy education minister says the government officers made their own selection criteria, then who is ultimately responsible? Head of JPA is ultimately the Prime Minister as it comes under his purview.

The problem was made worse when PM Najib announced that all 8A+ students will get scholarship. Of course, this could easily be misunderstood by students and parents to mean that these students can get to study medicine or engineering in overseas. But the PM didn’t say that. He just said “will get scholarship”. Where/when/what??? So, when JPA released the results we saw students getting scholarship to enter matriculation or asasi (foundation) at IPTA/IPTS. Of course, not as glamourous as getting PILN to study overseas.

But, still its hard to understand why someone with 4A+ or 5A+ is given place to go overseas while one with 10A+ is sent IPTS. Maybe didn’t get A in BM? Or not active in extra curricular activities?

Now its up to MCA, MIC etc to take up the cases and get the second round of application done. Some appeals  will be made and few extra students will get a place and the political parties have once again saved the people.

I wonder, what if  the many disgruntled parents and students, along with 10 of their relatives will picket in front of PM’s house or JPA office. Just imagine, a thousand unhappy people (read voters), and with no politicians involved, peacefully voicing out their unhappiness. Will the police use tear gas and water cannons to disperse them? I wonder if there’s any Facebook page or event for this.

 

Government officers who failed to follow Cabinet directives is one of the main reasons why top students failed to get the awards, said MCA Youth chief Datuk Dr Wee Ka Siong.

Many students who deserved the scholarships did not get the grants, but those who did not deserve them had successfully obtained the financial assistance, he added.

He described the situation where qualified students were unsuccessful in their scholarship applications was the worst this year in all the years when he handled appeals.

Dr Wee said these government officers set their own selection criteria and did not follow what the Cabinet had decided.

Tale of woe: Dr Wee listening to one of the students during the press conference in Wisma MCA, Kuala Lumpur, yesterday.

“If this trend continues, many Barisan Nasional parties will have to close shop because such a practice will only scare away young voters.

“Many talented young people will also be driven away and this will make the brain drain problem even worse,” he told a press conference at Wisma MCA yesterday.

Dr Wee said students who scored full A+ in the SPM examination were not given priority during the selection process, and were only offered open scholarships for government matriculation programmes or vacancies at local universities.

An open scholarship for matriculation studies is financial assistance given to students only after they have obtained good results during their first year in the programme.

“However, students who obtained poorer results were awarded scholarships to study at universities overseas,” he said.

Previously, the Government announced that 300 of the 1,500 Public Service Department (PSD) scholarships were given based on merit, regardless of race.

Dr Wee said this figure was sufficient to cater to the 363 full A+ scorers.

One of the students facing this problem is Chan Shu Ren from SMK Chung Ching in Raub, who obtained 11A+ in the SPM examination.

Shu Ren, who was present at the press conference with her father Chan Ah Kau, was offered an open scholarship for the government matriculation programme.

“I have friends from the same school who only obtained 8A+ and 9A+ but received PSD scholarships to study in countries like France and India,” Shu Ren said.

Students Lo Chia Hwee from SMK St Teresa, who obtained 10A+, said it was disheartening when she was only offered an open scholarship.

She had worked hard hoping to get a scholarship to study medicine overseas.

Another student, Chai Sheng Min from SMK St Joseph in Kuching, who also obtained 10A+, said he only got a scholarship to study engineering at Universiti Teknologi Petronas while his friends who got 4A+ and 5A+ were awarded scholarships to do Pure Science in the United States.

Dr Wee said MCA would meet with PSD officials to discuss the problem.

 

source: http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2011/5/19/nation/8714415&sec=nation

 

55 seek asylum in UK in 2010

May 6th, 2011
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


I do receive comments from readers asking about converting back to original religion after making hasty/ill-advised decision earlier to convert out. Well, I guess one way is to seek asylum in foreign country, if you got the cash to go there. But if you don’t even have a proper birth certificate or MyKad, can’t use this option.

China Press reported that 55 Malaysians sought asylum in Britain last year, citing reasons which touched on their religion, sexual orientation and political freedom.

Five of them said that they were seeking religious freedom, six said they wanted to escape prosecution for being homosexuals while three sought political asylum.

– from http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2011/5/6/nation/8615967&sec=nation