Posts Tagged ‘Poverty’

Deputy FT Minister clarifies on Sentul issue

December 30th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


If yesterday we read about YTL’s explanation, today we have a look at Deputy FT Minister Saravanan’s views:

THE Federal Territories and Urban Wellbeing Ministry has asked the developer, YTL Land & Development Berhad, to honour their promise to build low- and medium- cost homes for the poor in Sentul.

Its deputy minister, Datuk M. Saravanan, said when the negotiations was done years ago between Sentul Raya Sdn Bhd and Keretapi Tanah Melayu Berhad (KTMB) for the development of Kampung Railway, Sentul Raya had committed to build the low-cost houses for the residents.

“This agreement was done during the then Deputy National Unity and Social Development Minister Datuk Alex Lee’s time. We have a written confirmation on this (agreement),’’ Saravanan said.

“When YTL took over Sentul Raya, they confirmed that it would be their top priority to build these homes. Now they are refusing to honour their agreement,’’ he said.

Saravanan said he was disappointed with the developer’s reasoning that they were not responsible because the agreement was made with another company (Sentul Raya) and that YTL only took over in 1997.

“When you take over assets, you also take over the liabilities. As a developer you also have a corporate social responsibility to the community and not just be profit-driven,’’ Saravanan said.

Some 50 people, comprising Batu MIC division members and squatters from Kampung Railway in Sentul, staged a protest at the YTL building in Jalan Bukit Bintang in Kuala Lumpur on Monday over claims that low- and medium-cost flats were not being built as promised.

The group demanded for the promise based on an agreement in 1994 be fulfilled.

They held placards and marched for a short stretch along the street before crowding in front of the YTL building entrance waiting to hand over the memorandum to a management representative.

Kuala Lumpur City Hall Advisory Board member C. Ramanathan said DBKL had even issued a letter confirming the 1994 agreement and re-affirming the proposal to build the low-cost units.

“The letter basically says that they (DBKL) are still waiting for the developer to put in the development proposal,’’ Ramanathan said.

Ramanathan, who holds the housing and squatter relocation portfolio in the DBKL board, said the area was now developed with many high-end apartments.

“What about the poor people who have been living here since the beginning. What about their plight?’’ he asked.

Kampung Railway resident S. Siva said he was appalled by the manner how the residents were being side-lined by the developer.

We are not squatters. We have been paying quit rent since the 1940s up until 1991. Till today we are paying the assessment fees and bills like Indah Water,’’ he said.

The residents are being asked to relocate to Puchong — which will cripple them financially since most of them are very poor.

According to the 1994 agreement, Sentul Raya Sdn Bhd (under YTL) was to build 3,000 low- and medium-cost flats and two multi-purpose halls and a football field.

But so far, nothing has materialised.

See how is it to be labelled as squatters?  Last time, the community was driven out from estates to urban resettlement or left on their own. Now the vicious cycle continues in urban areas. Where else to run to?

Sentul developer not fulfilling promise

December 18th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Its not easy to stand up to giant developers. Today The Star published this:

The excerpt above says (a) the developer agrees to identify a plot of empty land which is suitable for building temporary houses for the residents while waiting for low cost houses to be built and allocated for the residents. (b) The developer agrees to inform about the empty land after Hari Raya Aidilftri.

This is not any developer, but YTL. So, what is going to be their response? This is a damage to the reputation of YTL if indeed they reneged on the agreement.

Years ago, Indian were thrown out of estates and left to fend for themselves. Now, the second cycle is happening. Housing areas are being developed with houses in the range of hundreds or thousands or even millions of ringgit. What happens to the folks with low-income? They become non-existent or sent to some corner of the city, away from the “rich” areas. Are we happy just watching the history repeat again?  Do you think the people would just disappear from the face of the earth? Or are we sowing the seeds of crime by pushing these people into an abyss of hopelessness and poverty?

Those of us earning thousands of ringgit would find it difficult when petrol price increases or when we incur extra costs due to distance. What more of people who earn less than RM2000 with 2 or 3 kids to feed?

Being less educated (or even uneducated), these folks can be easily conned into signing agreements without them understanding the contents. Let’s face it, some of us educated people also get confused with all the legal and technical terms, what more of them?

IT WAS a day of anxiety for residents of Sentul as a major part of the squatter homes in the area were under siege by both the local council and the developers.

Just moments after the Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL) officers had retreated from Kampung Tanah Lapang yesterday, political party representatives received a call from three distressed women in Lorong 15, Jalan Sentul Pasar.

The women were being evicted from their houses pending a court order from developer YTL Land and Development, the owner of the land they live on.

The eldest, a widow with 10 children, said she had unknowingly signed an agreement form to shift to the DBKL flats in Kampung Muhibbah, Puchong.

“I have no problem shifting, but I did not want a home in Puchong. I live off the RM400 welfare money I receive each month and the donations from organisations in Sentul,” said Thanaletchumy Marimuthu, 41.

She and her married daughter R. Jayanthy, 24, live in one house and each has been offered a unit in Puchong but they refuse to shift there as the move would affect their livelihood and their children’s education.

Another resident, K. Letchumi, 39, works in Batu Caves and has an ailing mother, a disabled sibling and her children, as well as her own child to care for.

She has to manage this with a monthly salary of RM1,000 and if she shifts to Puchong, a huge chunk of the money would be spent on travelling alone.

Their one question remains unanswered: What happened to the low-cost flats that were promised to them by the previous developer, Taiping Consolidated?

The new developer, YTL, denies the promise but residents have proof to claim otherwise.

Documents agreeing to the requests bearing the Sentul Raya Sdn Bhd letter head and several other documents from Taiping Consolidated have been unearthed.

This new turn of events has raised the morale of the people, as they have finally found grounds to fight their case.

The entire Sentul area is slowly being transformed, with high-end condominiums cropping up everywhere. However, this would mean that the original residents of the famed area will have to leave their homes.

The developer should build low-cost and medium-cost flats, and practise their corporate social responsibility here in Sentul,” Batu MIC division chairman Ramanathan Chinnu said.

For now, Ramanathan and the Batu MIC Youth chairman D. Pala Kumaran will seek the assistance of Deputy Federal Territories and Urban Well Being Minister Datuk M. Saravanan to find three units in the Batu Muda flats near by for the three women and their families.

The women are scheduled to shift out today.

Even in my housing area, the developer (Plenitude Permai) changed the plan many times now, and residents are the ones who are short-changed. No community hall, no club house, no proper signages. I’m not sure if they know what is CSR. I wonder how the local council (Majlis Perbandaran Sepang) can approve new phases without taking all this into consideration.

Coalfield Estate problem

December 8th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Another test for Selangor government. People not interested to listen to reasons and excuses, which was dished out in generous quantities by previous governments. Now, keyword is proactive and solve problems. If these people not eligible for loans from banks, then work some way out for them. The children can be transfered to schools in Tuan Mee area, for example. Look for solution, not excuse!

And who cares who sees you. I’m not interested in meeting MB or PM or Donald Duck. I just want my problems solved easily, not waste time chasing for appointment and listening to sweet words, but still end up in square one. The protesters also must think of solutions and suggest it.

The residents have to realise, when Tuan Mee estate closes down, the same thing will happen again.

A group of workers from the Coalfield oil palm plantation in Sungai Buloh are decrying the management’s tactics to ‘force’ them to vacate their houses.

Spokesperson Lobat Rajoo said water and electricity supply have been cut to the quarters occupied by 25 families even though negotiations are pending over the eviction order.

“We have had to resort to bathing in the river,” he told reporters, after he and other affected workers held a meeting with leaders of the National Union of Plantation Workers (NUPW) in Petaling Jaya.

He claimed that a further source of frustration was that utility supplies remain connected to some of the vacated houses.

The group had been told to move out by Dec 1, as the site has been earmarked for commercial development.

The families have been offered low-cost housing units near the estate, but are unable to purchase these for various reasons.

Following this, the management reassigned them to the Tuan Mee Estate, some 7km away, where they will be given houses.

Lobat said many in the group are third-generation estate workers and resisting relocation because of the costs that will be incurred. For example, their children will have to travel a longer distance to attend school.

Malaysiakini made several phone calls to the Coalfield estate manager’s office to seek comments, but these went unanswered.

‘State did try to help’

Selangor exco member Dr Xavier Jayakumar, who oversees estate workers’ affairs, said the state has tried to intervene, even though the matter involves an industrial dispute.

However, some of the workers, including Lobat’s group, do not qualify for bank loans to buy the low-cost houses.

He denied allegations that Menteri Besar Abdul Khalid Ibrahim, the state representative for the area, has ignored the plight of the affected workers.

“Khalid has met them twice – once at his office and once on the ground,” said Jayakumar (right), when contacted.

Hindraf activists and Malaysia Consumer Advisory Association president Varatharajoo Murugan, who accompanied the workers to the NUPW office, had earlier alleged that the state government has not been helpful to the group.

Salary of estate worker

December 1st, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


I’m sure readers are familiar with the recent spat between Plantation Industries and Commodities Minister Bernard Dompok and PSM over the salary of estate workers. It was started by Dompok who said that plantation workers like rubber tappers and oil palm harvesters earn more than the monthly poverty level amount, even quoting RM1700 per month for one category of workers. This was disputed by the Parti Sosialis Malaysia and JERIT. Dompok is even threatening to sue the challengers. But we need to remember that poverty line is for family income, not individual (Dompok compared wrongly in the first place because he took a person’s salary and compared with family poverty income level). This was even pointed out by the Deputy Minister after MK published pay slips of two people:

Malaysiakini had published two pay slips of plantation workers which showed that they were earning below the poverty line which is set at RM720 a month.

Hamzah, upset over statements from representatives of the plantation workers, asked for the news report to be retracted.

He claimed that this had to be done ‘as its objective was to ruin the dignity of the government and his ministry in particular’.

Hamzah (right) said a probe was done on the persons of whose pay slips were published and it was discovered that they were women who were employed as common workers at an oil palm plantation in Sungai Siput. They earned RM21.30 per day.

“Usually, common workers are women who are involved in fertilising and removing weeds (in the plantations). Mostly, they are wives of workers employed for other duties.

“Generally, the accumulated salary of both husband and wife is more than RM1,200 a month, which is above the poverty line,” said Hamzah.

According to him, oil palm fruit harvesters earn from RM26 to RM60 a day, depending on their productivity.

The wages, he said, were based on the ‘productivity-linked wage system’ (PLWS) which was adopted in the collective agreement between the Malayan Agricultural Producers Association (Mapa) and the National Union of Plantation Workers (NUPW).

“At the level of crude palm oil being priced at RM1,200 per tonne, when a harvester produces 38 tonnes a month, he will get RM844.

“At the level of crude palm oil being priced at RM2,000 per tonne, the harvester’s income is RM1,292.16 a month,” said Hamzah.

Therefore, that it was not ‘an impossible task and it is not a lie’ to say that an oil palm plantation worker could earn up to RM1,700 a month. [ah, not impossible, theoretically. why not produce payslips of workers (say 100 workers) who actually got such salaries? Its not that difficult, is it?]

“Especially workers who are productive and are able to produce three tonne bunches of oil palm fruits a day or 78 tonne of bunches of oil palm fruits a month,” said Hamzah.

Today, PSM provided some info and proof by showing salary slip of workers. Its shocking to say the least! Agreed, its just few workers, so may not really represent the whole sector. But I think HR Ministry, NUPW etc have done a survey on this before. What does it say? I also remember reading that many of the plantation workers are actually foreigners since locals shun these jobs.

The salary may be tied to productivity. Maybe it was low season so not much work or product. In the example below, the guy earns less than RM200 per month and has 8 kids. Not a good example for PSM.  While Dompok is most likely wrong in his assessment, the workers also need to play a part and not make their own lives more difficult. If  8 kids, RM10,000 also not enough in this age!

Many plantation workers in Perak, including foreigners, are being exploited and fleeced by estate managements who charge them exorbitant amounts for electricity and water supply.
Parti Sosialis Malaysia (PSM) state coordinator M Sugumaran told Malaysiakini today that estates are charged industrial rates for both the supply of water and electricity.

According to him, Tenaga Nasional Bhd (TNB) bills the estates on a monthly basis whereas the Perak Water Board (LAP) serves them with a bimonthly bill.

Sugumaran said the management could afford to charge domestic rates as the workers are occupying housing areas inside the estate but a recent survey painted a grim picture.

The survey of the working conditions of plantation workers in about 50 estates revealed that they are not only paid low wages but are also charged high electricity and water rates.

“The average gross daily salary for a plantation worker is RM21.10, inclusive of other benefits and allowances. The management deducts RM50 per person per month for utilities.

“There are about five to six foreign workers sharing a room and RM50 is deducted as electricity charges in their salary slips,” a shocked Sugumaran said.

“You mean to say that the electricity charge for a room in an estate comes to about RM300 monthly?” he asked.

Worker’s monthly salary of RM145

Earlier at a press conference, Sugumaran brought 15 plantation workers from Sungai Siput and Bagan Serai and displayed their monthly pay slips to disprove a claim made recently.

Plantation Industries and Commodities Minister Bernard Dompok (left) had stated in Parliament that rubber tappers earn RM870 monthly while plantation workers earn RM1,700.

Sugumaran welcomed the threat by Dompok to sue PSM for refuting his claims and calling him a liar as PSM have documentary evidence to prove the minister wrong.

“Dompok, instead of making statements in the comfort of Parliament, should come down and see the harsh realities of the sufferings of the plantation workers,” said Sugumaran.

Salleh Saari, 44, a plantation worker with eight children from Ladang Gedong in Bagan Serai, provided the press copies of his September and October 2009 salary slips.

His September 2009 salary slip showed that his net take home pay was a mere RM145.94. His gross earning was RM543.36 while his total deductions came to RM397.42.

Deductions were for his two-room estate home, water bill amounting to RM23.40 and electricity at RM85.27.

For October 2009, Salleh had to pay RM35 for water charges and RM93 for electricity usage. “Even a bungalow utilities charges would not be as high as mine,” said Salleh.

His gross October salary was RM381 and his net income after deductions showed RM181.

“How am I to feed my family of eight children? ” he asked, bursting into tears.

All this is going to be rendered academic, because we all know the poverty line is a joke. Good thing government is updating the line to something more sane. I think in rural area it should RM1000 to RM1500 per family of four.

Leaving that issue aside, this is what Sugumaran, coordinator for Plantation Workers Support Group said:

Moreover, he said that not even five percent of the housing policy introduced by former premier Abdul Razak Hussein had been implemented in the plantations.

“Even the clinics are not manned by qualified doctors… the clinics are run by dressers. And almost all Tamil-medium schools are only partially aided because the government does not have the will to convert the schools into fully aided schools,” said Sugumaran.

Also responding to the recent appeal by Human Resource Minister S Subramaniam to the Malaysian Agricultural Producers Association (Mapa) to create housing funds for estate workers, Sugumaran said:

“The problems of the estate workers can be solved if the employers and the government implement the existing policies.

“Since the Second Malaysia Plan, employers have been asked to implement housing schemes when the plantation sector was to be developed but most employers have not implement the policy. Until now fewer than 59 plantations have implemented the policy,” he said.

“It is clear here that employers are not committed to the implementation of housing schemes for their own workers. Then what is the use of the minister asking Mapa to invest these funds?

“Mapa will not execute it. Is it not better for plantation workers that a housing policy be enacted as law that requires companies to implement the practice?” Sugumaran suggested.

Why would employers build housing schemes when its more lucrative to redevelop land into housing schemes which can generate billions of ringgits? There’s no law, just policy.

MyKasih Program

November 10th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


This is an interesting concept due to the idea that every single sen of donation will be fully transfered to the recipients, no hanky-panky stuff. The recipients can use their MyKad account to purchase groceries directly from selected sellers. No use of cash. So, donors can contribute without worry, and the Foundation aligns with local NGOs to identify the needy.

A good project indeed!

Their website is http://www.mykasih.com.my

MYKASIH Foundation reaches out to more members of the community in the Klang Valley with the launch of its MyKasih – AmBank Group Community Programme in Sentul.

This is the fourth of such initiative by MyKasih Foundation following the launch of similar programmes earlier this year in Selayang, Puchong and Jinjang.

The success of these programmes has attracted a new corporate sponsor to step forward.

MyKasih Foundation chairman Ngau Boon Keat said MyKasih was a programme targeted at the poor members of society.

“The programme is more than just about subsidising the purchase of essential groceries. It also incorporates financial literacy courses and skills training for the recipients.”

“A corporate sponsor, in this case, AmBank Group, has entrusted MyKasih with their contribution.

“Our non-profit organisation partner in Sentul, the Lions Club, helped select the recipient families,” Ngau said at the launch.

“Funds are channelled to the housewife of each recipient family as a monthly allowance in her MyKasih account.

“The housewife will be able to buy selected essential grocery items using just her MyKad and a PIN. The transaction is convenient and safe as no cash changes hands.

“Instead of just receiving handouts, these families are able to make their own purchasing decisions. And as a result, a sense of independence and pride is instilled,” he added.

AmBank Group is donating RM50,000 towards the MyKasih programme in Sentul.

Fifty households will benefit as their spending on essential groceries will be subsidised for one year.

AmBank Group chairman Tan Sri Datuk Azman Hashim said: “Essentially, under this programme, AmBank Group will provide an allowance of RM20 per family per week to help defray the cost of essential food items.

“With the funds, the families can buy food items like rice, sugar, flour, milk and cooking oil.

“We are pleased with the method of distribution of the funds to the chosen families.

“The distribution is transparent and there is no question of abuse by any party.

“With the launch of the Sentul programme, more than 200 families will now benefit from MyKasih’s innovative food-aid programme.

“In conjunction with this, there will be a financial literacy programme where participating families will attend talks conducted by volunteers who will share their expertise and knowledge in financial management.

“This programme, we hope, will help the needy to learn how to cope with difficult times and maintain a sustainable lifestyle,” added Azman.

For more information onMyKasih, visit www.mykasih.com