Posts Tagged ‘Religion’

Ragunathan’s plight and temple issues in Merlimau

February 28th, 2011
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


We can trust some of our media to dig up interesting stories, especially when it involves elections. So far, it seems to be rosy for Merlimau folks. Everyday, I hear some Merlimau makkal interview recording on Minnal FM saying how the town has progressed. Merlimau has a polytechnic (I suppose the makkal there benefit by the economic activities generated by the polytechnic ecosystem or maybe their kids are studying there), no problem with basic amenities, and generally, its like heaven on earth. Oh ya, in terms of Indian community, there are 1567 folks are registered as voters and MIC has identified 1242 of them. MIC hopes do deliver at least 75% of the Indian votes. That’s the scenario which is obviously in favor of the ruling coalition.  The voter breakdown is as follows: 10,679 voters consisting of 64.1% Malay, 20.8% Chinese and 14.7% Indian. In GE2008, voter turnout was 7977 (76.2%) with BN winning by a majority of 2154 votes.

OK, back to problems. Similar as with Tenang, some of makkal folks live in estates and rural areas, thus there’s the standard problem of getting basic amenities for the last 30/40/50 years. Our first case is about the (now popular) Ragunathan, a dairy farmer. His problem: lack of water supply for about a short period of two decades, and also lack of access road. He seems to doing well with oil palm getting good prices. The land is their own but the location is sandwiched between private property and government reserve. Of course, within days of his problem being highlighted, the calvary arrives. Hopefully his problem will be solved. If not have to wait till next election. BTW, I learnt one thing: branding is important. Choose a good logo.

 

After more than two decades living without water, the by-election has finally brought welcome news for Merlimau voter C Ragunathan.

Soon after Malaysiakini reported his predicament last week, the dairy farmer received visits from politicians and representatives of government agencies suddenly keen to solve his problems.

“After the report, representatives of the state water agency came and inspected our premises and enquired about how we source for water.

 

“Even the health department came to ask if we put chlorine in the well we use for drinking water…But they didn’t promise to provide running water,” he said when met yesterday.

NONERagunathan (left) and his household of more than 10 live in Kampung Paya Yoki, 6km from Merlimau town smack in between a Sime Darby oil palm estate and government reserve land which is now a small forest.

Sime Darby had rejected the land as it was swampy and the government had then sold it to 20 families most of whom have now chosen to move out citing lack of amenities and access road.

Ragunathan’s family source water from a 9 meter deep pond and a well within the estate perimeter, the only access road goes through a gate locked up by Sime Darby daily from 7pm and 7am .

But about a week ago, Malacca MIC deputy chairperson S Mahadevan had told them that the government may build an access road which cuts through the government’s reserve land, bypassing the estate.

“He said that we should first clear the reserve land and we have. It cost us about RM4,000 as there was dense overgrowth…this will not be compensated. We’ve also shown him the plan of where the road can be, but it’s their job to do the land survey,” Ragunathan said.

New electricity poles, street lamps

Tenaga Nasional Berhad also dropped by several days after the report to build two more electrical poles and provide seven street lamps.

merlimauFive years ago Ragunathan had paid TNB for erecting a couple of electrical poles as the energy company said it would not be able to provide it otherwise as the power grid is about 2km away.

“It was done the proper way. I applied and paid them the fee for the electric poles. The total cost, including wiring work and generator, came up to about RM30,000.

This has been confirmed by Negri Sembilan and Malacca Electric Commission director Md Rasdi Abdullah, who sighted Ragunathan’s application to TNB in his investigation, fearing any wrongdoing on TNB Malacca’s part following the news reports.

NONE“The new poles and street lamps is really good news for us and we’re thankful to TNB. But we still have the road issue, which we hope that the relevant parties can help solve as soon as possible,” Ragunathan said.

The father of three added that the lack of an access road that does not cut through the estate also eats into his income.

“I also plant some oil palm, and when we want to bring our crops out the estate patrol officer would think that we are stealing their crop, so he insists that he escorts us out from our land to make sure the fruits are ours.

“But there are times when he is busy and we have to wait a few days and by then our fruits have reduced in weight. The price of oil palm fruits is about RM800 a tonne, and each kilogramme less is a loss for us,” he said.

Dacing means stability

All the same, Ragunathan remains a staunch MIC supporter, just as his late father was.

NONE“When I was younger there was a party using the symbol of a sampan. My father told me that when the sampan goes in the water it’s unstable.

“But the dacing (the weighscale, symbolising BN) is stable, showing that it is fair and does not prefer one race over the other, so this is the party we must support. I have supported BN ever since but I hope that BN will pay attention to our woes.

“I don’t know whether or not (the government) is thinking about our problems. We pay our asssesment fees too, and to pay the fee we must have revenue and this is not easy without amenities,” he said.

 

 

 

Now, if the first case was quite straightforward, the second is a tad more complicated AND sensitive. It involves religion. The politicians are treading carefully, but still I don’t think it will affect the vote bank, since the problem can be more dragged for few more years. Can have a couple of dozens of discussions, interspersed  by land surveys and field visits. If properly managed, this problem can be prolonged for 5 years or more.

Basically, its about a two-in-one temple’s (Hindu and Taoist) expansion plan which is being opposed. My comments are in red below, within the article.

 

Attracting both Hindus and Taoists, the Sri Mathurai Veeran Raja Karaimariamman Tuah Peh Kong temple in the Malay-majority Kampung Simpang Kerayong, Jasin, would have well been a 1Malaysia success story. 

NONEFounded about 40 years ago, the temple sits on private land on the border of the Merlimau and Rim constituencies. [private lamd? whose land is it? Did the landowner give permission for the place of worship? Got approval from local council? Is there proof of its existence for 40 years?]

A plan to put up a proper building to accommodate the large number of devotees who come to observe religious festivals has, however, been put on hold.

This is due to objections from the local Umno division and the village security and safety committee (JKKK), that claim to represent almost all of the Malay community. [Can this claim be justified? Any proof? JKKK reps are not voted, but appointed due to political connections. So how can they be representative of anything?]

NONE“We first met with the penghulu (village head) who said it is not his role and that we should meet with the YB (assemblyperson),” said temple official and priest K Ganesan (right).

“The YB (Rim assemblyperson Mohd Yazed Khamis) said he supports our plans, but we have to get the approval of the JKKK andpenghulu, so we’ve been going around in circles”. [Hmm…wild goose chase. Good strategy. I suppose now things are clear.” ]

A letter dated Dec 14, 2010, from Mohd Yazed, displayed on the temple wall, states that the assemblyperson has no objections to the expansion “granted that there are also no objections from JKKK Simpang Kerayong, Simpang Kerayong Umno and local residents”. [can a political party’s objection be used as an excuse?]

Ganesan claimed that five families object to the expansion as they are “worried that a bigger temple will disturb the peace”. [five families or majority residents object?]

NONE“They worry that the sound of bells and the smell of incense will reach their houses,” he said.  [Well, sounds logical, sound and smell does travel through air. Are they using loudspeakers? And how often is these bell sounds and incense smell? More than 5 times a day? At odd hours?]

Temple committee member N Visvanathan claimed that despite the JKKK and Umno’s claim, only about five families have objected to the expansion, and those families live about 1.6km away. [1.6km away? Wow..I wonder how bell sound and incense smell can reach even beyond few hundred meters.]

“I live just behind the temple and I don’t hear or smell anything. The lorries (from the surrounding oil palm plantation) are more of a disturbance,” he said. [That’s a good comparison. Lorry is more disturbing than temple sound and smell.]

Chief minister’s backing


According to Visvanathan, BN component parties MIC and MCA are on their side. Representatives of the parties have visited them many times, and have even given cash donations to the temple, which has proudly raised several BN flags and an MIC flag. [should be thankful for the cash donation, and don’t worry about solution yet. Will take time. Discuss few more years.]

NONEBut no one has managed to broker a deal with the Umno branch to allow the expansion which Fauzi Muhammad (left), who runs a sundry shop across the road from the temple, believes is supported by “85 percent” of the multi-ethnic residents there. 

“The bell that they worry about is not a constant. It is rung at specific times so it’s not a nuisance. This is a matter of religion, so they must follow their own rules too… even in Islam we have the azan, which may disturb some people, but we must be mature and respect each others’ customs,” he said. [So, the bell is rung according to prayer times – for Hindus, its usually in the morning, at noon, then in late evening. However, I’ve seen some Taoist temples praying into late night. Maybe this is problem – two different religion occupying same location, thus more activities therehmm..mature and respect each others’ customs. That usually is a one-way street in most cases, people like Fauzi are the exception. But this values do exist in Pendidikan Moral subject.]

NONEThis is an argument that is not getting through to those villagers who object to expansion. Even Malacca Chief Minister and state Umno head Mohd Ali Rustam has been unable to convince them, although the state government has approved the expansion in principle. [OK, so approval for extension exists “in principle”]

“I have met with the JKKK, some approve (the expansion), some don’t. I am in a difficult position. If I approve the temple, then Umno members people will say the chief minister supports Chinese and Indians and won’t vote for BN. But if I don’t, then DAP will attack me. [ahh..life of a politician and the decisions they must make..tough life. Tips: why not stop thinking like a politician and more like a sane human being? That may help]

“So I hope we can have more discussions and try to get to a solution,” Mohd Ali said at an event near the temple on Saturday. [the road well travelled – have lots of discussions. Hopefully can solve the problem by next election. Don’t get me wrong, discussion are good, but if its dragging for ages, then need to analyse if its being conducted properly by the right people.]


“Umno and JKKK were angry with me when I converted the land to temple land but I said the temple has been there for 40 years so what’s the problem? We have waited for 40 years, I am sure we can wait a little longer.” [Why the anger? Was the land eyed for some other use? Maybe can consider land swap now?]

NONETemple head Ng Hong Wah (right) said he welcomes the chief minister’s hands-on approach on the issue and is happy that Mohd Ali has visited the temple and is willing to host a dialogue between the parties involved. 

And although campaigning is in progress for the by-election, Ng and his committee members are unwilling to turn to the opposition to air their plight, as they do not want it to be politicised. 

Ng’s concern is just to get the plan off the ground, as the temple committee has spent more than RM100,000 on preparations, including purchasing the land, installing the piping and covering the swamp land. [opps, land has been purchased, so its their own land.]

‘Bell disturbs sleep’

According to Umno Simpang Kerayong division head Hasnol Abu Wahab, the state government and its agencies had, at a meeting with the division and the JKKK, agreed in principle to relocate the temple. [relocate? seems like chicken and duck talking? How can you decide when the party concerned is not around? Is this how things are supposed to be done? Make unilateral decisions?

“You know how these people are, they tie a red and yellow cloth somewhere and it becomes their deity. I don’t think the temple has been there for 40 years… we have located a piece of land less than 1km from the (current site and), which is near another temple and is more appropriate,” he said when contacted. [hmmm…shows how much this guy (and perhaps his cohorts) understand about other people’s religion. Silap haribulan, he can be arrested for sedition – belittling other people’s religion. AND this guy is division Head! He needs counseling from MCCBHST pronto! BTW, can he provide proof of the age of the temple?  Appropriate for who? ]

NONEState exco member R Perumal, who is heavily involved in the negotiations, however, denied that the state has any intention to relocate the temple. [no relocation? confirm chicken and duck talking. No wonder need lots of discussion!]

This will not sit well with the JKKK. Kamaruzzaman Salleh, a member, lamented that the exco did not even consult the villagers before approving the expansion plan. [So, its the Exco’s fault? What’s the local council doing?]

He said that just about all the Malay residents are against the temple because it is too close to their homes and only about 500m from the mosque. [About all the residents? need to conduct a survey to verify. Since earlier the distance was given as 1.6km and now this guy saying 500m, need to hire qualified land surveyor and engineers to verify the distance. Signs that we are bad in judging distance?]

“We are not objecting to the existence of the temple and we respect their right to pray, but the location is unsuitable,” he said. [Obviously its the location problem. The issue is how to verify the unsuitableness of the location.]

There is also an issue of access, as there is only one road leading to the houses behind the temple. The villagers have complained about congestion whenever there are festivals, as the temple is popular with devotees outside Jasin as well. [ahh..another problem added – access road. Of course not everyday there’s a festival. How’s the frequency? Once a week? Once a month? Once every 3 months? Is it bad as weekly Friday afternoon traffic jams? How about asking to build another road or widen the existing road?]

He said that residents, in a complaint letter to the JKKK, had said that the temple bell disturbs their children’s sleep. [must be a big bell with loudspeakers to boot.]

NONEThis, however, has left the temple officials baffled. They only use a hand bell and said they always wait for the azan to finish before ringing the bell. [Aiks! hand bell? At most I can hear my neighbor about 6 houses away praying using hand bell – that’s 50 metres only. Not sure what kind of bell can be heard 500 meters or 1.6km away.]

“When we pray, we ask for the safety of the whole kampung too,” said Ganesan. [Hmm… i think the kampung will be safe even if don’t ask for it.]

About 50 non-Malay families live in Simpang Kerayong, some of whom will vote in the Merlimau by-election on Sunday, in the Jasin Lalang and Chinchin polling districts. [hmm..not many votes here. Solution : have more discussions.]

PAS garnered about half of the votes in both polling districts in the 2008 general election.

 

Don’t get me wrong, but this kind of issues are fuel for people to protest. You may have just handed more ammo to HRP.

Now, looking at the second case above, what can the solution be (other than prolonging the decisions)? Get independent consultants to conduct study to verify distance, conduct survey among residents within a certain radius (don’t let outsiders interfere), study possibility of widening the road, study the decibel levels of the temple bell, measure distance travelled  by incense smell, survey how many kids are affected by sound/smell, study the prayer patterns of the Hindu and Tao devotees, study the frequency of festivals/major prayers, study possibility of relocation and the impact to residents, visitors, and devotees. See, not so difficult right? Heck, I should be a con-sultant! 🙂

 

can They take part in Ponggal or Lantern Festival?

December 16th, 2010
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


I was alerted to this news via twitter yesterday. I didn’t see any suggestion to ban Malay Muslims from joining such events as per one tweet from Selangor ADUN Elizabeth Wong said:

UKM lecturer NurFahana calls for ban for Msian Muslims to join celebrations of Ponggal, LanternFest, Deepavali bec it’s religious pluralism

The presenter was suggesting that the relevant authorities (for Islam) should come out with proper definitions for their followers to observe, when taking part in other religions’ events like Ponggal, Deepavali, Lantern Festival and Mooncake Festival. Which is something I agree. Its their religion and they should have some sort of guidelines for their followers. These folks should settle their problems internally without angering or even touching on other religions’ beliefs.  How they want to interpret their religious scriptures depends on their experts.

As long as they don’t touch my religion, fine with me. You mind your business and I shall mind mine. Just because other religion people think differently, doesn’t mean I’m going to stop celebrating Ponggal right?  I concur with MP Kamalanathan, who’s been organising Ponggal festival at KL Tower annually for some time now, that its a fun event (which thanks God for a good harvest – don’t ask me whose God!) and people from all walks of life take part in it. Continue organising it and continue inviting everyone to take part. They want to join or not, up to them.

And I’m not much into labelling everything under 1Malaysia to satisfy the current trending. 1Malaysia or not, festival still gets celebrated and we still invite everyone around.

Excerpt from the Malay version of the article from Malaysian Insider:

Pensyarah Jabatan Usuluddin dan Falsafah, Fakulti Pengajian Islam, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Nur Farhana Abd. Rahman pula berkata Jabatan Kemajuan Islam Malaysia (Jakim) memberi definisi secara jelas mengenai perayaan pelbagai kaum di negara ini supaya umat Islam tidak terjebak dengan penularan fahaman pluralisme.

Langkah ini penting supaya umat Islam lebih jelas sebelum menyertai mana-mana perayaan kaum lain kerana dibimbangi akan melanggar batasan agama disebabkan untuk mengamalkan kehidupan bertoleransi.

“Misalnya Jakim perlu jelaskan tentang meraikan Pesta Ponggal dengan Deepavali dan antara Pesta Tanglung dengan Pesta Kuih Bulan dari sudut agama dan juga budaya,” katanya dalam kertas kerja bertajuk Pluralisme Agama: Fahaman Pluralisme Agama dan Percanggahannya Dengan Akidah dan Syariah Islamiah.

Nur Farhana berkata, penjelasan Jakim ini penting kerana penglibatan dalam perayaan pelbagai kaum telah dijadikan sebagai merit yang perlu dipenuhi oleh mahasiswa universiti.

“Kita tidak mahu fahaman pluralisme ini mula menular menerusi bidang pendidikan seperti apa yang telah berlaku terhadap negara jiran kita, Indonesia,” katanya.

Sehubungan itu, katanya, pihak berkenaan diminta berhati-hati dalam pelaksanaan sesuatu dasar kerana pengaruh seperti fahaman ini begitu mudah untuk berkembang di kalangan pelajar.

Nur Farhana berkata, pluralisme memang mempunyai banyak percanggahan dengan agama Islam terutamanya dari sudut akidah, syariah dan akhlak.

“Malah pendukung pluralisme juga menegaskan semua agama bermatlamat tujuan yang satu iaitu Allah walaupun berbeza dari segi pendekatan dan ibadat mengikut agama masing-masing,” katanya.

Katanya, pluralisme juga membenarkan penganutnya berkahwin lintas agama di mana orang Islam bebas berkahwin dengan agama lain.

Karthigai Deepam

November 21st, 2010
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Today is the auspicious Karthigai Deepam Festival. Want to know about this special day celebrated by Hindus?

Read it on wikipedia at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karthikai_Deepam

I managed to visit Puchong Batu 14 Mariamman Temple for the prayers. Below is a recording of the kummi adithal dance during the prayers.

I’m sure you are aware of the Girivalam at Tiruvannamalai in Tamil Nadu, India which is held during Karthigai Deepam. This is one of the the five holy sites (pancha stalam) whereby Lord Siva is worshiped  as an element (in this case, as fire).

The Controversial Deepavali Ad by FINAS

November 9th, 2010
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


Here’s the ad. Have a look and share your thoughts.

Basically the ad is about a Hindu guy who marries a Muslim. The pregnant wife is seen singing Tamil song while cooking muruku (symbolising her acceptance of some of the Indian-Tamil aspects) and later the couple is invited to celebrate Deepavali with the husband’s family.

At the grandmother’s house, the husband’s father and grandma are comfortable with the couple (symbolising that older generation are more forgiving and tolerant?) while the the husband’s siblings ignore the couple (symbolising that younger generation is more intolerant, narrow-minded, ignorant?).

The muslim wife is seen not partaking in the lunch because worried about the food being served. However, a malay neighbor drops by and informs the wife that the food was prepared by her (the malay neighbor) and its safe to eat (here, the muslim is seen worried about halalness of the food).

After the meal, the wife gets labor pain and we see everyone rushing to help her (symbolising that in times of need, the younger and older generation will help regardless of religion, race?).

Finally, the scene cuts to a hospital where everyone is in a joyful mood  due to the first grandchildren (twins) being born to the family. Here the meaning may be that our differences (race/religion) can be overcome/forgotten when there’s good thing happening.

The ad can be easily misinterpreted to convey the message that converting is acceptable and the families of the convert will accept the convert. Indirectly, some feels its subtly (or subconsciously) promotes conversion to Islam among Hindus.

The ad doesn’t show any signs that husband has converted (he eats the food without thinking about the halalness nor does he advice his wife to eat), thus giving false impression that he is still a Hindu, but its a known fact that once you want to  marry a Muslim, you must convert.

The ad also tells us that we should get a muslim to prepare the food for Deepavali because to cater for muslim. Well, sorry to say, its our open house and we will serve it any which way we like it. We can’t guarantee that the Muslim won’t use same utensils used to cook non-halal item like beef when preparing food for Deepavali. All my life, never did I see food prepared specially for Muslims for Deepavali (not including the Deepavali open house by politicians). I think this is a bad precedent to set.

While the ad doesn’t insult Hinduism (to me), i’ll say its an ad to promote conversion to Islam rather than a Deepavali ad. Its telling “OK to convert because everything will be OK in the end”. Unfortunately, we are leaving in an unequal state, thus we have lesser rights and depend a lot on the interpretation of the authorities on the “rights”.  So, I expect nothing to change after this.

Some, like Senator Ramakrishnan questioned the ad, saying its belittling the holy festival. He also questioned why not show a reverse scenario where a person converts from Islam to Hinduism. But I think they forgot that’s a no-no in a unequal-rights country. Silap silap, get caught under ISA!

Finas on their behalf said there’s nothing wrong with the ad:

The Deepavali commercial by the National Film Development Corporation (Finas) has nothing to do with religious conversions and it should not be taken out of context in the way it was conceived and acted out in the commercial.

Finas director-general Mohd Mahyidin Mustakim (right) said that the commercial was aimed at promoting 1Malaysia in the spirit of various races and families celebrating the different Malaysian festivals. 

“This commercial is a follow-up to the commercial we had during Hari Raya when Muthu marries the Sarawakian, Rina.

“So we are portraying how Malaysians of different races celebrate their festivals and we will also have another follow-up during Christmas and Chinese New Year.

“This is a work of creativity and should not be mixed with politics. 

“The advertisement was certainly not conceived to put down any race and the idea of conversions was not on our minds at all.”

Mahyidin was responding to senator S Ramakrishnan who had questioned the message the commercial’s producers were trying to put across.

The storyline, he added was similar to a Bollywood drama where there is conflict in the beginning and eventually it all ends well with a happy ending. When the commercial ends it shows a positive and happy mood among the two families. 

The 30-second film – said to have appeared on RTM and Astro – shows how a male member of a Hindu family faces reluctance on the part of his siblings to accept his marriage to a Muslim girl. 

The Muslim girl, on her part, shows reluctance to partake of the meals prepared by her in-laws. She concedes, however, after being assured the food is halal by a friend of the family.

It is only after the Muslim girl has given birth that her in-laws warm up to the fact of their marriage and display affection toward the new-born child. 

Ramakrishnan noted that the Finas advertisement showed the hostility of the Hindu family while neglecting to address the compulsion on non-Muslims to convert before marrying Muslims.

Mahyidin said the advertisement was actually projecting tolerance and caring feelings among the different races. It demonstrates the various races showing respect for one another even when food is served and this is visible in the way the halal food is prepared for the visitors.

Hindu Sangam just issued statement protesting the ad:

Hindu Sangam has called a recent television advertisement on Deepavali insensitive and is meeting Finas officials tonight to protest its screening.

The advertisement, produced by Finas, or the National Film Development Corporation, and aired in conjunction with Deepavali, has provoked protests from Hindu politicians and community leaders.

They are unhappy with what they say is the insensitive undertones portrayed in the advertisement.

In the commercial, a Muslim convert and his pregnant Muslim Sarawakian wife visit his Hindu family members for Deepavali. They are treated with hostility by the man’s brother and sister-in-law.

At lunch, the man’s wife is hesitant to eat the food until a Malay guest assures her that it is halal.

The advertisement however ends on a joyous note with the wife giving birth to twins.

“I find this advertisement insensitive. Even some of my Malay friends are unhappy with it,” Hindu Sangam central council member Shanta Venugopal said.

She said the advertisement in no way portrays the spirit of 1 Malaysia, adding that instead an advertisement showing all the races enjoying a Deepavali meal would have served the purpose.

DAP’s Senator S. Ramakrishnan said: “This advertisement was done in bad faith. It has a subtle message underlying it.”

Calling it a mockery of Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak’s 1 Malaysia concept, Ramakrishnan told The Malaysian Insider that the repeated airing of the commercial could “subtly influence gullible and innocent people. They will be more accepting of Hindus converting to Islam. And why are they playing this advertisement during Deepavali?”

“The advertisement seems to be leading the community in one direction. Why does it have to be a Hindu converting to Islam? Why can’t it be the other way around?” Ramakrishnan asked.

Hindu Sangam deputy president Dr M Bala Tharumalingam said 45 Hindu NGOs, including the Hindu Sevai Sangam and the Hindu Youth Organisation, would be attending the meeting at its Petaling Jaya headquarters.

For me, say no to “conversion without proper counseling and information”. Counseling here means the convert-to-be should be counselled by his/her current religion officials/authority to ensure he/she is clear on leaving current religion. Information means the next of kin is made aware of the conversion plan BEFORE converting. Can or not? 🙂

Note: Still waiting for self-proclaimed guardians of Indian community to open mouth. Maybe to tired from all the deepavali open houses.

Inter-faith and inter-racial relationship is NOT easy!

November 2nd, 2010
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


I read the coverage of the final hearing for Ampang Jaya Municipal Council (MPAJ) draft plan as reported by The Star below, and could only shake my head in wonder. There’s so many complications and factors involved in deciding things like location of places of worship , crematorium and cemeteries, and schools. Have to consider the feelings of the various stakeholders, and the “relative” rights of individual (we live in an unequal rights country).

Its well-known that approval for non-Muslim place of worships is rarely given, thus some of them are located in shoplots and houses (can easily find many churches in my area).  Even the statistics are not proven to be correct, and often misused to say that there’s too many temples for population ratio. I think the government should fund an study to count the number of places of worship in the country. Can arrange for some research company to do it, and overseen by relevant ministries, respective state/district authorities and NGOs.

Another problem is cemetery. No one wants a cemetery next to their house (I think even mentioned in Hinduism scriptures to built house away from cemetery and crematorium) as it brings a negative conotation and usually leads to lower property value. Problem is, the people also want to have a burial place/crematorioum “nearby” for convenience, but as long as not “too near”. Its not easy to find such “ideal” location that can please everyone, but the effort must be undertaken. Let more public participation to take place so that can brainstorm better suggestions. Maybe MPAJ (or other authorities as well) can’t solve every problem because they are not smart enough or lack manpower.

Same goes for school relocation. If the majority population in an area is Chinese or Indian (or even if not majority,  25% and above will do), then should allocate enough space for both national school and vernacular school. If not, how to relocate schools from rural/underutilised areas? You can’t expect many sizeable areas to be 70-80% population by Chinese or Indian community, and then only want to relocate schools there.

THE Buddhist and Christian communities in Ampang are worried over the lack of space to build temples and churches following the final hearing for the Ampang Jaya Municipal Council (MPAJ) draft plan yesterday.

Selangor Buddhist Development Committee (SBDC) secretary Chua Teck Seong said the Selangor Planning Guidelines and Standards from the Town and Country Planning Department, released in June 2006, stated that for non-Muslims, there should be a place of worship for every 2,600 devotees or 5,000 residents.

“Taking the figures from the 2000 census carried out by the National Statistics Department, there are 160,748 Buddhists in Ampang and therefore there should be 62 temples here,” he said.

He pointed out that there were only three sites in Ampang allocated in the draft plan for non-Muslims’ places of worship.

Another religion-based issue discussed at the hearing was Charis Christian Association spokesman Chok Poi Fong’s request for a Christian crematorium in Ampang.

Making his point: Ee speaking at the hearing as Lee (seated right) looks on.

“The nearest one is in Cheras and there is one in Petaling Jaya and Seremban respectively. Not only is the one in Cheras far away but it often breaks down and has a long wait-list,” Chok said during the hearing, adding that the crematorium could be shared by churches in the area.

State Housing, Building Management and Squatters Committee chairman Iskandar Abdul Samad, who chaired the hearing, said there was a discrepancy in the statistics provided by the religious groups who attended the hearing.

“For instance, we have been told at the hearing by SBDC that there are fewer than 10 temples in Ampang, but we know of two registered ones and another 24 which operate in homes and shoplots,” he said.

He said that according to state records, there were 10 Hindu temples, two Gurdwaras and 22 churces in Ampang.

“The state Town and Country Planning Department will have to meet with these groups and figure out these discrepancies,” he said.

Another issue heard was the proposal to allocate land for a Muslim cemetery in Taman Bukit Permai 2 that was met with both objections and support from the residents who turned up.

Pangsapuri Anggerik Joint Management Body (JMB) chairman A. Karim Mohd Esin said there was a critical need for a Muslim cemetery in Ampang.

“We support the gazetting of the land which is just next to our apartment and separated by a ditch.

“However, we would like to suggest that the community hall that will be built in the buffer zone to also have a surau and a funeral parlour,” he said.

Opposing the cemetery plan was resident Julia Long, 48, who said that it was unfair to the residents who had been living there since 2000 to have to put up with a cemetery beside their homes.

“When we bought our houses, the master plan indicated that the land next to our area was a forest reserve. I would prefer it to remain as such,” she said.

She added that bulldozers and excavators had tried to level the forest in 2008 without residents’ knowledge and it was only stopped after the latter appealed to MPAJ.

“A cemetery will mean increase in traffic in the area, she said, adding that she did not want any kind of development taking place at the site.

Another resident, Sara Chan, 44, said she would approve of the building community facilities like playgrounds at the site.

Our property value will drop if a cemetery is built and I do not think that is right,” Chan added.

Another hot topic at the hearing was the issue of primary vernacular schools.

“We have received objections from five residents of Bukit Indah who do not want SJK (T) Ampang to be relocated to their area.

“We have also received petitions from residents who want part of a land to be used for a national school in Taman Saga to be given to the building of a Tamil vernacular school,” said Iskandar.

Taman Pandan Glades Residents’ Association chairman Terence Ee and Teratai assemblyman Jenice Lee voiced their support for the construction of a vernacular Chinese primary school in the open space along Jalan Perdana 6/2 in Pandan Perdana.

“I believe only a portion of the 2.45ha land is needed for such a school. The rest can still remain as an open space,” said Lee.

Iskandar said that the hearing, the last of four held for the MPAJ draft plan, was very good as residents came armed with facts and relevant arguments.

“All the information, suggestions and objections we have heard will be discussed at the State Planning Committee along with experts in December,” he said.