Posts Tagged ‘Marginalisation’

Review of PSD Scholarship quota

July 11th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


After it was revealed that this year, 45% of the PSD’s 2000 scholarships are being allocated to normal Malaysians, few extremist groups were unhappy and quite vocal about it. For the last decade, the normal Malaysians have been marginalized by only being allocated 10% of the scholarship, but this is conveniently left out during the argument.

Today’s Star (hard copy) said allocation for normal Malaysians were 50% while its online version mentioned 45%. Actually 5% is for “others”, 45% for normal Malaysians, and 50% for privileged Malaysians. Not sure who is the others are. Non-Malaysians?

Some groups said the allocation should reflect the population breakdown. Does it mean breakdown of privileged/normal Malaysians, or by race (Malays, Indians, Chinese, Dayaks, Kadazans, Orang Asli, etc). We have to be careful here because sometimes the terms bumiputera and Malay are liberally interchanged in use depending on the advantage it brings.

Most disappointingly, the quota will be reviewed, as mentioned by Najib.

My take: offer it only for those who deserve it by merit and family financial background. PSD perhaps can announce that it will offer scholarship for those who get 12A1s and family income is below RM3000 for the comin SPM examinations. In this way, students will know in advance what they should aim for.

HINDRAF unhappy with Pakatan Rakyat in Perak

July 10th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


HINDRAF is unhappy because only 48 Indian councillors were selected from a total of 338 appointed by Perak on Monday. The rest are as follows: 134 Chinese, 124 Malays, five representatives from special groups, such as Orang Asli and disabled people, and 27 from NGOs.

Surely the disabled and NGO representatives are from one race or another right?

According to HINDRAF’ memorandum sent to Menteri Besar Nizar, 60 councillors were promised to be from the Indian community, but only 48 were selected in the end. This is just 7 more than the number of councillor under the previous government. The delegation to submit memorandum was led by Perak Hindraf coordinator Vathe Murthi.

Further more, figures from Statistics Department indicate that 13% of the state’s population (300,000) are Indians.

Hindraf wants the new government to revert back to its promise and also initiate affirmative policies to provide vast opportunities in all fields in both public and private sectors to marginalised Indians.

It’s pointless to merely talk on correcting the wrongs done by the
previous BN state government when one failed to prove it’s a government
with a difference.

HINDRAF warned that Nizar should act firmly, fairly and meet its demands. If not the movement may resort to other means (demonstration) to voice their satisfaction. Pakatan should not forget the contribution of Makkal Sakthi, says its coordinator.

Can Hindraf cause another tsunami, this time in Perak? Can Pakatan be rattled or toppled by Makkal Sakthi?

New plans show Indians marginalised

July 6th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Some say that’s what the title of Malaysiakini article should have been. Of course its not their fault for the mistake because the interviewee, Dr S.Subramaniam the Human Resource Minister said so.

MIC leader Dr S Subramaniam has described the series of measures
unveiled by the government recently to help the Indian community as a
sign that it never marginalised the community.

S.Subra acknowledged that the series of policies announced after the cabinet committee meeting were results of the general elections outcome.

As a responsible government, not only has it responded to the message (by voters), it also sent the message back to the community that ‘look here, we never intended to marginalise you’

He also had described these policies as a major achievement for MIC. Perhaps he meant the only achievement in last three decades.

The government has been very sensitive to the requirement of the community and is actually committed to address the Indian community’s problem so that it can be at par with the other communities

Obviously one have to take his statements as something with an hidden meaning. What S.Subra was actually trying to say is the exact opposite. He gave us clues – by linking the decisions with general election results and using the phrase “never intended”. So, if the results were different, what would have been the status of the committee?

That’s why his statements are important. By making those seemingly self-serving statements he is indeed telling us SOMETHING.

S.Subra also said the cabinet
committee will have a monitoring team, led by his ministry, to check
implementation progress of these policies. He also called on the Indian community to take up what was offered by the government.

It’s
for the community to move forward now and avail themselves to these
opportunities. Of course the opportunity can be given but the person
must also take the initiative to come forward,” said the MIC leader.

I wrote my views about the decisions of the committee earlier. ynway, here’s more details about the committee’s decisions:

  • To convert 372 partially-aided Tamil schools into fully-assisted schools.
  • Consolidate schools which had an enrolment of less than 50 students.
  • To ensure at least eight percent of Indian representation at all levels in the civil service. To achieve that, it will also see more promotions for Indian civil servants.
  • The MIC-run Asian Institute for Medicine, Science and Technology (Aimst) to be re-categorised as one of the five private universities which recognise government-sponsored students to boost the intake of Indian students into critical sectors like medicine and engineering. At present, students who receive government scholarship were only given a list of choice of universities which does not include Aimst.
  • To allow Indian contractors to take part in government projects at all levels. For government’s mega projects, it is suggested that certain sub-contract jobs be given to Indian contractors.
  • Indian entrepreneurs to be given more opportunities in the development of vendor development scheme through companies like state-owned oil firm Petronas and national car-maker Proton.
  • Easier access to government loans for Indian entrepreneurs.
  • More taxi and bus permits for Indian companies.
  • To increase the Indian corporate equity from the current 1.1 percent to 1.5 percent in 2010. To do this, the government is planning to set up a unit trust scheme based on the Permodalan Nasional Berhad model to allow Indians to invest in the scheme to increase their equity in the market.

Breakdown of funds for temples and churches

July 4th, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Earlier, we read about the amount of money spent for mosques and other places of worship in general.

In today’s Star (hard copy) breakdown of the expenses for places of worship is given as below:

RM3.93 million for Hindu temples
RM3.16 million for other temples
RM1.6 million for churches

It is clarified that since 1991, RM1 million for physical development of churches and temples, and another RM1 million for Hindu temples have been allocated since year 2000.

Now, we can see that temples and churches individually receive less money than Hindu temples, but if combined, its more by RM0.83 million (3.16 + 1.6 – 3.93).

I can only assume that there is less allocation for churches since they are located in strategic areas with least disturbance, have good support from the affluent section of community they serve, or the churches have moved into shoplots, thus reducing maintenance cost. However, I wonder if this cost includes assistance to churches located in Sabah and Sarawak, where there are many Christians among the privileged people there.

Other temples most likely refer to Taoist temples, which again usually have an association, foundation or group supporting it.

For Hindu temples, due to the many sects in Hinduism, there is more temples to be maintained. Then, there’s the issue of relocation or compensation when temples make way for development.

For the period between 2005 and 2008, total money received by these places of worship:

RM8.1 million
+ RM8 million (RM2 million x 4)
= RM16.1million.

Mosques and surau got RM428 million in the same period.

As I said earlier, its a major injustice when the total amount given to these temples (RM16.1 million) in the last four years is just 3.6% of the total allocation (RM428 million + RM16.1 million). The mosques and surau are allocated 26.58 times MORE money than combination of all other places of worship.

Whatever happened to “Kepercayaan Kepada Tuhan”?

RM428 million for mosques and RM8 million for others

July 3rd, 2008
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


In a 60/40 population, 428 million versus 8 million doesn’t look balanced no matter how you cut it. And that is just for the period between 2005 and 2008.

 

Let’s do the maths:

 

428/ 42 months (from Jan 2005 until June 2008) = 10.19 million per month.

 

8/42 months = 190,000 per month.

 

That means mosques get 53.63 times more than other places of worship month-wise. Over the said period, its 53.5 times more than the allocation for temples and churches.

 

And bear in mind that this amount is to be shared between temples (Hindus, Buddhists, Taoist?) and churches.

 

The deputy minister for Internal Security also said that the government has been disbursing RM1 million per year for temples/churches and Hindu temples respectively for physical construction projects.