Posts Tagged ‘Funds’

Samy hounded by MAIKA investors

July 6th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


MAIKA will be an albatross around the neck of MIC for as long as the investors are not refunded and those responsible are bought to justice. Samy can expect more such receptions as long as MAIKA issue can be used to raise the emotions of the community. Just mention MAIKA, and you most likely will see the amount of anger, contempt and hurt that people seem to register. Whether the person was actually a victim had become irrelevant. It (MAIKA) has spread like a virus, affecting the community in general.

If we remember correctly, Samy Vellu announced that the investors will be refunded with some amount, but its going to be a year now. Habuk pun tarak. When people want to ask, these guys ran away (that’s what I understand from “drove away”).

Well, if anyone have more information on the incident, please share. Meanwhile, read the article that appeared in the Star:

JOHOR BARU: A commotion broke out in a temple compound here when a group of people claiming to be Maika Holdings investors could not meet MIC president Datuk Seri S. Samy Vellu yesterday. The group of about 50 had waited for more than three hours and became agitated when Samy Vellu refused to discuss their grievances over the losses they claimed to have suffered.

The protesters had initially gathered at around 9am outside the SJK (T) Ladang Ulu Tiram in Ulu Tiram near here. However, they rushed to the Arulmigu Thiru Murugan temple about 2km away when they found out that Samy Vellu was there.

At the temple, tempers flared between the protesters and MIC vice-president Datuk S. Sothinathan when they accused one another of speaking disrespectfully. The protesters calmed down and agreed to move out of the temple compound when they were told that the matter would be discussed outside.

The MIC leaders, however, later drove off.

Spokesman for the protesters, businessman K. Selvakumaran, 48, said they were upset because Samy Vellu had not responded to their questions about Maika Holdings.

Seri Alam OCPD Supt Roslan Zainuddin said that the situation was under control and the protesters had dispersed peacefully.

New plans show Indians marginalised

July 6th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Some say that’s what the title of Malaysiakini article should have been. Of course its not their fault for the mistake because the interviewee, Dr S.Subramaniam the Human Resource Minister said so.

MIC leader Dr S Subramaniam has described the series of measures
unveiled by the government recently to help the Indian community as a
sign that it never marginalised the community.

S.Subra acknowledged that the series of policies announced after the cabinet committee meeting were results of the general elections outcome.

As a responsible government, not only has it responded to the message (by voters), it also sent the message back to the community that ‘look here, we never intended to marginalise you’

He also had described these policies as a major achievement for MIC. Perhaps he meant the only achievement in last three decades.

The government has been very sensitive to the requirement of the community and is actually committed to address the Indian community’s problem so that it can be at par with the other communities

Obviously one have to take his statements as something with an hidden meaning. What S.Subra was actually trying to say is the exact opposite. He gave us clues – by linking the decisions with general election results and using the phrase “never intended”. So, if the results were different, what would have been the status of the committee?

That’s why his statements are important. By making those seemingly self-serving statements he is indeed telling us SOMETHING.

S.Subra also said the cabinet
committee will have a monitoring team, led by his ministry, to check
implementation progress of these policies. He also called on the Indian community to take up what was offered by the government.

It’s
for the community to move forward now and avail themselves to these
opportunities. Of course the opportunity can be given but the person
must also take the initiative to come forward,” said the MIC leader.

I wrote my views about the decisions of the committee earlier. ynway, here’s more details about the committee’s decisions:

  • To convert 372 partially-aided Tamil schools into fully-assisted schools.
  • Consolidate schools which had an enrolment of less than 50 students.
  • To ensure at least eight percent of Indian representation at all levels in the civil service. To achieve that, it will also see more promotions for Indian civil servants.
  • The MIC-run Asian Institute for Medicine, Science and Technology (Aimst) to be re-categorised as one of the five private universities which recognise government-sponsored students to boost the intake of Indian students into critical sectors like medicine and engineering. At present, students who receive government scholarship were only given a list of choice of universities which does not include Aimst.
  • To allow Indian contractors to take part in government projects at all levels. For government’s mega projects, it is suggested that certain sub-contract jobs be given to Indian contractors.
  • Indian entrepreneurs to be given more opportunities in the development of vendor development scheme through companies like state-owned oil firm Petronas and national car-maker Proton.
  • Easier access to government loans for Indian entrepreneurs.
  • More taxi and bus permits for Indian companies.
  • To increase the Indian corporate equity from the current 1.1 percent to 1.5 percent in 2010. To do this, the government is planning to set up a unit trust scheme based on the Permodalan Nasional Berhad model to allow Indians to invest in the scheme to increase their equity in the market.

Breakdown of funds for temples and churches

July 4th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Earlier, we read about the amount of money spent for mosques and other places of worship in general.

In today’s Star (hard copy) breakdown of the expenses for places of worship is given as below:

RM3.93 million for Hindu temples
RM3.16 million for other temples
RM1.6 million for churches

It is clarified that since 1991, RM1 million for physical development of churches and temples, and another RM1 million for Hindu temples have been allocated since year 2000.

Now, we can see that temples and churches individually receive less money than Hindu temples, but if combined, its more by RM0.83 million (3.16 + 1.6 – 3.93).

I can only assume that there is less allocation for churches since they are located in strategic areas with least disturbance, have good support from the affluent section of community they serve, or the churches have moved into shoplots, thus reducing maintenance cost. However, I wonder if this cost includes assistance to churches located in Sabah and Sarawak, where there are many Christians among the privileged people there.

Other temples most likely refer to Taoist temples, which again usually have an association, foundation or group supporting it.

For Hindu temples, due to the many sects in Hinduism, there is more temples to be maintained. Then, there’s the issue of relocation or compensation when temples make way for development.

For the period between 2005 and 2008, total money received by these places of worship:

RM8.1 million
+ RM8 million (RM2 million x 4)
= RM16.1million.

Mosques and surau got RM428 million in the same period.

As I said earlier, its a major injustice when the total amount given to these temples (RM16.1 million) in the last four years is just 3.6% of the total allocation (RM428 million + RM16.1 million). The mosques and surau are allocated 26.58 times MORE money than combination of all other places of worship.

Whatever happened to “Kepercayaan Kepada Tuhan”?

UMIC Bowling 2008 is back

July 4th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


RM428 million for mosques and RM8 million for others

July 3rd, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


In a 60/40 population, 428 million versus 8 million doesn’t look balanced no matter how you cut it. And that is just for the period between 2005 and 2008.

 

Let’s do the maths:

 

428/ 42 months (from Jan 2005 until June 2008) = 10.19 million per month.

 

8/42 months = 190,000 per month.

 

That means mosques get 53.63 times more than other places of worship month-wise. Over the said period, its 53.5 times more than the allocation for temples and churches.

 

And bear in mind that this amount is to be shared between temples (Hindus, Buddhists, Taoist?) and churches.

 

The deputy minister for Internal Security also said that the government has been disbursing RM1 million per year for temples/churches and Hindu temples respectively for physical construction projects.