Posts Tagged ‘intolerance’

Kuala Terengganu Indian voters meet Najib

January 14th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


I saw the Indians at Kuala Terengganu attending a dinner (organised by MIC?) over the TV. At that time, it was mentioned by the reporter that Deputy PM Najib may attend the dinner.

Looks like he did, and below is extract from NST report:

Datuk Seri Najib Razak last night urged the Indian community not to fall prey to the opposition’s provocative campaigns.

He said although there had been some recent problems affecting the Indians, these problems were not entirely insoluble.

“I am very confident that these problems can be addressed effectively through consultation and discussion,” he said at a dinner with the local Indian community.

The deputy prime minister acknowledged that there had been some dissatisfaction among Indians regarding several sensitive issues, including some that were raised within the Umno set up.

“Umno is a large party and the views of one or two members do not represent our stand as a whole.”

Najib said issues such as the destruction of Hindu temples had been blown out of proportion and exploited by some quarters for their own political benefit.

“Let me assure you of this: we are not the type of government that goes around destroying temples in the country.

Najib said the government was also constantly in touch with grassroots leaders from the community to solve their problems.

This included the problem of stateless Indians, he said, adding that he had raised this issue in the cabinet.

Najib urged Indians not to be fooled by the opposition’s propaganda, saying that unlike Barisan Nasional, Pakatan Rakyat was a loose coalition that could not even share common objectives.

3 things I would like to refer from his speech:

1. what he means by recent?

2. “including some that were raised within the Umno set up” and “the views of one or two members do not represent our stand as a whole” . I think the action that the party to in response to the one or two members is lacking. Latest incident is when banners saying close down Tamil schools were shown in Melaka during an unreleated protest by UMNO.

3. “we are not the type of government that goes around destroying temples in the country.” This is most laughable. While he may proclaim so, the truth is the opposite. Temples were and are being demolished for various reasons. He should have not said this statement.  He could have reworded it into something more acceptable like ” won’t demolish or relocate temples without proper procedures being followed”. Then, maybe we can consider his statement as possible.

At the same dinner, Sothinathan gave his views:

MIC vice-president Datuk S. Sothinathan said a party survey showed that in the March general election, 80 per cent of the Indians had supported Barisan Nasional.

“This time around, we do not see much problems in getting the support of the Indians.

“Things in Kuala Terengganu are far different as compared with the other states, for example during the Permatang Pauh by-election.

“There are no real issues among the Indian voters here,” Sothinathan said at the MIC office, near here.

Sothinathan, who is also MIC co-ordinator for the by-election, said he had been getting positive feedback during meet-the-Indian voters sessions.

“Most of the issues which they have raised are concerning day to day matters. We have pledged to look into their problems and seek solutions.”

One of the main grouses of the Indian community in Kuala Terengganu is difficulty in getting citizenship.

There was a case of an elderly couple, both in their 70s who have been here for more than 40 years but still have not got their citizenship.

Other issues include business opportunities, education, housing and employment in the civil service.

Sothinathan said MIC would also help to provide transport to bring back Indian voters working or living outside Kuala Terengganu.

1. Hmm…80% supported BN in the March general elections???

2. 40 years and no citizenship. Indonesian who comes now can be public bus driver holding PR. What an irony.

However, there seems to be a lack of local issues for Indian community, unless they look at national issues affecting the community. Of course, if what Samy Vellu says is right, there are some problems affecting the Indians due to UMNO itself!:

The MIC president also claimed that during his visit to the parliamentary seat of Kuala Terengganu recently to oversee the setting up of MIC’s operations room in preparation for the Jan 17 by-election, many had complained to him that Indian, especially Hindu religious songs and cultures, were allegedly barred from being practiced openly

Whoa! What a blooper! (or is it the truth?)

BTW, The same Star report mentioned that:

While the Chinese voters have been described as the “king-makers” in the Kuala Terengganu by-election, the voice of the 523 registered Indian voters cannot be ignored.

Of this number, 380 live in the area while the rest are working in Kuala Lumpur, Selangor, Penang and Johor.

Most of the Indian voters, at 235, are registered in the Bandar state seat, 188 in Ladang, 80 in Batu Burok and the rest in Wakaf Mempelam.

They are mostly businessmen and professionals, like lawyers.

This is critical as the majority by the previous MPs was only 628. If the Malay votes are split equally, the Chinese and Indians will be the king makers.

Pakatan Retak coming soon?

January 12th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


From Pakatan Rakyat to Pakatan Retak. Well, what we can expect from politicians 🙂

Since Khairy Jamaludin trapped Husam Musa (or is it something pre-planned?) over the implementation of Hudud, Pakatan is getting agitated. DAP is very unhappy at PAS and Anwar Ibrahim over their stand on Hudud.

If one remembers correctly, there was no mention of Islamic laws in the agreement made the 3 parties to work together. But now, PAS is backstabbing DAP, while PKR is playing sandiwara with words since the by-election is days away.

Let’s look at extracts from a Malaysiakini report below:

Hadi said that hudud laws were not an issue in this by-election because it had already been gazetted in Terengganu when PAS held power between 1999 to 2004.

It only applies for Muslims while non-Muslims can decide for themselves. Misunderstanding (on this issue) between Pakatan Rakyat (parties) does not arise.

“It is only Umno that is causing problems,” he added.

Lim then replied that DAP respects the opinion of its coalition partners but Pakatan Rakyat cannot make decisions as a federal government unilaterally.

“If any problems occur, we will resolve it through musyawarah, that is through discussions. All three parties must hold discussions and if a consensus is not reached, it must be discussed again.

“This means, should PKR and PAS agree to implement hudud and DAP disagrees then it cannot be implemented. Everything must be discussed until all three parties agree,” he said.

Lim went on along the same vein for about five minutes while Hadi was noticeably uncomfortable forcing Terengganu PAS chief Mustafa Ali intervened.

Mustafa told reporters that hudud was not an issue in the Kuala Terengganu by-election as the results would not have any impact on the state or federal government.

Hmm…the seat got hot for them until squirming nervously?

I always thought that PAS will back-track/backstab/break away from the coalition. Their ideology is being compromised for the sake of winning the general elections, but it cannot be surpressed for long. PKR is depending on Anwar for comments, but no news from Tian Chua and gang. They will most likely support the stronger side, and in this case, PKR-PAS team looks a better prospect than PKR-DAP prospect.

Its very hard to have a balanced partnership in any coalition. Each party would like to think of it as being the backbone of the coalition, and PAS certainly does not want to play 3rd fiddle to Anwar and DAP.

Interestingly, according to Malaysian Insider:

Speaking to The Malaysian Insider earlier, Khairy denied he had backed the implementation of hudud during his debate with Husam.

Khairy, who has in recent weeks been campaigning on a more inclusive agenda in the race for the top job in his party’s Youth wing, was quoted by The Star as saying he supported the implementation of hudud, in what would have certainly damaged his reputation among more moderate Muslims and non-Muslims.

The Star later retracted the report.

So, did he or did he not mention that he will support Hudud law? Suara Keadilan believes he did:

… The issue over hudud – not new – stirred up a storm of reaction after Husam and Khairy both declared at an open debate they would implement the Islamic law if they came to power.

… Deputy Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak too tried to limit the damage from Khairy’s comments. The son-in-law of Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi had been reported as saying he would implement hudud if he won the Umno Youth chief post. He has since said he was misquoted.

Another article from CKcounterpunch blog says:

Husam’s forthrightness led Associate Prof Mohd Agus – also participating in the forum – to ask Khairy point-blankly if he would push for hudud law if he became Umno Youth chief.

Khairy, the 32-year old son-in-law of Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, said he would.

Many in the audience were taken aback by his answer.

“It contrasted against his earlier remarks about multi-racialism and how important it was for Malaysians to shift to a new paradigm. With Husam, well, PAS and DAP have never been hypocritical about their opposing stands,” said a spectator who declined to be identified.

So, this unclear situation is not good. We may have some negative elements in BN itself who want to implement Hudud.

Hudud splits Pakatan

January 9th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Well well well, Anwar’s support for Hudud law for Muslims only creates a storm for DAP, especially Karpal Singh.

PKR will not reject outright PAS’ plan to implement hudud law, said its de facto leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim.

He also dismissed Karpal Singh’s remark that such legislation was unconstitutional, saying that the DAP chairman was making a general statement.

He said there was no need to reject the proposal as it was only applicable to Muslims.

What was needed, said Anwar, was an in depth discussion among Pakatan Rakyat partners on contentious issues which had resurfaced following a debate between PAS vice-president Datuk Husam Musa and Umno Youth deputy head Khairy Jamaluddin.

Hudud is not something new. There is allocation for it in Islam. This is what PAS has been saying all along, that it is solely for the Muslims,” he told reporters after launching the PKR main operation room for the Kuala Terengganu parliamentary by-election yesterday.

According to Anwar, all opposition parties understood Islam and that its legislative aspects should not just be confined to Syariah family or civil law.

Describing himself as a practising Muslim, Anwar stressed there was no blanket answer on hudud and that he would not emulate what former Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad did, which was to oppose and reject outright hudud law when PAS first proposed it without fully understanding the issue.

He said detailed discussions on the issue could clear the air.

He also urged all dissenting voices to study the specific proposal and its provisions closely before opening their mouths.

TV3 Nightline showed a press statement from Karpal who claimed that for Hudud to be implemented, the status of country should changed to islamic state. However, since Malaysia is secular (well actually its neither there nor here), implementing Hudud is unconstitutional. Malaysiakini extract below:

PKR leader Anwar Ibrahim’s statement that people should not worry about PAS’ intention to implement hudud laws as it would only be applicable to Muslims, was today called a fallacy by DAP stalwart Karpal Singh.

He said this was because Anwar’s statement was “diametrically opposed to PAS’ avowed aim to turn Malaysia into an Islamic state” which Karpal believes would also mean the indiscriminate implementation of hudud laws.

“This has been PAS’ stand from its inception as is clearly reflected by the statements by former and present leaders of PAS.

“In fact, (PAS spiritual leader) Nik Aziz is on record to have said on Dec 22 last year that PAS would implement hudud laws with or without the support of DAP and PKR,” said Karpal in a statement today.

Both News Straits Times and The Star on Dec 23 reported on Nik Aziz’ persistence that his party would pursue the implementation of hudud laws even without the support of its other Pakatan Rakyat coalition members.

He was also quoted as saying that he could not understand why DAP was rejecting hudud laws when he believed they were similar to western laws.

“In light of this statement, there is a fallacy in Anwar’s assertion that hudud laws would only be applicable to Muslims,” Karpal reasoned.

“The pre-requisite of implementing hudud laws is the setting up of an Islamic state and as such, it is wrong for Anwar to imply that the implementation of hudud laws would not affect everyone including the non-Muslims.

“It is important for Anwar to know exactly what PAS intends to do in calling for the setting up of an Islamic state,” Karpal added.

… Meanwhile, Karpal said PAS president Hadi Awang should clear the air as to whether hudud laws were intended to be made applicable to both Muslims and non-Muslims in the event PAS succeeded in setting up an Islamic state.

“In the public interest, he should do so,” said the veteran DAP leader.

Nevertheless, Karpal reiterated DAP’s stand that the country is not an Islamic state and that the implementation of hudud laws would be “unconstitutional”.

Looks like Pakatan had fallen into BN’s trap.

For me, even though they claim Hudud will be only for muslims, sooner or later it will start to interfere in everybody’s lives. That’s inevitable since the nature of their religion is intrusive (my opinion). As it is, we have lots of problem with syariah laws and implementation by the relevant departments.
Having hudud will mean a death trap of sorts for the rest of malaysians people. Personally, i think even the more liberal muslims will not support it. imagine those famous personalities can’t wear strapless gowns at high class dinners. Muslim college students have to cover up (i still having shock over the way some of them dress at a certain uni in cyberjaya – MAIS officers will have a good time there), mat rempits having their body parts chopped off if found guilty of robbing (ok, i’m over-reacting here!).

food problem from PLUS to local universities

December 30th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Roti canai and tosai lover Michael Yeap makes it a point to stop at the Ulu Bernam rest area near Tanjung Malim for breakfast when driving to Kuala Lumpur.

However, his 15-year love affair may have to end after Dec 31 because the stall that serves the Indian delight has failed to obtain a permit to continue operating at the rest area.

The 60-year-old dance instructor said he would time his travel so that he would either catch breakfast or lunch at the Indian stall at the rest area.

“I have been doing that for the past 15 years. I love the food there,” he said yesterday.

“But during my last visit, the operator told me his permit for the stall has been terminated,” Yeap said, adding that the stall was the only one run by an Indian there.

He said he or other travellers would be unable to find non-Malay food along the expressway if the permit were to be terminated.

The Star

I took PLUS quite often in the last two months. Most of the time before this, ‘ll enjoy a cup of tea or coffee together with some roti bakar (toast bread). But recently, not many stall are offering roti bakar (There’s one chinese stall in Air Hitam stop towards JB). Worse still, there’s lack of real Chinese and Indian food. The chicken rice or fried kuey teow doesn’t taste authentic. No fresh thosai or roti canai with thick, tasty sambar (dhal curry).  Most of the stalls are selling Malay food or localized version of other cultures’ food. There can be many copycat chicken curry, but nothing beats the authentic southern Indian chicken curry (IMHO).

Forget about getting vegetarian food. You can only depend on bread and fruits.

This is only natural as population imbalance increases. Traffics towards northern states will be predominantly of certain race, thus only those selling particular type of food will make profit. Those catering for minority will eventually suffer a loss as they can’t get the business volume needed.

But, those rest areas in the middle and southern region should have more multi racial meals.

Recently, the lack of non-Malay food served along the expressway was highlighted by Ipoh Barat MP M. Kulasegaran at a press conference. Kulasegaran said there were only a handful of stalls that served non-Malay food in the Tapah and Ulu Bernam rest areas.

“Many Malaysians use the expressway and it is a problem to those looking for vegetarian or non-Malay food,” he said.

Kulasegaran said he was not against the number of Malay food stalls at the rest areas but he was hoping that PLUS would allot more stalls for non-Malays.

He said he had written to PLUS, the Malaysian Highway Authority and the Works Minister to look into the matter.

According to PLUS representative, they are planning to introduce fusion food, and also said that meals were introduced based on demand. Also, the stalls were terminated due to various reasons as given below:

When contacted, PLUS senior public relations manager Khalilah Mohd Talha said PLUS would introduce a fusion of Malay, Chinese and Indian foods that appealed to the masses next year.

We are re-looking at our rest and recreational areas along the North-South Expressway. We are introducing more varieties in terms of menu to appeal to travellers from different ethnic and cultural background.

She said PLUS had never practised discrimination against the multi-racial stall operators, but over the years, operators requested to serve titbits and more Malay-based food based on demand for those kind of food.

We do invite multi-racial stall operators. The response is another story.

She said licences were only terminated if the operators did not comply with the Health Ministry’s guidelines on food preparation, cleanliness of premises or hygiene discipline, did not pay rental or had customer complaints.

“But this is after several warnings are issued.

Well, for those who are having certain preferences or limitations, better plan your journey well so that not deprived of your meals.

Now, the same problem is also manifesting in local universities. Recently, UM closed down its only Chinese-run food stall due to violation of its rules – serving non-halal food and employing non-Muslim cook. This was protested by the students and MCA stepped in. Through the BN Youth Education Bureau, the university management were persuaded to reinstate the stall at College 12. The college has about 600 Chinese student of 1200 students.

However, the stall operator has to abide by the rules –  Chinese cooks are allowed but only halal food and must be clean.

According to MCA Youth education bureau chairman, Chong Sin Woon, who had brought the issue of the stall closure to the BN Youth, the Chinese stall was ordered to close in May.

“However, on the insistence of students, the stall was allowed to operate until this month.

“UM then awarded the tender for the stall to another operator.

“The reason given by UM was that the stall served non-Muslim food and employed a non-Muslim cook.”

Chong said the demand by MCA Youth, acting on behalf of Chinese students, was that the food be prepared by a Chinese chef, especially as there were a total of 13 other stalls at College 12, run by Muslim operators.

Chong said only Universiti Sains Malaysia had proper Chinese food stalls while Chinese stalls at Universiti Putra Malaysia and Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia were only allowed to serve vegetarian food.

This begets the question – who should be tolerant? Is it wrong to eat the food the students are used to? What is the unversity imparting to its students? One-sided rule? All it takes is some extra measures to ensure the areas where non-halal food are separated. Disposable utensils can be used in some cases.  And we seldom can get nice Indian food if cooked by non-Indian, so I guess its the same for the Chinese. The food will be watered down or tastes different. So why get fixated with the rule that must be Muslim cook only? If there are muslims who like Chinese food, then set up another stall la! This kind of small things can be settled easily.

This problem rarely happens in Indian restaurants/stall as they don’t cook pork-based dish. All the chicken and mutton are halal. So its easy to accept Indian cook compared to Chinese cook. Yet, how many universities have Indian stalls with Indian cooks?

While I was in university, there was a short period when a chinese stall operated. It disappeared after a year or so. Most of the time, the Indian students get food from outside. The food served in the cafeteria had a kind of smell which was terrible.  Many of my friends, especially in their first year were forced to eat in-campus since no other option. But after entering second year, all those who had own transport seldom visit in-campus cafeterias.

As time goes by, due to relatively small population of Indian and Chinese students in local universities, the non-muslims stall will die a natural death. Unless of course we consider students from China (some of which who are Muslims). So, non-Muslim students face stiff challenge in adapting to university environment especially those who only avenue to a degree is local university.

Yoga ban for Malaysian Muslims

November 22nd, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


So, its finally announced that Yoga is not allowed for Muslims. Read it at Malaysiakini and The Star.

One person told me it’s a good news – One less Hinduism knowledge to be exploited by others and its their loss, so why should Hindus cry over it.

The Fatwa council says the physical movements, chanting and worshipping aspects of yoga makes it haram. So, unless those yoga centers manage to strip Yoga of the above three things, its time to put a notice “for non-muslims only”.

Well, I’m not sure whose loss it is, but definitely there are many ways to overcome this ban. One can go to other countries and learn it there 🙂 It seems only Singapore and Egypt has similar bans.