Posts Tagged ‘temples’

RM30k for Sri Subramaniar Temple Teluk Datuk

January 24th, 2011
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Good news for Teluk Datuk folks. However I’m not sure whose money it is. MCA, the president, or the federal government.

The Teluk Datok Hindu community received a gift of RM30,000 from MCA president Datuk Seri Dr Chua Soi Lek for the construction of their new temple building.

“We must remember how lucky we are that our country’s laws embrace freedom of religion,” Dr Chua said at the Sri Subramaniar temple on Wednesday.

He said that 1Malaysia was not a political slogan but embraces the fact that Malaysians comprise different races and religions.

“It is only when we have inclusive policies that take into account all races can we be called 1Malaysia,” he said.

Dr Chua urged Malaysians not take to take the country’s racial unity for granted.

“Every citizen has the responsibility to maintain peace with mutual respect and understanding for those of different cultures and sensitivities,” said Chua at the Thaipusam Musical Night organised by the temple committee.

It was held to raise funds for the new building.

Temple chairman P. Alagamali said in his speech that construction had begun in 2009.

“At the moment, it is almost half finished.

“We hope to be able to use it by the end of this year,” he said.

Also present was Kuala Langat MCA division chief Datuk Ei Kim Hock.

from The Star

Puchong devotee burn himself over Temple or School issue

November 9th, 2010
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


I think this is the talk of the town at the moment. This temple is near my house and I visit it few times a year. I even have its website on my blog roll. Its a well known temple, and currently they are on a donation drive to build a wedding hall. Was supposed to donate, but now I want to find out more info before giving away money.  The temple is just next to SJKT Castlefield and is blocked from from LDP by the new furniture shop.

A temple devotee (also MIC Puchong Information Chief – according to a twitter message) burned himself in protest over temple demolition. More news came out later and things became clear. There is no temple demolition, but two “structures’  – one is a toilet and the other is a large storage room to keep the temple chariot and other stuff. The story (according to the news articles below) goes like this:

  1. Land belongs to school. (But one report says the land is government reserve land).
  2. 10 years ago, temple asks the land to be temporarily used by temple and promise to return it when school needs it. School builds storage room and toilet. Some say the proposed new multi-purpose hall is proposed to be located on this land as well.
  3. School gets RM500k grant from Education Ministry to built pre-school. School says it wants the land given to temple earlier and writes to temple. Says no reply from temple. More discussions, but not fruitful. Grant will be revoked if no location is identified by year end, whereas temple wants 1 year grace period to relocate toilet and storage room.
  4. School contacts MBSJ. MBSJ issues notice to evacuate on Oct 26.
  5. After discussion, demolition postponed to after Deepavali.
  6. When the demolition team came yesterday, the guy climbed on the roof and threated to set himself on fire. One RELA member says a gust of wind caused the lighter flame to change direction and ignite the kerosene-soaked clothers. The brother claims got people instigate him. [Maybe Lord Perumal is upset and showing his power? You can’t play the fool with God.]
  7. The victim taken to hospital and buildings demolished. A meeting was held and the temple given another 7 days to relocate the storage room material. Problem considered solved by MBSJ councillor.

Its indeed a sad day for the Indian community when two of the important icons for us – the tamil school and the temple – get embroiled in such shameful incident. How can things end up like this? Lord Perumal is sure to be unhappy with this kind of attitude from His subjects.

For me, the pre-school  is more important. One friend suggested that both can co-exist, but I think this will cause problems. I can’t foresee both sides able to be tolerant, patient and well-planned in order to co-share a building.

HRP organised candle light vigil at Anwar Ibrahim’s house, attended by MIC folks as well, in protest of the incident. They also planned to submit a memorandum but its seems Anwar is conveniently missing at that time. While its OK to submit memo and do candle light vigils, I hope HRP can take other action as well, like getting the two groups (school and temple) to TALK and COME to a solution. Then, gather everyone and submit a proposal to state/federal government. That would have been a feather in HRP cap, but now, the candle light vigil and memo submission became “just another activity”. However, HRP did point out that the government reserve land next to temple can be allocated to the temple to solve the problem.

I wonder where’s the area MP and ADUN. Busy getting thrown out of parliament, visiting open houses, tired from by-elections, or simply not bothered?

News from Malaysiakini:

A temple devotee in Pusat Bandar Puchong was rushed to the hospital this morning after dousing himself with petrol and lighting up over fears that part of his temple would be demolished by the local authorities.

M Chakragunasegaran, 52, is now in critical condition at the Serdang Hospital after police and members of the temple committee doused the flames, by which time he had lost consciousness.

Temple committee secretary K Dharmalingam, 49, said he was in the midst of early morning prayers at the Sri Srinivasa Perumal temple – situated in a Tamil school compound – when a commotion broke out and he heard Chakragunasegaran shouting, “Don’t demolish the temple!”

NONEEnforcement officers from the Subang Jaya Municipal Council (MPSJ), police officers and men and members of the volunteer defence corp Rela had arrived to demolish a room that had served to store temple equipment, to make way for a pre-school.

After Chakragunasegaran was taken to hospital, Dharmalingam said, the local council personnel went about demolishing the storage room.

He said a notice had been issued on Oct 26, directing the committee members to vacate the storage room for the pre-school.

However, he is disappointed that the authorities did not give them sufficient time to vacate the area.

“It’s been 10 years since this temple was built. The land on which it stands is reserve land,” he told Malaysiakini when contacted.

NONEAnother temple committee member, T Pukalenthy, 42, said the school had allowed the construction of the additional building 10 years ago.

“The demolition was not appropriate. They should have told the temple management earlier,” he said.

MPSJ councillor KN Michael Tamilarason said a meeting was held late this morning, involving representatives of political parties, enforcement agencies, the school and the temple committee.

According to him, it was agreed that the demolition of the storage room would be put on hold for a week.

“The school authorities have agreed to give the temple committee seven days to move the equipment in the storage room. The problem has been solved,” Tamilarason told Malaysiakini.

Enforcement personnel have put up a fence around the area.

According to Bernama, Serdang police chief Abdul Razak Elias said Chakragunasegaran suffered burns to the body and face.

“The incident occured at 9.30am when 200 MPSJ workers, police and Rela members began the operation.

“A man shouted don’t demolish, set himself ablaze and then fainted. He was saved by members of the public,” he said.

The police had lodged a report on the incident at Puchong police station at noon today, Abdul Razak added.

From the Star:

A MAN set himself on fire in protest against the demolition of an illegal structure at a temple by the Subang Jaya Municipal Council (MPSJ) at the Puchong Industrial Park yesterday.

The person, identified as Chakara Guna, was sent to the Serdang Hospital for treatment.

No more: The illegal temple structures, comprising a toilet and a store room, being demolished.

A Rela member S. Magen said the man repeatedly doused himself with kerosene and threatened to set himself on fire on different occasions around the area.

“Around 9.45am, he pulled the same stunt while holding a cigarette lighter. Suddenly, the wind blew towards him and his kerosene-soaked body accidentally caught fire,” he said.

A meeting was held later in the morning after the incident. It was attended by MIC Youth chief T. Mohan, representatives from MPSJ town planning department and MPSJ councillor Michael Tamilarason.

According to SJK (T) Castlefield, Puchong board of directors chairman Nagamuthu, the issue began four years ago when the land surveyors came and certified that the Sri Srinivasa Perumal Temple’s store room and toilet were built on school land.

“We wanted to apply for a land title in 2007 and a licence survey was conducted.

“We had a meeting with representatives from the education department, Land Office, Parent-Teacher Association and the temple.

“The temple representatives agreed to demolish the structures when the school needed to utilise the land,” he said.

About six months ago, the school received a RM500,000 grant from the Education Ministry to build two kindergartens.

We wrote to the temple committee members asking them to move out but our request fell on deaf ears.

“Last month, we were informed by the ministry that the grants will be withdrawn if we did not identify the land for the kindergartens,” he said.

He added that they sought advice from the police and MPSJ to solve the issue as “the temple representatives were adamant”.

“The council put up a notice on Oct 26 that the structures be taken down in a week’s time.

“The demolition of the structures was supposed to be done last week but it was only carried out yesterday after requests from several political leaders to postpone it to after Deepavali,” he said.

At the meeting, the temple representatives asked to be given a year to relocate the temple’s toilet and store room but the school representatives declined.

Mohan and Michael were on hand to calm both parties when the discussion turned into a heated argument.

According to Mohan, it was decided the government reserve land next to the temple will be used temporarily until the temple completes the construction of the store room and toilet within the temple grounds.

Nagamuthu said the cost of the demolition and the temporary building will be borne by the school board.

The temple committee adviser could not be contacted for comments at press time.

More info from Malaysiakini, this time coverage on the brother of the devotee claiming the brother was instigated:

The younger brother of the temple devotee who burned himself yesterday over the demolition of part of his temple’s storage room alleged today that several persons were on the roof with M Chakragunasegaran and issued ‘challenges’ against the latter.

NONEM Alejandran claimed that his brother was only feigning the attempt at self-immolation, and suggested further that he was goaded into carrying out the act by the said individuals

“Who would want to burn himself? My brother was only bluffing,” Alegandran told Malaysiakini when contacted.

I was told that there were individuals who had gone up to the roof to order my brother to come down, and they issued threats against him.

“Because of his fear (of them), my brother got burned,” he added.

NONESeparate police reports were lodged by family members of Chakragunasegaran as well as by the committee members of the Sri Srinivasa Perumal temple in Pusat Bandar Puchong, Selangor, where the incident happened yesterday.

In the drama that unfolded, Chakragunasegaran had climbed to the roof of the temple and pleaded for enforcement officers from the local council, police and members of volunteer defence corp Rela not to demolish a room that had served to store temple materials.

This followed the issuance of a notice directing the committee of the temple – which is situated within the compound of government school – to vacate the ten-year-old storage room to make way for a pre-school.

After Chakragunasegaran had doused himself with petrol and set himself on fire, he fell off the roof and became unconscious, and was said to have been in critical condition. 

Chakragunasegaran has since stabilised and was transferred from the Selayang Hospital to the Kuala Lumpur Hospital. 

The demolition exercise has been suspended for a week after negotiations between the enforcement authorities and representatives of political parties and the temple committee.

Inter-faith and inter-racial relationship is NOT easy!

November 2nd, 2010
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


I read the coverage of the final hearing for Ampang Jaya Municipal Council (MPAJ) draft plan as reported by The Star below, and could only shake my head in wonder. There’s so many complications and factors involved in deciding things like location of places of worship , crematorium and cemeteries, and schools. Have to consider the feelings of the various stakeholders, and the “relative” rights of individual (we live in an unequal rights country).

Its well-known that approval for non-Muslim place of worships is rarely given, thus some of them are located in shoplots and houses (can easily find many churches in my area).  Even the statistics are not proven to be correct, and often misused to say that there’s too many temples for population ratio. I think the government should fund an study to count the number of places of worship in the country. Can arrange for some research company to do it, and overseen by relevant ministries, respective state/district authorities and NGOs.

Another problem is cemetery. No one wants a cemetery next to their house (I think even mentioned in Hinduism scriptures to built house away from cemetery and crematorium) as it brings a negative conotation and usually leads to lower property value. Problem is, the people also want to have a burial place/crematorioum “nearby” for convenience, but as long as not “too near”. Its not easy to find such “ideal” location that can please everyone, but the effort must be undertaken. Let more public participation to take place so that can brainstorm better suggestions. Maybe MPAJ (or other authorities as well) can’t solve every problem because they are not smart enough or lack manpower.

Same goes for school relocation. If the majority population in an area is Chinese or Indian (or even if not majority,  25% and above will do), then should allocate enough space for both national school and vernacular school. If not, how to relocate schools from rural/underutilised areas? You can’t expect many sizeable areas to be 70-80% population by Chinese or Indian community, and then only want to relocate schools there.

THE Buddhist and Christian communities in Ampang are worried over the lack of space to build temples and churches following the final hearing for the Ampang Jaya Municipal Council (MPAJ) draft plan yesterday.

Selangor Buddhist Development Committee (SBDC) secretary Chua Teck Seong said the Selangor Planning Guidelines and Standards from the Town and Country Planning Department, released in June 2006, stated that for non-Muslims, there should be a place of worship for every 2,600 devotees or 5,000 residents.

“Taking the figures from the 2000 census carried out by the National Statistics Department, there are 160,748 Buddhists in Ampang and therefore there should be 62 temples here,” he said.

He pointed out that there were only three sites in Ampang allocated in the draft plan for non-Muslims’ places of worship.

Another religion-based issue discussed at the hearing was Charis Christian Association spokesman Chok Poi Fong’s request for a Christian crematorium in Ampang.

Making his point: Ee speaking at the hearing as Lee (seated right) looks on.

“The nearest one is in Cheras and there is one in Petaling Jaya and Seremban respectively. Not only is the one in Cheras far away but it often breaks down and has a long wait-list,” Chok said during the hearing, adding that the crematorium could be shared by churches in the area.

State Housing, Building Management and Squatters Committee chairman Iskandar Abdul Samad, who chaired the hearing, said there was a discrepancy in the statistics provided by the religious groups who attended the hearing.

“For instance, we have been told at the hearing by SBDC that there are fewer than 10 temples in Ampang, but we know of two registered ones and another 24 which operate in homes and shoplots,” he said.

He said that according to state records, there were 10 Hindu temples, two Gurdwaras and 22 churces in Ampang.

“The state Town and Country Planning Department will have to meet with these groups and figure out these discrepancies,” he said.

Another issue heard was the proposal to allocate land for a Muslim cemetery in Taman Bukit Permai 2 that was met with both objections and support from the residents who turned up.

Pangsapuri Anggerik Joint Management Body (JMB) chairman A. Karim Mohd Esin said there was a critical need for a Muslim cemetery in Ampang.

“We support the gazetting of the land which is just next to our apartment and separated by a ditch.

“However, we would like to suggest that the community hall that will be built in the buffer zone to also have a surau and a funeral parlour,” he said.

Opposing the cemetery plan was resident Julia Long, 48, who said that it was unfair to the residents who had been living there since 2000 to have to put up with a cemetery beside their homes.

“When we bought our houses, the master plan indicated that the land next to our area was a forest reserve. I would prefer it to remain as such,” she said.

She added that bulldozers and excavators had tried to level the forest in 2008 without residents’ knowledge and it was only stopped after the latter appealed to MPAJ.

“A cemetery will mean increase in traffic in the area, she said, adding that she did not want any kind of development taking place at the site.

Another resident, Sara Chan, 44, said she would approve of the building community facilities like playgrounds at the site.

Our property value will drop if a cemetery is built and I do not think that is right,” Chan added.

Another hot topic at the hearing was the issue of primary vernacular schools.

“We have received objections from five residents of Bukit Indah who do not want SJK (T) Ampang to be relocated to their area.

“We have also received petitions from residents who want part of a land to be used for a national school in Taman Saga to be given to the building of a Tamil vernacular school,” said Iskandar.

Taman Pandan Glades Residents’ Association chairman Terence Ee and Teratai assemblyman Jenice Lee voiced their support for the construction of a vernacular Chinese primary school in the open space along Jalan Perdana 6/2 in Pandan Perdana.

“I believe only a portion of the 2.45ha land is needed for such a school. The rest can still remain as an open space,” said Lee.

Iskandar said that the hearing, the last of four held for the MPAJ draft plan, was very good as residents came armed with facts and relevant arguments.

“All the information, suggestions and objections we have heard will be discussed at the State Planning Committee along with experts in December,” he said.

India Trip Day 7

September 13th, 2010
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Read the caveats here before proceeding.

The following are events that took place on 10th July 2009 and covers Tanjavur-Tiruvaiyaru-Tanjavur-Tiruchi route. Read about the previous day here.

After a long hiatus (like 1.3 years!), I managed to write about day 7 of our journey (just thinking about  writing on the next 20-days to go gives me a headache!).

OK, here we go: We woke up quite early (around 6am) but our driver didn’t!We took the chance to take photos around the hotel.  The hotel listed useful info such as places of interest and distance. Quite useful if you snap a photo of it for reference.

The garden

Still use old style padlock!

Ended up leaving the hotel around 7.10am for our first destination, the famed UN World Heritage Site-listed Brihadeeswarar Temple aka Tanjavur Periya Koyil (Big temple). The temple is huge due to the large ground area. The main deity is Lord Shiva in his lingam form (4 metres high!). The temple looks similar to Airavateswar Temple (which we visited on Day 6). The parking cost Rs10. The crowd was less, and we were blessed to witness the abishegam ceremony for Lord Shiva. Left the temple at 9.30am for breakfast.

Had breakfast at nearby Abirami Restaurant, and then followed by trip to Tanjavur Palace which houses the museum.

The museum houses many artefacts from early as 7th century AD. A must visit for history and archeology fans. Spent about an hour here (10 to 11am).

The whale bone from 1955

Next stop, the Saraswati Mahal (a library) which is just next to the Tanjavur Palace (they share the same compound). There’s also a shopping gallery called the Tanjore Collections on the upper floor, under the auspices of Tanjore Handicrafts Workers Co-op Cottage Industry Society. Spent about 30 minutes here.

We proceeded to Saint Tyagaraja Samadhi in Tiruvayaru. He was a renowned poet and musician who lived in the 18th century.  He was born in Tiruvarur (not to be confused with Tiruvayaru which is close tho each other) and was named in honor of Lord Tyagaraja of Tiruvarur (The Tiruvarur chariot comes to mind).

The Samadhi is located on the banks of Kaveri river. Around middle of the year, Kaveri looks like desert!

Kaveri looks like this after rainy season starts:

We then stopped by the Arkondan Big Temple but since it was noon time, the temple was closed. We walked around and got kind of chased away since they didn’t like us snooping around.

Unique feature: Two Vinayagars

Left at 2.30pm to our next destination, shopping at Poompuhar Handcidraf Centre next to our hotel. We spent about 1.5 hours there and then check-out from hotel to proceed to Sivaganga Park.

Sivaganga Park is just like our playground or parks, except that its quite run down and simple-looking. There’s a diesel powered train that runs through the park, which takes about 10 minutes. The diesel smell is overwhelming, so skip it if can. You can walk the entire park within 20 minutes actually. Nothing much to see except some animals in cages. You can also view the gopuram of Brihadeeswarar Temple from the park. The park houses Sivaganga Teppakulam (water tank). All in all, we spent about 30 minutes here.

We left Tanjavur town at around 5pm and moved on to Tiruchi. Took about 2.5 hours. We checked into Hotel Mathura near the Tiruchi bus station. Had our dinner at the Sri Krishna garden/open air restaurant nearby. The meal was delicious.

That’s about it for Day 7. We had good day overall as we managed to cover our itinerary.

Photo of the day:

I would say that a visit to the Periya Koyil to view the abishegam is a must do!

Read the next day (Day 8) here (to be updated).

Selva Vinayagar Temple Klang

September 11th, 2010
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


We attended Vinayagar Chaturthi prayers today morning at Klang’s Sree Selva Vinayagar Temple (their website is here), along with about 150 people or so. Many carried paal kudam in the morning. I think we last went to this temple 2 years ago. The prayers ended at around 11am. There was an auction of mangoes which were kept at Lord Vinayagar’s tusk for last two days. Not sure who bought it as we didn’t stay long after the prayers ended.

Quite some time back, there were some issues with the relocation of staff quarters (JKR or KTM, can’t remember).

Today, the temple is surrounded by huge double storey house project. There’s barely space for parking. I wonder how the housing project was approved.

From Vinayagar Chaturthi at Selva Vinayagar Temple Klang

The temple is expected to have its kumbhabhishegam in 2012, and I think its going to be nightmare for those who bought their houses there.

From Vinayagar Chaturthi at Selva Vinayagar Temple Klang

I think it would create unnecessary friction especially when the house occupants are non-Hindus. Yeah, surely they bought the house with full knowledge that the temple exists there (its registered and official temple!), but you know how things work in Bolehland. If some influential people or those from certain race start to make noise, it will be problem regardless who was there first. The housing project should have not be given permission to proceed so close to the temple. I think its the fault of MPK for approving the project.