Posts Tagged ‘Perak’

HINDRAF unhappy with Pakatan Rakyat in Perak

July 10th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


HINDRAF is unhappy because only 48 Indian councillors were selected from a total of 338 appointed by Perak on Monday. The rest are as follows: 134 Chinese, 124 Malays, five representatives from special groups, such as Orang Asli and disabled people, and 27 from NGOs.

Surely the disabled and NGO representatives are from one race or another right?

According to HINDRAF’ memorandum sent to Menteri Besar Nizar, 60 councillors were promised to be from the Indian community, but only 48 were selected in the end. This is just 7 more than the number of councillor under the previous government. The delegation to submit memorandum was led by Perak Hindraf coordinator Vathe Murthi.

Further more, figures from Statistics Department indicate that 13% of the state’s population (300,000) are Indians.

Hindraf wants the new government to revert back to its promise and also initiate affirmative policies to provide vast opportunities in all fields in both public and private sectors to marginalised Indians.

It’s pointless to merely talk on correcting the wrongs done by the
previous BN state government when one failed to prove it’s a government
with a difference.

HINDRAF warned that Nizar should act firmly, fairly and meet its demands. If not the movement may resort to other means (demonstration) to voice their satisfaction. Pakatan should not forget the contribution of Makkal Sakthi, says its coordinator.

Can Hindraf cause another tsunami, this time in Perak? Can Pakatan be rattled or toppled by Makkal Sakthi?

Kulasegaran gets councillor post

July 8th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Two months ago, there were rumours that Kulasegaran will be nominated as Ipoh Mayor, which received mostly negative feedback from the public and other parties/organisations.

He was instead appointed as a councillor, an action that still received flak from certain groups:

Ipoh Ratepayers Association (Irata) vice-president Victor Sankey expressed concern whether Kulasegaran could spare the time from his tight schedule as a parliamentarian to attend to local issues. “No doubt, his credentials qualify him as a councillor but he has enough on his plate as a parliamentarian,” he said Tuesday. Pointing out that local councils were the third tier of government and closest to the people, Victor said ratepayers had high expectations. He added that people were already annoyed that only 30% of the councillors’ posts were allotted to non-governmental organisations.

Teja assemblyman Chang Lih Kang was also sceptical if Kulasegaran could handle the appointment. He added that the Ipoh Barat MP’s appointment had also set a bad precedent.”A politician should not be given excessive power. Kulasegaran’s appointment is a form of monopoly.  “As there were other candidates applying to become councillors, it should not be monopolised by politicians,” he said.

Perak MCA organising secretary Dr Mah Hang Soon questioned whether Kulasegaran could carry out his duties as a councillor as he would be away in Parliament for more than 100 days a year.  “Being a councillor, he needs to be regularly available to the people,” he said.

Kula still insists that he can serve his community well, and will be quitting his legal profession:

Kulasegaran, however, said he would not face problems in carrying out his duties as both MP and councillor. “As I have vast knowledge on local council affairs, I am expected to play a pivotal role in Ipoh City Council,” he said. He added that he would quit as a lawyer soon to concentrate on his dual role.

As for me, I still believe another person should have been given a chance. Definitely there are equally or better qualified people in Ipoh? Kulasegaran can still provide input and assistance via his position as MP. The intentions may be good, but the perception of the public will be negative. Bad move for Pakatan.

Perak UMNO apologises over Hamidah’s racial insult

July 2nd, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Following the furore over Perak Sungai Rapat assemblyperson Hamidah Osman’s racial insult in the state assembly, the state UMNO and BN had publicly apologized.

In a statement, state Umno secretary Datuk Ramly Zahari said the
remarks of Hamidah, who is also Gopeng Wanita Umno chief, were
regrettable.

“As such, Umno and Barisan apologises to
those, especially the Indian community, who felt slighted or
offended,” he said yesterday.

“Although she has retracted her words at the state assembly,
it is felt that we should still extend our apologies in order to
maintain the good relationship among the races,” said Ramly.

“We hope it will be accepted with an open heart by everyone,” Ramly added.

In NST, the following is mentioned:

In a statement faxed to the New Straits Times office here yesterday
evening, Perak Umno liaison secretary Datuk Ramly Zahari said he was
instructed by state liaison chairman Datuk Seri Tajol Rosli Ghazali to
issue a statement on the matter.

He said Tajol Rosli wanted the
matter dealt with quickly for fear it would affect race relations since
the issue had drawn flak from the public.

Ramly said Perak Umno
and the state Barisan Nasional regretted “the slip of tongue” by Sungai
Rapat assemblyman Hamidah Osman and “apologised to all quarters who are
unhappy with the remark, especially the Indian community”.

“Hamidah had retracted her statement in the state assembly.


“Nevertheless, to maintain a good relationship among the
races, we hope this statement of regret and apology will be accepted
with an open heart by all parties,” he said.

Ramly admitted that Hamidah had uttered a remark which insulted the
Indian community, but maintained it was merely a slip of the tongue.

Her statements caused much anger in the community, with many police reports being made and at least two protests being held.

MIC’s Samy Vellu also expressed unhappiness over her statements.

For the record, Hamidah had apologized 3 times publicly to community. Time to move on. We forgive, but not forget.

Hamidah insults Indian community

June 28th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Is the insult by Sungai Rapat (Perak) state assemblyperson Hamidah Osman reflective of BN’s treatment of MIC and Indians in general? One cannot forget Lim Keng Yaik’s famous words as well – something to do with rubber trees (wonder why no one protested him getting Tun). Obviously in a multiracial country, there’s always friendly banter between friends of different races, calling each other names. But that is in an informal, friendly environment. But in a formal setting, the assemblyperson should have known better. Now, Hamidah has become a liability for BN. Apology and wasting money going around her constituency will be wastage only. She might even be greeted with slippers. Best if she resign and save MIC from trying to do a salvage job. The story is below:

Hamidah insulted the Assembly Speaker Sivakumar and his race when she asked him whether he ‘agreed to
disagree’ with a well-known fable of whether a snake or a man from a
certain racial community should be killed first.

Her question caused a commotion by the ruling coalition asking her to retract her question, but Hamidah insisted that she was
merely asking if Sivakumar “agreed to disagree” with it and pleaded innocence.

The
speaker who is also DAP Tronoh assemblyperson instead let her off the
hook with a mere warning of “not to repeat such sensitive remarks.” She later retracted her words after being ordered to do so by the BN whip.

Realising her political mistake (though not necessarily repented) she publicly apologised for hurting the Indian community at a packed press conference in the Ipoh Country Club this
morning, saying that it was not her intention to hurt
the Indian community with a racial slur.

“I have already
retracted my statement in the House and now, I am offering my humble
and sincere apology here to all Indians for uttering the racist remarks
in the heat of the moment.

“I regret for saying that and promise
not to repeat it anywhere anymore,” said a visibly moved Hamidah, who
plans to embark on a ‘constituency road show’ to explain and apologise
over the incident to electorates in Gopeng, which encompasses Sungai
Rapat.

The Buntong assemblyman Sivasubramaniam had this to say (trust the ruling party to use this extensively):

DAP Buntong state assemblyperson A Sivasubramaniam did
not mince his words, labeling her “a racist upholding BN tradition of
racial brand politics”.

“It is ungainly graceless for a people’s
representative to utter such racist remarks against the speaker and his
community,” he said.

Sivasubramaniam
also said Hamidah’s remarks was proof that BN, particularly Umno, had
yet to accept its electoral defeat and conform to the reality that “a
speaker of Indian origin was presiding the House”.

“She and Umno are playing with fire by hurting the racial sentiment of others,” he told Malaysiakini.

Anyway, she was forced to make a public apology, causing a humiliation to BN, and probably take off the pressure from Nizar’s administration for the moment. She was not referred to the Privileges Committee because according to Malaysiakini:

However, a Perak
government insider said Hamidah was not referred to the Privilege
Committee because she was deliberately left to “suffer public
condemnation”.

“She could have become an Umno ‘heroine’ and
evaded public humiliation since she would gain ‘immunity’ if referred
to the committee.

“The game plan worked to force Hamidah to come
out and openly apologise to Indians in Perak and the country as well,”
the insider said.

Perak Assembly Speaker Sivakumar finds it tough

June 26th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


This is the second day of the Perak State Assembly sitting. And Sivakumar, being the first Indian state assembly speaker carries the burden and image of the community. He must not forget that.

Anyway, he’ll be more hellish times ahead since Perak’s situation is nearly balanced. He need to be far more patient than Pandikar Amin the Dewan Rakyat speaker!

He already faced his first walkout, but the Star reports sounds like he was being fair. Selangor’s Teng also doing quite well I guess as no complaints have been registered.

Speaker: Perak BN walkout was ‘childish’

Perak Barisan Nasional’s walkout during the state assembly was “childish” and unbecoming of an elected representative, assembly speaker V. Sivakumar said.

“They are here to bring forth the problems of the people, not to carry out their own agenda in order to get publicity,” he said when commenting on the incident here Thursday.

Asked about Datuk Seri Raja Ahmad Zainuddin Raja Omar (BN – Kubu Gajah) being denied the chance to debate, Sivakumar said that Raja Ahmad Zainuddin had been given the last half hour of the sitting on Wednesday to debate.

But for some reason, he chose not to speak and instead asked to debate Thursday on the motion of thanks on the royal address, said Sivakumar. “When you get the opportunity to speak, you grab it. Otherwise, you will have to wait your turn like everyone else. “Moreover, I never refused his request. I told Raja Ahmad Zainuddin he would debate next after Teja assemblyman Chang Lih Kang, who stood up first,” he said.

On accusations from Barisan representatives that he was biased towards Pakatan Rakyat, Sivakumar aruged that he had been more than fair to Barisan. He pointed out that he gave over two hours to former Mentri Besar Datuk Seri Mohamad Tajol Rosli Ghazali to present his debate.