Posts Tagged ‘Tamil school’

RM80 million given to Tamil schools

April 12th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


I’m still confused over the allocation given to Tamil schools. No reply from Dr S Subra after I emailed him. Anyway, since everyone saying its RM130 million, so be it. I guess the second stimulus package allocation (RM300 million) is not equally divided.

The Sun provided following breakdown of the allocation released so far:

RM80 million, of which RM50 million comes from the first stimulus package and the rest from the Ministry of Finance allocation, was distributed by PM Najib as follows for 374 Tamil schools from eight states and Kuala Lumpur:

[I calculated the average per school for reference]
> Johor: 56 schools to get RM8.65 mil [ RM154k/school]

> Kedah: 49 schools (RM12.2 mil) [RM248.9k]

> Malacca: 13 schools (RM2.66 mil) [204.6k]

> Negeri Sembilan: 47 schools (RM1 mill) [21.3k]

> Pahang: 26 schools (RM5.28 mil) [203k]

> Perak: 85 schools (RM13.2 mil) [155.3k]

> Penang: 22 school (RM5.9 mil) [268k]

> Selangor: 67 schools (RM25.16 mil) [375.5k]

> Kuala Lumpur: 9 schools (RM5.86 mil) [651.1k]

If you total up the amount, its RM 79.91 million.

According to ex-Education Minister Hishamuddin, the money will be disbursed through the Public Works Department (PWD) as it is the most effective method, since not all schools have board of governors. All projects must be completed by the end of the year.

“We want to do it in the quickest way possible and the PWD has the necessary expertise,” he said after Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak presented the allocation to Tamil school representatives from several states at the ministry.

“But if the boards of the Tamil schools are ready next time, then by all means we can go through them.”

In an immediate response, Tamil School Headmasters Association general secretary M.S. Muthiah said he was thankful for the allocation.

“Many of the schools are in rural areas so the allocation will help improve the conditions there,” he said.

Perhaps MIC wants back Work Ministry so that it could monitor the usage of the funds properly and to avoid unnecessary leakages.

countdown to Bukit Selambau 1

April 1st, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


I wonder why the Pakatan coalition need to talk about on-going case like the Mongolian lady murder in Bukit Gantang and Bukit Selambau by-elections. They need not be reminded that they are/were the ruling government in Kedah and Perak (up to February this year). So, they should produce their “report card” – What work has been done in last 11 months in the areas and state.  List out all the success stories and all the work in progress, and the future plans. The voters can compare the report card of both coalitions and then evaluate the candidates. That would be mature politics for me. Not the name-callings, cheap instant noodle projects, and melodramatic action.

In the last two days, two Tamil schools received their funds as promised in the second stimulus package – one presented by Muhiyiddin (SJKT Sungai Tukang) and the other by Hishamuddin (SJKT Ladang Sungai Getah, RM210,000). While we won’t know if these two schools were “recent” additions to the list, its a good publicity move by BN. Regardless of voters’ choice, two schools have got funds for renovation and repair works. Ganesan knows there’s 7 more Tamil schools left. How nice if these schools (and also all other schools – religious, secondary, missionary – in dire need of repairs) get some funds.

If PR wins, Indians will have an EXCO seat. If BN wins, Indians may get more funding via federal government. Its a win-win situation on paper, because the BN fellow may not be more than a figurehead while the PR fellow will be a lone ranger in PAS-dominated.  So, it may be a lose-lose situation in reality.  So, how about the independents? Can they offer something new? They win – no EXCO post. They may join PPP/MIC/Gerakan and try get some leftovers from federal government.

I’m worried when one of the indepedents – Jayagopal (suspended PKR member?) said the following:

He said he was using his Employees Provident Fund savings and money set aside for his children’s education to finance his campaign.

That’s a big risk. If he loses, big problem. If he wins, would the financial strain impact future decision making? It will be a big temptation to make some side money to compensate the campaign cost. I’m not only referring to Jayagopal, but all the independent candidates. They’ve spent 8K for deposit. Let’s put a modest RM10k for the election campaign. If they lose big, RM18k gone down the drain – in the current economy, its going to be a big blow.

Last 50 years record of BN ruling Bukit Selambau may be used as a yardstick to evaluate current BN promises. Pain of 50 years is more than pain of 11 months of “failures” and “lost promises”. So, on that count, BN has a problem.

To counter that, PKR division leader for Jerai, Kalaivanar, resigned from the party, calling Anwar a “pharaoh”. He has about 500-strong supporters and according to radio news today, it seems he told Nanban reporter that his group will support BN. So, few hundred votes in the bag for BN.  Kalai, who has few court cases related to cheating over his head, claimed that PKR (specifically Anwar) did not take into consideration the local Indians suggestions.

With the change of UMNO’s leadership, and possible the cabinet overhaul, BN is promising change. So do all the candidates. How would the voters judge? Can they throw aside past non-performances?

repeat call for religious education in tamil school

March 23rd, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


If those people who are familiar with MIC care to recall proposals/memorandums and resolutions made in the last 20 years, they’ll find that nothing much has changed. One can, to a certain extent, understand that because even the president has been around for 30 odd years. One can’t expect miracles.

Never mind that only last September this topic cropped up. I guess many of the round-table discussions, seminars, meetings, getaways, committees in the last decade or so would have suggested this idea in one way or another. Maybe they feel its not worth the time to dig back the past research, reports, studies etc., so the solution is to conduct yet another research and submit a memorandum. Where have we heard these lines before? 🙂

So, here we go again. MIC Youth has sent “a letter” to Education Minister. The leader, Mohan said that they have to start somewhere. I think he meant re-start because most likely next year this idea will come up again.

The argument is simple. Having other religions being taught will make it look like its on par or same pedestal with the religion that is official religion of the federation. For those people, their religion must be the first and the only one. The rest is sidelined, because it says so in the constitution. Liberal (one-sided) interpretation is made on the status of religion of federation, thus we have discrimination (or in better words, less emphasis) on other religions. As long as “others” can practice their religion in limited conditions, due to their tolerance and good heart, the “others” should be eternally thankful and not question at all.

Come on, when even temple height can’t be taller than their mosque height, you want to bring Hinduism to school? Even if the Tamil school got one muslim student, there will be a religious teacher assigned for him/her. That is the extent of expenses and power of the liberal interpretation of “religion of federation”.

Try suggesting a inter-faith committee, or department of non-muslim religious affairs. Try asking for tax exemption for donations related to religion or to tamil schools. Try asking for 60/40 budget for religious purposes.

We can’t argue with these people who are insecure, depend on outdated laws, and who need to resort to threats/violence. Just look at the PERKASA meeting last weekend. We have a 1/4 Indian Muslim fighting for Malay rights and yet the message is clear –  “Keep quiet or else”.

We don’t have the quality and qualified people to teach Hinduism. We don’t have enough classrooms to even run proper classes. We don’t have proper facilities in schools.

All the above sounds very pessimistic, but that’s what I feel. Deep inside, I wish the idea will succeed, but knowing the reality, its just wishful thinking.

KUALA LUMPUR: MIC Youth has urged the Government to implement religious education in Tamil schools as a measure to overcome social ills in the Indian community.

MIC Youth coordinator T. Mohan said religious education would help steer youths away from damaging activities.

“It is saddening to see reports of Indians being involved in gangsterism and violent crimes in the newspapers of late. We believe these youths had not been given any religious education,” he told reporters after chairing the national council meeting here Monday.

Mohan said the wing had already submitted a letter to Education Minister Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Tun Hussein requesting religious education be introduced in Tamil schools.

“We are undertaking some research and will submit a memorandum to the ministry within four months,” he said.

Mohan said the results would not be seen overnight but he was sure of positive results within five years.

“We have to start somewhere to ensure that there is a future for our generation in the country,” he said.

Mohan said the wing would also have discussions with Indian-based non-governmental organisations to find ways of reducing the incidence of crime within the Indian community.

same old story on Tamil schools

March 20th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


I think the community is getting bored with the excuses given by the concerned parties. In tamil we say “arache mave arachikitte” (grinding flour which has been ground already).

We know that nearly 2/3 of schools are in private land. Many of them are in GLC land. How difficult is it for these companies to exhibit some CSR and donate a piece of land to the school? Even if we talk about one school in a year, in the last 10 years, a plantation firm would have helped 10 schools. Multiply that by 3 companies = 30 schools converted to fully-aided in 10 years. That would have been something proud. But, in reality, how many schools were converted to fully-aided status in last 10 years? What is the effort done by our “guardian of tamil schools”? What is the effort of the relevant ministries, taskforces, committees, leaders, foundations etc? We have so many committees and leaders talking. But no output. Only “policies”, “principle agreements” and other sweet words that causes “mind” diabetes.

I think the next election manifesto of party that has a measurable pledge – To convert 50 Tamil schools to fully-aided in 5 years” should get the community support. No one is interested in catchy words,  ideals, abstract promises, and nice-to-hear pledges. What we want is quantifiable/measurable statements.

To be fair to Vallikannu, he is just an employee reading out a speech. I’m sure if he was a millionaire, he would have given a hundred thousand ringgit at least to buy land for some Tamil school.

Those concerned with tamil schools should initiate dialogues with land owners and PPD to facilitate smooth transfer of land.  The relevant departments should also cooperate and not put up hurdles to discourage such efforts.

THE delay in converting partly-aided Tamil schools into fully-aided ones is due to the schools being located on private land, reported Tamil Nesan.

Selangor Tamil school coordinator R. Vallikannan was quoted as saying that the government had imposed a condition that the land must be registered in the name of the school before it can become a fully-aided school.

He said some school managements and Parent-Teacher Associations were not aware who owned the school land.

Vallikannan added that the school management must get the necessary forms from the district education department and submit them with the necessary particulars to enable the department to take the steps to transfer the land to the school.

In Selangor, he said, only one Tamil school had managed to transfer the land to its name.

How much do Tamil Schools get under second stimulus package?

March 12th, 2009
|  Subscribe in a reader | Subscribe to poobalan.com by Email


I’m a bit confused. Earlier, it was mentioned that RM300mil has been allocated for religious, Chinese, Tamil and mission schools in the second stimulus package. This is in addition to the RM200 million announced in first stimulus package. I read DPM Najib’s speech in the Star and its verified under point 37:

Improving School Facilities 37. To further strengthen human capital development, the Government will provide a more conducive learning environment. For this, an allocation of RM1.95 billion is provided to build and improve facilities in 752 schools, particularly in rural areas as well as Sabah and Sarawak. A sum of RM300 million from this allocation will be used to improve facilities in government-aided religious schools, national-type Chinese and Tamil schools as well as mission schools.

I thought the RM300 million will be divided equally (as was in the case of the RM200 million earlier) among the four types of schools. So each type will get RM75 million. Thus, you can imagine my surprise when Dr S Subramaniam saidthe additional RM50mil allocated for Tamil schools by the Government under the second economic stimulus package will be used to rebuild 40 schools.”

So, looks like Tamil schools did not get an equal share, or is it a miscommunication by The Star?

He also added mentioned that RM30mil was approved by the Finance Ministry before the March 8 general election, and the total funding now is RM130 million. RM80 million has been disbursed through the PWD to rebuild more than 60 Tamil schools.

NOTE: I emailed Dr S Subra for clarification, but no reply received.