Posts Tagged ‘Education’

USM Munsyi test

April 17th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Well, for those who got shortlisted for test – congrats!

I heard that its an objective type of questions and focuses on your apptitude/personality etc. Its basically to gauge if you are suitable for the course you applied for.

All the best!

Chance of getting: 3500/26,635 = 13%, meaning one out of every 7.6 person will get a place in USM.

Selection trial tomorrow for entry into USM

GEORGE TOWN: The 26,635 students who applied to enter apex-status Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM) must not miss the Malaysian University Selection Inventory (Munsyl) special assessment test tomorrow.

USM deputy vice-chancellor (Academic and International Affairs) Prof Ahmad Shukri Mustapa Kamal said the test would enable them to select applicants who were suitable for the course they had opted for.

“Anyone who misses the test will miss a chance to study in USM. It’s just a one-hour test and it is to help the university and applicants make the right choice.”

He said USM had selected 117 locations nationwide for the applicants to attend the assessment tomorrow.

“Only 3,500 applicants will be picked to enrol in the university. The applicants will know their status at the end of this month.”

Prof Ahmad Shukri said unsuccessful applicants would have their applications submitted to the University Admission Unit (UPU) for other public universities.

He said those sitting for the Munsyl must print the attending slip from www.usm.my, bring their identification card, pencils and erasers to sit for the assessment.

“The location for them to sit the assessment can be found online,” he said, adding that the university had sent out SMSes to the candidates.

lecturer forced to resign

April 16th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Well, “sympathy marks”, “marks for attendance”, “make-up tests/assignments”, “remarking” etc  is quite common to pump up the marks. Which college/uni would like to be known as the place that fails students? Even students ask about passing rates before taking up courses.  Some even admit that they enrol in certain colleges because easy to graduate.

Lecturers also will have to face the students next semester if they fail this semester. So, why waste time failing students, just pass them with minimum marks and send them off.

In the end, students want a scroll. College want money. Staff want salary.

But, if only 4 out 157 students passed as in the case below, then something seriously wrong. I have friends and contacts in education industry, but yet to hear of such poor passing rates from any of them.  Its possible that the lecturer set too high a standard, or the quality of students are very poor. Being an Islamic university, attendance or discipline should not been an issue.

A UNIVERSITI Sains Islam Malaysia lecturer who passed only four out of 157 of her law students claims she was forced to resign so that the university could protect its reputation, Kosmo! reported.

Nor (not her real name) said the reason she left was because she could not stand the pressure from the university management on her to give “sympathy marks.”

“How am I to give extra marks if the marks they got is what they should be getting?” she said, adding that her downfall started when she received a show-cause letter on why so many students had failed.

She was then criticised by her superiors, who also wanted her to add marks based on attendance so as to reduce the number of failures.

“I stood my ground. How could I give them marks for that when it is their responsibility to show up for classes?” she added.

The university declined to comment.

RM80 million given to Tamil schools

April 12th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


I’m still confused over the allocation given to Tamil schools. No reply from Dr S Subra after I emailed him. Anyway, since everyone saying its RM130 million, so be it. I guess the second stimulus package allocation (RM300 million) is not equally divided.

The Sun provided following breakdown of the allocation released so far:

RM80 million, of which RM50 million comes from the first stimulus package and the rest from the Ministry of Finance allocation, was distributed by PM Najib as follows for 374 Tamil schools from eight states and Kuala Lumpur:

[I calculated the average per school for reference]
> Johor: 56 schools to get RM8.65 mil [ RM154k/school]

> Kedah: 49 schools (RM12.2 mil) [RM248.9k]

> Malacca: 13 schools (RM2.66 mil) [204.6k]

> Negeri Sembilan: 47 schools (RM1 mill) [21.3k]

> Pahang: 26 schools (RM5.28 mil) [203k]

> Perak: 85 schools (RM13.2 mil) [155.3k]

> Penang: 22 school (RM5.9 mil) [268k]

> Selangor: 67 schools (RM25.16 mil) [375.5k]

> Kuala Lumpur: 9 schools (RM5.86 mil) [651.1k]

If you total up the amount, its RM 79.91 million.

According to ex-Education Minister Hishamuddin, the money will be disbursed through the Public Works Department (PWD) as it is the most effective method, since not all schools have board of governors. All projects must be completed by the end of the year.

“We want to do it in the quickest way possible and the PWD has the necessary expertise,” he said after Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak presented the allocation to Tamil school representatives from several states at the ministry.

“But if the boards of the Tamil schools are ready next time, then by all means we can go through them.”

In an immediate response, Tamil School Headmasters Association general secretary M.S. Muthiah said he was thankful for the allocation.

“Many of the schools are in rural areas so the allocation will help improve the conditions there,” he said.

Perhaps MIC wants back Work Ministry so that it could monitor the usage of the funds properly and to avoid unnecessary leakages.

5 percent indians in IPTA intake

April 4th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Makkal Osai quoted Deputy Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Senator T. Murugiah as saying that the enrolment of Indians in public institutions of higher learning was low because of the merit system.

A nationwide survey at such institutions showed Indians made up only 5% of the total number of students at each intake. He said the racial gap would be higher in another five years if nothing was done to rectify it.

Does it mean the quality of education of Indians students is low? Probably it is. I guess there’s a widening gap between the top achievers and the mediocre/weak students.

How meritous is the meritocracy system? Do we have an independent audit in place to verify selection of students? What is the impact of having dual entrance system – matriculation and STPM on the intake?

I also noticed that something’s wrong in the requirements for diploma/degree programs in local universities. For example, when the requirement is 3 or 5 credits,  in certain cases, subjects like Pendidikan Islam and its ilk are considered, but not Moral Education. So, what is the purpose of studying Moral and making it compulsory when it does not help in getting a place in the university? The non-muslim students might as well take Islamic subjects and use it to fulfill entrance requirements. I only realised this when helping my niece to do the online application at UPU website. Unfortunately, I didn’t have time to do a properly analysis of all the courses.

Secondly, universities like USIM and others offer courses related to Islamic studies which is not accessible for 40% of the SPM leavers. We also have UITM which is mainly for certain race only. There’s also certain foundation (Asasi) program reserved for certain category of people.

countdown to Bukit Selambau 1

April 1st, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


I wonder why the Pakatan coalition need to talk about on-going case like the Mongolian lady murder in Bukit Gantang and Bukit Selambau by-elections. They need not be reminded that they are/were the ruling government in Kedah and Perak (up to February this year). So, they should produce their “report card” – What work has been done in last 11 months in the areas and state.  List out all the success stories and all the work in progress, and the future plans. The voters can compare the report card of both coalitions and then evaluate the candidates. That would be mature politics for me. Not the name-callings, cheap instant noodle projects, and melodramatic action.

In the last two days, two Tamil schools received their funds as promised in the second stimulus package – one presented by Muhiyiddin (SJKT Sungai Tukang) and the other by Hishamuddin (SJKT Ladang Sungai Getah, RM210,000). While we won’t know if these two schools were “recent” additions to the list, its a good publicity move by BN. Regardless of voters’ choice, two schools have got funds for renovation and repair works. Ganesan knows there’s 7 more Tamil schools left. How nice if these schools (and also all other schools – religious, secondary, missionary – in dire need of repairs) get some funds.

If PR wins, Indians will have an EXCO seat. If BN wins, Indians may get more funding via federal government. Its a win-win situation on paper, because the BN fellow may not be more than a figurehead while the PR fellow will be a lone ranger in PAS-dominated.  So, it may be a lose-lose situation in reality.  So, how about the independents? Can they offer something new? They win – no EXCO post. They may join PPP/MIC/Gerakan and try get some leftovers from federal government.

I’m worried when one of the indepedents – Jayagopal (suspended PKR member?) said the following:

He said he was using his Employees Provident Fund savings and money set aside for his children’s education to finance his campaign.

That’s a big risk. If he loses, big problem. If he wins, would the financial strain impact future decision making? It will be a big temptation to make some side money to compensate the campaign cost. I’m not only referring to Jayagopal, but all the independent candidates. They’ve spent 8K for deposit. Let’s put a modest RM10k for the election campaign. If they lose big, RM18k gone down the drain – in the current economy, its going to be a big blow.

Last 50 years record of BN ruling Bukit Selambau may be used as a yardstick to evaluate current BN promises. Pain of 50 years is more than pain of 11 months of “failures” and “lost promises”. So, on that count, BN has a problem.

To counter that, PKR division leader for Jerai, Kalaivanar, resigned from the party, calling Anwar a “pharaoh”. He has about 500-strong supporters and according to radio news today, it seems he told Nanban reporter that his group will support BN. So, few hundred votes in the bag for BN.  Kalai, who has few court cases related to cheating over his head, claimed that PKR (specifically Anwar) did not take into consideration the local Indians suggestions.

With the change of UMNO’s leadership, and possible the cabinet overhaul, BN is promising change. So do all the candidates. How would the voters judge? Can they throw aside past non-performances?