Posts Tagged ‘Poverty’

urban poor poverty line to be rm3000?

October 29th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


This may be the news many people have been waiting for. As it is, majority of Malaysian are living in urban areas (surprised?),  contrary to notion that we have lots of people in rural areas. About 63 to 70% of the Malaysian population are in urban areas (read more below). Naturally, that can imply that the poor segment of the society is not only limited to the rural areas, but are found in urban settings too.

The current poverty line of RM700 or so (its different for Peninsular and East Malaysia) is ridiculous to say the least. Even in rural areas, it would be difficult to raise a family of four with monthly income of RM700.

RM3,000 is poverty line for the urban poor while those in the rural area may find the bar upped to about RM1000 to RM1500 monthly income. Its also prudent to note that the urban population in Malaysia was 62% in the year 2000, and estimated to be 62.8 in the year 2007.  UNHCR says its 69% as of 2009. That may mean that 7 out of 10 Malaysian are living in cities and towns, and we are still using a poverty line set in the 70s!

And did you know that in the year 2000, Klang was the THIRD largest city in the country, after KL and Johor Bahru? Read it here [PDF file]. The definition of urban in the year 1991 (Census) is as follows:

definition of urban areas used in the 1991 Census, refers to gazetted areas and their adjoining built-up areas with a combined population of 10,000 persons or more. Built-up areas were defined as areas contiguous to a gazetted area which had at least 60 per cent of their population (aged 10 years or more) having modern toilet facilities. However, several exceptions were made to the above definition. Gazetted areas which cover entire administrative districts and areas gazetted prior to the implementation of the restructuring of local authorities under the respective Local Government Act/Ordinance in Malaysia, together with their adjoining built-up areas and having a combined population of 10,000 persons or more were classified as urban areas.

While setting the bar higher may increase the poverty percentage in the country, it will be a more realistic figure. I personally don’t think there are only 5% hard core poor in Malaysia, and the low-income bracket is not just 20 or 30% of the population, but may be as high as 50% of the population.

The setting of the poverty line should be tied to the size of city/town, population, CPI for that particular location,  and the household population. It should also take into consideration retirees and disabled persons.

Talking about household population, there should be some limitation in counting the number of children in a family to determine poverty level. We don’t want to see cases where families have many children without considering their economic status and merely depending on the state for welfare benefits.  The poverty line can be abused to claim welfare benefits if no limits are set. This “limits” may support the aim of having a family planning policy. While its sad to read about parents with 6 or 8 kids, one do wonder why they have so many children if can’t even provide proper meals. And these are the families that tragedy strikes often – chronic health problems, death of a spouse, lack of stable income, retrenchment, etc.  So, the poverty line should cater for a family for maximum 4 children. Anything beyond that should not be borne by the government.

And I suggest that it should be made compulsory for a member of a family that falls under the poverty line to be fully sponsored to undergo a certificate, diploma or degree program as part of the poverty eradication program. Secondly, another member of the family must also enrol in a suitable entrepreneur program, again fully sponsored by the government. This two activities can help to alleviate the poverty problem.

PETALING JAYA: The Government has decided to set RM3,000 as the poverty line for the urban poor based on feedback from people living in major urban areas such as Kuala Lumpur.

This is according to Federal Territories Minister Datuk Raja Nong Chik Raja Zainal Abidin whose ministry is to be renamed Federal Territories and Urban Wellbeing Ministry, in efforts to improve the lives of the urban poor.

If you have three children and your household income is RM3,000 or below, you’re almost at the poverty line,” he said, adding that many lower income families had more than four children and still needed to pay for their cars, houses and other mortgage payments.

Therefore, a new set of criteria to eradicate urban poverty is in the pipeline, he said.

“I will have to work out the details with my ministry’s secretary-general,” he said on the sidelines of a family fair at the Malay-sian Tourism Information Centre here yesterday. Raja Nong said his ministry would also have to conduct a new census to identify those who came under the urban poverty mark.

“The number of urban poor and slum dwellers in the cities is rising,” said Raja Nong.

“There is no social safety net for such people, including single parents with three to five children living in low-cost flats.”

In his Budget 2010 speech on Friday, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak an-nounced that urban poverty eradication programmes would be drawn out nationwide.

The Budget had allocated RM48mil to implement the programmes.

According to Housing and Local Govern-ment Minister Datuk Seri Kong Cho Ha, the Government had decided two to three months ago that urban poverty eradication would be handled primarily by the Implementation Coordination Unit (ICU) under the Prime Minister’s Department.

“The information of those identified as being in the urban poverty bracket will be passed on to the ICU, which gets a list from the Rural Department, and other ministries and departments.”

Misuse of welfare funds

October 23rd, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Just reading the below news makes my blood boil. These criminals should be imprisoned.

WELFARE aid totalling RM418,145 was paid out in cash to 184 people up to December 2008 in Perlis, but there are no records of the recipients with the National Registration Department, revealed the Auditor-General’s Report.

The report found that the Perlis Welfare Department also discovered that 26 recipients who died between 2007 and 2008 continued to receive cash aid totalling RM14,520.

“In one case, the recipient continued to receive cash aid 20 years after he passed away,” said the report.

The report also discovered another startling case where a department employee created 20 fictitious identities and paid out RM16,140 to them until December last year.

The report said that the NRD confirmed that the recipients did not exist.

“The Perlis Welfare Department lodged a police report against an assistant community development officer in February over the alleged misappropriation of funds,” said the report, adding that police were still investigating.

“This case happened due to lack of monitoring and supervision from high-ranking officers. The incident could have been avoided if duty rotation among staff members was practised,” said the report.

The department explained that the cash aid was paid to representatives of the recipients. In one case, a representative was found to be receiving two sets of cash aid, one in Titi Tinggi and the other in Beseri, it said.

Such cases took place because there was no monitoring or checks and change of duty among staff, it said.

“The auditors are of the view that cash aid should not be given to a representative or a proxy. The recipient never gave consent for such representation,” the report said.

Samsu Report on Al-Jazeera

October 20th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Got this from Saravanan’s FB entry.

Few interesting facts:

1. Samsu (rice wine) can have up to 50% alcohol content.

2. According to CAP’s Subbarow, the government banned sales of samsu in plastics about 20 years ago because it was becoming a social problem among the Malay youths.

3. MIC’s new Information Chief, P Kamalanathan says taxes on the samsu should be raised, similar to cigarettes, wine, beer etc.

4. The guy interviewed in the report says he won’t stop drinking until death. (Even pawned wife’s jewelery to buy liquor).

5. The reason given be the interviewee is that he drinks to forget his sorrows.

6. CAP estimates rural Indians spend US6 million (RM21 million) annually on alcohol.

7. In this example, drinking samsu leads to domestic violence, runaway children, disease and early death.

800ha land allocated for Indian education fund in Perak

October 17th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


This article came out on Star few days ago. The BN state government also allocated 2000ha for Islamic religious schools aid and 1000ha for private Chinese school aid. The aim is to use the proceeds from the cultivation of the land via an education fund to help the poor students.

It is indeed a good news. We can only hope that capable people are given the trust to manage the land, and all the three lands receive similar returns.

In what is seen as a Deepavali gift, the Perak government has announced the allocation of 800ha of land to generate funds for an Indian education fund in the state.

Mentri Besar Datuk Seri Dr Zambry Abdul Kadir said earnings from the land, to be cultivated with oil palm by the Perak Foundation, would be channelled into the fund (Tabung Pendidikan dan Pengupayaan Pendidikan Kaum India) for distribution to poor students.

“I hope this will come as good news for the Indians who will be celebrating Deepavali tomorrow.

This is the state government’s commitment to ensure that all races facing problems related to education are given aid,” he told reporters after attending the 2009 Umno General Assembly at the Putra World Trade Centre (PWTC) here.

He said the state government had also allocated 2,000ha for the benefit of more than 700 Islamic religious schools and 1,000ha to aid private Chinese schools.

How did these people get PR status?

October 1st, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


If you read Star Metro section today, there’s the news about houses built by people along the Jalan Duta. The main points from the article:

– land belongs to Malaysians who rent it out to these people. The families spent money to built their houses.

– the people who rent the land are Indonesian with PR status.

– from the phot0s,  can see cars, astro dish ouside the houses.

– the families’ financial status doesn’t allow for loans from banks to buy properties.

Question: If the financial capability is not strong, can the person still get PR? Don’t they need to have a proper job, and pass various strict conditions imposed by the government? Is it that easy to get PR status for certain people, because I read in papers that professionals  and people who lived all their lives in Malaysia also can’t get PR?  Should these people be offered PPR flats since they are considered low-income Malaysians? What action can be taken against the land owner, who probably misled the tenants? Will DBKL take any action or things would be “adjusted”?

A row of shacks along Jalan Duta near Kampung Segambut Dalam in Kuala Lumpur has become an eyesore for those who come into the city through the North-South Highway.

The 14 houses are built eight months ago by Indonesians with permanent resident (PR) status on a land that belongs to a Malaysian.

Resident Jaafar Sawar, 42, said they were renting the land from a Malaysian owner.

Permanent: Some of the 14 shacks that have been built at the site.

The rent amounts to RM200 for each house.

Jaafar, who has been in Malaysia since 1985, said he spent RM40,000 building his three-room, zink-roofed house.

“I am looking after this place. Every month I collect the RM200 rental from the others and pass it to the owner,” he said.

He added that the land had been lying idle.

The residents, however, did not obtain any building permits from the Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL).

It is on private land, so what we do on it is supposed to be up to us,” Jaafar said.

However, four months ago, they were issued notices of demolition by the DBKL for building illegal structures.

Unfinished: A backlane in between the houses.

“The landowner went to sort things out with the DBKL and, so far, nothing has happened.

“DBKL officers have visited several times to take pictures of the place but nothing else has been done,” he said

Before this, the residents were living at a different plot of land in the area.

Segambut MP Lim Lip Eng said the Indonesian colony in the Segambut area was huge and the new colony was not the only one.

Most of the homes are built on private land owned by Malaysians and then rented out to Indonesians with PR status.

They hold red identification cards so it is difficult for them to buy a house of their own. They are not big income earners, and therefore can’t afford to buy homes.

“Looking at their financial status, banks will not give them loans and that is why they have resorted to building their houses like this,” Lim said.