Posts Tagged ‘Economy’

TEKUN recipients in KL

June 10th, 2011
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Rm320k / 37 recipients = average RM8648 per person.  Was wondering when the TEKUN loan recipients was announced.

 

BEAUTICIAN Stephanie Reavathi Marimuthu has been wanting to upgrade her beauty business in Lebuh Ampang, Kuala Lumpur for a long time.

The 35-year-old is now able to do so after receiving a RM15,000 loan from the Economy Funds Venture Group (Tekun) under the Young Indian Entrepreneurs Scheme (Spumi) recently.

“I wanted to upgrade and enhance my business into an academy status, but I was not able to because of lack of funds.

“We need money to buy the right tools for teaching. Now with this loan, I will be able to move forward,’’ she said.

Dental technical support assistant Benedict Soosai also received a loan of RM7,000 to upgrade his business.

The 37-year-old said he was grateful for the loan which he would channel towards buying dental spare parts for his business.

Stephanie, Benedict and 35 other young entreprenuers received their cheques from Deputy Federal Territories and Urban Wellbeing Minister Datuk M. Saravanan at Kuala Lumpur City Hall recently.

A total of RM320,000 was distributed to young entreprenuers and petty traders doing business in KL.

Saravanan said the scheme was introduced by the Government to help Indian traders obtain micro credit loan to upgrade their business.

He said the scheme was introduced in 2008 and RM18mil have been disbursed to poor traders.

source: http://thestar.com.my/metro/story.asp?file=/2011/6/4/central/8818559&sec=central

 

 

72 percent of Malaysians optimistic about job prospects

May 26th, 2011
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Wow! We rank fourth in the world in terms of job prospects. Not sure if Malaysians thinking about jobs in the country or overseas. Probably a mix of both.

But then, the Wellness report says 83% of Malaysians consider themselves as suffering or struggling! Hmm…

Probably we are optimistic about getting jobs, but still worried about economy, cost of living, politics, health, environment, education, crime rates, and so on.

Malaysians are among the most upbeat in the world in terms of their employment outlook and ranked as the fourth most optimistic in the world over their job prospects in a Nielsen survey released today.

Malaysia surged to the fourth place globally in the first quarter of this year from sixth in the fourth quarter of 2010 in terms of consumer optimism about their job prospects.

Seventy-two per cent of online respondents in the survey described their job prospects as excellent or good over the next 12 months, compared to 70 per cent in the previous quarter. Across the Asia Pacific region, the average was 66 per cent.

Malaysia came in ahead of Switzerland in fifth place but behind top ranked India as well as Singapore and Saudi Arabia which were second and third most optimistic respectively.

“The positive response mirrored the good news on Malaysian exports which hit a record of RM64.1billion in March 2011, driven by the growth of shipments of goods including electrical and electronics as well as commodities — refined petroleum products and palm oil,” said Nielsen in a media release.

Malaysians fared less well, however, in terms of optimism over the economic outlook, coming in ninth and also expressed concern over their personal finances.

More than half — 55 per cent of online consumers surveyed — felt that the nation is not in an economic recession, compared to 49 per cent a quarter ago. About a third, or 27 per cent, of respondents believed the country is still in recession and anticipated that the recession would last for another 12 months.

“Malaysian consumers seemed concerned that inflationary pressures, rising food and fuel prices and potential interest rate hikes would reduce their disposable incomes,” said Nielsen.

The Nielsen survey also showed that Malaysia ranked second (41 per cent of online consumers) and sixth (33 per cent) globally when it comes to paying off debts/credit cards/loans and investing in shares/mutual funds respectively.

The survey was conducted by global information and measurement company Nielsen and was conducted between March 23 and April 12, 2011 and polled more than 28,000 consumers in 51 countries throughout Asia Pacific, Europe, Latin America, the Middle East, Africa and North America.

 

source: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/malaysians-4th-most-optimistic-globally-over-job-prospects/

 

Why roti canai costs 4 times more?

May 24th, 2011
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


So, why does our food cost a lot? According to the article below, its due to (i) rental price, (ii) worker cost, (iii) material cost, and (iv) hidden costs.

Logically, those tepi jalan stalls should be the cheapest places to eat (and yes indeed), but there are some stalls whom prices are equal to restaurants.

Some restaurants may reduce price by sourcing for lower quality products as raw material. This brings down the cost for materials.

Others may hire illegal workers, which also brings down the cost a bit.

Some become creative and reduce the portion of the food, or use smaller plates to play tricks on our eyes.

 

To understand why Malaysians are charged four times more for a 20-sen roti canai, CHAI MEI LING and TAN CHOE CHOE delve into the economics of food to dissect the prices of popular fare

WHY is it that we pay RM3.50 for a bowl of instant noodles when the same amount can get us five packets from the hypermarket?

What is the real cost of a plate of nasi lemak, fried rice and roti canai?

To answer these questions, the New Sunday Times team got insiders from the food and beverage industry to open up on the sensitive and tricky issue of pricing.

The truth is the actual cost of most Malaysian staples is just one-third of the price we are paying.

For example, it takes only slightly more than RM1 to whip up an average plate of char kuey teow, which sells for RM4 at a regular outlet.

Roti telur, the actual cost a mere 60 sen, is priced at RM1.80.

As drinks cost much less to prepare, businesses reap an even higher profit margin.

On an average, consumers fork out five times the actual cost of a drink. It takes, for instance, 30 sen to come up with a glass of teh tarik that we pay RM1.50 for.

These lopsided equations may raise the question of unfair trade practices, but traders argue that there are other factors that need to be taken into account.

Rental, workers’ wages, hidden costs and profit are also worked into the price tag, they say.

Of them all, rental carries the most weight, says business operator and chef Khairul Arifin Ismail.

At the high-end restaurant where he works, rent amounts to an astronomical RM40,000 a month.

“Rent is the biggest expenditure for businesses housed in a proper lot. It’s a fixed amount. It’s not something traders can change. Some business people struggle just to pay the rent.”

It is not surprising then that 30 to 40 per cent of what we pay for is attributed to rental. Other factors give business owners more flexibility in fixing an amount that can maximise their profit.

For example, many opt for foreign labour which costs less. This is especially when locals fresh out of school are now demanding up to RM1,000 pay a month.

Workers’ wages normally make up 15 to 25 per cent of the food price, says Khairul.

Businesses also have to contend with wastage and hidden costs, such as food packaging, wear and tear of equipment and miscellaneous items such as tissue paper and plastic cutlery.

If businesses are prudent, they can bring it down to five per cent of the food pricing, and thus channel more of the savings into profits.

With all these to juggle, striking a balance between costs and profit is a huge challenge for businesses. Fix a price too low and one ends up running a loss; charge too high and one risks losing patrons.

To come up with competitive prices, operators depend on experience and business acumen.

Marcus Poon, for one, feels the price of his food items are “reasonable”, if not bordering on cheap.

Poon operates a WiFi-enabled, air-conditioned cafe that serves a combination of Asian and Western cuisine near a residential area in the Klang Valley.

His competitors include hawker stalls and several other cafes in the area.

“Most of my food items cost 35 to 45 per cent of the price I charge. But that is just the cost of materials.

“When you take the cost of labour and rental into consideration, the total cost per item is about 65 to 75 per cent,” says Poon.

So, a profit of between 25 and 35 per cent is reasonable, he adds.

“The F&B business is getting increasingly competitive these days and consumers are spoilt for choice. Although my profit margin is supposedly about one-third of the price, my turnover is not that high,” says Poon.

Khairul says a profit of 20 to 30 per cent is considered normal for any budget and medium-sized business, but high-end restaurants and hotels mostly take home a profit margin of about 10 per cent because of the high costs of investment.

Even then, they are the biggest takers as the value of the margin is much bigger than the profit of smaller businesses.

“A hotel that charges RM45 for a plate of fried rice may gain a 15 per cent profit after deducting all the other expenses that come in the form of a gold-rimmed plate, air-conditioning, expensive tablecloth, good service and such. The value is almost RM7.

“Comparatively, at a normal eatery, a 30 per cent profit amounts to only RM1.20.”

Sometimes, the price of a dish is reflective of the labour that goes into preparing it.

“There’s more to a packet of nasi lemak than it seems. Making the sambal takes a lot of effort,” says Khairul, who has 20 years of experience in the food industry.

“Many people think that nasi beriani gam, which sells at RM8 to RM9 a plate, is expensive. But the process of making it is tedious. We’re also paying for the process, not just for the materials.”

Poon says consumers should appreciate that the prices they pay are also for the ambience of the restaurant.

“Wallpaper, decorations and renovations — all these cost money but we cannot factor these into the calculation of the prices of food items we sell. At least, not in this neighbourhood.”

But this doesn’t mean that he can choose not to repair, upgrade or renovate his cafe because “every restaurateur has to strive to differentiate themselves from others”.

“Everyone likes a concept store these days. Some places sell yucky food at exorbitant prices, but if the concept or design of the shop is appealing, people will still come.

“Ultimately, it is very much a demand and supply situation,” says Poon.

Lim Hui San, a single mother with three children who operates a hawker stall in Jinjang, Kuala Lumpur, says the food business does not promise huge returns.

She says the material cost of a plate of char kuey teow with shrimps, blood cockles and bean sprouts is RM1.20. She sells a plate at RM3.80. On a good day, she can sell up to 80 plates.

Similarly, her profit margin is about 30 per cent after deducting the cost of rental and labour.

“But the coffee shop where I operate my stall only opens six days a week and it also closes shop on public holidays. I also have to pay a local assistant RM1,200 a month.

“I could easily get an illegal for less, probably RM700 to RM800, but I’m trying not to.”

Lim earns about RM2,000 to RM3,000 a month.

“A respectable amountlah. Any less and I would not know how to survive in Kuala Lumpur.”

source: http://www.nst.com.my/nst/articles/10mfo/Article/#ixzz1MrG83EVh

Two differing articles on My First Home scheme

May 17th, 2011
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


The first article is quite positive:

A total of RM21.3mil in loans has been approved under the My First Home Scheme since its launch in March, said Second Finance Minister Datuk Seri Ahmad Husni Hanadzlah.

“As of April 30, RM21.3mil in loans was approved to 143 applicants with an average value of RM149,365 per loan.

“We have also received encouraging response from banks as we now have 25 that have agreed to give out such loans compared to 20 initially,” he said before witnessing the signing of a memorandum of understanding between Syarikat Peruma-han Negara Bhd and banks on the scheme.

He said as of April 30, 772 people had applied for loans under the scheme.

The scheme, launched by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak on March 8, is to enable young adults earning RM3,000 or less to obtain 100% financing for their first home with the price capped at RM220,000.

Ahmad Husni said SPNB had also constructed over 4,500 houses worth between RM100,000 and RM200,000 for the scheme and another 8,991 being built in 16 projects nationwide.

“The future is in creative economy with the private and public sectors playing an important role in corporate social responsibility,” he added.

On the affordable housing programme for young urban folk and the poor announced on May 6, Ahmad Husni said they were looking at providing these in the Klang Valley and other urban areas through a public-private partnership.

“We realise that property prices have escalated.

“We are discussing with various groups to supply such houses. A couple of companies have already agreed to do so.

“We are looking at various initiatives to help the people,” he said, adding that the matter was also being discussed in one of the Budget 2012 focus groups.

SPNB chairman Datuk Idris Haron said they were in talks with land owners in the Klang Valley, including Putrajaya, Cyberjaya, Rawang, Puchong, Damansara, Shah Alam and Klang, to build affordable homes by 2020.

source: http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2011/5/17/nation/8699140&sec=nation

The second is not a rosy one:

There has been poor response to 4,516 housing units under the My First Home scheme in the country.

The units were completed by Syarikat Perumahan Negara Bhd (SPNB) and were priced within the RM100,000 to RM220,000 range.

The scheme, launched by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak in March, is opened to private sector employees aged between 18-years-old and 35-years-old; drawing a monthly salary of not more than RM3,000.

Potential buyers can get 100% financing and a repayment period of up to 30 years.

According to SPNB chairman Datuk Idris Haron, the company has completed 11,400 low and medium cost houses valued at RM1.1bil which remained unsold.

“Of these, 4,516 housing units in 12 development projects can be categorised under the My First Home scheme.

“The response has not been encouraging, perhaps due to the lack of publicity.

“We need to step up our marketing efforts,” Idris said at the opening of the new SPNB headquarters in Wisma Perkeso, Jalan Tun Razak yesterday.

SPNB signed MoUs with and 19 banks, witnessed by Second Finance Minister Datuk Seri Ahmad Husni Hanadzlah, for the scheme.

Ahmad Husni said as of April 30, 772 applications had been received for the My First Home Scheme.

“A total of 143 applications have been approved, amounting to RM21.3mil in housing loans. The average loan is RM149,365,” he said.

Idris said 8,991 housing units, which fell under the My First Home scheme, were being built in 16 development projects in Selangor, Kedah, Johor, Kelantan, Sabah and Sarawak.

“For future developments in the Klang Valley, we are also in talks with landowners in Puchong, Putrajaya, Cyberjaya, Damansara, Rawang, Klang and Shah Alam,” said Idris.

He pointed out that it was not realistic to build homes under the scheme in prime areas in the Klang Valley due to high land values.

“We work with private land owners. However, in areas that we have built homes, such as Laguna Biru apartments in Sungai Buloh, have good potential to become prime locations in five or 10 years.”

source: http://biz.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2011/5/17/business/8695472&sec=business

And it appeared in the same paper 🙂 Personally, not sure if its the marketing, or the terms of loan, or even the location of the properties. As a housebuyer, I would like to get a nice property, possibly landed, which seems impossible with the current income levels of many Malaysians. So, if our parents could buy houses, why can’t we, who are more educated and earning “more”?

Wellness Survey shows 83 percent of Malaysians are struggling or suffering

May 10th, 2011
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


The Gallup Wellness Survey report is at:

http://www.gallup.com/poll/147167/High-Wellbeing-Eludes-Masses-Countries-Worldwide.aspx

Below is the result of the 124 countries.

And this is an interesting opinion based on the survey above:

The Gallup survey of 124 countries sought to categorise people into three groups — those who were thriving, struggling or suffering.

The survey found that majorities in only 19 out of 124 countries considered themselves thriving. Unsurprisingly, more people in the developed world felt that they were doing well compared to those from the developing world.

Income levels are, of course, a key determinant of wellness. Countries with higher per capita incomes invariably tend to have better healthcare, social safety nets and opportunities for advancement.

As well, developed countries tend to have a better overall environment for the pursuit of wellness. An independent judiciary, a responsible police force, less corruption, and equitable laws that level the playing field for all citizens facilitate wellness.

In short, political systems that are accountable to their citizenry and responsive to their needs generally provide for a better quality of life, and that is the key.

Denmark, Sweden, Canada, Australia and Finland were among the top five countries in the world where the majority of people felt good about their lives. In Denmark, 72% considered themselves as thriving.

And what of Malaysia? The survey revealed that Malaysians are an unhappy lot. Seventy-nine per cent of the population considered themselves to be struggling.

To put this in a wider context, Malay­sia fared worse than Lebanon or Russia but did better than Mon­golia, Uganda and Mali, if that is any con­solation.

In high-income Sin­ga­pore, 61% considered themselves as struggling, suggesting that the quality of life there is not as great as its leaders think it is. Perhaps the restrictive political environment in the island republic might have something to do with it.

The world wellness survey tends to correspond with the data contained in the World Bank’s Migration and Remittances Factbook 2011 (MRF2011) which came out in February. It must come as no surprise that people who are struggling or suffering usually vote with their feet and flee for greener pastures.

Torrents of people from Asia, Africa, the Middle East and Latin America are moving, legally or illegally, to the developed world. Third World nationalists, dictators and mullahs might inveigh against the West but many of their own people are risking life and limb to head West. Those that can’t make it to their preferred Western destinations end up in the relatively more prosperous developing countries like Malaysia.

Thousands of people from all over Asia and Africa now live in Malaysia, legally or otherwise. In fact, according to the MRF2011, Malaysia has become one of the top destinations for Asian migrants who already account for 8.4% of our population. The remittances from these migrants amounted to more than US$ 6.8bil (RM 20.3bil) in 2009.

And while poor unskilled migrants flood into Malaysia, skilled Malaysians are leaving in greater and greater numbers.

The MRF2011 data indicates that more than 1.4 million Malaysians, or 5.3% of our population, have already left. Included in this figure are 1,727 locally trained physicians.

The US, Britain, Australia, New Zealand, Canada and Singapore were the main destinations.

The continuing outflow of skilled Malaysians, coupled with the rising inflow of unskilled migrants, cannot be good news for the long-term future of our nation.

Cheap labour might boost our industries in the short-term but will do nothing to help us in the critical areas of innovation, research and entrepreneurship that is vital for our future prosperity.

The other thing about unhappy people is that they tend to send their money abroad because they lack confidence in the future of their own countries.

Here again, Malaysia is one of the chart toppers with more than US$ 8bil (RM 23.8bil) going abroad last year. How long can we continue to bleed this way?

What all these say is that Malaysians are not happy with the way things are going and with the overall quality of life they now experience. It suggests, as well, that they have no confidence that things are going to improve anytime soon. It also means that our present efforts to persuade talented and skilled Malaysians to return home are unlikely to be successful.

Offering tax incentives and better remuneration alone are not going to cut it with people whose priority is a better quality of life for themselves and their families.

The message that the Gallup Wellness Survey sends to many Third World governments, including our own, is that they need to do a better job in improving the quality of life of their citizens.

For us, that means seriously tackling the growing racial and religious divide, significantly improving our education system, providing equal opportunities for all Malaysians to prosper, and being attentive to the plea for better governance.

Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak appears to be acutely aware of the challenges that Malaysia faces. Let us hope that the government’s plans to improve the wellness of all Malaysians bear fruit.

In the meantime, we will continue to hear that sucking sound of men and money moving abroad much to our detriment.

Datuk Dennis Ignatius is a 36-year veteran of the Malaysian foreign service. He has served in London, Beijing and Washington and was ambassador to Chile and Argentina. He was twice Undersecretary for American Affairs. He retired as High Commissioner to Canada in July 2008.