Posts Tagged ‘Elections’

Pity the protestors

November 13th, 2010
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Just now, I saw TV3 coverage of the protest at PKR HQ organised by Jenapala. I felt pity looking at the (elderly) women folk who seemed uninterested or unaware of what’s going on. Some came with kids. There were some teenagers and youths as well. Majority of the protester seemed to be Indians. There were few banners and protest shouts. Later, the news showed some of them having meal at restaurant. The news said about 200 people came (maybe be including about 20 reporters/photographers). From the video, can see about 50 or so people.

Watch the video taken by Malaysiakini:

Some of the questions seems valid. Many complaints have been lodged but nothing seems to be happening.

Here’s two news articles (one from Star and another from Malaysiakini). You can read and enjoy the discrepancies.

The Star:

A group of protestors gathered at the PKR headquarters in Damansara for 30 minutes calling for the party polls to be stopped.

The protesters, mostly from Rawang also put up banners calling for PKR advisor Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim and PKR vice-president Azmin Ali to step down.

The peaceful gathering which started at 11.30am lasted about 30 minutes. The PKR headquarters was closed with only a security guard seen at the entrance.

Organiser of the gathering former PKR deputy secretary-general P. Jenapala said there were many irregularities in the on-going party election and wanted it stopped immediately.

He claimed the party leadership was not being fair and transparent as it had stopped credible people from contesting.

Malaysiakini:

About 100 people with some children in tow turned up in front of the PKR headquarters in Petaling Jaya this morning for a 30-minute ‘protest’ against the ongoing party elections, demanding it to be stopped. 

What’s more almost three quarters of the noisy ‘protestors’ who were ferried to the venue in three buses appeared to have no idea of what was going on. 

Jenapala protest at PKR headquarters crowd on busOrganiser P Jenapala claimed that the party elections has been fraught with irregularities and malpractice, and that the “members present here are very unhappy”.

However, upon being approached by reporters some said that they were not entirely sure what was happening, and neither were they party members.

Kamisah Arippin, 75, said that she had no clue as to what was going on. She had come just for the ride, pointing to the person who had invited her to the 30-minute ‘event’.

Jenapala protest at PKR headquarters crowdHer friends, Kamariah Bapu, 70, and Zaleka Mohd Ashin, 72, also confessed they were not party members and that they only recognised Jenapala through his several TV appearances.

And another lot of around 50 youths looked no older than 19, some of whom later also conceded that they weren’t party members.

Jenapala however insisted that they were all party members and that they were “deeply upset over the party elections”.

“But I don’t deny that some of them may have been paid and planted by our enemies to sabotage my programme,” he said.

‘Anwar must go’ bugle sounds

Jenapala also insisted that party de facto leader Anwar Ibrahim should step down.

“He calls himself a ketua umum when he was not democratically elected by the party members. If he wants to be a leader, then contest. For now, he doesn’t even have the right to lead the party,” he said.

Jenapala protest at PKR headquarters womenJenapala was the party’s deputy secretary-general until he was sacked after it was discovered that he had been declared a bankrupt, a charge that he described as “defamatory”.

“Yes, I was bankrupt in 2001 but that is an old story. They don’t even have records of my sacking and it was improperly done,” he said.

He also insisted that he be allowed to contest the deputy presidency, a post that he is confident of winning.

“Azmin Ali (PKR vice-president and deputy president candidate) knows that he has no fighting chance against me. He knows that he will lose because a majority of PKR members are Indians,” he said.

Jenapala also said that he will be filing an injunction next week to stop the party congress scheduled for Nov 26 and that he will also sue the party secretariat for “defamation”.

Jenapala protest outside PKR headquarters crowdMeanwhile, former Selangor treasurer KS Kottapan repeated former PKR Federal Territories Zaid Ibrahim’s stinging criticism of Anwar on Tuesday.

“If someone as successful as Zaid can say something like that, it has to be true,” said Kottapan.

Before he brought the curtain down on the event, Jenapala went up to the reporters to apologise for the haphazard organisation of the demonstration, promising a better organised sequel, “a massive mega-rally”, next time.

The protesters shouted “Hidup Zaid” a few times before leaving the PKR headquarters.

Interesting

IIUM Study on voters and current issues

October 9th, 2010
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Interesting to read that 14% of Indians are choosing not to choose any sides. Probably they realised being taken for a ride by both groups? Assuming that previous study has 0% of non-choosers, that would mean Indians support for PR dropped a whopping 10%!

With 59% still supporting BN, MIC can still breath a bit.

As it is, with the issues grappling PR coalition, it would only further enhance BN, unless of course BN shoot themselves with words/(in)actions that hurt the community.

Also, I think the respondent category for Malay/Bumiputera should be split to get a more clearer picture. Not all Bumiputeras are Malays.

Note that the number of respondents are just 1367, and may not be indicative of the true situation.

The report:

The people’s support for the Barisan Nasional (BN) has increased of late compared to during the 2008 general election, according to a recent study conducted by the International Islamic University of Malaysia (IIUM).

The study shows that BN’s popularity increased by four per cent to 55 per cent from 51 per cent during the 2008 general election, while only 37 per cent of Malaysians are willing to vote for Pakatan Rakyat (PR), a drop of 12 per cent from 49 per cent in the same period.

Eight per cent of the 1,367 respondents in the survey said they were unsure which party they would vote for if elections were to be called tomorrow.

The same study was done in August 2009 involving 1,458 respondents.

According to the latest study, Malay support for BN has increased by three per cent to 61 per cent in August 2010 from 58 per cent in August 2009. Chinese support for BN is still low but has increased by two per cent from 40 per cent previously.

However, support from the Indian community has dropped from 63 per cent to 59 per cent because 14 per cent of them chose not to support any party.

The study was done from August 1 to 18 nationwide to obtain the views of respondents aged 21 and above, on current issues. The 1,367 respondents comprised Malays/Bumiputeras, Chinese, Indians and Malaysians of other races.

The study was headed by Azrul Hisyam Wakichan and supervised by Prof Datuk Seri Syed Arabi Idid, senior lecturer of the university’s Commmunications Department.

According to the study, BN’s increased popularity is due to several factors, including the effectiveness of the government’s programmes and that the BN component parties have recovered from their internal problems, as well as Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak’s leadership.

Pakatan Rakyat’s popularity, on the other hand, has taken a dip due to the internal squabbles among party members and between its component parties, and its failure to fulfil the promises made in the last general election. – Bernama

MMSP still making news

September 26th, 2010
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


…but for the wrong reasons. now there’s a row over the president’s post after one group held an AGM.  I think ROS has to step in and settle this before this guys make a fool out of themselves and also spoil Hindraf and community name.

The results:

…Vaneson Micheal became the deputy president while Dr M. Thuraichelvan, M. Ganesan and S. Sanjeyiramah were voted in as vice-presidents.

R. Sathiaseelan, S. Krishnan, N. Ramu and C. Sathiavathy were elected as secretary-general, treasurer, Youth chief and Wanita chief respectively.

Kannan said the party decided to hold the elections after 14 of its 27 central committee members quit.

He dismissed claims by sacked president R.S. Thanenthiran that the EGM did not have the mandate of the Registrar of Societies (ROS).

“We notified the ROS three weeks ago. They would have stopped us if we are not supposed to hold the elections,” he said yesterday.

…Kannan claimed that 14 CC members had passed a no-confidence vote against Thanenthiran.

“The reason is that he had tarnished the image of the party by locking the office and giving statements against the party’s objectives and for not being transparent about the accounts of the party’s launch (on Oct 10, 2009),” he said.

He said the other 13 CC members were stripped of their posts for failing to attend three consecutive CC meetings without reason.

Kannan Ramasamy (the previous Secretary General) was  elected as the new president on Saturday based on the AGM held:

Malaysia Makkal Sakti Party (MMSP) secretary-general Kannan Ramasamy was elected the new party president today amid disputes over the validity of the Indian party’s AGM.

Kannan, who was party secretary-general till today’s AGM, won the presidency unopposed amid cheers from the 250-odd party delegates.

Kannan’s appointment as the new leader of the troubled party will not sit well with embattled former president R.S. Thanenthiran (picture), who claimed that the AGM was unlawful and had not been given the go-ahead by the Registrar of Societies (RoS).

Thanenthiran had on Thursday claimed to have contacted the RoS who had informed him that it had not “issued any letter or endorsement for the September 25 AGM or EGM.”

He had also said that he would lodge a police report over the AGM.

However, Kannan insisted today that the scheduled AGM was legitimate, saying that he had personally obtained permission from the RoS to go ahead with meeting.

“Is Thanenthiran now speaking on the behalf of RoS? I spoke to the RoS yesterday, they told me to continue with the AGM and EGM according to the party’s by-laws. They (RoS) had said that they would not be making any statements yet regarding today’s AGM. The RoS will only recognise the latest developments after we deliver the reports of today’s AGM to them,” Kannan told reporters today.

He accused Thanenthiran of lying concerning Barisan Nasional (BN) secretary-general Datuk Seri Tengku Adnan Mansor’s attendance at the AGM.

Thanenthiran had said that Tengku Adnan had informed him that he had not received any invitation to the party’s AGM, and would not be attending.

“What Thanenthiran is saying is b******t. Tengku Adnan replied two days ago, saying that he could attend today’s AGM.

“I went to Tengku’s open house in Putrajaya yesterday and had a discussion with him on the party’s situation… Tengku told me he was disappointed with how Thanenthiran had misquoted him,” claimed Kannan.

The newly-minted party president likened Makkal Sakti’s situation to BN component party MCA’s own internal feud between former MCA president Datuk Seri Ong Tee Keat and current president Datuk Seri Dr Chua Soi Lek.

“What we are adopting now is the same resolution taken by MCA during its party crisis… There were two teams in MCA, so they had fresh elections to solve the issue,” said Kannan.

He also accused Thanenthiran of collecting funds under the “guise” of Makkal Sakti but kept all the money to himself.

“Thanenthiran keeps on collecting funds under his name using the banner of Makkal Sakti. We will be lodging a police report against him very soon,” added Kannan.

The MMSP has been rocked by internal conflict since the end of last year — with one faction aligned to Thanenthiran and the other to deputy president A. Vathemurthy expelling each of the leaders and taking their woes to the RoS.

The party was launched by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak on October 10 last year and is seen as a catalyst to regain declining grassroots Indian support for the ruling coalition.

This is what Thanenthiran said:

Thanenthiran insisted today that he was still the party’s rightful president, refusing to recognise Makkal Sakti’s AGM today which saw Kannan elected unopposed as the new party president.

“As far as the party is concerned, and as far as I am concerned, I am still Makkal Sakti president. I was legally elected while Kannan is a sacked member, I had sacked him so he is not even a member, how can he be president?” said Thanenthiran.

He accused Kannan of being a “power-hungry liar”, saying that today’s AGM showed Kannan’s true motives.

“He is showing that he is hungry for power, having an unlawful AGM to elect him as president… the people who are there are not even party members, they have not even paid their subscription fees.

“My party members know who the real president is, I have informed them and they know that today’s AGM is illegal,” Thanenthiran told The Malaysian Insider.

He said he would go ahead and conduct Makkal Sakti’s “real AGM” on October 10.

“I will go ahead and conduct my AGM, the proper lawful AGM. My members, those who have paid the subscription fees will attend the proper AGM and elect its members in a way that is recognised legitimately.

“He has gone ahead and had his little AGM, the joker, no one will recognise it,” said the embattled “former” president.

…Ironically Thanenthiran alleged that Kannan’s response earlier this afternoon was a blatant lie, and that Thanenthiran had himself met Tengku Adnan last night at the same function.

“I do know what he is saying. I was at Tengku Adnan’s open house last night and he didn’t say that to me. Tengku Adnan should clarify this then,” said Thanenthiran.

PKR elections heats up

September 22nd, 2010
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


As expected Mike Manikavasagam, Gopalakrishnan and Xavier Jayakumar have thrown in their hats into the fray. Another candidate mentioned by Malaysian Insider is Suresh Kumar, an aide to PKR de facto leader Anwar Ibrahim. I think left with Sivarasa to make announcement.

Can expect lots of backstabbing and juicy stories from now till election date. Goes to show these folks are same as (if not worse) that the other coalition.

Read what Gopalakrishnan says:

Hitting out at vice-president R Sivarasa, who is also the Subang MP, Gobalakrishnan accused him of not performing in addressing issues faced by the Indian community.

“I’m not happy with Sivarasa’s leadership. When I raised Indian issues, he never listens to me and he has not served the Indians,” said Gobalakrishnan (below, in dark suit) pointing out that 10 representatives from various divisions in Selangor are backing his bid.

If you have guts, you should tell the shortcomings as it happens. Not when its election time and everyone fighting for post. And remember, people want to hear what you can do, not what other people can’t do.

Meanwhile, the indian candidates seem to be banking on estimated 35% Indian members in PKR. However, its a big “if” whether the members will come out to vote. Secondly, would the vote along racial lines, and if they did, wouldn’t so many candidate split the votes?

Banking on a claimed 35 per cent Indian membership in PKR, the party’s community leaders have launched into a mad dash for the vice-presidencies up for grabs in the ongoing party elections.

Indian leaders in PKR, the source of the membership estimates, claimed the racial breakdown puts them in a strong position to secure at least one of the four posts in contention (a fifth is by appointment). They further asserted that the community’s representation in the party may be as high as half of the 400,000 members.

“With such a huge and lopsided Indian membership in PKR I am confident of winning,” said an Indian leader contesting as vice-president, who requested anonymity. “I am confident Indian members would cross for at least one Indian candidate maybe even two.”

“All I need is some Malay and Chinese votes to clinch a deal,” he said.

To secure the extra support, the Indian hopefuls have also been trading horses with other non-Indian leaders vying for other posts, offering “Indian” in return for “Chinese” or “Malay” backing.

However, the assertions of the disproportionately high Indian membership in PKR has been challenged by some party members and political analysts, who point out that the community constitutes just eight per cent of the country’s population.

The leaders making the claims, however, offered up as examples divisions in Selangor — such as Kapar, Klang and Kota Raja — which have sizeable Malay and Chinese populations but were dominated by Indians.

The contentious numbers have also given the Indian leaders a perceived advantage in the contests.

“We have a head start,” said another vice-presidential hopeful.

Currently, only two vice-presidential candidates — Suresh Kumar, an aide to PKR de facto leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim and Selangor exco member Dr Xavier Jeyakumar — have declared their candidacy.

Kapar MP S. Manikavasagam said he would contest for spot if PKR divisions nominate him. Two nominations are needed to contest for any of the party’s top posts.

Other Indian PKR leaders are, however, expected to join the fray. Top on that list are Padang Serai MP N. Gobalakrishnan and Subang MP S. Sivarasa.

Other lesser-known Indian candidates are also expected to contest, but PKR sources have dismissed them as “spoilers” out to bargain for posts.

With at least five or six Indian leaders vying for one vice-president’s post, a mad scramble is expected among them.

Some of the group, such as Sivarasa, do not consider themselves as merely representatives of Indian community but instead viewed themselves as representing all Malaysians.

That very principled stand might by their undoing because they are coming under attack from the other Indian PKR leaders for not being “Indian” enough.

“PKR is multi-racial but Indians need representation. They need a leader to speak up for them bravely in the party and outside,” one of the Indian contestants said.

“Sivarasa is not speaking up,” he said while campaigning among PKR Indian members in Ipoh, Perak last week. “I know we are multi-racial but speaking up for your people is basic because Malays and Chinese PKR leaders speak up for their communities.”

“Only our leaders want to be Malaysians but they (Malays and Chinese) are not,” he said.

Jeyakumar has also suffered the “not Indian enough” attacks, after being characterised as being “not [a] good Tamil speaker, don’t know Tamil songs, ignorant of Tamil history, not bold and constantly kowtowing.”

Sivarasa’s Tamil proficiency has improved in response and Xavier, by most counts is a fluent Tamil speaker, but the labels continue to stick and they have to answer for it largely because their progressive styles, which is viewed with suspicion by the conservative Indian base.

But there are many trade-offs to this “Indian vote real Indian” campaign and one is a possible backlash against such a race-centric movement, with Malay and Chinese members voting for candidates like Sivarasa and Xavier in protest.

The other is that the estimated high Indian membership notwithstanding, not all of them — or all PKR members — would come out to vote.

It is also not a foregone conclusion that Indian PKR members would vote for Indian candidates over candidates for other races.

Candidates are estimating that only 20 per cent of the 400,000 PKR members would come out to vote, with their voting patterns still an unknown.

“It is anybody’s guess because this is the first time direct elections are being held,” said a PKR strategist. “We are not sure ourselves but believe the votes would go the way Anwar signals it, if he signals at all.”

Being realists, the PKR Indian leaders who are banking on the “Indian vote Indian” movement are also claiming to be close to Anwar or to have his blessings to contest.

Two big line-ups are likely, PKR leaders said, referring to a rival teams likely to be fielded by deputy presidential rivals Azmin Ali and Datuk Zaid Ibrahim.

Both these leaders are said to be searching for the right Indian leaders to be listed in their line-up, with their main consideration the ability of their choices to bring with them Indian votes in the deputy president’s contest.

As of now, Gobalakrishnan  and SIvarasa are said to be in Zaid’s camp while Manikavasagam fielded an appearance among the MP’s who have endorsed Azmin but may still shift his allegiance, according to his supporters. Jayakumar has also similarly backed Azmin.

These alliances remain fluid and promises to see a dramatic switching of sides as the battle shapes up.

HRP aims to be third political platform

August 13th, 2010
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


I can’t say much of the “dreaming of numbers” as it sounds melodramatic, but hey, great things start with one man’s dream, don’t they? Only time will tell how HRP’s ambitions will turn out.

The one problem I envision, with targeting Indian majority seats is that it will most likely be a direct assault on other Indian candidates from either BN or PR. I agree that PR will be most affected as compared to BN if HRP does enter the fray.

Anyway, for long term success, HRP should extend their manifesto beyond Indian community uplifting. They should insert issues that benefit everyone such as housing for the poor, equal education.

Good luck to HRP! Unggal vottu, Uthayavukku?

In the next general election, the Human Rights Party Malaysia (HRP) is aiming to become the third political platform to uplift the socio-economic status of the Indian community in the country.

The party is planning to go for 15 out of the total of 222 parliamentary seats in the nation and 38 out of the total of 576 state seats in the country.

Party pro-tem secretary-general P Uthayakumar (left) said. “I dreamt of the magical number ‘1538’ while I was in detention under ISA in the Kamunting Detention Camp in Taiping and we hope to realise this dream in the coming general election. This will give us the political power to voice out the concerns of the Indian community both in the state assemblies and in Parliament.”

The Indian community had first put their faith in the Umno-BN government but he was disappointed to note that it had denied the Indian community their basic rights to a better socio-economic environment for the past 53 years.

“Then the community opted for the Pakatan Rakyat as a second platform during the last general election, hoping for a change in the political climate of the country.

“They (Pakatan) sailed through the elections by taking four states by politicising our ‘Makkal Sakthi’ theme and benefiting from our labour and even imprisonment,” said the former ISA detainee.

According to him, Pakatan did not measure up to the Indian community’s expectations in solving their economic woes and improving their standard of living.

Pakatan Indian politicians who were elected in constituencies with a large Indian presence failed to highlight the plight of the community both in the state assemblies and in Parliament he charged.

Uthayakumar claimed they were not action-oriented but only gave media statements and lip service and did not bother to go the ground to solve the woes of the marginalised community.

“These elected representatives only played second fiddle to their masters and did not want to offend the Chinese and Malay voters by aggressively campaigning for the rights of their community,” he alleged.

So, HRP has decided to go on the warpath against Pakatan and BN by forming the third platform and this move may put the spanner in the works of Pakatan’s ambition to take over Putrajaya in the next general election.

He accused both BN and Pakatan of harping on Malay and Chinese issues and problems but conveniently forgetting the Indian community.

When asked about allegations that he was attacking Pakatan publicly with the aim of getting his party registered by the Registrar of Societies (ROS), an angry Uthyakumar said, “Our enemy is Umno-BN who had taken away our rights as citizens of this country.”

As the ROS has not approved the application to register HRP, the party will field its candidates as independents under the banner heading of Uthayakumar.

When asked if HRP would work with Pakatan in the coming general election, he said it was possible but with the condition that Pakatan must surrender some of its state and parliamentary seats for HRP.

“We are not going to give a blank cheque to Pakatan but expect seats in return,” said Uthayakumar.

At the moment, Parti Sosialis Malaysia (PSM) wants DAP to cede the Jelapang state seat to it or else their candidate will stand as an independent.

Uthayakumar said HRP will also take the same stand if its demand for some of the state and parliamentary seats from Pakatan is unsuccessful.

When told that HRP is seen by some as a racist party, Uthayakumar said the it was formed to help the marginalised Indian community uplift their socio-economic status in the country.

But he quickly added that the spin-off from helping the Indian community would help make all Malaysians equal partners in the economic cake.

HRP has started their preparation for the next general election by targeting the Buntong state seat, which has the highest proportion of Indian voters in the country at 46 percent, and next the parliamentary seat of Ipoh Barat which has 22 percent Indian voters.

The party leader hopes to increase the number of Indian voters in Buntong from 46 percent to 54 percent to make possible a win for HRP.

Then it will go into constituencies with a large Indian presence and increase the Indian voter populations to ensure that they win their seats.

HRP is now highlighting several social problems in the Indian community, including conversion cases involving Indian women, Malaysian born Indians being denied birth certificates and identity cards and the increase in Indian youths turning to crime.

The party also wants Tamil schools, Hindu temples and Hindu cemeteries to be given permanent state land titles and gazetted accordingly.