| Renouncing citizenship: Chinese top the list http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/75069 |
|
|
|
|
Chinese Malaysians record the highest number of those who have renounced their citizenship, followed by the Malays and Indians, the Dewan Rakyat was told today. The Home Ministry's parliamentary secretary, Abdul Rahman Ibrahim, said 14,316 Chinese (87%) have surrendered their citizenship, compared to 1,098 Malays (6.6%), 822 Indians (5%) and 238 (1.4%) others from 2000 to 2006. He also explained that 106,000 people have renounced citizenship since Independence in 1957. Abdul Rahman said these Malaysians had applied for citizenship to India, Sri Lanka, Singapore, Japan, Canada and Indonesia. "(Others) have applied to the UK and US, Taiwan, Thailand, Germany, New Zealand, France, Austria, Ireland, Sweden, Belgium, Brunei, Finland and Jordan," he said. Living condition As to why so many Malaysians have opted to leave for other countries, he replied: "The main reason is the (quality of life) in those countries." "They also consider the working environment, such as better opportunities and better pay. And some consider education for their children as a reason to apply for a citizenship in a particular country," he said. Abdul Rahman was replying Mohamed Aziz (BN-Sri Gading) who asked for a breakdown of the figures according to race and the country of destination. On a related matter, Abdul Rahman said the government takes into consideration three things before stripping a person of citizenship. "Firstly, we see if the person holds citizenship in another country. Secondly, we see if the person has voted in that country's elections. And lastly, we (check) if the person holds a foreign passport," he said. He explained that revoking citizenship can be implemented under Article 24(2) and 3(a) of the Federal Constitution. |
Archive for the ‘BornInMalaysia’ category
chinese top the list of citizenship surrender
November 21st, 2007
nazri says civil and syariah powers are clear
November 20th, 2007(In the case, the Federal Court held that the civil and syariah courts must determine first whether either had jurisdiction over a matter. Judge Abdul Hamid Mohamad ruled that if one of the parties in a dispute was non-Muslim, the syariah court did not have jurisdiction over the case even if the subject matter fell within its jurisdiction.)
what does this mean? Subashini ( here and here too) can pursue her case in civil court?
No need for clarification on civil, syariah laws: Nazri
http://sun2surf.com/article.cfm?id=20007
KUALA LUMPUR (Nov 19, 2007): The government will not amend the Federal Constitution to clarify the position of syariah and civil laws in the country because there is no necessity to do so, Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Datuk Seri Mohamed Nazri Abdul Aziz said today.
He said this was because the powers of both civil and syariah courts are clearly provided for by the Federal Constitution, particularly under Article 121(1) and (1A), and in the Federal List and State List of the Ninth Schedule. "Based on several decisions of the Federal Court, it is clear that there is no necessity for the government to amend the Federal Constitution," Nazri said. Replying to a question from Datuk Kamaruddin Jaafar (PAS-Tumpat), he said the matter was quite clear as was decided by the Federal Court recently in the case of Latifah Mat Zin v Rosmawati Sharibun and Roslinawati Sharibun.
(In the case, the Federal Court held that the civil and syariah courts must determine first whether either had jurisdiction over a matter. Judge Abdul Hamid Mohamad ruled that if one of the parties in a dispute was non-Muslim, the syariah court did not have jurisdiction over the case even if the subject matter fell within its jurisdiction.)
"The Federal Court decided in this case that matters involving Muslim law falls under the power of the Syariah Court as is clearly provided under List II of the Ninth Schedule of the Federal Constitution, as well as subsection 61(3) of the Islamic Administration Enactment (Selangor) 2003," Nazri said. He added that in this case the matter of overlapping jurisdiction between the syariah and civil court did not arise at all.
Hindraf meeting a journey of facts
November 20th, 2007A reader’s account of the Hindraf talk at Brickfields on 18th Nov 2007. Thanks to Kannan.
from Kannan Ramasamy
to M Poobalan
date Nov 20, 2007 10:49 AM
subject Hindraf meeting – a journey of facts
Hi all,
It was abt 3.30 pm yesterday (18th Nov 2007) when I moved from our UMIC
Deepavali gathering for 300 kids in Klang.
I had to move early leaving our UMIC function to be handle by other CC team
to avoid any delay to HINDRAF’s meeting in Brickfield due to roadblocks.
Pick up few frens in Kelana Jaya and we drive thru Federal Highway.
On the way we called few others to see if there were any blocks ahead near
Brickfileds, the reply was no roadblocks.
By 4.45 pm we were there in front of the hall in Brickfields. It was just 25
mins drive from Kelana Jaya.
There were only a few of them near the gate at that time, so we drive to
have a small chaya at nearby restaurant.
Walked to the hall at 5.45 pm and saw the crowd slowing coming in.
This is the 1st meeting we are going which organized by HINDRAF to seek more
info and as well to show support to them.
There were few people giving away form to pen down support sign for the UK
case.
The mix crowd of old and young, man and woman soon filled the hall and
around 6.45 pm the hall was almost full.
Sharp at 7.00 pm, the 1st speaker, Mr Mano introduce himself and talked
about fundamental discrimination of right happening in Malaysia towards
Indians.
This followed by Mr Genga and Mr Wathya on the current situation and support
on the suit.
The whole atmosphere in the hall was very vibrating as the crowd claps for
every point made by the speakers.
The crowd also echoes with high spirit support with clear loud voices.
He even called the people not to worry to the police presence outside as it
is LEGAL and PERMIT APPROVED gathering.
There were a lot of things and facts shares in this gathering which needs to
be known by all of us.
This is must attend meeting by every Indian in Malaysia regardless of age,
religion, education or status as long as they are Malaysian Indians.
This group of lawyers from Mr. Mano, Mr Genga, Mr Waytha, Mr Uthaya and Mr
Rao has put the community above all to serve them with high dedication.
Their speech full of facts on
* the reason and the way the Indian were brought into Malaysia
* the promises given by the British before independence
* The suffering and pain by the Indians here under British colonial
* the contribution and glory made by our Indian towards British
* the dirty ways of the current government cleaning Indian history and
icons
* the discriminations by umno lead government in last 50 years
* the right that every Malaysia Indian have in law and constitution
* the wrongdoing by the PM as the government leader to save Indian as
whole.
And the most important thing was the reason why the suit was filed against
the UK and how the Reid commission failed the Malaysian Indians !!
This information shared was the most crucial and interesting parts.
I have to salute to this team of lawyers whom dedicated so much time and
life in preparing the findings and filing the suit.
As Mr Watya said, this suit is the bull’s eye shot that will open the eyes
of world towards the suffering of Indians in Msia.
It was a bit sad part to see only abt 2000 plus people came from Klang
Vallley to this meting despite Brickfields is well known as Indian hub.
Nevertheless the HINDRAF gathering at the other parts of Malaysia pulls huge
crowd in Sban ( ~7000) and Penang (~5000), Butterworth (~4000) and Kulim
(~4000).
As said, may be people are still worried on Bersih gathering reaction
recently. But this is total is different gathering with NON POLITICAL
purpose.
The other request made in the speech were,
1. The signature support by Malaysian Indian on the suit against UK
a. Each Indian to get at least 10 signatures and make 10 copies
of the form
2. The peaceful gathering to support the memo submission to the UK
counsel on coming 25th Nov 2007 at 9am in front of British Council, Jln
Ampang KL.
a. Request made if possible to be in “orange” to assemble peace
and sacred gathering. ( Amathiyum Thuimaiyum)
b. Be in peace and total calm during the gathering as it
resembles the Indians in Msia to pledge the HRH Queen of England to appoint
Her Queen’s Counsel to represent us.
c. The international media will be present at the gathering to
record this peace wave.
d. It will be a legal peace gathering with police permit.
e. Be there early to avoid traffic jam and possible to take
public transport like LRT Star to Ampang Park Stn which is only 50m walk to
the council.
3. Do daily prayers and light up a “agal villaku” in front of every
Indians house daily from 7pm – 8 pm to shown support on the suit against UK.
The gathering came close to end at 10.30 pm with standing recognition to the
brave hearts that fought their life to save the recent Kg Jawa Amman Temple
followed highly motivated song and the IKRAR reading.
It was a stunning and high vibrate gathering that I ever been.
We need more Malaysian Indian to support this team that is fighting for the
rights of all of us whom are poor, oppressed, suppressed and permanently
colonized.
As your simple contribution, pls pass this info to all the Indian tht u
knew.
Pls seek for the form and pen down your signature of support.
Be there in all the meeting to get to the root of the truth.
“KAMI MAHU HAK KAMI”
“KAMI MAHU HAK KAMI”
“KAMI MAHU HAK KAMI”
Thanks for reading and seek for support.
– Kannan Ramasamy –
Kamala says several factors causing racial division
November 20th, 2007Several factors causing racial division
DECLINING racial tolerance can be attributed to the country's education system, rural to urban migration and poor understanding of government policies.
Replying to a question by Datuk Lee Hwa Beng (Subang Jaya-BN) on the issue at the state assembly meeting, state executive councillor Kamala Ganapathy said polarisation among students could give rise to misunderstandings and fights.
She said this problem was further compounded by differences in culture, lifestyles and religion.
Misunderstanding among races was more of concern especially to those who felt that many obstacles had been placed in front of them, she added.
Kamala said many also felt that the playing field was not level and they also did not have the same starting line.
She stressed that the quality of the intervention was important as it should not bog down people with endless red tape.
Earlier, at the start of the question and answer session, Teng Chang Khim (DAP-Sungai Pinang), who made a comeback yesterday after being suspended for 30 months, asked the speaker why one of his questions on the construction of a mosque in Klang had been rejected.
Deputy Speaker Datuk Satim Diman did not allow the question as Article 3 of the Federal Constitution states that Islam is the official religion.
HINDRAF gathering to attract 10000 people
November 17th, 200710,000 to petition Queen E for support
source
KUALA LUMPUR: About 10,000 people are expected to converge at the British High Commission on Nov 25 to petition the Queen of England to support a suit they filed recently.
The group will be led by the Hindu Rights Action Force (HINDRAF), which on Aug 30 filed a class-action suit against the British government for bringing Indians to Malaysia as indentured labourers and exploiting them for 150 years and thereafter failing to protect the minority Indians rights in the federal constitution when independence was granted. The sum sought was US$4 trillion (RM14 trillion) — or US$1 million for every Indian currently residing in Malaysia.
P. Waytha Moorthy, the lawyer who filed the suit, said HINDRAF was also seeking an unspecified sum in damages "for all the pain and suffering of generations of Indians in Malaysia over the years". "The cost of the suit is about RM5 million, as estimated by our British solicitors and barristers.
"Malaysian Indians are poor and cannot afford the cost, so we are appealing to the Queen to appoint her Queen's Counsel and solicitors to represent the minority Indians," said Waytha.
He said the suit was not a demonstration or a rally. "We just want to petition the Queen's help and we want the British to know that Indians here are supporting this suit."
The British High Commission said it was aware of the petition and would consider it. "However, Nov 25 is a Sunday and the commission will be closed. I don't know whom they will be giving the petition to," said its political and press affairs adviser Abdul Rashid Hussein.
HINDRAF representatives met Cheras police yesterday to apply for a permit to hold the gathering. The district police chief, Assistant Commissioner Ahmad Amir Mohd Hashim, said police had not made a decision on the application. "We are studying the situation," he said.