Posts Tagged ‘Hindraf’

Samy hits back at HINDRAF on memorandum

August 17th, 2007
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


finally, something that appeared on mainstream media (the NST) about the memorandum by HINDRAF. Just some hot air and no facts as usual 🙂

Samy Vellu hits back at Hindu Rights Action Force
BERNAMA
source
try H E R E
PUTRAJAYA, FRI:

MIC president Datuk Seri S. Samy Vellu today launched a stinging attack against a non-governmental organisation, the Hindu Rights Action Force (HINDRAF), which claimed that the Barisan Nasional (BN) government had done little to address the woes of the Malaysian Indian community over the last 50 years.

“I must state here that if there is anything that affects the Indian community, the MIC will be there to fight it out even when we are partners of the Barisan Nasional. To me, I have never remained idle and I don’t waste time,” Samy Vellu, who is also Works Minister, told Bernama today.

The MIC supremo was asked to comment on a 18-point memorandum by HINDRAF, which was handed to the Prime Minister’s office last Sunday by the organisation’s chairman P. Waytha Moorthy, secretary V.K Regu and its legal adviser P. Uthayakumar.

Apart from stating that the Indian community was marginalised by the BN government, in the memorandum, HINDRAF also wanted an end to special privileges given to Malays. The memorandum also took a dig at Umno asking the largest political party in the country to “stop playing politics” through the “mandore” (supervisor) system by dishing out aid to the Indian community on a piecemeal basis.

Indians gathering at Putrajaya to hand memorandum

August 13th, 2007
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


I made it a point to attend the gathering organised by HINDRAF (Hindu Rights Action Force) to hand over the 18-point memorandum produced from a forum held recently in KL. It was supposed to be at 10am today (Sunday August 12th) at the PM's residence in Putrajaya. Partly to see the support of the community and also to take some photos (view them at the end of the article.)
 
I reached the PM's residence at Precinct 10 at 9.20am only to find it very quite, just as it was supposed to be on a Sunday morning! Then it crossed my mind that the organisers possibly got confused with PM's residence and office. So, I rushed off to Dataran Putra. Reached it in 10 minutes time. There were a handful of people, probaby numbering around 50 only. They were gathered at the shady area between the mosque and PM's office. The organisers were using a hailer to get people to register themselves. There was a chartered bus dropping of some of the participants.
 
The weather was not hot due to the hazy conditions. As the clock ticked, the crowd began to swell. The dataran is a popular tourist destination, thus there were about 100 – 200 curious onlookers wondering what was going on. By 10.30am, the crowd could be easily about 500-600 people. The organisers began to hand out banners and posters to the crowd, and try to marshal them into position at the roundabout exit towards the PM's office. By this time, the police were alerted, and some of the crowd control officers began to line out outside the entrance to PM's office complex.
 
By 11am, the crowd has doubled to about 1200 people. There were rumours that the police had blocked the roads leading towards the dataran and some 10 bus are unable to reach the location.
 
The event proper started with a prayer, after which the organisers explained the purpose of the gathering today, which was to hand over the 18-point memorandum to PM. Unfortunately, as it was made known, the PM is away. This was followed by slogan chanting and singing of motivational songs. The media had a field day covering the event. I think few foreigners representing Al-Jazeera, and possibly BBC was there as well. Saw Nanban and MKini people too. There were also plainsclothes police mingling with the crowd, taking photos and video as well.
 
The organisers the explained that the crowd will march from the entrance of the PM's office and walk one round around the roundabout. Before beginning, the media was invited to take photos of the crowd with the PM's majestic office complex as the background.
 
The walk took about 30 minutes, by which the crowd has become about 1500 people. The roundabout were full of cars on both sides, which made the march slower. The crowd made their way around the roundabout and came full circle at the entrance to PM's office again. The crowd marched until they were about 15 metres from the gates, and separated by a row of police personnel. The crowd were then asked to sit on the pavement, while the organisers read out the details of the 18-point memorandum which included among others:
 
– tamil schools to be made full government-aided
– increase participation of senior government officials to 20% of the positions available
– allocate permits for taxi, lorries etc
– to allocate land for agriculture for indians
– to stop temple demolition
– to provide equal rights in all areas
– minimum wage of RM1000
– to provide proper housing for the poor.
– to help all poor families with racial barriers.
– to enact a minorities rights protection act.
– to initiate a royal commission on rights violation.
– to end special privileges.
– provide RM1million compensation for each dead person's family in the Kg Medan Massacre
 
I didn't not manage to catch all the points since the hailer was not powerful enough to reach the crowd. Copies of memorandum was being sold and quite a number bought them for RM5 each.
 
The organisers also highlighted that for the pass 50 years, no one had fought for the Indian communities’ rights. The politicians had failed the communities, thus it is up to the community to fight for itself. They also highlighted that for the last 200 years, Indians has toiled in rubber estate and railway tracks to develop the country, but in return only got displaced and rewarded with low-cost houses or longhouses, and pitiful amount of cash, compared with the FELDA schemes which receive millions in allocations. The talk on various discriminations went on for about 15 minutes.
 
While the talk was going on, the organisers were informed that the police will send an Indian policeman to receive the memorandum, but this was rejected by the organisers. They mentioned that they had already sent a letter to the PM informing about the gathering and since the PM had many assistants and political secretaries, he should have assigned one to be there. In the end, one of the secretaries, Hj Ahmad Yaakob came out accompanied by about 20 security officers and received the memorandum at about 12.30pm. Good thing he did, because it was getting cloudy and skies were turning dark. The organisers announced that they have asked for a meeting with the PM within a week before 31st August to discuss the memorandum. The crowd then dispersed as it started to rain.
 
Overall I think the police did not expect such a big crowd on a Sunday. It really made an impact as there were many media representative as well foreign and local tourists. The organisers could have provided maps or clarified about the venue so that a bigger crowd could have come. I think some were like me and went to PM's residence instead of the office. This kind of event should be organised regularly to build a stronger voice for the community. I was surprised with the crowd since my expectation was about 1000 people only, but the whole place was crowded. This will definitely make some of the political parties squirm in their seats.
 
The rakyat have realised that without making some noice or getting the media involved, nothing works. We have seen the protest in JB about increasing crime rates. We have seen people picketing on being cheated by property developers. We have seen many environmental issues being highlighted. So, I'm not surprised that we are going along the path of the developed countries who see public demonstation as a way of getting the governments' attention.
 
View the photos at Picasa

 

Update: More photos taken by organisers here and videos at YouTube and MKini too.

Hindraf sends complaint to Pak Lah

August 4th, 2007
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Hindraf: Stop the bullying, Pak Lah!
Jul 31, 07 10:43am
The demolition of a Hindu temple yesterday in Malacca has triggered an immediate complaint to Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, who is also accused of reneging on a pledge to Malaysians.
Condemning the action in a letter to the premier, Hindu Rights Action Force (Hindraf) legal adviser P Uthayakumar described it as an act of ‘bullying’ by the Umno-controlled government.

This was partly a reference to objections raised by the Umno branch in Tambak Paya village, where the 16-year-old Sri Periyachi Amman temple was located.

“Malaysia once again has violated Article 11 of the Federal Constitution with impunity,” he said in the letter, a copy of which was made available to malaysiakini.

A city council team pulled down the temple, despite claims by the landowner to have shown the officers a ‘stay order’ he had obtained from Chief Minister Mohd Ali Rustam and Mayor Zaini Mohd Noor earlier that morning.

Caretakers had been given until July 15 to tear down the renovated portion of the building, on grounds that the expansion was not welcome in a Malay village. 

Local Umno Youth members had shown displeasure by putting up two banners in the vicinity that read: 'Don’t test our patience' and ‘Tear down this unlawful temple’.

‘Application submitted’

During the demolition exercise, Malacca PKT vice-president A Jayathas was arrested by the police for ‘interfering’ with their duties.

Uthayakumar described the arrest as a direct violation of the Article 8 of the Federal Constitution, which calls for equity before law.

“He was arrested when he stood in front of the bulldozer demanding to see the court order (for demolition) of the temple which is on the private land. (He also asked) why similar buildings without approval were not demolished,” Uthayakumar said.

“In any event this temple had, vide their application, filed the necessary forms and documents formally applying for building permission, and (this was) supported with the signatures and endorsements of their devotees.”

Uthayakumar said the government’s position that the temple is in the middle of a Malay village runs contrary to its own call for national unity, integration, racial and religious co-existence, as well as the premier’s declaration upon taking office in November 2003 that ‘Malaysia is for all ethnic communities’.

He urged Abdullah, at the next cabinet meeting (tomorrow), to issue a firm and unconditional directive to all relevant authorities to stop the demolition of Hindu temples.

Over the past year, Hindraf has recorded 76 cases of demolition of such structures, which it has described as illegal.

Uthayakumar, saying he represents two million Hindus nationwide, has initiated a public interest suit against 10 government bodies to stop temple demolitions nationwide.
Legislation needed

Meanwhile the Malaysia Hindu Sangam said that the temple demolition only showed that the state government has arbitrarily taken action against a Hindu temple without any regards to the sensitivities of the Hindu devotees.

“Given that many other structures throughout Malaysia are still standing even though they too were built without local authority permission, it is particularly disturbing to Hindus that a place of worship is targetted in this manner,” Malaysin Hindu Sangam president A Vaithilingam in a statement today.

He added that any demolition of a place of worship must be based on a court order and should only be carried out after the devotees of the place of worship have been given a meaningful opportunity to be heard.

“We urge all state governments to carry out this practice, and for legislation to be enacted to recognize and protect the special status of places of worship,” he added.

 
 

Extracts from Hindu Human Rights Report 2006 by Hindu American Foundation

July 17th, 2007
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


source: http://www.hinduamericanfoundation.org/pdf/HHR2006.pdf (7MB)

note that information to the foundation was provided by Hindu Rights Action Force (HindRAF)

Malaysia: Pg 49-52 and 162-167

Introduction

The Indian and Chinese influence in the Malay-speaking world dates back to at least 3rd century BCE when traders from both regions arrived at the archipelago. Hinduism and Buddhism were both established in the region by the 1 st century CE. Between the 7th and 14th centuries, the Indian Hindu culture reigned in the Malay world. During the 10 th century the arrival of Islam broke apart the Hindu empire and led to the conversion of most of the Malay-Indonesian world. The 16th century saw the arrival of the European colonizers, beginning with the Portuguese, followed by the Dutch, and ultimately the British. In 1824, the Anglo-Dutch created a border between British Malaysia and the Dutch East Indies, which is now Indonesia. This phase of occupation was followed by the mass immigration of Chinese and Indians who entered the country as workers in the colonial British economy. Between 1942 and 1945, the Japanese occupied the region, detracting power from the British in East Asia. Although short-lived, this occupation triggered feelings of nationalism, ultimately leading to the establishment of an independent Federation of Malaya in 1957. Upon the acquisition of British territories in North Borneo and Singapore, Malaya became Malaysia in 1963.

Status of Human Rights of Hindus in Malaysia, 2006

For years, Malaysia seemed to be balancing a secular government with the strong Islamic roots of the majority of its citizens. However, in recent years that balance has shifted and increased religious tensions among the population. Marina Mahathir, a rights activist and daughter of Malaysia’s longest-serving premier, says that the Malaysian government is not properly protecting the rights of its citizens from conservative Muslims. She spoke further about the incursion of Muslim values through a variety of confrontations, including the trial of a Chinese couple caught kissing in public and rules requiring non-Muslim policewomen to wear headscarves in parades. Mahathir also says the policy of giving preferential treatment to ethnic Malays should be modified. “The original intentions were good; it was about equality, bringing up people so that there was a level playing field, but I think maybe nobody foresaw some of the psychological side effects,” she said, citing the “sense of entitlement.

Religious freedom has been eroding within the country. As it is, ethnic Malays are required to be Muslims, as they are born into Islam and do not have the freedom to convert. However, even the minority Hindus and Christians in the country struggle to maintain and practice their religions. In the past few years, numerous disputes have come to light over the burial of Hindus in accordance with Muslim rites. The most well-known of these incidents occurred in 2005 when a prominent Malaysian climber was buried as a Muslim, despite protests from his Hindu family that he remained a Hindu.

In a further incident, an ethnic Indian man, Chandran Dharma Dass, was buried according to Islamic rites despite claims by his family that he had renounced Islam. Dass had converted to Islam in 2001 in order to marry a Muslim woman, but renounced Islam when he married a Thai woman instead. However, Syarifuudin Alsa Osman, a Kuantan Islamic religious offer, said that as Dass had not embraced another religion after renouncing Islam, “the deceased was a Muslim and should be buried according to Islam and this cannot be disputed by his family or other parties.” Dass was buried at a Muslim cemetery in his hometown of Gopeng, Perak.

In another example of the growing religious tensions in Malaysia, two practicing Hindu siblings of Indian origin are trying to change their religion on their birth certificates from Islam to Hinduism. The sibling’s father, K. Seshadri, converted from Hinduism to Islam before their birth but reverted back to Hinduism in 1991. Again, Seshadri was buried according to Islamic rites despite protests by his family. The siblings, S. Jeevanathan and S. Maneemegalay, are registered as Hindus on their identity cards but have been denied by Malaysia’s National Registration Department in changing their Muslim status on their birth certificates. “According to the law, when one embraces Islam, there is no provision that allows him to take another religion or go back to his former religion,” said Rahimin Bani, Malacca religious department head.

Separately, Fauzi Mustaffar, the head of Malaysia’s Shariat Department, has asked Muslims in Malaysia not to wish Hindus a Happy Diwali. Although the government distanced itself from the directive, Mustaffar’s message claimed that for a Muslim to greet Hindus on Diwali was equivalent to practicing polytheism. In an email to his staff, Mustaffar wrote, “So Muslims who have inadvertently wished Hindus a Happy Diwali, Happy Durga Pooja or Happy Lakshmi Pooja [all are prominent Hindu festivals] must immediately repent and not repeat it in the future.”

The highest profile atrocity faced by Hindus in Malaysia is the destruction of their temples. A total of seventy-six separate demolitions, desecrations or forcible relocations of Hindu temples are enumerated and discussed in Appendix C. According to P. Waytha Moorthy, Chairman of the Hindu Rights Action Force (an umbrella of approximately 40 NGOs in Malaysia), authorities are destroying temples “in an unlawful and indiscriminate fashion, at the federal, state, and local levels.”

Many of these temples have existed since British colonial rule as Indian laborers who were brought into the country to work on rubber plantations built them. Malaysian mosques have not faced similar fates and actually mosques are given preference in the government allocation of public funds and land. Moorthy lists six major temples that were demolished by the authorities between February and June 2006:

– Sri Ayyanar Sathiswary Alayam at Jalan Davies demolished February 22
– Malaimel Sri Selva Kaliamman at Pantal demolished April 17
– Sri Kaliamman at Midlands Estate demolished May 9
– Sri Balkrishan Muniswarer at Setapak partly demolished May 14
– Gangai Muthu K Karumariaman at PMR Batu Buntung Estate Kulim torched May 15
– Muniswara at Setapak demolished June 8

A more prominent case involves the demolition of the Sri Muthu Mariamman, a temple that is over 100 years old. The temple, which was located on rubber plantation that was home to approximately 1000 families, has been at the center of a fight since 1992 when the Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM) made claims to temple’s land. There have been various attempts to save the temple, but a court order allowed the demolition of the temple in December 2006. The deities within the temple are to be moved to a separate location that will be provided by the Johor state. Hindu Rights Action Force has filed an application with the Malaysian High Court in Kuala Lumpur in order to stop the continued demolition of Hindu temples.

Violations of Constitution and UN Covenants

Malaysia has not taken any action toward signing or ratifying the UN’s International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights or the UN’s International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination. Malaysia’s Constitution upholds Islam as “the religion of the Federation” but provides for the practice of other religions “in peace and harmony.” Part II of the Constitution defines the fundamental liberties of people, which include the right to equality before the law; the right to freedom of speech and peaceful assembly; and the right to “prove and practice his religion.” The Constitution also guarantees that every religious group may “manage its own religious affairs, establish and maintain institutions for religious or charitable purposes, and acquire and own property and hold and administer it in accordance with law.” Furthermore, religious groups hold the right “to establish and maintain institutions for education of children in its own religion” although the Federation retains the right to “establish or maintain or assist in establishing or maintaining Islamic institutions.” Additionally, the Constitution mandates that no individual is “required to receive instruction in or take part in any ceremony or act of worship of a religion other than his own.” Clearly, state-sponsored temple destruction and infringements on personal religious freedom seen in Malaysia today are direct violations of the aforementioned guarantees enshrined in the nation’s Constitution.

Conclusion and Recommendations

Over the past decade, the rights of minorities in Malaysia have eroded as the government shifts from its seemingly secular state to one that is rooted in conservative Islam. Religious freedom is not protected and for ethnic Malays, does not exist at all. While the Hindu community faces numerous struggles, the two key ones are their right to cremate their dead as Hindus and the demolition of their temples. The Malaysian government should respect the wishes of family members and permit them to carry out final rites for their deceased in accordance with Hindu tradition. The U.S., UN and various human rights groups should pressure the Malaysian government to protect Hindu temples from desecration and destruction ? the primary institutions of the Hindu community in Malaysia. Hindu places of worship that existed prior to independence should be designated as temple property and title to the land should be handed to the respective temple trustees/committees as has been done for pre-independence era mosques. The Malaysian Government should be urged to not discriminate in the allocation of public funds and land for places of worship between Muslim and minority religious groups.

Appendix C:

Destruction of Hindu Temples in Malaysia – 2006

ELEVEN HINDU TEMPLES DEMOLISHED IN THE KLANG VALLEY

1. The Sri Ayyanar Sathiswary Alayam Temple (more than 65 years-old) was demolished on February 22, 2006 and the sacred icons buried at the site.
2. The Malaimel Sri Selva Kaliamman Temple Pantai (more than 100 years-old) was demolished on April 17, 2006 on orders by the Kuala Lumpur City Hall.
3. The Vaalmuniswarar Rajaamman Kovil (more than 60 years-old) at the Lady Templer Hospital was demolished on May 3, 2006 or orders by the Kuala Lumpur City Hall.
4. Sri Kaliamman temple at Midlands Estate, Seksyen 7, Shah Alam (more than 100 yearsold) was demolished or orders by the Shah Alam City Hall on May 9, 2006.
5. The Sri Balakrishan Muniswarer temple in Setapak (more than 60 years-old) was partly demolished on May 11, 2006 or orders by the Kuala Lumpur City Hall.
6. The Sri Balakrishan Muniswarer temple in Setapak was completely demolished and sacred icons destroyed on June 8, 2006.
7. The partly demolished Sri Kaliamman temple at Midlands Estate, Seksyen 7, Shah Alam was demolished for a second time on June 12, 2006 wherein three main Hindu deities were hammered and smashed to pieces with a sledge hammer by the Shah Alam City Council enforcement officers.
8. On August 1, 2006 the Om Sri Sakti Nagamma Allaya Hindu Temple in Taman Sri Manja, PJS 3/30 Petaling Jaya, Selangor was demolished by the Petaling Jaya City Council.
9. The Sri Subramaniam temple in Country Homes, Rawang, Selangor, Malaysia was demolished on September 29, 2006.
10. On October 31, 2006 the Sri Muniswarar Temple (more than 100 years-old) which was built on private land in Bandar Rinching, Semenyih Selangor was demolished.
11. The Devi Sri Karumaniamman Hindu Temple, Petaling Jaya Utara, Section 21, Kampung Taman Aman was demolished on November 30, 2006.
12. On December 29, 2006 the Sri Muniswarar Temple (more than 100 years-old) which was built on private land in Bandar Rinching, Semenyih Selangor was demolished.

FOUR OTHER DEMOLISHED HINDU TEMPLES LOCATED OUTSIDE KLANG VALLEY BUT WITHIN PENINSULAR MALAYSIA

13. The Sri Maha Sivalingaeswarrar Hindu Temple, Batu 7, Gemas Tampin was demolished on April 10, 2006.
14. The 80 year-old Sri Muthumariamman Alayam Hindu Temple in Skudai Johor Bahru was demolished in August 2006.
15. Sacred icons in the Sungai Wangi Mathurai Veeran Temple (60 years-old) in Sitiawan, Kampung Tirali, 9 th Mile Jalan Air Tawar, Sungai Wangi Estate, Perak were hammered, smashed up and thrown into a drain and the temple demolished on October 17, 2006 by the Manjung District Council.
16. The 55 year-old Kaliaman Alayam Hindu Temple in Taman Impiana Mengelembu in Ipoh was demolished on November 27, 2006.

THIRTY ONE HINDU TEMPLES IN KLANG VALLEY THAT HAVE BEEN ISSUED A DEMOLITION NOTICE

17. A demolition notice was issued to the Kuil Hindu Sri Mariaman di Seksyen 11, Shah Alam on April 26, 2006 by the Shah Alam Municipal Council.
18. The Sri Maha Mariamman Temple Taman Intan Baiduri Selayang was issued a demolition notice in June 2006.
19. The Sri Subramaniam Temple Kg.Jawa Klang (107 years-old) was issued a demolition notice in June 2006.
20. The Mariamman Temple Jalan Meru Bandar Setia Alam, Shah Alam (101 years-old) was issued a demolition notice in June 2006.
21. The Kg.Jawa Mariamman Temple (more than 120 years-old) was issued with a demolition notice in June 2006.
22. The Sri Maha Laxhsmi temple in Sunway was issued with a demolition notice in June 2006 by the Petalaing Jaya City Council.
23. The Sri Angineer Temple in Taman Tun Dr. Ismail, Kuala Lumpur built on a private land was issued with a demolition notice in June 2006 by the Kuala Lumpur City Manager.
24. Sri Mahamariaman Hindu Temple in Kg Semarak, Old Klang Road has been threatened with demolition five times (Nanban, July 6, 2006, pg. 12)
25. The Sri Sai Bala Raman Hindu Temple in Klang Jaya was threatened with demolition (Nesan, July , 2006)
26. The 101 year-old Dewi Sri Karumari Aman Temple at the 4 ? Mile Jalan Meru, Klang was ordered closed by the Selangor State Government on July 10, 2006, and the temple was threatened to be demolished to make way for housing development.
27. The 101 year-old Thevy Sri Karumariamman temple’s Bandar Setia Alam, Shah Alam access road was closed on July 10, 2006 by the Selangor State Government and later threatened with demolition to make way for a private housing development.
28. The Arun Estate Temple in Shah Alam was issued a demolition notice (
Nesan, July 12, 2006, pg. 6)
29. In July 2006 the 110 year-old Tepi Sungai JKR Mariaman Temple was given a notice that it would be demolished.
30. In July 2006 the Sri Muniswarar temple in Jalan Air Panas Baru Setapak was given a notice that it would be demolished.
31. In July 2006 the Sri Jada Muniswarar Hindu Temple in Danau Kota, Kuala Lumpur was given a notice that it would be demolished.
32. The Jedda Manismanar Hindu Temple in Jalan Setapak was given a notice that it would be demolished (Nesan, August 17, 2006)
33. The Sri Maha Megeswari Hindu Temple in Lembah Jaya, Ampang is being threatened with demolition (Nesan, August 20, 2006)
34. The Muniswarar Hindu Temple in Bandar Baru Ampang is being threatened withdemolition (Nesan, August 20, 2006)
35. The Sri Sakti Vinayar Hindu Temple in Kampung Ampang Indah is being threatened with demolition (Nesan, August 20, 2006)
36. The Mariaman Hindu Temple in Kg Tasik Permai, Ampang is being threatened with demolition (Nesan, August 20, 2006)
37. Siti Subramariam Hindu Temple in Kg Tasik Permai, Ampang is being threatened with demolishment Nesan (20/8/06)
38. The Sri Mariaman Temple (60 years-old) in Section 18 was issued a notice demanding relocation, on October 18, 2006.
39. The Sri Kaliaman Temple (80 years-old) in Section 18 was issued a notice demanding relocation, on October 18, 2006.
40. The Sri Vinayagar Temple (80 years-old) in Section 18 was issued a notice demanding relocation, on October 18, 2006.
41. The Sri Mariaman Temple (109 years-old) in Section 19, which has a sacred 100 year old tree, was issued a notice demanding relocation, on October 18, 2006.
42. The Sri Mariaman Temple (100 years-old) in Section 15 was issued a notice demanding relocation, on October 18, 2006.
43. The Sri Maha Mariaman Hindu Temple in Section 11 was issued a notice demanding relocation, on October 18, 2006.
44. The 80 year-old Sri Athi Muniswara Temple in Jalan Semarak, off Jalan Gurney in Kuala Lumpur was issued a demolition notice on October 19, 2006.
45. On November 21, 2006 the Sivaksakthi Linggeswara Hindu Temple in Kampung Tropikana, Jalan Padang Tembak, Subang Jaya was issued a demolition notice.
46. The Sri Kamatchie Amman Telecoms Temple Cheras (more than 100 years-old) is being threatened with demolition.
47. Despite receiving recognition from UNESCO, the Nageswari Hindu Temple in Bangsar is being threatened with demolition.

SEVENTEEN OTHER HINDU TEMPLES LOCATED OUTSIDE THE KLANG VALLEY BUT WITHIN PENINSULA MALAYSIA THAT HAVE BEEN THREATENED WITH DEMOLITION

48. The Sri Muniswarar Aalayam Seremban (150 years-old) and a 150 year-old “rain tree” have been threatened with demolition since March 2006 by the District and Land Office.
49. On June 26, 2006 the 110 year-old Sri Chinna Karuppan Temple in Masai Johor was issued a notice of demolition.
50. The 60 year-old Saiva Muniswarar Temple Temple in Sg.Petani Kedah was given a notice of demolition (Nanban June 29, 2006, pg 4).
51. The Sri Muthumariaman Aman Skudai Hindu Temple (70 years-old) in Lindon Estate risks being demolished (Nesan, July 3, 2006, pg. 7)
52. Sri Muniswarar Temple in Slim River risks being demolished (Nesan, July 14, 2006)
53. On July 15, 2006 the Muniswarar Temple in Sitiawan was given a demolition notice (Nanban, July , 2006).
54. A Hindu temple was threatened with demolition (Nesan, July 19, 2006, pg. 6)
55. The Sri Nageswari Amman Alayam Hindu Temple is being threatened with demolition (Nesan, July 19, 2006, pg. 6)
56. The Muniswarar Hindu Temple is being threatened with demolition (
Nesan, July 19, 2006, pg. 6).
57. The Sri Sakti Viyanayagar Hindu Temple is being threatened with demolition (Nesan, July 19, 2006, pg. 6).
58. The Sri Maha Mariaman Hindu Temple is being threatened with demolition (Nesan, July 19, 2006, pg. 6).
59. The Sri Subramaniam Hindu Temple is being threatened with demolition (Nesan, July 19, 2006, pg. 6).
60. The Muthu Mariaman Hindu Temple in Liutan Estate Skudai was threatened to be demolished on August 13, 2006.
61. The Sri Subramaniam Hindu Temple in Kampar is being threatened with demolition (Nesan, August 21, 2006).
62. Bangi Mariaman Hindu Temple is being threatened with demolition (
Nesan, August 23, 2006).
63. The Taman U Hindu Temple in Skudai, Johor Bahru was on the verge of being demolished when about 600 Hindu devotees protested on August 23, 2006.
64. The Sri Mathuraimeeran Hindu Temple in Kampar Taman, Sri Wangi is being threatened with demolition (Nanban, August 25, 2006).

THREE HINDU TEMPLES THAT HAVE BEEN BURNT TO THE GROUND

65. The Ganggai Muthu Karumariaman temple in PMR Batu Buntung Estate Kulim, Kedah on May 15, 2006 was torched by unknown individuals.
66. The Sri Kalikambul Kamadeswarar temple in Ebor Estate Batu Tiga, Shah Alam Selangor was burned down.
67. The Sri Kalkattha Kaliamman temple in Kampung Sungai Kayu Ara, 47400 Petaling Jaya was burned down.

SIX TEMPLES FORCED TO BE RELOCATED NEXT TO SEWAGE TANKS

68. The Sri Muneeswarar JKR Temple, Batu 5/12, Jalan Kapar, 42100 Klang, Selangor (73 years-old) was given notice to be demolished and forced to be relocated next to a sewage tank (June 2006, Hindraf)
69. The Sri Kumaravel Hindu Temple in Kampung Medan, Petaling Jaya, Selangor was forcibly relocated next to a sewage tank, electric station (TNB) and high voltage cable on July 14, 2006 (Makkal Osai, August 15, 2006)
70. The Mariaman Hindu Temple in Bukit Beonang, Taman Bukit Melaka was forced to relocate next to a sewage tank (Nanban, August 25, 2006).
71. The Sri Raja Rajeswarar Hindu Temple in Taman Tunku Jaafar, Senawang, Seremban was relocated next to a sewage tank (Hindraf).
72. The Mariamman and Perumal Hindu Temple in Puchong Perdana, Selangor were relocated next to a sewage tank (DAP sources).
73. The Mariamman Temple in Desa Mewah, Sunway Semenyih was forcibly relocated next to a septic tank, according to Bandar Rincing, the Semenyih Temple Chairman.

THREE HINDU TEMPLES WHERE DEITIES WERE FORCIBLY REMOVED

74. Icons in a 73 year-old JKR Sri Muniswarar Temple, Jalan Kapar Klang Temple were forcibly removed and taken away under mysterious circumstances in July 2006.
75. Deities from the Devi Sri Karumariaman Hindu Temple, Petaling Jaya Utara, Section 21, Kampung Taman Aman were forcibly removed and left in a construction site.
76. At the Kaliamman Hindu Temple, Jalan Matin Batu 5 Seremban (which is more than 28 years-old) deities and temple bell were removed (Nanban, September 3, 2006).

HindRAF hands memo over demolition of 79 temples

June 30th, 2007
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


well, looks like all those sent letters (sometimes CC'ed to online forums as well) did not even warrant a decent reply from govt. speaks a lot about our delivery system!

Group seeks action over the demolition of 79 Hindu temples

source

PUTRAJAYA: Some 100 people from the Hindu Rights Action Force handed a memorandum to the special officer to the Solicitor-General Ilham Abdul Kaderover the apparent lack of action on the demolition of 79 Hindu temples nationwide. 

The group, which gathered in front of the Attorney-General's Chambers yesterday, expressed disappointment over the apparent lack of action although 99 police reports had been lodged over the matter. 

Chairman Waytha Moorthy said the memorandum stated that Hindu temples, some more than 100 years old and located on private land, had been demolished without proper court orders since last. Apart from the 99 police reports, the organisation had also sent out 74 letters and memoranda to the A-G's Chambers and other relevant state authorities but had so far received no response, he said.