Posts Tagged ‘Pakatan Rakyat’

HINDRAF unhappy with Pakatan states

July 29th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Very surprising indeed. in the pro government Star, HINDRAF coordinators Kannan and Thanenthiran were quoted as HINDRAF not regretting asking supporters to vote for opposition. They said many changes were seen after the elections, especially in Pakatan led states.

But today, in the pro-opposition Malaysiakini, a different tune is being sang. The report says that HINDRAF, together with two previously unheard of groups – Penang Makkal Sakti Welfare Association (Pemaswa) and Hindu Action Network (Han) are fed up with the “indifferent attitude of Pakatan Rakyat governments”.

These three groups are now asking for these Pakatan states to set up state Indian councils to be led by the menteri besar or chief minister. The suggested councils will plan and implement beneficial programmes
for the Indian community, with short, medium and long term goals.

Hindraf National Coordinator, Thanenthiran declares that the Pakatan government had failed to fulfill the promises. He said during the elections, Pakatan used the Hindraf tagline Makkal
Sakti but since winning they have not unveiled any policy to benefit
the community. “Pakatan Rakyat ruling parties, be it DAP in Penang, PAS in Kedah and
Perak and PKR in Selangor, seemed to have made empty electoral promises
to the Indians,” he added. He stressed Hindraf would continue to fight along the movement’s
18-point memorandum submitted to the federal government last year.

Pemaswa’s president, G Asohan also chips by saying that Indian leaders in the Pakatan government have “betrayed the Indian community’s trust in them” to deliver the goods. “Until today, the state governments, particularly Indian leaders, are resting on their laurels,” he said. He claimed that more from MIC, PPP and IPF have benefited from the DAP government in Penang than genuine Hindraf supporters.

HAN’s coordinator G Mugunthan criticised Penang’s elected Indian assemblypersons of protecting their
chronic self-interests when they rejected a previous DAP proposal for a
state council. Though DAP members were keen for a one-stop council, the DAP Indian
assemblypersons rejected it as “it will put undue pressure on them to
deliver.” “Now they are freely doing anything according to their
whims and fancies,” he said, adding that the appointment of an Indian
as Penang deputy chief minister has been more “a curse than a blessing”
to the community. “It has only helped some chronic characters from BN.”

The three groups plan to organise a joint dialogue session with all relevant Pakatan Rakyat heads of state governments over the issue.

As for me, in the short period since last August, HINDRAF had done the impossible. and brought immense self-confidence into the community. It may be a relatively short-lived shot in the arm for the community which was fed up with shoddy treatment from all corners. Post-elections, its a new voyage into unchartered areas. Here, HINDRAF, just like the Indian community, had to make sure its stand is clear. How the community’s newly acquired self-confidence is used may be out of HINDRAF’s control. As Waytha admitted in Singapore months ago (the famous misused interview), it is very likely that HINDRAF will cease to exist in the near future. If it has outlived its purpose – to create an awakening – then its time to retire HINDRAF. The spirit of Makkal Sakthi can take form in newer groups or agendas. It might even cleanse MIC, for all we know. But the contribution of HINDRAF is undeniable.

HINDRAF’s main agenda is to push its 18 point memorandum, and to free its detained leaders. They should stick to that and be clear. They should not meddle into many things (like PI Bala’s disappearance) and cloud the situation. They are apolitical. A pressure group. Their job is to push the community’s agenda (just, fair and logical ones) to the authorities. If group A does not help, then move to group B. Remember that political parties need Hindraf, not the other way around. If such parties conveniently forget HINDRAF now, they will be rudely reminded in the next election. Its not end of the world if Pakatan states neglect the community. In the end, these people will come begging for votes. The community have realised that the era of 50 years of empty promises are gone already. Now, 5 years only given, maybe lesser.

On another note, if the Pakatan led governments implement race-independent measures and policies that directly and indirectly benefit the community, HINDRAF should welcome those measures and policies. We have seen settlers getting land title and pig farms projects continuing, but partially-aided Tamils schools have not got their land. Perhaps the process is longer, but Pakatan leaders in Selangor, Penang and Perak must keep the community updated. What is the progress in getting the land? what are the problems they face? Is it due to federal laws?

The Indian community does not owe any party or individuals a living. Those who think that we should bow down and kowtow to others are seriously wrong. We don’t agree that some other group are supremacist, while we are slaves. We stand equal, shoulder to shoulder with other human beings, and are not fourth class citizens. The community may be stuck between two useless groups – the BN and the Pakatan, but it must never lose its self respect.

Pakatan state magazines come under fire

July 29th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Penang and Perak state governments had announced the publication of magazines that various groups branded as propoganda. These groups called the the two state governments ‘hypocrites’ as they were doing the same thing as the previous governments which they had earlier criticised.

Malaysiakini carried some of the responses from these groups:

Media Watch:

Penang-based Media Watch group described Suara Rakyat, published by the DAP-led Penang government and Citra Perak in PAS-led Perak as “merely a public media tool of partisan propaganda.”“The Pakatan Rakyat governments are no different from the previous ones after all. They are hypocrites by copying BN media policy to serve their cynical self interests,” said its coordinator B K Ong, stressing Media Watch’s stand on governments to ‘stay away’ from media publications.

Even if a state government funds and publishes a state magazine, he argues it should be administrated by an independent editorial board to provide free and fair news coverage.

“But these magazines are more like mouthpieces of Pakatan Rakyat state governments than independent magazines,” he told Malaysiakini.

By following the precedent set by his predecessor, Ong said Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng had proven to be a hypocrite since “he had condemned BN-controlled media all these years.”

“He should have titled the magazine as Suara Kerajaan (Government Voice) not Suara Rakyat (People’s Voice),” he said.

United Hindu Religious Council:

President G Mugunthan criticised the Pakatan Rakyat state governments of not going on an austerity drive to save government spending, more so during such difficult times for the people.“The Pakatan state governments claim to be thrifty but are wrongly spending precious government funds
on propaganda. The money could have well spent for noble causes like helping the poor and Tamil schools,” he stressed.

Aliran:

Although social reform movement Aliran is not against the government-sponsored publications, it nonetheless said that state magazines should be more for “intellectual discourse, intelligent thinking and people centric.”

Penang Heritage Trust:

Penang Heritage Trust head Dr Choon Sim Poey concurred that it would not be right for the state governments to utilise public funds for political publicity, instead of  publishing government policies and action plans for the information of the people.

Opposition Leader in Penang:

Azhar Ibrahim on Monday criticised the state government of going back on its promise to cut operational costs due to a lack of funds.“Is this what we call the ‘CAT’ government?” he asked, taking a swipe at the state government’s widely-propagated principles of competency, accountability and transparency (CAT).

it is estimated that Penang government will spent RM300,000 (20,000 copies x 3 editions) . Perak is also expected to spend same amount for 6 editions of 10,000 copies each. Suara Rakyat (52 pages), Penang’s version is in 3 languages – Malay, Mandarin, and Tamil. Citra Perak (20 pages) is in Malay only.

Previous Penang government spent nearly RM300,000 a year to publish separate Malay, Chinese and Tamil magazines in Penang. The Malay version, Wawasan Rakyat was published first in 1994, Hong Yuan in Mandarin was launched in 1999 while Makkal Madal in Tamil was started in 2003.

The previous Perak BN government only published Warta Perak in Bahasa.

The Pakatan government must be careful to ensure that they do not follow the path of those they criticised earlier. This kind of expense will not go down well with public, and will be used by opposition to attack government.

Protest over surau while MP gets punched in Desa Mentari

July 20th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


I guess all Malaysians already know that MP for Kelana Jaya, Loh Gwo Burne got punched in the corner of his eye by the aide of fellow PKR state assemblyman, Nik Nazmi (currently overseas). As reported in Malaysiakini, Loh says he has forgiven the attacker, Mior Azam Shah Mior Yahya and had talked to him later. Loh made a police report, nonetheless, and police has taken statement from Azam. Says Loh:

I do not hold any grudges against Azam. I still do not fully understand why he hit me but I am not angry at him. When he saw me at the police station, he apologised. He made a mistake.

However, Loh stated that he will not retract his police report because it was necessary to send out the right message.

I will not retract the police report. If I do so, that sends out a message that anybody can whack me and I don’t want that.
I only hope there will be no serious consequences against him. I don’t want him to go to jail.

The reports in NST and Star did not mention details except saying that its over a place of worship, but Malaysiakini had more details, for example mentioning that the place of worship is actually a surau!

According to my sources, the area in Desa Mentari already has 3 surau. The large Indian community there were upset when plans to put up fourth one came up as it will cause more noise. They were expecting a playground instead.

The Star version:

The alleged incident occurred during the ground-breaking ceremony for a place of worship at Desa Mentari here at about 3pm. It seems residents living in the area had protested against the construction of the building there and Loh, who was present, had approached them.
After speaking to the group, Loh approached the organisers of the function to discuss with them the protesters’ concern when he was allegedly punched by Azam. Loh said he went to the scene after being informed about the protest.He said he was surprised because the matter was supposed to have been resolved on Thursday. He said the problem started two weeks ago when residents complained about construction of the building and he was unable to find out who was responsible for the construction.
“When I arrived there today, I kept on asking him (the aide), ‘Who was responsible for this?’ I must have asked him about 10 times and pointed at him saying that, ‘You as a PA should know’. That was when he punched me in the face above my right eye,” he said.The crowd then stopped the individual, he said.“I do not think I provoked him,” Loh said.He added that the party should do something “comprehensive” against his alleged assailant.

Malaysiakini version:

The parliamentarian went to see what was going on after learning there was a protest by residents living in the area against the construction of the surau. He said the problem started two weeks ago when residents complained about the construction of a surau but he could not find out who was responsible for the construction.
He also noted that the structure has no permit from the local council and the residents disagree with the structure. “The residents wanted a playground for the children, not another surau. “I am not opposed to anything that people want to build as long the
residents are properly consulted and have agreed to it,” he stated.
After speaking to the protesters, Loh approached the organisers of the function to discuss with them the residents’ concern and was suddenly punched in the face by Azam. “I kept asking (Azam), ‘Who was responsible for this?’ for about 10 times and pointed at him saying, ‘You as a PA should know’. That was when he punched me in the face above my right eye,” he said.
Immediately after the incident, the police controlled the crowd who tried to reprimand Azam themselves.

Loh then said that the people behind this construction had decided to halt the project as they await further consultation with about 6,000 of the residents there.

Selangor MB, Khalid Ibrahim said that the assault issue has been resolved after apologies were exchanged by the two persons involved. He claims that incident is due to “young PKR leaders eager to bring forward their respective opinions as representatives of the local people”. Does he mean that there are gangsters in PKR? In The Star, the MB is quoted as saying this issue is an internal dispute.

It’s among the young ones of PKR. We see it as an internal dispute that has been solved between both individuals. Both men have apologised and it’s a neighbourhood issue that will be resolved in an amicable manner with the help of Kelana Jaya division chairman Syed Shahir Syed Mohamud.

Khalid said no disciplinary action would be taken on either individual as it was just a difference of opinion.

The young ones are eager to do their best for the people, express the people’s views but it has to be done through constructive
consultation and must not get physical at any moment of time.

One good thing that has come out of this is the high level of transparency, accountability and the presence of the people’s representatives in the neighbourhoods to solve issues.

Asked how it could be an internal dispute when the incident occurred in public, Khalid once again played the matter down by saying that it was all right as it shows that the party members are very much involved in the field and are with the people.

Differences of opinion take place but we encourage constructive consultation and views shared. It also fosters a better understanding among the leaders and its people in a particular neighbourhood.

Khalid said to avoid future misunderstandings; construction of all places of worship must obtain approval from the respective local authorities. But isn’t this ALREADY a rule for non-muslim places of worship???

By the way, UMNO’s Muhammad Muhammad Taib took this opportunity to tell some lies. Read this:

During Barisan Nasional’s administration, since 1957, there were never incidences about fighting over places of worship. “We
usually resolved everything through a consensus. We allowed churches, temples, mosques and all … but now they have to get physical about it

Does he think we forgot about Padang Jawa?

Question now will arise on how Pakatan Rakyat goverment will solve this problem. Will they allow building of a unapproved place of worship? Will rules be bent to get the plans approved? Does the surau actually have an approval? Were residents’ view taken into consideration before construction? What if the residents continue protesting? What is Hindraf’s stand on this? Will MIC say something?

Hmm… so many questions arising.

HINDRAF may reject Pakatan Rakyat

July 15th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Well, if earlier there was discontent due to selection of councillors in Perak (only 48 Indians were selected), now HINDRAF outrightly declares that it will support only to those parties that is able to improve the Indian community’s standing. So say its national information coordinator S. Jayathas who foresee a time when Hindraf would have to split ranks and support Barisan Nasional instead, if Barisan proved it could do better:

It would be up to the Hindraf chairman to decide whether to split from Pakatan. The challenge now is for Pakatan and Barisan to prove who can do better. We will wait and see. Until then, we will keep on demanding that Pakatan work for the betterment of the Indians.

 

 

Jayathas said Hindraf sought support from the Opposition because MIC had failed to address the community’s issues in Parliament. Jayathas stressed that Hindraf was a group that also wanted better job opportunities, respect and dignity for the Indian community. He added that Hindraf’s allegiance with the Opposition parties did not mean that the group had given up on MIC.

 

 

Now, this can be read in many ways –

 

1. HINDRAF may realise that Pakatan Rakyat is not able to help in its quest as fast as it wanted too.

 

2. Government is beginning to introduce policies and goodies for the community.

 

3. MIC is trying to change itself to be better.

 

Even though the above three are all “work in progress”, I’ll say that groups like HINDRAF are not political parties. They are civil rights or pressure groups who fight for a particular issue – in this case Indian community rights vis-a-vis equal rights for Malaysian citizens.

 

So, they will see who will best support their ideals. Earlier, Waytha asked the community to support opposition and we saw the effect in last General Elections. Many of the safe seats fell.

 

If now Waytha says don’t support Pakatan Rakyat coalition in Perak, what will happen? Can we see the assemblymen like Sivanesan, Keshvinder, Sivakumar etc. jump to BN or at least be independent? Will this help BN to gain back Perak by August 31st?

HINDRAF unhappy with Pakatan Rakyat in Perak

July 10th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


HINDRAF is unhappy because only 48 Indian councillors were selected from a total of 338 appointed by Perak on Monday. The rest are as follows: 134 Chinese, 124 Malays, five representatives from special groups, such as Orang Asli and disabled people, and 27 from NGOs.

Surely the disabled and NGO representatives are from one race or another right?

According to HINDRAF’ memorandum sent to Menteri Besar Nizar, 60 councillors were promised to be from the Indian community, but only 48 were selected in the end. This is just 7 more than the number of councillor under the previous government. The delegation to submit memorandum was led by Perak Hindraf coordinator Vathe Murthi.

Further more, figures from Statistics Department indicate that 13% of the state’s population (300,000) are Indians.

Hindraf wants the new government to revert back to its promise and also initiate affirmative policies to provide vast opportunities in all fields in both public and private sectors to marginalised Indians.

It’s pointless to merely talk on correcting the wrongs done by the
previous BN state government when one failed to prove it’s a government
with a difference.

HINDRAF warned that Nizar should act firmly, fairly and meet its demands. If not the movement may resort to other means (demonstration) to voice their satisfaction. Pakatan should not forget the contribution of Makkal Sakthi, says its coordinator.

Can Hindraf cause another tsunami, this time in Perak? Can Pakatan be rattled or toppled by Makkal Sakthi?