Posts Tagged ‘Media’

Tamil news airtime to remain

April 23rd, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Well, after MIC fellas submitted memorandum and made some complaints, as well as MCA, the Minister announced that the time would not be changed.  So from May 1st, Tamil and Mandarin news will revert back to the original time:

The Tamil news will be moved back to the 7.30pm slot from May 1 but on TV2 instead of TV1 previously.Information, Communications and Culture Minister Datuk Seri Dr Rais Yatim said TV1 had to respect the national policy, which emphasised the national language.

“Therefore at 8pm, we will air national news, important events and news from Sabah and Sarawak.

“We’ll also air a little bit of foreign news (in Malay),” he told reporters after a handing-over ceremony of the new ministry by former Unity, Culture, Arts and Heritage Minister Datuk Seri Mohd Shafie Apdal at the Sultan Abdul Samad Building here yesterday.

Dr Rais said the initial change of the Tamil news from 7.30pm to 6pm was part of the ministry’s process to refine the timing of slots for all news.

“Currently, the change of the Mandarin news time slot is from 8pm to 6.30pm on TV2 and Tamil @ 2 news from its original 7.30pm to 6pm.

“Tamil @ 2 news will revert to 7.30pm on May 1,” he said, adding that the ministry would also study whether the English and Mandarin news should be slotted for 8.30pm or within the nearest time to 8pm.

Human Resources Minister Datuk Dr S. Subramaniam had said that Indian viewers would not be home in time to watch the Tamil news if it remained at 6pm.

“This can prove to be a minus point in the Government’s effort to disseminate information about its policies and programmes to the Indian community,” he said in lauding Rais’ decision.

MIC Youth submits memorandum on RTM airtime

April 21st, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Unfortunately, I’m not at liberty to publish the memorandum, but you can read the writeup (edited) and view the photo of the submission:

Dear all,

Good to see all are having a united voice over this matter. This issue of change of RTM Tamil News airtime has been raised in vernacular newspaper by MIC Youth Adviser,Mr.Vell Paari two days earlier. And it has been raised in within the Ministry by both Datuk Seri S Samy Vellu and Dato Dr S Subramaniam.

Under the guidance of Mr.S.Vell Paari, earlier today,Mr.T.Mohan led a team of MIC Youth members which included Mr.C.Shivarraaj,Mr.S.Subramaniam and Mr.T.M.Selvam to handover a memorandum titled ” MEMORANDUM UNTUK MEMPERTINGKATKAN KUALITI SIARAN BERITA TAMIL DAN PROGRAM-PROGRAM TAMIL DI RTM ” to MOI Minister, Dato Seri Utama Dr Rais Yatim

Our leaders had a fruitful talk with the Honourable Minister where he promised to revamp the structure and system of RTM news within 30 days. He even gave few constructive idea like forming a “special committe” with MIC Youth and NGOs to “monitor” Tamil language programs in RTM.Thank you.

For further information please call Mr.C.Shivarraaj at 019-266 3060.

mic-youth-memo-rtm

More photos at Pemuda MIC website.

I remember writing about the airtime in RTM2 last year, and just to update, let’s see what’s on RTM2 today:

2.30pm – Ardhangani (Hindi?)

5.00pm – Suvaiyana Sutrulla

5.30pm – Thisaigal

6.00pm – Tamil @ 2 (news)

4.30am – Piriyatha Uravu

Total of 2.5 hours of Indian programmes in 24 hours.

RTM Tamil news time change

April 18th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


As mentioned by one of the readers, the airtime for tamil news on RTM2 is to be changed again from 7.30pm to 6pm. This causes a lot of unhapiness it seems, and MIC secretary general (and HR Minister) Dr S Subra has sent a letter to Information, Communications and Culture Minister Rais Yatim asking that the decision to be reviewed. According to him, the majority of working Indians would not be able to reach home by 6pm.

I think the ministry or the information department must come out with the reasons for the change. Any survey done to justify the change of time? Is it due to less viewership if set at 7.30pm?

DPM Muhyiddin interview on Chinese community

April 14th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


This the excerpt from Mingguan Malaysia interview with DPM Muhyiddin:

Kalau melihat kepada keputusan pilihan raya kecil baru-baru ini terutamanya di Bukit Gantang dan Bukit Selambau, ia seolah-olah menampakkan laluan BN masih sukar untuk mendapat sokongan rakyat, apa pandangan Tan Sri?

MUHYIDDIN: Saya fikir paling jelas terbukti masyarakat Cina dan India belum bersedia menerima apa-apa bentuk pimpinan kerajaan yang seperti ada sekarang ini, lebih lagi agak terlalu menonjol ialah terhadap apa yang berlaku di Perak itu sendiri. Sesetengah masyarakat di sana, melihat ia dari sudut yang rasis, kerajaan orang Cina ditumbangkan oleh kerajaan orang Melayu walaupun tanggapan itu tidak betul.

Mungkin mereka tidak berapa jelas cara dari sudut Perlembagaan dan peraturan, maka mereka melihat apa yang berlaku sebagai satu bentuk menolak hak majoriti rakyat, mereka mahu kerajaan dipilih seperti pilihan raya lepas.

Komplikasi ini menyebabkan rasa marah di kalangan orang Cina dan juga masyarakat India, jadi bagi saya itu agak menjadi faktor utama di Bukit Gantang dan kesannya sampai ke Bukit Selambau. Ini jelas apabila ada masyarakat Cina di Bukit Selambau ramai yang tidak keluar mengundi, kita tidak pasti sama ada mereka memboikot atau tidak mahu menyatakan pendirian.

Bagaimanapun petanda lain, kita melihat sokongan orang Melayu meningkat, jadi dari satu sudut ada faktor yang positif kerana masyarakat Melayu mungkin lebih yakin apabila melihat angin perubahan dalam kepimpinan negara, kepulangan Tun Dr.Mahathir Mohamad ke dalam UMNO dan lain-lain usaha yang kita buat untuk menjelaskan isu yang berlaku di Perak sebab itu mereka membantu kita.

Saya fikir ada juga faktor-faktor lain yang menyumbang kepada kekalahan seperti pembangunan, faktor tidak ada keputusan yang dibuat oleh kerajaan yang menyenangkan rakyat, isu tanah dibangkitkan dan mungkin dari segi bantuan sekolah-sekolah bukan kebangsaan, jadi sama ada faktor ini menggambarkan senario nasional atau pun lokal, kita akan ketahui selepas kita membuat satu kajian oleh badan bebas nanti. Di Bukit Selambau pun tidak banyak bezanya, mungkin ‘angin’ yang sama ‘bertiup’ ke sana dan kesannya hampir serupa, faktor sokongan Melayu hampir positif, kaum India sedikit ada penambah baikan tetapi tidak banyak berubah, jadi ini satu perkara yang perlu kita kaji dan teliti. Tetapi macam di Sarawak, di Batang Air, mungkin disebabkan ia jauh di pedalaman mereka melihat soal pembangunan, jadi mereka melihat kerajaan sebagai satu tempat yang mereka harapkan sangat.

Di Semenanjung pembangunan tidak menjadi isu, mereka melihat kepada isu-isu yang lebih nasional apa lagi dibebankan dengan apa yang dibuat oleh parti pembangkang. Mungkin methodologi yang kita guna masih lama sedangkan mindset baru. Ini kita akan ambil iktibar daripada itu, bagaimana kita hendak mengubah methodologi kepada suatu yang lebih sesuai dengan keadaan dan masa.

Tetapi bukankah setiap kali pilihan raya kecil, permintaan kaum bukan Melayu dipenuhi, malah di Bukit Gantang walaupun peruntukan RM1juta diberikan tetapi kaum Cina tidak juga menyokong BN? [this is the tricky question asked by the interviewer]

MUHYIDDIN: Ya, kadang-kadang kita berasa terpedaya juga kerana zahirnya nampak macam ‘ok’, sambutan dengan tepukan gemuruh tetapi mungkin sudah ada tertanam dalam hati iaitu sesuatu tidak mudah hendak berubah, pokoknya masalah isu Perak terutamanya di kalangan masyarakat Cina yang mungkin telah dipengaruhi dengan sentimen simpati kepada Datuk Seri Ir.Mohamad Nizar Jamaluddin, kononnya dia ‘dijatuhkan’, lepas itu kononnya dasar memberi pegangan tanah selama 99 tahun dilihat dasar yang menguntungkan.

Ini yang mungkin menyebabkan sukar BN mendapat sokongan walaupun kita fikir bila mereka hendak sekolah Cina dibantu, kita bantu, sepatutnya mereka membalas budi. Pada waktu itu, kita pun tidak berharap sokongan kaum Cina akan meningkat 40 peratus dan sebagainya cuma kita berharap ada peningkatan sedikit tetapi apa yang berlaku ia mencatatkan penurunan, macam tidak ada penghargaan terhadap apa yang kita lakukan.

Oleh itu kita kena kaji psikologi apa yang menyebabkan masyarakat Cina tidak bersedia untuk berubah, pada zaman dahulu tidak begitu.

Persoalannya apakah mereka melihat dalam konteks senario politik baru ini, selepas kerajaan BN tumbang di lima buah negeri, mereka sudah menjadi kuasa penentu? Orang Cina rasa sekarang, walaupun mereka kumpulan minoriti, merekalah menentukan kerana kelompok masyarakat Melayu sudah berpecah tiga kumpulan. Masyarakat Cina tidak berpecah mereka bersatu, setidak-tidaknya dari segi semangat apabila bersama-sama membuat sesuatu keputusan.

Dalam keadaan ini, mereka boleh menentukan keputusan sesuatu pilihan raya dan apabila kesan itu dapat dilihat dalam pilihan raya umum lalu dan beberapa pilihan raya kecil, mereka fikir sekarang mereka lebih ada kuasa penentu, bukan sahaja Cina malah masyarakat India pun begitu, apa tah lagi apabila mendapat kedudukan dalam kerajaan yang ditubuhkan pakatan pembangkang dengan menjadi Timbalan Ketua Menteri, Speaker dan exco kerajaan negeri, jadi ini bagi mereka seolah-olah tawaran yang diberikan oleh pihak sana lebih baik daripada kita pernah tawarkan dalam konteks BN, jadi ini kita harus teliti.

Apakah situasi ini yang mendorong Tan Sri membuat seruan supaya semua orang Melayu bersatu kembali di bawah UMNO?

MUHYIDDIN: Saya membuat seruan itu kerana saya berpendapat dalam situasi sekarang ini, orang Melayu sudah banyak berpecah, faktor antara lain apakah kerana ia kelemahan UMNO yang tidak memahami cita rasa orang Melayu atau kerana ia perbuatan yang dilakukan oleh sesetengah kelompok contohnya Anwar Ibrahim yang memberikan kononnya satu gagasan baru atas dasar keadilan dan kesamarataan, ada sesetengah kelompok yang terpedaya, jadi dengan sebab itu selagi Melayu berpecah, saya bimbang kelompok majoriti akan menjadi minoriti.

Teras pembangunan negara kita adalah berasaskan kepada suatu jumlah masyarakat Melayu yang agak besar tetapi terpisah atau dipecahkan oleh perbezaan politik yang begitu ketara, dalam masa yang sama di pihak sana pula bukan Melayu menjadi penentu, inilah yang saya kata sudah berubah landskap politik negara kita, dan kalau hal sebegini berterusan apakah ia akan menguntungkan Melayu?

Bila saya berkata demikian bukanlah bermakna bukan Melayu akan rugi, orang bukan Melayu tidak akan rugi kerana mereka sudah maju, berjaya menguasai bidang ilmu dan ekonomi dan sebagainya. Bagaimana dengan masa depan orang Melayu? Apakah orang Melayu akan terjamin dengan situasi sebegini? Saya sudah mendapat banyak maklum balas bahawa orang Melayu berasa bimbang, mereka memikirkan soal generasi Melayu akan datang, macam mana nasib anak cucu kita. Perasaan ini wujud kerana mereka merasakan kedudukan orang Melayu sudah mula tergugat, kuasa politik Melayu melalui UMNO sudah tergugat, sedangkan dahulu kita jadi teras kita adil, saksama dan kita bantu semua kaum.

Kita menolong orang Melayu lebih kerana orang Melayu miskin, orang Melayu belum ada banyak harta dan orang Melayu belum menguasai kekayaan ekonomi dan sebagainya, jadi kita bantu beri pendidikan, biasiswa dan bantuan macam-macam lagi. Sebenarnya agenda pembangunan umat Melayu belum beres, sekarang tercabar dengan sebab berbeza politik menyebabkan orang Melayu berpuak-puak.

He says that his words were twisted and misintepreted, especially by the Chinese newspapers until it sounded as if he called the Chinese as “ungrateful”.

From what I understand, he starts by saying that the Chinese and Indian are not ready to accept any type of government leadership as it is now, especially after what happened in Perak. Some people there think that the Chinese government have been toppled  by the Malay government, even though that is wrong assumption, says Muhyiddin. Its possible that the people in Bukit Gantang are unhappy at the way the majority choice is rejected, because they want a government chosen after elections. He thinks the same issues affected the Chinese in Bukit Selambau, perhaps that’s why many of them did not turn up to vote (either they want to boycott or did not want to make a stand). He also mentioned that other factors like development, no populist decision by government, help for land titles, and issues related to national type schools.

However, the next question by the interviewer is very dangerous one – the interviewers asks as follows: Is it not that for every by elections, the requests of non Malays are fulfilled, even in Bukit Gantang an allocation of RM1 million was given, yet the Chinese did not support BN?

Now, how is one supposed to answer this question? Let’s see how newly minted DPM answers (I translated the relevant paragraphs from above):

Yes, sometimes we feel cheated because on face value it looks “ok”, reception with loud claps, but maybe deep in the heart its already planted that not easy to change, issues like sympathy sentiment for Nizar and land lease of 99 years which is seen as beneficial.

This is perhaps that make it difficult for BN to get support because even if we think they want Chinese schools to be helped, we help, they should repay the kindness (membalas budi?). At that time, we do not expect the support from Chinese to increase 40% or so, but we hope at least a small increment, but what happens is a reduction, as if there’s no appreciation (penghargaan) of what we have done.

So, we have to study what pyschology makes the Chinese community not ready to change, it was not so those days.

The question is do they see, in the current political scenario context, after BN fell in five states, themselves as determining power? The Chinese now, even though are minority, they are the deciders because the Malay community has split into three groups. The Chinese community did not spilt, they are united, at least in spirit when they make a decision together.

In this situation, they can decide the decision of a election, and when the effect is seen in the last general election and past few by-elections, they think they have more deciding power now, now only the Chinese but also the Indians, what more when get positions in the governments formed by opposition coalition by becoming deputy chief minister, speaker and state exco, so this, for them, makes the offer made by the other party better than what we have ever offered in BN, so this we have to study.

Well, did DPM insult the Chinese community? Is what he said a fact? I think he is voicing his frustration because their prediction of small increase in support did not materialise, in fact, it went the other way. Regardless of that MCA and Gerakan benefitted from cabinet revamp, so maybe the Chinese community will show their appreciation in the next elections.

As for the Indians, they got a better deal under Pakatan states as mentioned by DPM – deputy chief minister post, more exco seats, speaker post and so on. Something that never happened in last 51 years. Of course some may argue – these few posts, does it translate to overall improvement of the community or merely symbolic.  Sometimes actions speak louder than words. BN has lots of promises  for the community over the 50 years, and the report card have many red marks.  Just look at Tamil schools, intake in public service, number of students in IPTA, number of entrepreneurs, income imbalance, asset ownership, and equity in shares, among others. Pakatan just into second year, so still got long way to go before we can compare on equal footing.

For me, if you are taken for a ride, its your foolishness that plays a major role.  One thing for sure, the Chinese really make use of MCA/Gerakan/DAP etc to achieve many things. They are a lot more politically savvy than the Indian. Definitely its not the place of any minister to teach or advise the community on how to show appreciation or to repay gratitude. There’s a saying that goes like this – “don’t expect gratitude” and “do good without expecting anything in return”. But in politics, its always a trade, a busines transaction. Thus in the recent cases, its seems that one party refuses to honor the deal, as implied in the interview.

As some quarters asked – whose money is that RM 1 million? Did it come out of someone’s pocket? Then the recipients should thank those people.

MCA and Gerakan are quick to point out that piecemeal actions and last minute work would not guarantee the support of the community. Just RM1 million will not sway the votes, when there are many other outstanding issues still unsolved.

Youngster rely on Internet more

April 12th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


This doesn’t really surprise many of us. We have seen the impact of Internet in highlighting social issues,elections, e-commerce, and even crime. The survey by Synovate had the following to report:

– about 45 percent of the Malaysian youth interviewed in the survey said they planned to use the Internet more than other media.

– young Malaysians were active bloggers with close to half (48 percent) spending a portion of their time blogging.

– a total of 21 percent of Malaysian youngsters create and update their blogs regularly and this figure is expected to rise

– young Malaysians aged eight to 24 spend an average of 1.2 hours a day on email, one hour and thirty-six minutes a day as part of online communities, two hours and 48 minutes on instant messaging and two hours and 36 minutes on other Internet activities.

“Young Malaysians are definitely turning to the Internet more for their information and entertainment needs and it’s not surprising that the Internet is slowly becoming the medium of choice,” said managing director of Synovate in Malaysia, Steve Murphy.

The survey covers 12 markets across Asia, including Japan and Vietnam for the first time. Besides Malaysia, the other markets were China, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, South Korea, the Philippines, Singapore, Taiwan and Thailand.